VA770-17-R-0423-010.pdf
PDF 25 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Document Printing and Insertion, Mid-South CMOP Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- VA77017R0423
About this file
VA770-17-R-0423 S02 Attachment 4 - Past Performance Questionnaire 02.pdf
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 36C77018D0014-000.docx | DOCX document | |
| VA770-17-R-0423-00002000.docx | DOCX document | |
| VA770-17-R-0423-00001000.docx | DOCX document | |
| VA770-17-R-0423-012.pdf | ||
| VA770-17-R-0423-009.pdf | ||
| VA770-17-R-0423-011.pdf | ||
| VA770-17-R-0423-013.pdf | ||
| VA770-17-R-0423-006.docx | DOCX document | |
| VA770-17-R-0423-008.pdf | ||
| VA770-17-R-0423-007.pdf | ||
| VA770-17-R-0423-000.docx | DOCX document |
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Network Contracting Office 15/Consolidated Mail Outpatient Pharmacy (CMOP) is conducting a competitive acquisition for Document Printing and Insertion Services.
The offeror has identified you as a reference to validate the offeror’s past performance. Please complete the following questionnaire to assist our evaluation of the contractor’s past performance and return no later than 3:00 p.m. CDT, October 20, 2017 to Leah Thurman, NCO 15/CMOP, Fax 913-684-0179 or e-mail at leah.thurman@va.gov.
Name of Contractor being evaluated: _______________________________________________
1) How long has your company had this contract with this contractor? ____________________
2) Type of service being provided: ________________________________________________
3) Where is the service being provided? ____________________________________________
4) What is total value of this contract? _____________________________________________
5) Management Effectiveness
• Contractor provided experienced personnel with technical and administrative abilities to meet contract requirements.
Exceptional ____Very Good ______Satisfactory _____ Marginal _____ Unacceptable_____
• Contractor maintained appropriate staffing levels (number/qualifications)
• Contractor’s overall management effectiveness
6) Quality of Service and Workmanship
• Contractor provided professional services
• Contractor maintained the quality of storage facilities
• Contractor’s overall quality of service
7) Timeliness/Adherence to Schedules
• Contractor transported your cargo within the timeframe as identified in your contract mailto:leah.thurman@va.gov
• Contractor was proactive in keeping you informed of schedule conflicts if they were going to occur
• Contractor responded to emergency requirements in a timely manner.
• Overall contractor timeliness
8) Quality/Training Control
• Contractor provided an adequate quality control plan to ensure reoccurring facility inspections during contact duration.
• Contractor adhered to its quality control plan and ensured the plan was available for review upon request.
• Contractor’s overall quality control
9) Customer Satisfaction
• Contractor maintained a professional working relationship
• Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in resolving customer complaints
• Contractor was flexible in responding to urgent requirements
• Overall customer satisfaction
10) Please provide any other examples or comments concerning the contractor’s performance that would be relevant in assessing the probability of successful contract performance:
Rating System:
Exceptional: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the contractor’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective action taken was highly effective.
Very Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the contractor’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective action taken was effective.
Satisfactory: Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective action taken appears or was satisfactory.
Marginal: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has identified some corrective actions. The proposed actions appear only marginally effective or have not been fully implemented.
Unacceptable: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problems for which the contractor has identified corrective actions. The proposed actions appear or were ineffective.
Your Name: _____________________________Your Title: _____________________________
Your Phone #: ___________________________Your Fax: ______________________________
Your e-mail address: ____________________________________________________________
File details come from the government source that posted it.