TSTC Industry Day 07 May 2026 _SAM.pdf

PDF 1 MB Posted

Attached to
Industry Day for PEO IWS 1 Total Ship Training Capability (TSTC) systems
Solicitation number
Not on record
Issued by

About this file

This document is an Industry Day briefing presentation for the Total Ship Training Capability (TSTC) Production Contract, held on May 7, 2026, under PEO IWS 1IT (Integrated Training Systems).

The Government seeks a strategic partner to manufacture and support mature training systems for the U.S. Navy on a build-to-print basis with an estimated target award in FY28. Primary production items include the T52 Training Interface Unit (45 units anticipated over 5 years), T46 systems (2 units, sunsetting), Virtual Tactical Bridge Embarked Shipboard Radio (VTBeSR, 28 units), Interface Control Panels (47 units), and Interface Panels (47 units). The contract structure comprises a base year plus four option years valued at approximately $58 million, with funding from OPN, OMN, SCN, and FMS appropriations. Production pricing uses a Firm Fixed Price (FFP) structure with quantity-based discounts; Engineering and Technical Support efforts are structured as Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) and estimated at less than 20 percent of total contract value. The Government will provide Government Furnished Property (GFP) and Government Furnished Equipment (GFE), with specific lists to be refined and provided in the RFP. The contractor must establish an approximately 8,000 square-foot, climate-controlled, insured warehouse facility capable of receiving large freight shipments. Scope includes production (build and test per Technical Data Packages), project management, engineering support for obsolescence resolution and engineering change proposals, logistics support including Integrated Logistics Support materials, and warehousing with full inventory management following joint government inventory and formal transfer. Key qualifications include proven past performance on production contracts, technical capability with necessary personnel and facilities, understanding of Federal Acquisition Regulation requirements, and Department of Defense cybersecurity readiness (CMMC certification). The contract does not currently require security clearance, though future requirements are under assessment. The Government intends to release a Request for Information in Q3 FY2026 and will distribute Technical Data Packages under Distribution Statement D at a later date. The previous contract (N00024-23-C-5307) was a small-business set-aside; the current acquisition strategy remains unfinalzed regarding set-aside versus unrestricted competition.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Distribution Statement A: Approved for Public Release; Distribution Unlimited.

Industry Day Total Ship Training Capability (TSTC)

Production Contract

PEO IWS 1IT

Integrated Training Systems

07 May 2026

Product Service Code: PSC 6930 - Operation Training Devices

NAICS Code: 334111 - Electronic Computer Manufacturing

Agenda

◼ Welcome and Introduction

◼ Industry Day Purpose

◼ Overview of Products

◼ Scope of Work

◼ Scale of Work

◼ Who are we looking for?

◼ Questions and Answers

◼ One on One Sessions

◼ Networking Opportunities

Purpose of Industry Day

◼ Provide an overview of the program, clarify the scope of work, and answer questions from industry.

◼ Gauge industry interest, understand capabilities

◼ Identify any potential barriers to a future competitive procurement.

◼ Gather Industry Feedback & Enhance Transparency

◼ Clarify Requirements

Respond to topics, questions or concerns that have been submitted.

Please ensure your name, company name, slide number and question are legible on the note card.

Disclosure: This notice is for market research purposes only and does not constitute a solicitation or Request for Quote (RFQ). The

Government is not liable for any costs incurred by attendees and will not provide reimbursement for expenses related to this Industry Day.

IWS 1.0 Introduction

◼ IWS 1.0 Mission: “Develop, deliver, and support an effective and operationally dominant

Integrated Combat System that enhances warfighter capabilities, safety, and decision-making in operational environments”

◼ What we do:

Maintain technological superiority in the rapidly evolving threat landscape

◼ Hardware and software capabilities

Complex software development

Simultaneous efforts

◼ Working toward the future

– Integrated Combat System (ICS)

– Baseline 10

◼ Sustain and enhance new and legacy platforms

AEGIS Combat System

The first Flight III Arleigh Burke-class DDG, USS Jack H.

Lucas (DDG 125), equipped with Baseline 10 and employing the new SPY-6, completed Developmental Test Phase 1 in

August 2024

AEGIS is a “system of systems” that integrates a multitude of components including radar, sensors, and weapons to perform multi-mission combat capabilities for the Surface Combat

Force.

IWS 1IT – Integrated Training

Total Ship Training Capability (TSTC)

◼ Total Ship Training

Capability (TSTC) is a flexible, onboard training system that allows crews to run complex practice missions.

◼ Crews can train completely on their own, or link up virtually with other ships for large scale fleet training exercises to ensure they are fully prepared for real-world deployments.

TSTC Production Overview

◼ The Total Ship Training Capability (TSTC)

Production Contract is for build-to-print execution of MATURE products.

◼ Procurement is strictly aligned with established plans to ensure fleet requirements are met.

◼ Products feature stable, fully documented designs with proven performance and formal change processes.

◼ Requires proactive identification and resolution of COTS obsolescence and emergent mission requirements.

◼ Combined engineering support efforts are estimated to constitute less than twenty percent (<20%) of the total contract value.

◼ Target award in FY28

Production of these systems is critical to sustain training readiness, maintain capability, address obsolescence, repairs, and upgrades.

T46 Production Units

◼ The T46 is a large, multi-cabinet hardware setup used for Navy training simulations. It is divided into three distinct physical cabinets (called "racks"), each serving a specific role in running the US Navy's Battle Force Tactical Training (BFTT) system. The T46 also contains the training hardware to support connectivity to distributed Live Virtual

Constructive (LVC) training exercises conducted over the Navy Enterprise Tactical

Training Network (NETTN).

◼ Multiple variations of this system exist. The production of T46 is sunsetting and very few number of systems are expected to be procured in future years.

Rack Role Description

Equipment

Rack 1

The Core Engine This is the primary powerhouse. It houses the main computers and servers that run the heavy-duty training simulations.

Equipment

Rack 2

The Support &

Networking Hub

This rack acts as a flexible support unit. In basic training setups, it is mostly empty space. In more advanced setups, it is packed with extra processing power, network connections, and system upgrades to link everything together.

BOPC Rack The Command &

Planning Station

"BOPC" stands for BFTT Operator Processing Console. This specialized cabinet is dedicated entirely to the computers and interfaces used by operators to plan, run, and manage the training scenarios.

T52 Production Units

◼ T52 is the Training Interface Unit (TIU) that provies unique training hardware to support connectivity to distributed Live Virtual Constructive (LVC) training exercises conducted over the Navy Enterprise Tactical Training Network (NETTN). The TIU facilitates Shipboard CIC watch team training utilizing the Navy’s Advanced Training

Domain (ATD) capability fielded with Surface Navy Combat Systems.

◼ T52 reduces the amount of space needed for equipment (compared to its predecessor-

T46). The hardware is designed to be a compact, all-in-one hardware system that can support different training requirements depending on how it's configured. Customizable currently as six different variants for specific training needs.

Component Description

Rack Frame The physical structure that holds and protects all the electronic equipment.

Servers (NAVSIM, PSIM) These are powerful computers that run training software. The NAVSIM runs navigation training, the PSIM support MH60R sim training.

Uninterruptible Power

Supply (UPS)

This device provides clean, emergency power to the entire rack, ensuring the system can shut down safely without losing data if the main power goes out.

Power Distribution Unit

(PDU)

This distributes electricity from the main UPS to all the individual components inside the rack.

Network Switches These devices manage the flow of data. They connect all the computers inside the rack to each other and to external systems.

Firewall & Encryptor The Firewall prevents unauthorized network access, and the Encryptor scrambles data.

Maintenance Display Unit

(MDU/KVM)

This is a pull-out drawer with a keyboard, video monitor, and mouse. It allows technicians to directly access and work on the computers in the rack.

I/O & Phone Panels These are panels with various ports and plugs (like USB, Ethernet, and phone lines) that allow other devices and systems to connect to the rack.

Shipboard Connectivity Suite (SCS)

Production Unit

◼ The Shipboard Connectivity Suite (SCS) is an integrated hardware and software package that enables a ship to connect to the NCTE. It provides the secure, communication links necessary for Live, Virtual, and Constructive

(LVC) training, allowing geographically dispersed units to train together in a single, shared synthetic environment.

◼ The SCS is resident in the T46, T52 or as a standalone unit.

Component Description

NCTE Gateway Server A dedicated communications processor that manages data flow and ensures low-latency synchronization with off-ship participants.

Networking Gear Shipboard-hardened COTS routers and switches (typically Cisco-based) that manage the dedicated training network (VLANs).

Cryptographic Interfaces Hardware nodes that interface with the ship’s COMSEC equipment (e.g., KGV or KG-series devices) for secure data transmission.

I/O Patch Panels Physical termination points for connecting to the ship's Satellite

Communications (SATCOM) or Pier-side fiber-optic "umbilical's."

VTBeSR Production Units

◼ Virtual Tactical Bridge Embarked Shipboard Radio (VTBeSR) is a specialized communication technology designed to bridge the gap between live shipboard operations and virtual training environments.

◼ Developed by the Naval Air Warfare Center Training Systems Division (NAWCTSD), it is a key component of the Navy's Live-Virtual-Constructive (LVC) training framework.

◼ VTBeSR is a compact hardware and software unit that connects directly to a ship’s radio switchboard.

◼ Key Components: The installation kit is built to hold three main assemblies:

VTBeSR Main Chassis Assembly

T-Junction Overall Assembly

Transformer Mounting Assembly

◼ Modules to populate the VTBeSR Main Chassis are provided to the contract as

Government Furnished Property (GFP).

12 modules each type are required to populate each chassis - VTB, Voice matrix, T junction

◼ Chassis Structure consists of a system of brackets, friction slides for rack mounting, and various hardware fasteners.

Other Production Items

◼ Two interface panels are required for situational awareness and located at different locations on the ship.

These are required for both T46 and T52 systems.

◼ Interface Control Panel (ICP)

Allows switching between simulated and real navigation in support NAVSIM software

◼ Interface Panel (IP)

Provides situation awareness of the combat system status of simulated or real navigation data. This panel is located on the bridge.

Scope of Work

Functional Area Key Responsibilities

Production Build, test, and deliver T46, T52, and VTBeSR training systems strictly adhering to Technical Data Packages (TDPs).

Project

Management

Plan and execute budget/schedule per IWS 1. Build standard products for shipboard customization with strict financial, schedule, and quality control.

Engineering Manage technical documentation, engineering change proposals

(ECPs), resolve hardware issues, and update government TDPs.

Tech & Logistics

Support

Oversee lifecycle inventory, manage material obsolescence

(DMSMS), and develop Integrated Logistics Support (ILS) materials

(manuals, field kits).

Warehousing Provide a secure, climate-controlled, and insured ~8,000 sq. ft. facility capable of receiving large freight (up to 800 lbs / 84" tall).

The primary focus of this effort is training system production. The contractor will also provide comprehensive, full-lifecycle support—spanning production, engineering, logistics, and warehousing—for the Total Ship Training Capability

(TSTC) across US Navy, FMS, and shore sites.

Scale of Work

Category Requirement

Production Build to Print - Alignment to Technical Data Packages (TDP), 1-year time to build. Average annual procurement of 10-15 suites of systems.

Testing All delivered systems must pass Government-furnished operational and functional tests.

Mil-Spec &

Ruggedization

Systems must adhere to various military specifications, EMI, shock and vibration, and ship alteration updated standards.

Engineering Support multiple engineering changes, drawing updates, and other functional areas as required.

Logistics Support &

Warehouse

Support lifecycle logistics and engineering support.

Updates to tech data packages will be required to address obsolescence issues, deficiencies, and new requirements.

Strategic Synergy

◼ The Program Management Office (PMO) is the centralized entity responsible for the overall planning, execution and oversight of the contract.

◼ The In-Service Engineering Agent (ISEA) is the designated technical authority responsible for the life-cycle support, maintenance, and modernization of a system once it has been fielded.

◼ To ensure sustained fleet readiness, the contractor is required to establish a cohesive and integrated partnership with the Program Management Office

(PMO) and the In-Service Engineering Agent (ISEA).

◼ Core Collaboration areas:

Baseline & Configuration Control

Open & Proactive Communication

Meticulous Data & Documentation Delivery

Joint Risk Mitigation & Problem Solving

Strategic Technical Alignment

Current Contract Structure

◼ Period of Performance: Base year + 4 option years, $58M

◼ Appropriation Types: OPN, OMN, SCN, and FMS

◼ Production Pricing: Established as a Firm Fixed Price (FFP) structure, includes quantity-based discounts.

◼ Labor & Support: Structured as Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) for both

Engineering and Technical Support efforts.

◼ Direct Cost Areas: Defined cost structures are included for materials, travel, and warehousing requirements.

◼ Functional Purpose: Technical Instructions (TIs) provide clarifying details based on the existing SOW, drawings, specifications, or fielding plans within the contract's scope.

◼ Approval Authority: Each TI is PCO-approved with COR concurrence and formal acknowledgment from the contractor.

Planning Purposes Only: The above details are for informational use and do not represent an official RFQ or solicitation. The Government assumes no obligation to issue a solicitation or award any contract based on the information presented during this Industry Day.

Industry Feedback on Future RFI is ENCOURAGED!

Foundations for Our Shared Success

◼ The purpose of this effort is to deliver WARFIGHTING CAPABLITY to the fleet.

◼ This effort demands a highly competent, autonomous industry partner to deliver production items that support critical warfighting capabilities.

◼ The program office requires elite program management, technical mastery, strict schedule adherence, realistic pricing, and uncompromising quality.

◼ Plan – Perform – Pivot Framework

Strategize for Success – Building a robust, forward-leaning blueprint that anticipates challenges before they arise.

Disciplined Execution – Bringing the plan to life with technical mastery and uncompromising quality.

Vigilant Oversight – Continuous, transparent monitoring to ensure every milestone is a win for the Fleet.

Dynamic Alignment – The agility to adjust and optimize our path forward in an ever-evolving mission landscape.

Who are we looking for?

We are looking for more than just a vendor. We are looking for a strategic partner. We want you to bring your best capabilities to the table so we can push the boundaries of innovation and deliver unparalleled support to the Fleet.

What You Bring to the

Team

How We Will Succeed Together

Visionary Project Leadership

Bring your mastery in project management to help us steer complex, high-stakes missions to flawless execution!

Pioneering Technical Excellence

Push the limits of innovation and deliver top-tier engineering solutions alongside our dedicated technical experts.

Dynamic Schedule Execution

Drive the mission forward with superior schedule control, ensuring our warfighters get exactly what they need, precisely when they need it.

Strategic Value Creation Showcase your excellence in cost control and budget management to maximize mission resources and deliver unparalleled value.

Uncompromising Quality Partner with us to build and maintain rigorous quality standards that the

Fleet can trust without hesitation.

Agility & Adaptability Join forces with a team that highly values your ability to pivot, innovate, and adapt to fielding plan changes or fleet needs.

Unwavering Resilience & Proactivity

Bring your proactive mindset to anticipate challenges, defeat obstacles early, and keep the mission moving forward!

Are you a potential candidate?

Attribute Description

Past Performance A proven track record of successful production contract execution and customer satisfaction. This is a primary indicator of future success.

Technical Capability The expertise and resources to meet the specific production requirements of the contract. This includes having the necessary personnel, equipment, and facilities.

Understanding of

Government

Contracting

Familiarity with the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and other relevant regulations. This demonstrates a commitment to compliance.

Cybersecurity

Readiness

For Department of Defense (DoD) contracts, businesses must demonstrate the ability to safeguard their systems and data, often through Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification

(CMMC).

Questions & Answers

Before we begin the Q&A portion of this Industry Day, we need to establish the ground rules and Rules of Engagement for this session.

1. Purpose: The purpose of this Q&A is to clarify the Government’s requirements, gather industry feedback, and promote a better understanding of the effort.

2. Verbal vs. Written Responses: Please note that any remarks or explanations provided by

Government personnel today are strictly informational and non-binding. The only official, binding

Government responses will be those published in writing via an amendment on SAM.gov. If there is any discrepancy between what is said today and what is published in the formal Q&A document, the written document takes precedence.

3. Answering Questions: We will attempt to answer as many questions as time permits. If we do not answer your question live, it does not mean your question is being ignored. Some questions require coordination with our technical or legal teams, and others may be skipped simply due to time constraints. All submitted questions will be captured and addressed in the final, written Q&A posted to

SAM.gov.

4. Information Protection: This is an open, unclassified forum. Do not ask questions that contain your company's proprietary information, sensitive intellectual property, or Controlled Unclassified Information

(CUI). If your question requires discussing proprietary data, please submit it privately in writing to the

Contracting Officer following the instructions in the Industry Day announcement.

* Please ensure your name, company name, slide number and question are legible on the note card.

BREAK

Up Next: Question and Answers

Questions & Answers

◼ What are the expected production quantities?

Anticipated production demand over 5 years (USN + FMS)

◼ T52A - qty 45

◼ T46E - qty 2

◼ VTBeSR - qty 28

◼ IP - qty 47

◼ ICP - qty 47

◼ TDP Maturity and Maintenance: Since the Government estimates engineering efforts at <20% of the contract value, to what extent will the contractor be expected to "redline" or update Government-Furnished

TDPs to reflect modern manufacturing processes versus simple "build-to-print" execution?

The baseline requirement is strict 'build-to-print' execution. The Government considers the provided

TDPs to be production-ready. The estimated <20% engineering allocation is not intended for redesigns. It is reserved primarily for resolving Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material

Shortages (DMSMS) and obsolescence.

◼ 365-Day Production Lead Time: The requirement specifies a 365-day build time. Given the current global lead times for ruggedized microelectronics and MIL-SPEC components, how does the Navy view the risk of long-lead material procurement prior to formal task order awards?

The Government is aware of current global supply chain constraints and DMSMS regarding ruggedized microelectronics and MIL-SPEC components. While the 365-day 'Time to Build' remains the target metric for standard production, the Government is interested in obtaining recommended mitigation strategies from Industry.

Questions & Answers

◼ Will the contract include installation support, ship-check support, or only production/delivery/warehouse support?

Primarily production/delivery/warehouse support. On site support could be required for new components (e.g., specific mounting hardware).

◼ Will FMS and shore-site configurations be ordered under the same contract vehicle?

Yes. Industry must prepare for distinct configuration management tracks. While the systems share a common core architecture, Foreign Military Sales (FMS) variants will require strict adherence to exportability rules. The contractor’s

Configuration Management Plan (CMP) must demonstrate the ability to maintain strict separation between USN and FMS baselines on the production floor and in the warehouse.

◼ Is there a clearance requirement? What level?

The current contract does not have security clearance requirement. Future security requirements are still being assessed.

Questions & Answers

◼ Warehousing and GFM Integration: With the requirement for 8,000 sq. ft. of climate-controlled warehousing, will the contractor be responsible for the full intake and cataloging of all Government

Furnished Material (GFM), or will the Navy provide a pre-cataloged inventory baseline for the

AN/T46 and AN/T52 suites?

Upon contract award and facility stand-up, the Government will provide a pre-cataloged inventory baseline and conduct a joint physical inventory with the incoming contractor.

Following the successful completion of this joint inventory and formal transfer via Government

Furnished Property (GFP), the contractor will assume full responsibility for the continuous intake, cataloging, climate-controlled storage, and property management of all GFM.

◼ What government-furnished test equipment, software, and acceptance procedures will be provided?

The exact software, hardware and test procedures will likely be provided in the RFP's

GFE/GFI attachments.

◼ Is the Navy considering a small-business set-aside, unrestricted competition, or a hybrid prime/subcontracting model?

We are currently in the market research phase. The prior contract was a small business set aside (N00024-23-C-5307). The acquisition strategy is not finalized.

Questions & Answers

◼ Quality Assurance for Build-to-Print: Can the Navy clarify the "Customization" phase mentioned in the project management scope? Specifically, is this customization considered "Engineering"

(<20%) or "Production" for the purposes of the business participation goals?

The Government generally categorizes 'Customization'—defined as configuring a baseline system for a specific ship class/hull.

The Statement of Work (SOW) and CLIN architecture will define these boundaries in the

RFP’s.

Questions & Answers

Questions from Industry Day note cards

◼ Our company provides an enabling technology - software - utilized in Aegis/SSDS/ATD etc. How could we present a capability brief to help you utilize this software in an efficient manner?

The government intent is to go out with an RFI requesting information from companies pertaining to their capabilities. Expect to see RFI tentatively in Q3.

◼ The T52 1 rack system is the only rack that contains a UPS? Why is there no mention of a UPS in the 3 rack system?

There are UPS in the 3 rack system.

◼ Is this a classified build? If so, at what point does it become classified

No, this is not a classified build.

◼ Can you provide a breakdown between GFE and what the prime would have to purchase ?

We are still refining the GFE/GFM lists and will provide at a later date.

◼ What type of power requirements/source (120 Val/240/450 Any DC)?

Further details will be provided at a later date.

◼ What cooling is required (aired/water)? If Water, do we provide cooling system?

Fans internal to the cabinets and ships AC

◼ Since this is a mature product, what mandatory test will we have to pass to field? Shock/vibe?

For non-changed equipment, Functional test, test procedures will be provided and audited by the ISEA. Shock and Vibe are required if a modification is made within the rack that constitutes a retest by the tech warrant holder.

Questions & Answers

Questions from Industry Day note cards

◼ Slide 9 - where is the BOPC for ATD?

The BOPC hardware was eliminated for ATD, it is a submode of the Aegis Combat system console with operator operating in the Training Supervisor role.

◼ What is the % of requirement changes from original/mature product to new product

We are in the process of refining the requirements, further information can be provided at a later date.

◼ Is the design of the hardware the same between platforms (Aegis/SSDS/FMS)?

No, but they are similar. Each of the variations have slightly different configurations but the core is the same. The V1 has most abundance while other variants have parts removed. The hull specific differences are documented via TI and vary based on baseline and ship class.

◼ What does the integration process look like before fleeting (install)?

There is no integration performed before installed on the ship.

◼ Are there going to be communication requirements to interface it the Government?

Contractors will be required to be able to obtain a CAC and a Flankspeed account.

Next Steps

◼ The Government intends to release a Request for Information (RFI) during the third quarter of Fiscal Year 2026 to conduct market research and assess industry capabilities.

◼ Technical Data Packages (TDPs) will be released under Distribution

Statement D at a later date.

◼ One on One sessions and networking opportunity.

Default Section
Slide 1: Industry Day Total Ship Training Capability (TSTC) Production Contract
Slide 2: Agenda
Slide 3: Purpose of Industry Day
Slide 4: IWS 1.0 Introduction
Slide 5: IWS 1IT – Integrated Training Total Ship Training Capability (TSTC)
Slide 6: TSTC Production Overview
Slide 7: T46 Production Units
Slide 8: T52 Production Units
Slide 9: Shipboard Connectivity Suite (SCS) Production Unit
Slide 10: VTBeSR Production Units
Slide 11: Other Production Items
Slide 12: Scope of Work
Slide 13: Scale of Work
Slide 14: Strategic Synergy
Slide 15: Current Contract Structure
Slide 16: Foundations for Our Shared Success
Slide 17: Who are we looking for?
Slide 18: Are you a potential candidate?
Slide 19: Questions & Answers
Slide 20: BREAK Up Next: Question and Answers
Slide 21: Questions & Answers
Slide 22: Questions & Answers
Slide 23: Questions & Answers
Slide 24: Questions & Answers
Slide 25: Questions & Answers
Slide 26: Questions & Answers
Slide 27: Next Steps

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .