TEST.pdf
PDF 2 MB Posted
- Attached to
- IMAGEEXPRESS NANO MX-G SYSTEM Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 00HCVGED-2020-45165
View the file
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
JUSTIFICATION FOR SOLE SOURCE PROCUREMENT (OPEN MARKET OR GSA)
UNDER $250,000
Sole source acquisitions may be used on a limited basis and only when the Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR)/Program Official has provided sufficient justification and the Contracting Officer has determined that the circumstances warrant such action. The content for a justification must contain detailed facts and rationale to justify the sole source acquisition. Soliciting from a single source must be done in accordance with FAR 13.106-1(b) or 8.405-6. At a minimum, the following information must be included:
Identification of Program Office, Contracting Activity, and Proposed Requirement, Justification and Program Office Certification:
A. Program Office:
NCIRD/DVD/VVPDB
Building 18, 5-103 MS C-22 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Atlanta GA 30333
B. Contracting Activity:
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Office of Financial Resources Acquisition Branch Click here to enter text.
C. Identification of Requirement:
1. Nature of Action to be Approved by Contracting Officer:
a. Sole source acquisition of: ImageXpress® NANO Widefield High Content Screening System
b. Procurement Request (PR) Number (if available): 45165
2. Proposed Vendor and Estimated Procurement Amount (if available):
a. Proposed Vendor: VWR International, LLC, 1050 Satellite Blvd. Suwanee, GA 30024
b. Estimated Procurement Amount: $
3. Is the requirement on GSA Schedule? Yes No
If yes, provide schedule number:
Estimated Procurement Amount: $Estimated Procurement Amount: $
Rev. 5/14/19
D. Justification:
1. The justification for this non-competitive action is: (NOTE: Must select only ONE of the listed justifications for other than full and open competition and fully support the justification in the following paragraphs. Please delete this note prior to submitting the justification.)
In accordance with FAR 13.106-1(b)(1), “only one source [is] reasonably available” which states that, “For purchases not exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold. (i) Contracting officers may solicit from one source if the contracting officer determines that the circumstances of the contract action deem only one source reasonably available (e.g., urgency, exclusive licensing agreements, brand-name or industrial mobilization). (ii) Where a single source is identified to provide a portion of a purchase because that portion of the purchase specifies a particular brand-name item, the documentation in paragraph (b)(1)(i) of this section only applies to the portion of the purchase requiring brand-name item. The documentation should state it is covering only the portion of the acquisition which is brand- name.”
Urgency
Exclusive licensing agreements/Proprietary data
Brand name required
Industrial mobilization
Other (e.g., compatibility, space issues, continuity, compatibility, etc.)
In accordance with FAR 8.405-6 “Limiting Sources” which states that, “the only circumstances that may justify the action are – (A) An urgent and compelling need exists, and following the procedures would result in unacceptable delays; (B) Only one source is capable of providing the supplies or services required at the level of quality required because the supplies or services are unique or highly specialized; or (C) In the interest of economy and efficiency, the new work is a logical follow-up to an original Federal Supply Schedule order provided that the original order was placed in accordance with the applicable Federal Supply Schedule ordering procedures. The original BPA must not have been previously issued under sole-source or limited-sources procedures.”
Urgency
Only One Source
Logical Follow Up
Brand name required
2. Other facts supporting sole source procurement:
a. What can this product/service do that other products/services cannot do?
b. What other products/services were considered and why did they not meet theneed?
Click here to enter text.
[Provide a list of alternatives available to the government, reasons (technical, cost, etc.) why each is unacceptable except for the alternative selected, and the impact if other alternatives are selected. Example: “ABC company unit did not have the speed/dilution rate/sensitivity, etc. to perform needed operation. JKL corporation unit is 400 pounds and this must be a portable unit for use in the field,” etc. Or in the case of maintenance: “ABC company does not have technicians certified to work on XYZ equipment and uses aftermarket parts rather than XYZ company parts in repair.” Please delete this note prior to submitting the justification.]
3. Program Office efforts to seek potential offerors:
E. Program Office Certification:
I have reviewed this sole source justification and certify the justification is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and adequate to support other than full and open competition.
Center/Institute/Office COR/Program Official Name/Title:
Center/Institute/Office COR/Program Official Signature:
F. Contracting Office Certification:
I have fully relied on the information provided herein and hereby certify that this justification is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief:
Contracting Officer Name: Click here to enter text.
Contracting Officer Signature:
Certification Date: Click here to enter a date.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .