The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.
Technical Evaluation Rating Definitions Ensure the Ratings Match the Strength & Weakness Narrative
Technical Capabilities and Pricing
| Rating |
| Abbreviation |
| Risk Level |
| Definition |
| Excellent |
| E |
| Very Low Risk |
| The proposal contains no deficiencies or weaknesses. Based on information provided, there is no doubt that the offeror demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the services required to meet or exceed most contract requirements. The highest quality of contract performance is anticipated. |
| Very Good |
| VG |
| Low Risk |
| The proposal contains no deficiencies and only a few minor weaknesses that do not require discussions. Based on the information provided, there is little doubt that the offeror demonstrates a high quality of understanding of the services required to meet or exceed some contract requirements. |
| Satisfactory |
| S |
| Moderate Risk |
| The proposal contains no deficiencies and some weaknesses. Based on the information provided, the Offeror demonstrates an understanding of the services required to meet contract requirements. |
| Poor |
| P |
| High Risk |
| The proposal contains deficiencies and significant weaknesses. Based on information provided, there is doubt that the contractor understands the services required to meet the contract requirements. Requirement/services can be met only with major changes to the proposal. |
| Unacceptable |
| U |
| Unacceptable Risk |
| Technical proposal has many deficiencies and/or gross omissions; failure to understand much of the scope of work necessary to perform the required tasks; failure to provide a reasonable, logical approach to fulfilling much of the government's requirements; failure to meet many personnel requirements in the solicitation. (When applying this adjective to a proposal as a whole, the technical proposal would have to be so unacceptable in one or more areas that it would have to be completely revised in order to attempt to make it other than unacceptable.) |
Relevant Past Performance
| Rating |
| Abbreviation |
| Risk Level |
| Definition |
| Excellent |
| E |
| Very Low Risk |
| Contractor has performed successfully and greatly exceeded expectations under contracts. |
| Very Good |
| VG |
| Low Risk |
| The contractor has performance successfully under contracts. |
| Satisfactory |
| S |
| Moderate Risk |
| The contractor has performance marginally under contracts. |
| Neutral |
| N |
| Neutral |
| No past performance or record is inconclusive. |
| Unacceptable |
| U |
| Unacceptable Risk |
| Past performance is unacceptable. |
