Technical Acceptability-Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 18 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 12905B24Q0022
About this file
This document contains a solicitation for replacing environmental controls in four greenhouses for the USDA Agricultural Research Service in Riverside, California. The solicitation seeks quotes by February 16, 2024 to determine necessary equipment and software, remove existing controls, and install and test new controls hardware and software under three contract line items. The work must be completed within 90 days of award on site in Riverside. The solicitation is set aside for total small businesses with a 650 employee size standard. Evaluation criteria are in the attached terms and conditions. Offers must include updated FAR provision 52.212-3 and are due by email to Shelley.steen@usda.gov by the deadline. A mandatory site visit will be held on February 8th; registration is required by February 12th. Questions are due by February 13th to the same email.
View the file
Other files
Show all 29
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Technical Acceptability-Greenhouse Controls Please provide professional references by submitting the attached Past Performance Questionnaire as completed by clients for whom you have provided similar services.
Before sending, please insert the name of your company where is says “contractor name” in the questionnaire instructions.
12905B24Q0022
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)
The Contractor shall complete the company specific information on this form, contact their clients, forward this form to their clients and request that their clients complete it (verify/concur and score) and send it via email to at shelley.steen @usda.gov . This will expedite the response from each referenced source.
Name of client organization:
Project name and contract/task order number:
Brief description of support provided:
Total period of performance, dates, and total cost/price:
Number of contractor personnel assigned to the project, by skill category:
SECTION 1:
Name and Title of Technical Point of Contact (POC):
Address of Technical POC:
Telephone number of Technical POC:
Date the Technical POC was contacted for this PPQ:
Did you inform your client that a past performance questionnaire must be completed and returned to USDA by February 16, 2024 and that a USDA representative may contact him/her sometime after that date?
|_|Yes |_|No
Please BOLD the rating your Technical POC indicated he/she would give your project if contacted:
1. Overall Technical Performance
| Excellent |
| Very Good |
| Good |
| Fair |
| Poor |
| N/A |
| 2. | Quality of work |
| Excellent | |
| Very Good | |
| Good | |
| Fair | |
| Poor | |
| N/A |
| 3. | Schedule Performance |
| Excellent | |
| Very Good | |
| Good | |
| Fair | |
| Poor | |
| N/A |
| 4. | Cost Performance |
| Excellent | |
| Very Good | |
| Good | |
| Fair | |
| Poor | |
| N/A |
| 5. | Did the contractor proactively identify risk areas, mitigate risks, and respond to emergency and critical situations? |_|Yes |_|No |
| 6. | Would your Technical POC use your company again? |_|Yes |_|No |
SECTION 2:
Name and Title of Contracting Point of Contact (POC):
Address of Contracting POC:
Telephone number of Contracting POC:
Date the Contracting POC was contacted for this PPQ:
Did you inform your client that a past performance questionnaire must be completed and returned to USDA by February 16, 2024 and that a USDA representative may contact him/her sometime after that date?
|_|Yes |_|No Please BOLD the rating your Contracting POC indicated he/she would give your project if contacted:
| 1. | Overall Contractual Performance |
| Excellent | |
| Very Good | |
| Good | |
| Fair | |
| Poor | |
| N/A |
2. Would your Contracting POC use your company again? |_|Yes |_|No
Employee(s) who made the contact with above-named client references:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .