SubHDR MMS NGSC_Draft Statement of Work.pdf

v4.2_FEBRUARY2025

STATEMENT OF WORK (SOW)

Submarine High Data Rate (SubHDR) LN-100 Mast

Motion Sensor (MMS) Repair, Restoration and Replacement Services

1.0 Background

The Naval Undersea Warfare Center Division, Newport (NUWCDIVNPT) Code 34 is designated as the National Maintenance Center (NMC) for the Submarine High Data Rate

(SubHDR) Mast Group System, per the Naval Warfare Systems Command (NAVWAR)

Program Executive Office Command, Control, Communications, Computers and Intelligence

(PEO C4I) Undersea Communications & Integration Program Office (PMW770), the

Participating Acquisition Resource Manager (PARM). NUWCDIVNPT SubHDR NMC is the sole repair facility capable of repairing SubHDR Masts for the fleet. The SubHDR NMC conducts maintenance and repair of SubHDR Masts, establishes and maintains a rotatable pool of

Ready for Issue (RFI) SubHDR Masts, and implements engineering changes into SubHDR Masts to enhance the life of the system.

1.1 Places of Performance

The work specified herein shall be performed at the contractor's facility.

1.2 Authorized Users

The NUWCDIVNPT Electromagnetic Systems Department, Code 34.

1.3 Sponsors

Code 34 Sponsors anticipated to fund Delivery Orders (DO) under this contract:

• Naval Warfare Systems Command (NAVWAR) PEO C4I, PMW 770 and PMW/A 170

• US Submarine Fleet Maintenance Activity Commander Submarine Force

(COMSUBFOR N4)

• Foreign Military SubHDR partners

1.4 Types of Funding

• Operations and Maintenance, Navy (O&MN)

• Shipbuilding and Conversion (SCN)

• Other Procurement, Navy (OPN)

• Foreign Military Sales (FMS)

2.0 Scope

This Statement of Work (SOW) defines the services and supplies required to test, inspect, evaluate, repair, calibrate, or overhaul failed Mast Motion Sensors (MMSs) returned from the fleet in support of the NUWCDIVNPT Code 34 NMC. The contractor shall perform MMS repairs as further defined in Section 4.1; MMS overhauls as further defined in Section 4.2; and manufacture of Shop Replaceable Units (SRUs) and inventory management as further defined in

Section 4.3.

2.1 Program or Systems Supported

• Submarine High Data Rate (SubHDR) Program

• Navy Multiband Terminal (NMT) Program

3.0 Applicable Documents

The contractor shall perform the tasking required in Section 4.0 in accordance with (IAW) the below Applicable Documents (ADs).

NUMBER TITLE

REVISION/

DATE

APPLICABLE

SOW TASK

3.1 DoD Issuances

3.1.1 G608292: SubHDR Drawing: Sensor, Mast Motion

TBD ALL

3.1.2 831401 Rev G: Mast Motion Sensor

(MMS) Acceptance Test Procedure (ATP) TBD 4.1 and 4.2

4.0 Technical Requirements

As specific needs are identified, Delivery Orders (DO) will be issued to initiate work. DOs will be issued on a Firm Fixed Price basis and will identify specific SRUs to be manufactured. The

Contractor shall use failed MMS’s provided as Government Furnished Property (GFP) and

Government provided inventory SRUs in performing the below tasking.

4.1 MMS Evaluation and Repair

4.1.1 Incoming Evaluation

In accordance with AD 3.1 and 3.2, and using the Maintenance Action Report (MAR) (GFI 6.1), the contractor shall perform initial incoming evaluation of MMS assemblies to identify all the fault conditions.

The contractor shall identify the repair level required as: Standard Repair, Over and Above

Repair, or Beyond Economic Repair (BER).

The contractor shall document all failures, repair level, and recommended corrective actions in a

Repair Activity Summary (RAS) Report.

If failures identified are beyond the Over and Above Repair level, the contractor shall provide a

BER Report detailing the condition of the MMS and the basis for the BER determination. Upon

Government concurrence, the contractor shall return all BER MMS assemblies to the

Government for disposal.

Deliverable:

CDRL A001 – DI-MISC-80508B, RAS Report.

4.1.2 Standard Repair

In accordance with the contractor’s repair procedures, drawings, and specifications current at the time of standard repair, using the SRU inventory, the contractor shall:

• Repair up to two (2) Circuit Card Assemblies (CCAs) and one (1) “instrument” (Gyro or

Triad); and

• Replacement of up to one (1) Gyro.

The contractor shall repair, calibrate, and reload the MMS firmware on the unit to ensure it meets the acceptance criteria in accordance with AD 3.2.

The contractor shall provide a bi-weekly status report detailing the MMS standard repair status.

The contractor shall document all repair services performed in the RAS Report.

While performing the standard repair of the MMS, the contractor shall note any additional identified failures that were not detectable during initial incoming evaluation. If this occurs, the contractor shall provide an Over and Above Repairs (OAR) Report detailing the failures and recommended corrective actions.

Deliverables:

CDRL A001 – DI-MISC-80508B, RAS Report

CDRL A002 – DI-MISC-80508B, OAR Report

CDRL A003 – DI-MISC-80508B, BER Report

4.1.3 Over and Above Repair (OAR)

Upon Government approval of the OAR report and recommended corrective actions, the

Government will issue a separate DO for the OAR. In accordance with the contractor’s repair procedures, drawings, and specifications current at the time of standard repair and upon receipt of the DO, the contractor shall repair the MMS.

The contractor shall document all repair services performed in the RAS Report.

CDRL A001 - DI-MISC-80508B, RAS Report

CDRL A002 - DI-MISC-80508B, OAR Report

4.2 MMS Overhaul

In accordance with its standard repair procedures, drawings, and specifications current at the time of overhaul, the contractor shall perform MMS overhauls to bring the MMS to a like-new condition.

As part of the overhaul process, the contractor shall:

• Replace the three (3) gyros and triad with new SRUs

• Reset the internal time meter to zero (0)

• Perform full sensor calibration

• Reload the MMS firmware

• Perform MMS specific ATP in accordance with AD 3.2

The contractor shall document MMS overhaul status as part of the bi-weekly status report.

The contractor shall provide the SRU replacement serial numbers and include findings and corrective actions in the RAS report.

CDRL A001 - DI-MISC-80508B, RAS Report

4.3 Manufacture and Material Management of SRUs

4.3.1 Manufacture of SRUs

The contractor shall manufacture the following SRUs (components and subassemblies) to accomplish required MMS repairs and overhauls:

• P/N 821089-1 Laser Gyro Instrument Assembly

• P/N 734427-1 Accelerometer Triad Assembly

• P/N 800985-4 High Voltage Power Supply, Circuit Card Assembly

• P/N 801105-8 LN100 Flex Cable Assembly

• P/N TBD SYS Processor, Circuit Card Assembly

• P/N 831410-2 Sensor and Cable Assembly

• P/N 837740-6 Low Voltage Power Supply, Circuit Card Assembly

• P/N 897881-1 Sensor Electronics, Circuit Card Assembly

The contractor shall report SRU manufacturing status as part of the bi-weekly status report.

CDRL A004 – DI-MGMT-80368A, Biweekly Status Report

4.3.2 Material Management of SRUs

The contractor shall record the serial numbers of the GFP and SRUs consumed during the repair or overhaul of an MMS. All GFP and SRUs shall be traceable to the repaired or overhauled

MMS and documented in the bi-weekly status report.

The contractor shall document material inventory levels and provide recommendations for replacement SRUs, including manufacturing lead times, in the bi-weekly status report.

4.5 Non-Recurring Engineering (CPFF)

Upon learning that a component, part, or any other item has become or is anticipated to become obsolete, non-procurable, out of production or otherwise unavailable, the contractor shall provide, within thirty (30) calendar days, written notice to the Contracting Officer and the

Contracting Officer Representative (COR) with a resolution plan providing recommendations of how to address the obsolescence to be provided forty-five (45) calendar days thereafter. If required, this forty-five (45) day obsolescence resolution plan submission requirement will be extended on a case by case basis.

CDRL A006 – DI-TBD, Resolution Plan

5.0 Progress Reports

5.1 Contract Status Report

The Contractor shall prepare a Contractor’s Status Report that indicates the progress of work, status of the program(s), and existing or potential problem areas for all assigned tasks. The

Contractor shall submit the Contract Status Report for the same timeframe as each invoice submitted in the Wide Area Workflow (WAWF) Module of the Procurement Integrated

Enterprise Environment (PIEE).

CDRL A005 – DI-MGMT-81991, Contract Status Report

6.0 Government Furnished Information

The following Government Furnished Information (GFI) will be made available under this contract.

Number Title Applicable SOW Task

Number

6.1 Maintenance Action Report (MAR) 4.1 and 4.2

7.0 Government Furnished Property

The Government may provide Government Furnished Property (GFP) as listed in Attachment X.

The contractor shall adhere to DFARS Clause 252.245–7005 for the management and reporting of Government Property and shall use the GFP Module of the Procurement Integrated Enterprise

Environment (PIEE) as specified in the clause. In addition, the Contractor shall prepare and submit a Government Property (GP) Inventory Report to capture GFP status IAW CDRL

AXXX.

Deliverable: CDRL AXXX

8.0 Quality Surveillance and Performance Standards

The Government will conduct quality surveillance via various methods including formal and informal meetings, review of technical reports, review of monthly progress reports, and review of deliverables. Contractor performance will be evaluated in the areas of technical quality, cost control, schedule/timeliness, management, utilization of small business, and regulatory compliance as follows:

• Technical Quality: The government will evaluate technical quality using the criteria defined in the Performance Requirements Summary Table (PRST), Attachment X;

• Cost Control: The government will evaluate the contractor’s effectiveness in forecasting, managing, and controlling actual costs in comparison to negotiated costs;

• Schedule/Timeliness: The government will evaluate the contractor’s ability to meet negotiated milestones and delivery schedules;

• Management: The government will evaluate the contractor’s ability to integrate and coordinate all activities needed to execute the contract;

• Utilization of Small Business: The government will evaluate the contractor’s compliance with the Small Business Subcontracting Plan and any small business subcontracting goals contained in the contract/task order;

• Regulatory Compliance: The government will evaluate the contractor’s compliance with the terms and conditions of the contract relating to applicable regulations and codes.

9.0 Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Accessibility Requirements

The Government has determined that this procurement is not Information and Communication

Technology (ICT).

The Government has determined that this procurement is an exception to the Information and

Communication Technology (ICT) Accessibility Standards (36 C.F.R. Part 1194, Appendix A).

Notwithstanding that an exception exists, the Contractor may furnish items or services provided under this contract that comply with the ICT Accessibility Standards (36 C.F.R. Part 1194, Appendix A).

Exception #1 national security for (name the national security system/program)

10.0 Security Compliance

10.1 Program Protection

SECURITY: All Contractor personnel shall adhere to the Security provisions of 32 CFR Part 117

– National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual (NISPOM). While performing work at a Government Facility, Contractor personnel shall comply with the security regulations of the host facility. Applicable FAR, DFARS, NMCARS clauses, and NAVSEA text shall be adhered to in the performance of this contract. Security incidents shall be promptly reported through the companies Facility Security Officer (FSO), to the Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR), Technical Point of Contact (TPOC), and the Cognizant Security Office to NUWCDIVNPT

Security.

Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) including Legacy FOUO and Covered Defense

Information (meeting the definition of 48 CFR 252.204–7012(a)) generated and/or provided under this contract shall be marked and safeguarded as specified in DoD Instruction 5200.48, CUI available at:

https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodi/520048p.PDF. Any product containing Covered Defense Information shall be assigned a distribution statement (distribution statements B through F) in accordance with DoDI 5230.24 (Distribution Statements on Technical

Documents); and DoDI 5230.24, Enclosure 3 Procedures, available at https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodi/523024p.pdf

INFORMATION SECURITY: If the work is performed at the Contractor's facility, the

Contractor shall implement and maintain security procedures and controls to prevent unauthorized disclosure of classified information and controlled unclassified information (CUI) and to control distribution of CUI in accordance with National Industrial Security Program

Operating Manual (NISPOM) codifying 32 CFR Part 117, NISPOM Rule, and SECNAV M-

5510.36B. If the work is performed at the Government's facility, the Contractor shall comply with facility policy.

CUI INCIDENT REPORTING AND RESPONSE: The Contractor shall promptly report any unauthorized, inadvertent, or illegal release or disclosure of CUI to the Contracting Officer’s

Representative / Technical Point of Contact (TPOC), Procuring Contracting Officer, and the

Security Office. Contractor personnel shall coordinate this effort through the relevant industry site FSO.

PUBLIC RELEASE: Any controlled unclassified information pertaining to this contract shall not be released for public dissemination, including posting to any social media sites such as

Facebook or Twitter, unless it has been approved for public release by appropriate U.S.

Government authority. Proposed public releases shall be submitted for approval prior to release through the appropriate U.S. Government Office.

10.2 Operations Security (OPSEC)

OPSEC is a process that identifies critical information to determine if friendly actions can be observed by adversary intelligence systems, determines if information obtained by adversaries could be interpreted to be useful to them, and then executes selected measures that eliminate or reduce adversary exploitation of friendly critical information.

The Contractor shall develop and implement, and update and maintain an OPSEC program to protect controlled unclassified and classified activities, information, equipment, and material used or developed by the Contractor and any subcontractor during performance of the contract.

The Contractor shall be responsible for the subcontractor implementation of the OPSEC requirements. The Contractor developed OPSEC program may include Information Assurance and Communications Security (COMSEC). The OPSEC program shall be in accordance with

National Security Presidential Memorandum (NSPM) 28, and at a minimum shall include:

1) Assignment of responsibility for OPSEC direction and implementation.

2) Issuance of procedures and planning guidance for the use of OPSEC techniques to identify vulnerabilities and apply applicable countermeasures.

3) Establishment of OPSEC education and awareness training.

4) Provisions for management, annual review, and evaluation of OPSEC programs.

5) Flow down of OPSEC requirements to subcontractors when applicable.

While performing aboard Government sites, the contractor shall: comply with all OPSEC instructions and policies; include OPSEC as part of its ongoing security awareness program and take all required Agency training; Be responsive to the Supporting OPSEC Manager on a non-interference basis; and Protect sensitive unclassified information and activities, which could compromise classified information or operations, or degrade the planning and execution of operations performed by the Requiring Organization and contractor in support of the mission.

10.3 Electronic Spillage

Electronic Spillage (ES) is defined as a situation where information of higher classification than a system is authorized to process is introduced into that system, intentionally or otherwise. If a

Contractor is determined to be responsible for an ES, all direct and indirect costs incurred by the

Government for ES remediation will be charged to the Contractor.