SUAS PWS.docx
DOCX document 43 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- M67001-26-Q-0033
- Issued by
-
United States Marine Corps
About this file
This is a Performance Work Statement (PWS) for a Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems (SUAS) marketplace procurement vehicle for Marine Corps Installations East (MCIEAST) and II Marine Expeditionary Force. The contractor shall operate a commercially available, off-the-shelf (COTS) web-based marketplace serving as a single point of entry for designated commands to nominate SUAS parts, fund evidence collection services, and procure parts certified as National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA)-compliant by the Government. The core service is the contractor's role as a documentation agent responsible for collecting evidence and preparing NDAA compliance packages for Government validation through the SRA Portal by the designated authority (PMA-263). The contractor must conduct preliminary screening of nominated parts for disqualifiers and, if none are found, execute full evidence package preparation including formal attestation of compliance, evidence collection from original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), and package assembly and submission to the Government's portal using DoD-approved External Certification Authority (ECA) certificates at the contractor's expense.
The contract utilizes a hybrid pricing structure with two separate CLINs: a Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP) CLIN for NDAA evidence package preparation services (estimated 100 vetting actions in base year, 50 each in two option years) and a Time & Materials (T&M) CLIN with a Not-to-Exceed (NTE) ceiling for part procurement ($200,000 per year). The contractor shall propose a single fixed surcharge percentage applied to direct costs of all parts sold, with final prices determined Fair and Reasonable by the Contracting Officer and not exceeding prices on the contractor's public commercial website. The COTS marketplace must meet commercial security standards including TLS 1.2+ encryption, Multi-Factor Authentication, and demonstrate mature data protection (SOC 2 or ISO 27001). Performance requirements include 100% on-time submission of evidence packages within 30 calendar days, 95% order fulfillment within standard commercial practice, 99.5% order accuracy, 99.8% marketplace uptime, and timely monthly and quarterly reporting. The contractor must process returns within one business day and provide replacement parts or full credit for defective items.
View the file
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Final Performance Work Statement (PWS)
1. Introduction & Background The operational readiness of II Marine Expeditionary Force (MEF) and other supported commands within Marine Corps Installations East (MCIEAST) is increasingly reliant on the availability and rapid procurement of parts for its growing fleet of Group 1 Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems (SUAS). The current procurement landscape for these components is fragmented across the region, leading to procurement delays, a lack of supply chain visibility, and an increased risk of inadvertently acquiring parts non-compliant with the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA).
This Performance Work Statement (PWS) establishes the requirement for a secure and efficient procurement vehicle to resolve these challenges. The goal is to consolidate the ordering of SUAS parts into a single contract vehicle for II MEF and other MCIEAST supported commands, providing them with enhanced visibility, improved supply chain security, and greater accountability for SUAS sustainment.
To achieve this, the Contractor shall provide and operate a commercially available, off-the-shelf (COTS) marketplace. This marketplace will serve as a single point of entry for designated commands to nominate parts, fund the contractor's evidence collection service, and procure parts that have been formally certified as NDAA-compliant by the Government.
2. Scope of Work
2.1. General Scope
The Contractor shall provide and operate a COTS secure, web-based marketplace for the sale and delivery of SUAS parts. The core service provided under this contract is the Contractor's role as a documentation agent, responsible for collecting evidence and preparing compliance packages that enable the Government to perform its own NDAA validation.
2.2. Operational Workflow
The workflow shall be a Government-directed process. The Government will nominate specific parts for review. Upon receiving a nomination, the Contractor shall execute the "NDAA Compliance Attestation and Evidence Package Preparation" process as detailed in Section 3.2. The Contractor will then be responsible for uploading the complete package directly into the Government's SRA Portal. The Government's designated validation authority (currently PMA-263) will then review the submission. Only upon receiving official approval from the COR may the Contractor list the part on the marketplace for procurement.
2.3. Pricing and Ordering Framework
2.3.1. General
This contract will utilize a hybrid pricing structure to distinguish between the evidence preparation service and the ongoing procurement of parts, which will be managed in a manner like a Contractor-Operated Parts Store (COPARS).
2.3.2. NDAA Evidence Service (Firm-Fixed-Price)
The "NDAA Compliance Evidence Package Preparation" service will be ordered on a Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP) basis via a distinct CLIN or Task Order. To meet the legal requirements for an IDIQ contract, the Government will commit to a small, legally required minimum guaranteed quantity of these services (e.g., a minimum of 10 services over the life of the contract), which is typically satisfied by the first task order. The contract will also specify the estimated quantities and a maximum quantity (cap).
· Preliminary Assessment (Non-Billable): Upon receiving a nomination, the Contractor shall conduct a preliminary screening for obvious disqualifiers. If found, the Contractor will notify the COR, and this action will not count against the contract's quantities.
· Full Evidence Package Preparation (Billable FFP Service): If no disqualifiers are found, the Contractor is authorized to proceed with the full evidence package preparation service. This full service is the billable event under the FFP CLIN.
| Year |
| Estimated Vetting Actions (Quantity) |
| Base |
| 100 |
| Option Year 1 |
| 50 |
| Option Year 2 |
| 50 |
2.3.3. Part Procurement (Time & Materials - T&M)
The procurement of parts will be managed under a Time & Materials (T&M) CLIN with a Not-to-Exceed (NTE) ceiling. There is no minimum purchase requirement for parts. The NTE ceiling represents the maximum value of parts that may be procured, not a spending commitment.
2.3.3.1. Not-to-Exceed (NTE) Ceiling
This CLIN will function as a "charge account" for as-needed purchases. The total value of parts procured per period shall not exceed the ceilings established in the table below.
| Year |
| Not-to-Exceed (NTE) Ceiling |
| Base |
| $200,000 |
| Option Year 1 |
| $200,000 |
| Option Year 2 |
| $200,000 |
2.3.3.2. Pricing Methodology & Surcharge
Offerors shall propose a single, fixed surcharge percentage to be applied to the direct cost of all parts sold. This surcharge covers all contractor operational costs. The proposed percentage will be incorporated as a fixed rate for the life of the contract.
2.3.3.3. Fair & Reasonable (F&R) Price Determination
As each new part is approved, its final, fully burdened price (Contractor's direct cost + fixed surcharge) must be determined to be Fair and Reasonable (F&R) by the Contracting Officer. The final F&R price shall not exceed the price for the same item on the Contractor's publicly accessible commercial website.
3. Specific Tasks
3.1. Marketplace Platform
3.1.1. Operation: The Contractor shall operate its COTS marketplace as the channel for procuring Government-approved, NDAA-compliant SUAS parts.
3.1.2. User Interface: The COTS platform must provide standard e-commerce functionalities. The "NDAA Compliance Indicator" on a product page must clearly signify that the part has been formally approved by the Government's validation authority (PMA-263).
3.1.3. Commercial Security Standards: The platform must adhere to commercial best practices, including encrypting data in transit (TLS 1.2+), supporting Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA), and demonstrating a mature data protection program (e.g., SOC 2, ISO 27001).
3.1.4 - External Certification Authority (ECA) Certificate Requirement. Performance of this contract requires the Contractor to access a CAC-protected Government system (the SRA Portal). To meet this requirement, the Contractor shall, at their own expense, acquire and maintain valid DoD-approved External Certification Authority (ECA) certificates for all personnel responsible for uploading compliance documentation. These certificates must be of a sufficient assurance level to grant access to the portal. This is a mandatory technical requirement for contract performance.
3.2. NDAA Compliance Attestation and Evidence Package Preparation The Contractor shall support the Government's compliance process by preparing a formal "Attestation of Compliance" document, along with all supporting evidence, for each nominated part and submitting it to the COR.
3.2.1. Part 1: Attestation Generation: The Contractor shall author a formal "Attestation of Compliance" document structured to capture all information required by the PMA-263 guidance.
3.2.2. Part 2: Evidence Collection: To support the attestation, the Contractor shall engage the OEM to gather all evidence listed as "Required" by the PMA-263 guidance.
3.2.3. Part 3: Package Assembly and Submission to COR: Package Assembly and Submission. The Contractor shall assemble a single, organized "Compliance Documentation Package." This package must include the Contractor-generated Attestation of Compliance as the primary document, followed by all supporting evidence, clearly labeled.
The Contractor shall be solely responsible for uploading the complete package directly into the Government's SRA Portal using their ECA certificate. The Contractor's responsibility for this task is complete upon successful submission to the portal and notification to the COR.
3.2.4. Marketplace Status: The Contractor shall await official notification from the COR regarding PMA-263's final determination.
3.3. Part Returns and Discrepancy Resolution
The Contractor shall manage a streamlined process for the return and replacement of incorrect, damaged, or defective parts. Within one business day of a user initiating a return, the Contractor shall issue a Return Merchandise Authorization (RMA) number and provide a pre-paid shipping label. Upon receiving the returned item, the Contractor shall ship a replacement. If a replacement is not possible, a full credit for the part's original F&R price shall be issued to the Government's T&M account.
3.4. Reporting
3.4.1. Monthly Performance & Compliance Report: This report shall detail sales data, order fulfillment times, and a summary of all evidence packages submitted.
3.4.2. Quarterly Part Quality Report: This report shall provide an analysis of user feedback data, identifying trends in part quality and performance.
3.5. Electronic Invoicing
On a monthly basis, the Contractor shall submit a single, consolidated invoice through WAWF under the T&M CLIN. This invoice shall list each part delivered and its corresponding approved, fully burdened F&R price. No separate invoice or fee for storefront operation shall be submitted.
4. Deliverables
| Deliverable |
| PWS Reference |
| Due Date |
| Access to COTS Marketplace |
| 3.1 |
| Upon contract award |
| Compliance Documentation Package |
| 3.2 |
| Per Government nomination |
| Monthly Performance & Compliance Report |
| 3.4.1 |
| 10th day of each month |
| Quarterly Part Quality Report |
| 3.4.2 |
| 30 days after end of fiscal quarter |
5. Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) The Government will monitor performance against this QASP. Failure to meet a threshold requires a corrective action plan within ten (10) business days.
| Performance Objective |
| Performance Standard |
| Performance Threshold |
| Method of Surveillance |
| Timely Submission of Evidence Packages |
| Percentage of Compliance Documentation Packages submitted to the COR within 30 calendar days of Government nomination. |
| 100% on-time submission. |
| COR tracking of nomination vs. receipt dates. |
| Timely Delivery |
| Percentage of orders shipped within standard commercial practice. |
| ≥ 95% |
| Analysis of Monthly Performance Report; spot checks. |
| Order Accuracy |
| Percentage of orders delivered with correct items and quantities. |
| ≥ 99.5% |
| Analysis of Monthly Performance Report; user-reported discrepancies. |
| Marketplace Availability |
| Percentage of uptime for the COTS marketplace portal. |
| ≥ 99.8% (excluding scheduled maintenance). |
| Review of Contractor uptime reports; random verification. |
| Timely Reporting |
| Percentage of required reports submitted on or before the due date. |
| 100% |
| COR verification of report submission dates. |
DISTRIBUTION: DoD COMMUNITY ONLY
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .