Statement of Qualification Scoring Criteria.pdf
PDF 120 KB Posted
- Attached to
- 2026 CDBG Annual Competition
- Solicitation number
- PE-66425-NONST-2026-000000002
- Issued by
- Mitchell County, Georgia
About this file
This is a Statement of Qualifications Scoring Criteria document used to evaluate architectural and/or engineering firms for a state or local contract opportunity. The evaluation form provides a standardized framework for assessing qualified firms across six primary criteria: the firm's ability to provide necessary disciplines for the project, experience with the type of construction involved, key personnel experience with similar construction types, quality of reference information, previous experience with comparable projects, and price competitiveness. Each criterion is scored on a scale of 0 to 2 points, with designations for poor, good, and excellent performance, allowing evaluators to assign a total points value based on the firm's qualifications.
The form includes additional evaluation components requiring reviewers to verify whether the firm can meet project delivery deadlines and confirm the firm carries Errors and Omissions insurance coverage. Evaluators are provided space to document comments explaining why the selected firm should be awarded the contract and to record the reviewer's name and date of evaluation. The scoring approach enables systematic comparison of competing firms based on objective qualifications rather than subjective criteria, ensuring fair and consistent evaluation across all submitting architectural and engineering firms.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS
SCORING
CONTACT:
NAME OF FIRM:
FIRM ADDRESS:
Evaluate the Architectural and/or Engineering Firm based on the points assigned to each selected criterion.
CIRCLE POINTS
CRITERION POOR GOOD EXCELLENT
POINTS
ASSIGNED
0 1 2
0 1 2
0 1 2
0 1 2
0 1 2
1. Ability to provide the disciplines necessary for this project.
2. Firm’s experience with this type of construction.
3. Key personnel experience with this type of construction
4. Quality of reference information.
5. Has Firm had experience with similar projects?
6. Is price competitive? %___________ 0 1 2
TOTAL POINTS
Firm can meet PER/PAR deadline? Yes No
Firm carries Errors and Omissions insurance? Yes No
COMMENTS ON WHY FIRM SHOULD BE SELECTED:
NAME:
DATE OF REVIEW:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .