Statement of Qualification Scoring Criteria.pdf

PDF 120 KB Posted

Attached to
2026 CDBG Annual Competition
Solicitation number
PE-66425-NONST-2026-000000002
Issued by
Mitchell County, Georgia

About this file

This is a Statement of Qualifications Scoring Criteria document used to evaluate architectural and/or engineering firms for a state or local contract opportunity. The evaluation form provides a standardized framework for assessing qualified firms across six primary criteria: the firm's ability to provide necessary disciplines for the project, experience with the type of construction involved, key personnel experience with similar construction types, quality of reference information, previous experience with comparable projects, and price competitiveness. Each criterion is scored on a scale of 0 to 2 points, with designations for poor, good, and excellent performance, allowing evaluators to assign a total points value based on the firm's qualifications.

The form includes additional evaluation components requiring reviewers to verify whether the firm can meet project delivery deadlines and confirm the firm carries Errors and Omissions insurance coverage. Evaluators are provided space to document comments explaining why the selected firm should be awarded the contract and to record the reviewer's name and date of evaluation. The scoring approach enables systematic comparison of competing firms based on objective qualifications rather than subjective criteria, ensuring fair and consistent evaluation across all submitting architectural and engineering firms.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS

SCORING

CONTACT:

NAME OF FIRM:

FIRM ADDRESS:

Evaluate the Architectural and/or Engineering Firm based on the points assigned to each selected criterion.

CIRCLE POINTS

CRITERION POOR GOOD EXCELLENT

POINTS

ASSIGNED

0 1 2

0 1 2

0 1 2

0 1 2

0 1 2

1. Ability to provide the disciplines necessary for this project.

2. Firm’s experience with this type of construction.

3. Key personnel experience with this type of construction

4. Quality of reference information.

5. Has Firm had experience with similar projects?

6. Is price competitive? %___________ 0 1 2

TOTAL POINTS

Firm can meet PER/PAR deadline? Yes No

Firm carries Errors and Omissions insurance? Yes No

COMMENTS ON WHY FIRM SHOULD BE SELECTED:

NAME:

DATE OF REVIEW:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .