View the file

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

JUSTIFICATION FOR SOLE SOURCE PROCUREMENT (OPEN MARKET OR GSA)

UNDER $250,000

Sole source acquisitions may be used on a limited basis and only when the Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR)/Program Official has provided sufficient justification and the Contracting Officer has determined that the circumstances warrant such action. The content for a justification must contain detailed facts and rationale to justify the sole source acquisition. Soliciting from a single source must be done in accordance with FAR 13.106-1(b) or 8.405-6. At a minimum, the following information must be included:

Identification of Program Office, Contracting Activity, and Proposed Requirement, Justification and Program Office Certification:

A. Program Office:

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Office of Safety, Security, and Asset Management (OSSAM) Security Services Office (SSO) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Atlanta, GA 30341

B. Contracting Activity:

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Office of Financial Resources Acquisition Branch KOGR Bldg COLGA Rm 3124, Atlanta, GA 30341

C. Identification of Requirement:

1. Nature of Action to be Approved by Contracting Officer:

a. Sole source acquisition of: UPS System (Fort Collins)

b. Procurement Request (PR) Number (if available): TBD

2. Proposed Vendor and Estimated Procurement Amount (if available):

a. Proposed Vendor: : Motorola

b. Estimated Procurement Amount:

3. Is the requirement on GSA Schedule? Yes ☐X No

If yes, provide schedule number:

Rev. 5/14/19

D. Justification:

1. The justification for this non-competitive action is:

X In accordance with FAR 13.106-1(b)(1), “only one source [is] reasonably available” which states that, “For purchases not exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold. (i) Contracting officers may solicit from one source if the contracting officer determines that the circumstances of the contract action deem only one source reasonably available (e.g., urgency, exclusive licensing agreements, brand-name or industrial mobilization). (ii) Where a single source is identified to provide a portion of a purchase because that portion of the purchase specifies a particular brand-name item, the documentation in paragraph (b)(1)(i) of this section only applies to the portion of the purchase requiring brand-name item. The documentation should state it is covering only the portion of the acquisition which is brand-name.”

□ Urgency

□ Exclusive licensing agreements/Proprietary data

□ X Brand name required

□ Industrial mobilization

□ Other (e.g., compatibility, space issues, continuity, compatibility, etc.)

In accordance with FAR 8.405-6 “Limiting Sources” which states that, “the only circumstances that may justify the action are – (A) An urgent and compelling need exists, and following the procedures would result in unacceptable delays; (B) Only one source is capable of providing the supplies or services required at the level of quality required because the supplies or services are unique or highly specialized; or (C) In the interest of economy and efficiency, the new work is a logical follow-up to an original Federal Supply Schedule order provided that the original order was placed in accordance with the applicable Federal Supply Schedule ordering procedures. The original BPA must not have been previously issued under sole-source or limited-sources procedures.”

□ Urgency

□ Only One Source

□ Logical Follow Up

Brand name required

2. Other facts supporting sole source procurement:

a. What can this product/service do that other products/services cannot do?

This level of effort includes both compatible electrical equipment as well as installation activities. The Motorola UHF radio system is a proprietary network thus the identified equipment was rated and meet their specifications to ensure optimum compatiability. Failure to obtain the requested procurement will result in damage to previously procure radio equipment.

b. What other products/services were considered and why did they not meet the need?

None. The UPS is compatible with the CDC UHF radio proprietary system. The procurement is designed to provide both compatible equipment and electrical installation to protect previously purchase equipment with an estimate value of $350K. Failure to complete the desire procurement will result in damage to communications equipment and therefore jeopardize the security posture for both the Select Agent’s lab and Fort Collins, CO campus.

3. Program Office efforts to seek potential offerors:

Rev. 5/14/19

No efforts were made to seek other potential offerors. The UPS is compatible with the CDC UHF radio proprietary system. The procurement is designed to provide both compatible equipment and electrical installation to protect previously purchase equipment

E. Program Office Certification:

I have reviewed this sole source justification and certify the justification is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and adequate to support other than full and open competition.

Center/Institute/Office COR/Program Official Name/Title: Maurice Lacey/SSO/PSO Brach Chief

Center/Institute/Office COR/Program Official Signature:

Certification Date: July 22, 2020

F. Contracting Office Certification:

I have fully relied on the information provided herein and hereby certify that this justification is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief:

Contracting Officer Name:

Contracting Officer Signature:

Certification Date: 09/15/2020

Tayaria Smith

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .