SS211-002020-03.docx

DOCX document 62 KB Posted

Attached to
Construction, University Drive Bike Lanes
Solicitation number
IFB-114424
Issued by
Fairfax County, Virginia

About this file

This document is a supplemental specification guideline issued by the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) for asphalt concrete work on road and bridge projects, effective March 18, 2024. The specifications establish technical requirements for various asphalt concrete mix types designated by nominal maximum aggregate size and traffic loading levels, measured in Equivalent Single-Axle Loads (ESAL). The document defines 14 primary mix types ranging from SM-4.75 (surface mixture) through BM-25.0 (base mixture), with corresponding asphalt performance grades, aggregate properties, and design criteria. Key specifications include minimum fractured face requirements for coarse and fine aggregates, void-in-total-mix (VTM) percentages, voids-filled-with-asphalt (VFA) ranges, and voids-in-mineral-aggregate (VMA) minimums. The guidelines permit contractors to optionally use approved Warm Mix Asphalt (WMA) additives or processes and mandate the use of antistripping additives in all asphalt mixes, either through hydrated lime or approved chemical additives at specified minimum application rates.

The document establishes mandatory testing and acceptance procedures including permeability testing for surface mixes using VTM-120 methodology, with a maximum allowable permeability of 150 x 10-5 cm/sec. Process tolerances are specified for each sieve size and binder content with variations based on the number of tests conducted, and binder content must be measured through extractable binder or weight-after-ignition methods with burn tickets submitted to the Engineer. Contractors are required to maintain original tickets on file for five years or until final contract acceptance, whichever is longer, with notification to the Engineer within 24 hours of any discrepancies between ticket information and PLAID submissions. An adjustment points system is implemented for lots not conforming to acceptance requirements, with points assessed based on gradation deviations outside specified process tolerances, ranging from one adjustment point per one percent deviation for most sieve sizes to three points for the No. 200 sieve.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
SQ105-000611-01.docx DOCX document
cn801-000100-00.docx DOCX document
SS321-002020-02.docx DOCX document
SS220-002020-01.docx DOCX document
SS235-002020-01.docx DOCX document
SP107-001510-06.docx DOCX document
cn105-000150-00.docx DOCX document
UPC 121556 C-105 form.pdf PDF
2 - Appendix A - Approved by City Attorney 6.2026.pdf PDF
SS236-002020-01.docx DOCX document
SP0F0-000100-00.docx DOCX document
SQ107-001300-00.docx DOCX document
SS246-002020-02.docx DOCX document
cq107-000130-00.docx DOCX document
SS315-002020-05.docx DOCX document
SP107-000120-00.docx DOCX document
SS318-002020-01.docx DOCX document
3 - UPC 121556 PW Standards & Specifications.pdf PDF
cn105-000140-00.docx DOCX document
SS407-002020-02.docx DOCX document
SS317-002020-01.docx DOCX document
12 - Bid Submission Form.pdf PDF
SS223-002020-02.docx DOCX document
SP109-000100-05.docx DOCX document
SS411-002020-01 .docx DOCX document
7 - IFB 114424 University Dr Bike Lanes Final Plans - UPC 121556.pdf PDF
SS234-002020-01.docx DOCX document
SS308-002020-01.docx DOCX document
10 - Standard Labor and Material Payment Bond - Fairfax City.pdf PDF
SP107-003100-00.docx DOCX document
cn100-000026-09.docx DOCX document
UPC 121556 C-76 form.pdf PDF
Prebid Conference Attendance.pdf PDF
SS512-002020-03.docx DOCX document
1 - IFB 114424 University Dr Bike Lanes - UPC 121556.pdf PDF
cn103-000100-01.docx DOCX document
SP100-000051-00.docx DOCX document
5 - UPC 121556 Project Special Provisions.pdf PDF
SP0F0-000130-02.docx DOCX document
SS109-002020-01.docx DOCX document
UPC 121556 C-48 form.pdf PDF
SS319-002020-02.docx DOCX document
11 - Fairfax City Performance Bond.pdf PDF
SS248-002020-02.docx DOCX document
SS704-002020-02.docx DOCX document
SP0F0-000150-01.docx DOCX document
SS305-002020-02.docx DOCX document
SS309-002020-01 .docx DOCX document
UPC 121556 C-104 form.pdf PDF
Show all 49

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Guidelines: All Projects.

SS211-002020-03 March 18, 2024

VIRGINIA DEPARTEMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

2020 ROAD AND BRIDGE SUPPLEMENTAL SPECIFICATIONS

SECTION 211 – ASPHALT CONCRETE

SECTION 211 – ASPHALT CONCRETE of the Specifications is amended as follows:

Section 211.01 – Description is replaced with the following:

Asphalt concrete shall consist of a combination of mineral aggregate and asphalt binder mixed mechanically in a plant specifically designed for such purpose.

An equivalent single-axle load (ESAL) will be established by the Engineer, and SUPERPAVE mix types may be specified as one of the types listed as follows:

Mix Type1
Equivalent Single-Axle Load (ESAL) Range (millions)

Minimum Asphalt Performance Grade (PG)2 NominalMaximum Aggregate Size3

SM-4.75A
0 to 3
64S-16
No. 4
SM-4.75D
3 to 10
64H-16
No. 4
SM-4.75E
3 to 10
64E-22
No. 4
SM-9.0A
0 to 3
64S-16
3/8 in
SM-9.0D
3 to 10
64H-16
3/8 in
SM-9.0E
Above 10
64E-22
3/8 in
SM-9.5A
0 to 3
64S-16
3/8 in
SM-9.5D
3 to 10
64H-16
3/8 in
SM-9.5E
Above 10
64E-22
3/8 in
SM-12.5A
0 to 3
64S-16
1/2 in
SM-12.5D
3 to 10
64H-16
1/2 in
SM-12.5E
Above 10
64E-22
1/2 in
IM-19.0A
Less than 10
64S-16
3/4 in
IM-19.0D
10 to 20
64H-16
3/4 in
IM-19.0E
20 and above
64E-22
3/4 in
BM-25.0
All ranges
64H-16
1 in

1SM = Surface Mixture; IM = Intermediate Mixture; BM = Base Mixture 2Minimum Asphalt Performance Grade (PG) is defined as the minimum binder performance grade for the job mix formulas as determined by AASHTO T170 or AASHTO M332.

3Nominal Maximum Aggregate Size is defined as one sieve size larger than the first sieve to retain more than 10 percent aggregate.

Asphalt concrete shall conform to the requirements for the mix type designated on the plans or elsewhere in the Contract for use.

At the Contractor’s option, an approved Warm Mix Asphalt (WMA) additive or process may be used to produce the asphalt concrete mix type designated.

Table II-12A – Standard Deviation is renamed Aggregate Properties and is replaced with the following:

TABLE II-12A

Aggregate Properties

Mix Type
Coarse Aggregate Properties
Fine Aggregate

Properties

CAA
ASTM D4791

F & E (5:1) % by weight

1 fractured face
2 fractured faces
SE
FAA

SM-4.75A

40% min
40% min

SM-4.75D

45% min
45% min

SM-4.75E

45% min
45% min
SM-9.0 A
85% min.
80% min.
10% max.1
40% min.
40% min.
SM-9.0 D
85% min.
80% min.
10% max.1
45% min.
45% min.
SM-9.0 E
95% min.
90% min.
10% max.1
45% min.
45% min.
SM-9.5 A
85% min.
80% min.
10% max.1
45% min.
45% min.
SM-9.5 D
85% min.
80% min.
10% max.1
45% min.
45% min.
SM-9.5 E
95% min.
90% min.
10% max.1
45% min.
45% min.
SM-12.5 A
85% min.
80% min.
10% max.1
45% min.
45% min.
SM-12.5 D
85% min.
80% min.
10% max.1
45% min.
45% min.
SM-12.5 E
95% min.
90% min.
10% max.1
45% min.
45% min.
IM-19.0 A
85% min.
80% min.
10% max.1
45% min.
45% min.
IM-19.0 D
95% min.
90% min.
10% max.1
45% min.
45% min.
IM-19.0 E
95% min.
90% min.
10% max.1
45% min.
45% min.
BM-25.0
80% min.
75% min.
10% max.1
45% min.
45% min.

110 percent measured at 5:1 on maximum to minimum dimensions

Table II-13 – Asphalt Concrete Mixtures: Design Range is replaced with the following:

TABLE II-13

Asphalt Concrete Mixtures: Design Range

Mix Type

Percentage by Weight Passing Square Mesh Sieves

1 1/2 in
1 in
¾ in
½ in
3/8 in
No. 4
No. 8
No. 16
No. 30
No. 50
No. 200

SM-4.75 A,D,E

1001
95-100
90-100

30-55

6-13

SM-9.0 A,D,E

1001
90-100
90 max.
47-67

2-10

SM-9.5 A,D,E

1001
90-100
58-80
38-67

23 max

2-10

SM-12.5 A,D,E

100
95-100
90 max.
58-80
34-50

23 max

2-10

IM-19.0 A,D,E

100
90-100
90 max.
--
--
28-49

2-8

BM-25.0
100
90-100
90 max.
--
--
--
19-38

1-7

C (Curb Mix)

100
92-100
70-75
50-60
28-36
15-20
7-9

1A production tolerance of 1% will be applied to this sieve regardless of the number of tests in the lot.

Table II-14 – Mix Design Criteria is replaced with the following:

TABLE II-14

Mix Design Criteria

Mix Type
VTM (%)

Production

VFA

Design

VFA (%)

Production

Min. VMA Fines/Asphalt Ratio

No. of Gyrations N Design

SM4.75A 2, 4
3.0-6.0
70-75
70-80
16.5
1.0-2.0
50
SM4.75D 2, 4
3.0-6.0
70-75
70-80
16.5
1.0-2.0
50
SM4.75E 2, 4
3.0-6.0
70-75
70-80
16.5
1.0-2.0
50
SM-9.0A 1,2
2.0-5.0
75-80
70-85
17.0
0.6-1.3
50
SM-9.0D 1,2
2.0-5.0
75-80
70-85
17.0
0.6-1.3
50
SM-9.0E 1,2
2.0-5.0
75-80
70-85
17.0
0.6-1.3
50
SM-9.5A 1,2
2.0-5.0
75-80
70-85
16.0
0.7-1.3
50
SM-9.5D 1,2
2.0-5.0
75-80
70-85
16.0
0.7-1.3
50
SM-9.5E 1,2
2.0-5.0
75-80
70-85
16.0
0.7-1.3
50
SM-12.5A 1,2
2.0-5.0
73-79
68-84
15.0
0.7-1.3
50
SM-12.5D 1,2
2.0-5.0
73-79
68-84
15.0
0.7-1.3
50
SM-12.5E 1,2
2.0-5.0
73-79
68-84
15.0
0.7-1.3
50
IM-19.0A 1,2
2.0-5.0
69-76
64-83
14.0
0.6-1.3
50
IM-19.0D 1,2
2.0-5.0
69-76
64-83
14.0
0.6-1.3
50
IM-19.0E 1,2
2.0-5.0
69-76
64-83
14.0
0.6-1.3
50
BM-25.0 2,3
0.5-3.5
67-87
67-92
12.0
0.6-1.3
50

1Binder content should be selected at 4.0% air voids for A and D mixes, 3.5% air voids for E mix.

2Fines-asphalt ratio is based on effective bindercontent.

3Base mix shall be designed at 2.0% air voids. BM-25.0shall have a minimum binder content of 4.6% unless otherwise approved by the Engineer.

4 Binder content shall be selected at 5.0 percent air voids.

Table II-14A- Recommended Performance Grade of Asphalt Cement is replaced with the following:

TABLE II-14A

Recommended Performance Grade of Asphalt Cement

Mix Type
Percentage of Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement (RAP) in Mix
%RAP 25.0%
25.0% < %RAP ≤ 30%
25.0% < %RAP ≤ 35%
SM-4.75A, SM-9.0A, SM-9.5A, SM-12.5A
PG 64S-22
PG 64S-22
SM-4.75D, SM-9.0D, SM-9.5D, SM-12.5D
PG 64H-22
PG 64S-22
IM-19.0A
PG 64S-22
PG 64S-22
IM-19.0D
PG 64H-22
PG 64S-22
BM-25.0
PG 64H-22

PG 64S-22

211.02—Materials (h)- is replaced with the following

(h) An antistripping additive shall be used in all asphalt mixes. IAdditives may be hydrated lime or a chemical additive from the Materials Division Approved List No. 7 or a combination of both. When using an approved chemical additive, it shall be added at a rate of not less than 0.30 percent by weight of the total asphalt content of the mixture unless otherwise indicated on the Department’s Approved List No. 7.

211.02—Materials (m)- is replaced with the following

(m) Warm Mix Asphalt (WMA) additives or processes shall be approved by the Department prior to use and shall be obtained from the Department’s ApprovedList No. 66. When using an approved chemical additive, it shall be added at a rate of not less than 0.50 percent by weight of the total asphalt content of the mixture unless otherwise indicated on the Department’s ApprovedList No.66.

Section 211.03(d)8 – For surface mixes is replaced with the following:

For surface mixes, permeability test data shall be submitted in accordance with VTM-120 using either single point verification or the regression method for each surface mix having a different gradation. The specimen height shall be one inch for SM-4.75 mix types. If the average of the permeability results from the single point verification method exceeds 150 x 10-5 cm/sec, or if the regression method predicts a permeability exceeding 150 x 10-5 cm/sec at 7.5% voids, the Contractor shall redesign the mixture to produce a permeability number less than 150 x 10-5 cm/sec.

Section 211.04(a) – Types SM-9.0A, SM-9.0D, SM-9.0E, SM-9.5A, SM-9.5D, SM-9.5E, SM-12.5A, SM-12.5D, and SM-12.5E asphalt concrete is renamed Types SM-4.75A, SM-4.75D, SM-4.75E, SM-9.0A, SM-9.0D, SM-9.0E, SM-9.5A, SM-9.5D, SM-9.5E, SM-12.5A, SM-12.5D, and SM-12.5E asphalt concrete and replaced with the following:

Types SM-4.75A, SM-4.75D, SM-4.75E, SM-9.0A, SM-9.0D, SM-9.0E, SM-9.5A, SM-9.5D, SM-9.5E, SM-12.5A, SM-12.5D, and SM-12.5E asphalt concrete shall consist of crushed stone, crushed slag, or crushed gravel and fine aggregate; slag or stone screenings; or a combination thereof combined with asphalt binder.

For all surface mixes, except where otherwise noted, no more than 5% of the aggregate retained on the No. 4 sieve and no more than 20% of the total aggregate may be polish-susceptible. At the discretion of the Engineer, SM-9.5AL or SM-12.5AL may be specified and polish susceptible aggregates may be used (without percentage limits).

Unless Type C (curb mix) is specified in the Contract, SM-9.0, SM-9.5, and SM-12.5 mix types are acceptable for use in the construction of asphalt curbing.

Section 211.04(e) – Type SM-9.5, SM-12.5, IM-19.0 and BM-25.0 asphalt concrete is renamed Type SM-4.75, SM-9.5, SM-12.5, IM-19.0 and BM-25.0 asphalt concrete and amended to replace the first paragraph with the following:

Type SM-4.75, SM-9.0, SM-9.5, SM-12.5, IM-19.0 and BM-25.0 asphalt concrete may be designated E (polymer modified), or stabilized (S). Asphalt concrete mixtures with the E designation may not be stabilized.

Table II-15 – Process Tolerance is replaced with the following:

TABLE II-15

Process Tolerance

Tolerance on Each Laboratory Sieve and Binder Content: Percent Plus and Minus

No. Tests
Top Size1
1 ½”
1”
¾”
½”
3/8”
No. 4
No. 8
No. 16
No. 30
No. 50
No. 200
A.C.
1
0.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
6.0
5.0
2.0
.60
2
0.0
5.7
5.7
5.7
5.7
5.7
5.7
5.7
5.7
4.3
3.6
1.4
0.43
3
0.0
4.4
4.4
4.4
4.4
4.4
4.4
4.4
4.4
3.3
2.8
1.1
0.33
4
0.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
3.0
2.5
1.0
0.30
5
0.0
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.6
2.7
2.2
0.9
0.27
6
0.0
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
2.4
2.0
0.8
0.24
7
0.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
2.3
1.9
0.8
0.23
8
0.0
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.1
1.8
0.7
0.21
12
0.0
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
1.7
1.4
0.6
0.17

1Defined as the sieve that has 100% passing as defined in Table II-13.

Section 211.08 – Acceptance is amended by replacing the sixth paragraph with the following:

Binder content will be measured as extractable binder or weight after ignition. The Contractor shall submit a copy of burn tickets from an ignition oven to the Engineer and all the original tickets shall be available upon Engineer’s request. The Engineer shall be notified within 24 hours from testing of a report edit if the date and time on a ticket do not match information submitted in PLAID.Original tickets shall be maintained on file by the Contractor for a period of 5 years or until final acceptance of the applicable contract, whichever is greater.

Section 211.09 – Adjustment System is amended by replacing the first paragraph and following table with the following:

If a lot of material does not conform to the acceptance requirements of Section 211.08, the Department will determine adjustment points as follows:

Adjustment Points for Each 1% the Gradation Is Outside the Process Tolerance Permitted In Table II-15

Sieve Size
(Applied in 0.1% increments)
1 1/2 in
1
1 in
1
3/4 in
1
1/2 in
1
3/8 in
1
No. 4
1
No. 8
1
No. 16
1
No. 30
2
No. 50
2
No. 200
3

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .