StatementofWork.pdf

24 January, 2019

STATEMENT OF WORK

for

F-15 Aircraft Intermediate Shop (AIS)

NSN : 6625-01-344-4544

Buy PR # FD2060-19-00160

NSN Part # Noun 6625-01-344-4544 1993125-6 Servo Command Generator Drawer

1.0 SCOPE:

This Statement of Work (SOW) defines the tasks, supports, and technical requirements for the procurement of quantity of two (2) NSN 6625-01-344-4544 P/N 1993125-6. This NSN is a drawer in the Aircraft Radar Test Station, AN/GSM-345, which is a part of the F-15 Avionics Intermediate Shop (AIS) Test Equipment. This is one of 13 drawers in the 2-bay test equipment.

This NSN generates servo sensor command signals for controlling three servo loops (Azimuth, Elevation, Roll) of the Unit Under Test (UUT).

1.1 Background

The F-15 AIS Test Equipment was developed in the early 1980s to provide depot and field level support to the highly complex F-15 avionics and radar line replaceable units (LRUs) and shop replaceable units (SRUs). The F-15 AIS was originally designed/developed by Honeywell International, Incorporated over thirty (30) years ago using 1980's parts and technology.

2.0 REQUIREMENTS:

The new item shall provide Key Performance Parameters (KPPs) and capabilities all the tasks of the existing item as stated in section 1.0.

3.0 COUNTERFEIT PREVENTION PLAN (CPP):

Contractors that supply electronic parts or systems that contain electronic parts shall establish policies and procedures to avoid, detect, mitigate and dispose of counterfeit electronic parts to prevent such parts from entering the USAF/DoD supply chain. These policies and procedures shall be documented in a CPP for submission and approval in accordance with Data Item Description (DID) DI-MISC-81832 and accomplished for all specified contract items.

DI-MISC-81832 is applicable to Parts, Material and Processes Selection (PMPS) associated with delivery of systems and assemblies to the USAF and DoD. The requirements established by DI- MISC-81832 also apply to electronics components procured in sustainment of such systems and assemblies. The requirements of the recently DoD-adopted SAE AS 5553A, Fraudulent/Counterfeit Electronics Parts; Avoidance, Detection, Mitigation, and Disposition shall also apply. [CDRL A001, DI-MISC-81832, Counterfeit Prevention Plan]

3.1 At a Minimum, the CPP shall address:

3.1.1 Applicability. The Contractor shall identify all Business locations and programs to which the CPP and programs to which the CPP applies. The CPP shall address materials, hardware, electronic parts, and procured assemblies.

3.1.2 Definitions. The Contractor shall utilize definitions per AS 5553 to ensure consistency.

Any contractor-derived definitions must be included in an appropriate CPP appendix or annex.

(Ref. AS5553, paragraph 3, 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, appendix H)

3.1.3 Parts Availability and Use of Parts Brokers. The Contractor shall not procure materials, systems, assemblies, subassemblies or parts from parts Brokers when available from Original Manufacturers (OM) or their Authorized Distributors. In cases where materials, systems, assemblies, subassemblies or parts are no longer available from the OM or their Authorized Distributors, procurement from Brokers may be authorized as defined by the Contractor’s policy and their CPP. (Ref. AS5553, paragraph 4.1.1, 4.1.2.e., appendix A)

3.1.4 Procurement Policies. The Contractor shall provide and implement policy directing development and implementation of business practices and procedures, and processes to prevent procurement of Counterfeit materials and parts. The Contractor shall identify the appropriate office(s), business units, functional organizations, and programs, who shall have responsibility for development, maintenance and implementation of the CPP. The CPP shall identify the specific roles and responsibility for each. (Ref. AS5553, paragraph 4.1.2, 4.1.3, appendix B, C, D)

3.1.5 Risk Assessment. The contract shall address the risk of using unknown sources and or unauthorized suppliers in the CPP. Application or technical risk assessments shall establish the effect that counterfeit parts may have on performance. Vendor or source of supply risk assessments shall establish the potential for obtaining counterfeit parts. Using any risk analysis tool acceptable to the Government, the Contractor shall conduct a risk assessment based upon item characteristics and how likely it is that a counterfeit part will be received. The contractor shall identify and describe in the CPP how parts are selected for assessment and what risk is acceptable based upon the parts design, construction, material and functional requirements. As a minimum, analysis shall be completed for flagging high risk items, such as items that are obsolete, discontinued, rare, etc. The contractor shall require completion of a trade study, documented within the CPP, that shall facilitate determining whether 100% testing of parts procured from after-market sources is more cost effective than qualification or requalification of a manufacturer. (Ref. AS5553, paragraph 4.1.2, 4.1.3, appendix B, C, D)

3.1.6 Detection and Avoidance Responsibilities. The Contractor shall establish processes for the review and approval of contractor and applicable subcontractor systems for the detection and avoidance of counterfeit electronic parts and suspect counterfeit electronic parts, which processes shall be comparable to the processes established for contractor business systems under section 893 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4311; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note). The Contractor shall flow down such requirements and processes to their subcontractors per ODASD Memo titled “Overarching DoD Counterfeit Prevention Guidance”, dated 16 March 2012. (Ref. AS5553, paragraph 4.1.4, 4.1.5, appendix E)

3.1.7 Testing and Verification. The Contractor shall establish and accomplish testing and verification processes for items not received from an original equipment manufacturer, original component manufacturer, or authorized distributor that are identified as having high risk for counterfeit potential. These processes apply to prime contracts, and to subcontracts or suppliers below the prime contracts. The Contractor shall provide a list of acceptable test facilities if the subcontractor or supplier does not have the capability to perform required testing. Submittal of Certificates of Compliance indicating the parts are not counterfeit shall be acceptable for verification of testing. (Ref. AS5553, paragraph 4.1.4, appendix E)

3.1.8 Configuration Identification and Traceability. The Contractor shall identify and control the configurations of all systems, assemblies, subassemblies and parts, and enable mechanisms to provide traceability of parts. The Contractor shall report to the Government when control of the configurations of all systems, assemblies, subassemblies and parts, and mechanisms to provide traceability of parts are not possible. The Contractor shall identify the specific systems, assemblies, subassemblies and parts beyond the Contractors’ control. The Contractor shall be responsible for detecting and avoiding the use or inclusion of counterfeit materials and parts, to include procured assemblies and subassemblies, in such products and shall be responsible for the rework or corrective action that may be required to resolve the use or inclusion of counterfeit materials and parts. The cost of counterfeit electronic parts and suspect counterfeit electronic parts and the cost of rework or corrective action that may be required to remedy the use or inclusion of such parts are not allowable costs under Department contracts , unless: a) the contractor has established a counterfeit avoidance/detection system approved by the DoD, b) the counterfeit parts were procured from a DoD-accredited trusted supplier or provided as government property, and c) the contractor has provide timely notification to the government.

(Ref. AS5553, paragraph 4.1.6, appendix F)

3.1.9 Counterfeit Notification and Reporting. The Contractor shall report in writing to the Procuring Activity within 30 days of determining any end item, component, part, or material contained in supplies purchased by the Department of Defense, or purchased by a contractor or subcontractor for delivery to, or on behalf of, the Department, contains counterfeit electronic parts or suspect counterfeit electronic parts for the purpose of investigation and notification of the Air Force Office of Special Investigations (AFOSI).

The Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO) shall coordinate reporting to the appropriate Program Management/Item Management, System Engineering Management, the AFMC Discrepant Materiel Reporting Program (DMRP) Office in 406 SCMS/GULA, and the AFOSI. Additionally, the Contractor shall within the same 30 day period ensure all suspected or confirmed counterfeit items are entered into the Government-Industry Data Exchange Program (GIDEP) system, which will serve as the DoD central reporting repository. (Ref. AS5553, paragraph 4.1.7, appendix G)

3.1.10 Counterfeit Prevention Training. The Contractor shall provide appropriate training and shall require all personnel working procurement within their company, to include at a minimum their supply chain management specialists, receiving inspectors, and engineers, to complete said training. The Contractor shall determine the appropriate training required. Training may be developed in-house or may be other Industry accepted training. The CPP shall describe and list the training provided by the contractor to their personnel.

4.0 Item Unique Identification: (IUID)

4.1.1 The IUID Program requires each qualifying Air Force (AF) asset to be uniquely identified with a permanent marking that can sustain its information throughout the life of the asset. The program addresses two categories of assets—those already in the AF inventory and those currently under contract but not currently in the AF inventory. For assets under contract, IUID requirements are specified in Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) 252-211.7003, Item Identification and Valuation and Department of Defense (DoD) 4100.39-M, Federal Logistics Information System (FLIS).

4.1.2 IUID Marking Plan. The Contractor’s IUID Marking Plan shall fully detail and document the strategy and scope to be used to meet MIL-STD-130, DoD Standard Practice Identification Marking of US Military Property. The plan must be approved by 410 SCMS/GUEA engineer (Reference address in Block 14 of CDRL) prior to implementation. (CDRL A002, DI-MGMT- 81803, Item Unique Identification (IUID) Marking Plan).