AMENDMENT SPRTA122R0268-0001.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE Page 1

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO.

SPRTA1-22-R-0268-0001

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

26 JAN 2022

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

FD20302200268ADV

5. PROJECT NO (If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE

DLA AVIATION AT OKLAHOMA CITY, OK

DLR PROCUREMENT OPERATIONS (AO)

3001 STAFF DRIVE

TINKER AFB OK 73145-3070

BUYER: Kevin Howe/DLA-AOAA kevin.howe.1@us.af.mil Phone: (405) 734- 8108

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6) CODESPRTA1

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code)

CODE

X

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

SPRTA122R0268

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

1-NOV-2021

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended. Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods. ( a ) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; ( b ) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or ( c ) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified. 25-FEB-2022 4:00 PM

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return 1 copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Solicitation Amendment purpose:

1. Revise Sections L & M

2. Extend closing date

SEE FOLLOWING PAGES FOR FULL DESCRIPTION OF CHANGES

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

BY ________________________________________________________

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

BY ____________________________________________________

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. DATE SIGNED

FACILITY CODE

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

PREVIOUS EDITION UNUSABLE

30-105 STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

PRESCRIBED BY GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

X

X X

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

SPRTA1-22-R-0268-0001

Continuation of block 14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION

The purpose of this Amendment is to to update Sections L & M of subject Solicitation SPRTA122R0268. The original Sections L & M are now removed and replaced with the below versions in accordance with DLA Aviation at Oklahoma City policy. As a result of this change, the closing date of the Solicitation is hereby extended to 25 February 2022. All other terms and conditions remain unchanged from the original Solicitation.

SECTION L

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS (ITO) AND INSTRUCTIONS FOR PROPOSAL PREPARATION

USING BEST VALUE PROCESS, PERFORMANCE PRICE TRADEOFF (PPT) SOURCE SELECTION

PROCEDURES (WITH SMALL BUSINESS PARTICIPATION FACTOR)

General Instructions

Instructions to the Offerors (ITO):

This section of the ITO provides general guidance for preparing proposals as well as specific instructions on the format and content of the proposal. The offeror’s proposal must include all data and information requested by the ITO and must be submitted in accordance with these instructions. The offeror shall be compliant with the requirements as stated in the Solicitation and the attachments of the solicitation. Non-conformance with the instructions provided in the ITO may result in an unfavorable proposal evaluation.

Include Sufficient Detail:

The proposal shall be clear, concise, and shall include sufficient detail for effective evaluation and for substantiating the validity of stated claims. The proposal should not simply rephrase or restate the Government’s requirements. Offeror shall assume that the Government has no prior knowledge of their facilities and experience, and will base its evaluation on the information presented in the offeror’s proposal.

Embellishment Not Desired:

Elaborate brochures or documentation, binding, detailed artwork, or other embellishments are unnecessary and are not desired.

Proposal Acceptance and Validity Dates:

The proposal acceptance period is specified in Section A of the solicitation. The offer shall make a clear statement in Section A of the proposal documentation that the proposal is valid for at least the number of days identified in Section A, starting from the closing date of the solicitation.

Disposition of Proposals:

In accordance with FAR Subpart 4.803(a)(10) (Contents of Contract Files), the Government will retain one copy of all unsuccessful proposals. Unless the offeror requests otherwise, the Government will destroy extra copies of such unsuccessful proposals.

Electronic Reference Documents All referenced documents for this solicitation are available on the Beta Sam Website under Contract Opportunities (formerly FedBizOpps) at https://.sam.gov/, unless indicated otherwise. Potential Offerors are encouraged to subscribe for real-time e-mail notifications when information has been posted to the website for this solicitation.

Amendments to Solicitation If this RFP is amended, all terms and conditions that are not amended remain unchanged and in full force and effect. Offerors shall acknowledge receipt of any amendment and provide confirmation upon submission of the offeror’s proposal.

General Information

Point of Contact:

The Buyer identified in Block 5b is the sole point of contact for this acquisition. Address any questions or concerns you may have to the buyer. Written requests for clarification may be sent to the buyer at the address located in Section A of the solicitation.

Amendment/Modification SPRTA1-22-R-0268-0001

Discrepancies:

If an offeror believes that the requirements in these instructions contain an error, omission, or are otherwise unsound, the offeror shall immediately notify the buyer in writing with supporting rationale. The offeror is reminded that the Government reserves the right to award this effort based on the initial proposal, as received, without discussions.

Electronic Offers:

Proposals may be emailed to kevin.howe.1@us.af.mil by the closing date.

Technical Proposal Offerors shall bid IAW requirements in Section B. Your responses to the factors will be evaluated in accordance with Section M of the solicitation. All the requirements specified in the solicitation are mandatory.

FACTOR 1 - Technical Formal technical proposals are not required. Offers shall propose IAW requirement in Section B and all attachments herein. Your proposal will be evaluated in accordance with Section M of the solicitation. All the requirements specified in the solicitation are mandatory.

FACTOR 2 - Price Completion of the RFP, Section B Schedule will represent the price proposal.

FACTOR 3 – Past Performance The offeror is not required to provide Past Performance information. Past performance information will be determined primarily based on the offeror’s “Supplier Risk Score” in the Supplier Performance Risk System (SPRS) at the time of the close of the solicitation period. Past performance may also be obtained through the contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), similarly systems of other Government departments and agencies (MOCAS, etc), questionnaires tailored to the circumstances of this acquisition, Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) channels, interviews with program managers and contracting officers, and other sources known to the Government, including commercial sources.

FACTOR 4 - Small Business Participation Information The offeror shall submit a Small Business Participation Plan. The Small Business Participation Plan is required from all offerors, including small businesses and companies with Master, Individual, commercial subcontracting plans and/or comprehensive subcontracting plans. The offeror shall include only the first tier of subcontractors for this effort. Offerors are advised that the Small Business Participation Plan is not the same as the Small Business Subcontracting Plan required by FAR 52.219-9. Large business offerors shall not utilize the Small Business Subcontracting Plan in the place of the Small Business Participation Plan.

The Small Business Participation Plan shall address (1) the extent of participation of proposed Small Businesses when subcontracting possibilities exist to include the (2) description of the subcontracted work these proposed firms are to perform, (3) the company names/CAGE codes planned for use in the performance of this resultant contract along with the (4) associated goals to include service-disabled veteran-owned small business concerns, HUBZone small business concerns, small disadvantaged business concerns, and women-owned small business concerns (5) expressed in terms of percentages of both the total planned subcontracted dollars and total contract dollars.

If limited or no subcontracting possibilities exist for these socio-economic entities, provide rationale for such.

Offerors are cautioned against only acknowledging a goal is not met, if applicable. Rather, adequate rationale includes specific reasons why a goal is unmet and any actions being taken to increase any unmet goals.

Additionally, if the offeror is a small business concern, it should include the work it will be performing when calculating the goals for your Small Business participation information.

When an evaluation assesses the extent that small businesses are specifically identified in proposals, the small businesses considered in the evaluation shall be listed in any subcontracting plan submitted pursuant to FAR 52.219-9 to facilitate compliance with 252.219-7003(e).

Contract Documentation The purpose of this section is to provide information to the Government for preparing the contract document and supporting file. The offeror’s proposal shall include a signed copy of the solicitation, and Sections A through K. This includes:

Section A – Solicitation/Contract Form Completion of blocks 12, 13, 14, 15, and 27, with name, title, and date included in block 27 of the SF 1447 is required. Signature by the offeror on the SF 1447 constitutes an offer which the Government may accept.

Section B – Supplies or Services and Costs/Prices All pricing information shall be addressed in Section B – The Schedule of the solicitation. Information shall be limited to Contract Line Item Number (CLIN), Sub-CLIN or ELIN level pricing, including unit and extended pricing as specified in Section B.

Section C – Description/Specifications/Statement of Work

Section D – Packaging and Marking

Section E – Inspection and Acceptance Complete Inspection and Acceptance address.

Section F – Deliveries or Performance Complete F.O.B. Origin Clause IAW FAR 47.305(b).

Section G – Contract Administration Data Complete Activity Address Clause.

If applicable, annotate remittance address within proposal.

Section H – Special Contract Requirements Not applicable

Section I – Contract Clauses

Section J – Attachments Small Business Subcontracting Plan (if required in accordance with the solicitation)

Section K – Representation, Certifications, and Other Statement of Offeror’s Completed representations, certifications, acknowledgements and statements.

Exceptions to Terms and Conditions Exceptions taken to terms and conditions of this prospective contract, to any of its formal attachments or to other parts of the solicitation shall be identified. Each exception shall be specifically related to each paragraph and/or specific part of the solicitation to which exception is taken. Provide rationale in support of the exception and fully explain its impact, if any, on the performance, schedule, cost and specific requirements of the solicitation. This information shall be provided in the format shown below. Failure to comply with the terms and conditions of the solicitation may result in the offeror being removed from consideration for award.

Table 1 - Solicitation Exceptions

Solicitation Document Paragraph/Page

Requirement/ Portion Rationale

Model Contract, ITO, etc. Applicable Page and Paragraph Numbers

Identify the requirement or portion to which exception is taken

Justify why the requirement will not be met

Other Information Required

Authorized Offeror Personnel Provide the name, title, and telephone number of the company/division point of contact regarding decisions made with respect to your proposal and who can obligate your company contractually. Also, identify those individuals authorized to negotiate with the Government.

Person(s) that can obligate your company:

Name: _____________________________ Title: ______________________________ Telephone: __________________________

Person(s) authorized to negotiate with the Government:

Name: ______________________________ Title: _______________________________ Telephone: __________________________

Government Offices Provide the mailing address, telephone and fax numbers and facility codes for the cognizant Contract Administration Office, DCAA, and Government Paying Office. Also, provide the name and telephone and fax number for the Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO).

Company/Division address, Identifying Codes, and Applicable and Designations Provide company/division’s street address, county and facility code; CAGE code; DUNS code; size of business (large or small); and labor surplus area designation. This same information must be provided if the work for this contract will be performed at any other location(s). List all locations where work is to be performed and indicate whether such facility is a division, affiliate, or subcontractor, and the percentage of work to be performed at each location.

SECTION M

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD USING BEST VALUE PROCESS, PERFORMANCE PRICE

TRADEOFF (PPT) SOURCE SELECTION PROCEDURES (WITH SMALL BUSINESS PARTICIPATION

FACTOR)

A. Basis for Contract Award This acquisition will utilize the Best Value Process, Performance price Tradeoff source selection procedures in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 15.101-1, as supplemented, to make an assessment for a best value award decision. Tradeoffs will be made only between price and past performance among those offerors who have been determined technically acceptable. Award will be made to the offeror who is deemed responsible in accordance with FAR Part 15.101, as supplemented, whose proposal conforms to the solicitation requirements and is judged, based on the evaluation factors, to represent the best value to the Government. The Government seeks to award to the offeror who gives the Defense Logistics Agency the greatest confidence that it will best meet the requirements affordably. This may result in an award to a higher rated, higher priced offeror, where the decision is consistent with the evaluation factors and the Source Selection Authority (SSA) reasonably determined that the technical acceptable, superior past performance of the higher price offeror outweighs the cost difference. While the Government source selection evaluation team and the SSA will strive for maximum objectivity, the source selection process, by its nature, is subjective and, therefore, professional judgement is implicit throughout the entire process. The Government intends to award without discussions/reserves the right to award without discussions. Therefore, each initial offer should contain the offeror’s best terms from a price and technical standpoint. However, the Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if determined necessary by the Contracting Officer.

B. Number of Contracts to be Awarded The Government intends to select one contractor for the program. However, the Government reserves the right to award no contract at all, depending on the quality of the proposals and prices submitted and the availability of funds.

C. Rejection of Unrealistic Offers The Government may reject any proposal that is evaluated to be unrealistic in terms of program commitments, including contract terms and conditions, or unrealistically high or low in cost/price when compared to Government estimates, such that the proposal is deemed to reflect an inherent lack of competence or failure to comprehend the complexity and risks of the program.

D. Correction Potential of Proposals The Government will consider, throughout the evaluation, the “correction potential” of any deficiency or proposal inadequacy. The judgment of such “correction potential” is within the sole discretion of the Government. If an aspect of an offeror’s proposal not meeting the Government’s requirements is not considered correctable, the offeror may be eliminated from the competitive range.

PRE-AWARD SURVEY

The Government may conduct a pre-award survey (PAS) as part of this source selection. Results of the PAS (if conducted) will be evaluated to determine each offeror’s capability to meet the requirements of the solicitation.

PLANT VISITS

In the event discussions are necessary, plant visits may be conducted during the evaluation phase to develop knowledge for judging the potential for correction of the deficiencies.

SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS, TERMS AND CONDITIONS

Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements; such as terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as factors, subfactors to be eligible for award. Any aspect of the proposal judged to be unacceptable would render the entire proposal unacceptable.

Failure to comply with the terms and conditions of the solicitation may result in the offeror being removed from consideration for award. Any exceptions to the solicitation’s terms and conditions must be fully explained and justified.

EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR AWARD

(IAW FAR 13.106-2(b), 14.201-5(c), and 15.204-5(c))

For the purposes of award, offers will be evaluated for acceptability of evaluation factors described below:

FACTOR 1: Technical FACTOR 2: Cost/Price FACTOR 3: Past Performance FACTOR 4: Small Business Participation

a. Order of Importance For this solicitation, technical and small business participation acceptability is a prerequisite to the best value analysis and potential trade-off between Price and Past Performance. The Order of importance is used to explain how the other factors will be traded off on technically acceptable proposals.

For all technically and small business participation acceptable proposals, Factor 2 (Cost/Price) will be evaluated on a basis approximately equal to Factor 3 (Past Performance). Tradeoffs may only be made between price and past performance among those offerors who have been determined technically acceptable.

b. Evaluation Methodology All proposals will first be evaluated for technical and small business plan acceptability. Second, price will be evaluated. Concurrent with the price evaluation, past performance will be evaluated. A decision will then be made as to which proposal provides the best value to the Government.

c. Technical Factor

(1) Technical proposals are not required. Technical acceptability will be determined based on the offerors compliance with the requirement as stated in Section B Schedule and/or any referenced specifications, engineering notes and all other attachments herein.

(2) The delivery schedule will be evaluated based on the dates established in Section B of the solicitation. It should be noted that the Government’s required delivery is based on the Requirements’ need date, and may not be attainable. Therefore, if a proposed delivery does not meet the Government’s required delivery, the proposed delivery may be considered responsive.

Technical acceptability will be ascertained based on one of the ratings described below. Proposals will be evaluated for compliance with solicitation; receipt of a responsive proposal to deliver the supplies in accordance with the solicitation and all other attachments herein.

Acceptable – The proposal meets specified minimum requirements necessary for acceptable contract performance.

Unacceptable – The proposal fails to meet specified minimum requirements necessary for contract performance. Proposals with an unacceptable rating are not awardable.

d. Cost/Price Factor (IAW 5315.305(a)(1))

(1) The offeror’s cost/price proposal will be evaluated for award purposes by multiplying the proposed unit price by the total quantity. The quantity utilized for evaluation will be based on the firm quantity incorporated in Schedule B.

(2) Unrealistically low proposed costs or prices, initially or subsequently, may be grounds for eliminating a proposal from competition either on the bases that the offeror does not understand the requirement or the offeror has made an unrealistic proposal.

(3) Offerors are cautioned against submitting an offer that contains unbalanced pricing. Unbalanced pricing may increase performance risk and could result in payment or unreasonably high prices. Unbalanced pricing exists when, despite an acceptable total evaluated price, the price of one or more contract line items is significantly over or understated as indicated by the application of cost or price analysis techniques. The Government shall analyze offers to determine whether they are unbalanced with respect to separately priced line items or subline items. Offers that are determine to be unbalanced may be rejected if the contracting officer determines that the lack of balance poses an unacceptable risk to the government.

(4) Cost/price proposals submitted by vendors shall be evaluated by multiplying the proposed unit price by the quantity desired by the Government to determine the contractor’s total price.

Proposals will be evaluated as follows:

The contractor’s proposal for the firm quantity under CLIN 0001 is the price factor that will be used in evaluation. Evaluation of award will be based on the proposed unit price multiplied by the required quantity.

(5) If incidental or miscellaneous expenses not related to specific CLIN structure accompany vendor proposals, these charges shall be added to the total CLIN cost/price to reach the final total cost/price proposed to the Government. In addition ‘Price Analysis’ shall be conducted in accordance with FAR 15.404-1, to determine ‘Reasonableness’ on all offers submitted by vendors.

*Unrealistically low costs/prices proposed either initially or subsequently may be grounds for elimination of an offer from the competition and shall be based upon the vendor not understanding requirements or because an unrealistic proposal was submitted.

e. Past Performance Factor The Past Performance Evaluation is accomplished by reviewing aspects of an offeror's (1) relevant past performance and (2) recent past performance, focusing on and targeting performance, which is relevant to the technical requirement. In determining relevance, consideration will be given to the likeliness and similarity of the effort to include contract scope, contract type, and contract schedule. This information may include data on parts manufactured by other divisions, critical subcontractors, or teaming contractors, if such resources significantly influence the proposed requirement. The Government may consider relevant work as those performed for agencies of the federal, state, or local governments and commercial customers. Where relevant performance record indicates performance problems, the Government will consider the number and severity of the problems and the appropriateness and effectiveness of any corrective actions taken (not just planned or promised). The Government may review more recent contracts or performance evaluations to ensure corrective actions have been implemented and to evaluate their effectiveness.

The Government will evaluate the offeror's past performance by reviewing the offeror’s record of supplying products that comply with contract requirements, including cost and schedule. Under the Past Performance factor, a Performance Confidence Assessment Rating represents the evaluation of an offeror's present and past work record to assess the Government’s confidence in the offeror's probability of successfully performing as proposed.

The offeror is not required to provide Past Performance information. Past performance information will be determined primarily based on the offeror’s “Supplier Risk Score” in the Supplier Performance Risk System (SPRS) at the time of the close of the solicitation period. Past performance may also be obtained through the contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), similarly systems of other Government departments and agencies (MOCAS, etc), questionnaires tailored to the circumstances of this acquisition, Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) channels, interviews with program managers and contracting officers, and other sources known to the Government, including commercial sources.

Each offeror will receive an integrated Performance Confidence Assessment rating, which is the rating for the Past Performance factor. Although the past performance evaluation focuses on performance that is recent and relevant to the technical requirement, the resulting Performance Confidence Assessment is made at the factor level and represents an overall evaluation of contractor performance. The Past Performance factor will receive one of the following performance confidence assessment ratings IAW the Department of Defense (DoD) Source Selection Procedures.

Rating Description

SATISFACTORY

CONFIDENCE

Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

NEUTRAL

CONFIDENCE

No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. The offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance.

LIMITED CONFIDENCE

Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

NO CONFIDENCE

Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Note: With regards to the best value award decision, all offerors receiving the same past performance rating will be considered equal for the Past Performance Factor.

Offerors without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance and, as a result, will receive a "Neutral confidence" rating for the Past Performance factor. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, a neutral rating shall be considered “acceptable.”

Offerors with adverse past performance information to which they have not previously had an opportunity to respond will be given the opportunity to provide clarifications concerning the adverse information.

f. Small Business Participation Factor

All offerors, including small businesses, must submit a Small Business Participation Plan. Each offer will be determined acceptable for this factor if the Small Business Participation Plan is determined adequate in accordance with the descriptions below. Only those Plans determined to be acceptable, either initially, or as a result of discussions, will be considered for award. Each offeror will receive one of the Small Business Participation Plan ratings below:

Acceptable - Proposal indicates an adequate approach and understanding of small business objectives.

Unacceptable - Proposal does not meet small business objectives.

The evaluation will consider whether the Small Business Participation Plan adequately reflects an approach and understanding of the following small business objectives to include (1) the extent of participation of proposed Small Businesses when subcontracting possibilities exist to include the (2) description of the subcontracted work these proposed firms are to perform, (3) the company names/CAGE codes planned for use in the performance of this resultant contract along with the (4) associated goals to include service-disabled veteran-owned small business concerns, HUBZone small business concerns, small disadvantaged business concerns, and women-owned small business concerns (5) expressed in terms of percentages of both the total planned subcontracted dollars and total contract dollars.

E. Discussions It is the Government’s intent to award without discussions, therefore, it is imperative that offeror’s submit their best terms initially. However, if during the evaluation period, it is determined to be in the best interest of the Government to hold discussions, offeror responses to Evaluation Notices (ENs), and the Final Proposal Revisions (FPRs) will be considered in making the source selection decision.