AVN_S53_-_1700147_(002)_Redacted.pdf

JUSTIFICATION FOR OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

FOR SOLE SOURCE AND LIMITED COMPETITION

1. Agency: Contracting Activity:

Document Identification Number Solicitation Number:

FAR 15 FAR 12 FAR 13.5

2. The action being approved is the acquisition of supplies/services on other than a full and open competition basis.

Amendment:

NSN/PN ESTIMATEDVALUE

*If too numerous, attach list of NSNs and AMSC codes.

This Acquisition:

Type of Contract (may include number of base years) Base Year(s)

Will not include an option.

will include_____option for increased quantity. Total estimated dollar value of option quantity is $________________.

will include an option to extend the term of the contract for a period of_______months, exercisable in increments of_______months. Total estimated dollar value of all option periods is $

The total estimated dollar value of this acquisition is: (inclusive of any options) $

4. The statutory authority permitting other than full and open competition is 10 U.S.C. 2304(c)(1) – Available from only one or limited number of sources.

5. The acquisition is restricted to the only source(s) of supply known to have the capability of furnishing the required supplies/services. Source(s) are:

CAGE COMPANY NAME

The supplies/services

USAF DLA Aviation at Oklahoma City

FD20301700147 SPRTA1-17-R-0152

REAR SPOOL 2840-01-486-1845 OK

PN 5126T37P03 44 EA

$ 0.00

$ 0.00

97X4930

Fixed Quantity, Firm Fixed-Price (FFP) N/A

22819 AVIALL SERVICES INC.

The use of authority 10 U.S.C. 2304(c)(1) is based on:

AMC 1. Suitable for competitive acquisition for the second or subsequent time.

AMC 2. Suitable for competitive acquisition for the first time.

AMC 3. Acquire, for the second or subsequent time, directly from the manufacturer.

AMC 4. Acquire, for the first time, directly from the manufacturer.

AMC 5. Acquire directly from the sole source contractor, who is not the manufacturer.

AMSC A. The Government’s right to use data in its possession is questionable. This code is under review and will be updated when the review is complete.

AMSC B. This must be acquired from a manufacturing source(s) specified on a source control drawing.

AMSC C. This part required engineering source approval by the design control activity in order to maintain the quality of the part.

AMSC D. The data needed to acquire this part is not economically available.

AMSC H. The Government does not have sufficient, accurate, or legible data to purchase this part from other than the current source. This code is under review and will be updated when the review is complete.

AMSC K. This part must be produced from class 1 castings under MIL-STD-2175.

AMSC L. The annual buy value of this part falls below the screening threshold established by DoD.

AMSC M. Manufacture of this part requires use of master or coordinated tooling.

AMSC N.

AMSC P.

AMSC Q.

AMSC R.

AMSC S.

AMSC U.

AMSC V.

AMSC Z.

Other:

Manufacture of this part requires special test and/or inspection facilities to maintain function or system integrity The rights to use the data needed to purchase this part from additional source(s) are not owned by the Government and cannot be purchased, developed, or otherwise obtained.

The Government does not have adequate data, lacks rights to data, or both. It is not economical to buy the data or rights to thedata.

The Government does not own the data or rights to the data needed to purchase this part from another source. It is not economical to procure the data or rights to the data Acquisition of this item is restricted to Government approved source(s) because the item involves military sensitive technology.

The cost to the Government to breakout this part and acquire it competitively has been determined to exceed the projected savings over the life span of the part.

This part has been designated a high reliability part. Probability of failure would be unacceptable. The engineering activity has determined that data to define and control reliability limits cannot be obtained.

The design of this part is unstable. Engineering, manufacturing, or performance characteristics indicate that the required design objectives have not been achieved.

This is a "Flight Safety Critical Item (FSCI) that has been designated a high reliability part under a formal reliability program. The safety of personnel and equipment requires high safety and reliability standards that will minimize the probability of failure.

This item is considered a highly specialized component of a major weapon system. This part contains critical characteristics whose failure, malfunction or absence could cause a catastrophic failure resulting in loss or serious damage to the aircraft or cause engine shutdown resulting in an unsafe condition for personnel and the surrounding environment. Accordingly, Aviall Services Inc. is the only source that has specifically and uniquely designed and manufactured this part for use by the military. Aviall has met and exceeded the standards specified for quality and reliability from past productions of this item.

Thus, an award to any other source would result in substantial costs to the Government that are not expected to be recovered through competition and unacceptable delays in fulfilling agency requirements. Therefore, Aviall is the only known source currently possessing the unique capabilities to manufacture this part and who can satisfy the Government's requirement as described above in Section 3.

6. Efforts to ensure that offers are solicited from as many sources as practicable are:

The acquisition will be synopsized on or about_______________and any firm requesting a solicitation copy will be provided one.

A synopsis exception cited in FAR 5.202 applies: (Explain).

Manufacturers of similar products identified in the market survey will be solicited.

Dealers of the manufacturers will be solicited.

Other: (Explain)

7. I hereby determine that the anticipated cost to the Government will be fair and reasonable. (Explain)

8. A market survey as defined by FAR 10:

was conducted, and firms indicating an interest in the acquisition will be solicited. Market research efforts, include.

09-Dec-2016

The Government does not have qualification requirements as only the Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) approves additional sources.

The contracting officer will complete a price analysis. If the proposed dollar amount exceeds the TINA threshold IAW FAR 15.403-4 , certified cost or pricing data will be required and a detailed cost analysis will be accomplished.

Support from the Defense Contract Management Agency or the Defense Contract Audit Agency may be requested as appropriate to aid in evaluating the proposal.

Market research efforts included inquiries of available Air Force data systems such as Haystack, Parts Manufacturer Approvals, Google, and Thomas Register. The market research was accomplished on 29 FEB 2016. This search revealed that there were no commercial items available to meet this requirement. As described above in Section 6, market research in accordance with FAR Part 10 will be conducted by synopsis of the proposed acquisition, advising industry of the pending acquisition, and soliciting inquiries from interested parties.

A Sources Sought Synopsis was also conducted on 28 JUL 2016 and closed on 5 AUG 2016. This posting was created on the Federal Business Opportunities website under the PR number FD2030-17-00147. No vendors indicated interest in the acquisition. Based on this market research, Aviall Services Inc. was found to be the only source able to fulfill the requirement described above in Section 3.

was not conducted due to:

9. Additional facts supporting other than full and open competition are:

Based upon the technical certification on file, technical data is not available and cannot be developed to permit full and open competition. The data presently available reflects the minimum needs of the Government.

When FAR 6.302-1 is cited for follow-on acquisitions as described in 6.302-1(a)(2)(ii), an estimate if the cost to the Government that would be duplicated and how the estimate was derived.

Other:

10. A listing of sources, if any, indicating an interest in writing in the acquisition are: (if none, state none)

CAGE COMPANY NAME

11. The actions, being taken to overcome barriers to competition before any subsequent acquisition are made: (Explain)

This item has been designated a FSCI. Because the risk associated with reverse engineering (i.e. potential damage to engine or aircraft should this item fail during engine operation) outweighs any potential gain or cost savings, the Government considers this item too critical to make reverse engineering feasible.

None

The Government will continue to monitor the marketplace for source development. The Government will continue to synopsize the requirement and re-screen the item.

APPROVAL

APPROVAL LEVELS OF THE JUSTIFICATION – FAR 6.304

Not exceeding $700,000………………………… Contracting Officer

Over $700,000 not exceeding $13,500,000…….. Competition Advocate

TECHNICAL/REQUIREMENTS PERSONNEL CERTIFICATION – FAR 6.302-2(c) Supporting data that is the responsibility of technical or requirements personnel and which form the basis for this justification have been certified as complete and accurate by the cognizant technical/requirements Personnel. .

DLA COUNSEL AVIATION – DLAD 1.691(e)(ii) DLA Counsel Aviation has reviewed this Form S53 and concluded it creates a legally sufficient justification for restricting competition pursuant to 10 U.S.C.

2304(c)(1) and FAR 6.302-1 in acquisitions for NSNs in the federal supply system.

CONTRACTING OFFICER – FAR 6.303-2(b)(12) I hereby certify that the information contained in this justification is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. If not exceeding $700,000, this signature serves as the approval.

Name and Title Signature Phone Date

COMPETITION ADVOCATE – FAR 6.304(a)(2) The Competition Advocate for the procuring activity designated pursuant to FAR 6.501 has reviewed and approved this Justification for a proposed contract over $700,000, but not exceeding $13.5 million.

Name and Title Signature Phone Date

SHIRAZI.LYNDS

EY.G.

Digitally signed by

SHIRAZI.LYNDSEY.G.

DN: c=US, o=U.S. Government, ou=DoD, ou=PKI, ou=DLA, cn=SHIRAZI.LYNDSEY.G Date: 2016.12.01 14:19:40 -06'00'Lyndsey Shirazi Contracting Officer 01-Dec-2016

JONES.BENJA

MIN.ROBERT

F.

Digitally signed by

JONES.BENJAMIN.ROBER

T F.

Date: 2017.08.10 13:48:13 -05'00'BENJAMIN R. JONES 10-Aug-2017

DLA Aviation at OKC Local Addendum to AVN Form S53

ENGINEERING TECHNICAL CERTIFICATION

Purchase Request(s) / Local Identification Number(s): _________________________

Program Name: ______________________________________________________

NSN(s) / Part Number(s):

I certify that the technical/engineering aspects of this “Justification for other than Full and Open

Competition” are accurate and complete.

Engineer: Date Signed

Title:

Org. / Office Symbol

DSN:

Com. Phone:

Title:

Org. / Office Symbol

DSN:

Com. Phone:

Date Signed

FD20301700147

2840-01-486-1845 OK

PN 5126T37P03