SPM4A815Q0001.pdf

SPM4A815Q0001 Page 1 of 68 gpd0116 Typewritten Text gpd0116 Typewritten Text 10/09/2014 gpd0116 Typewritten Text gpd0116 Typewritten Text 11/21/2014

SPM4A815Q0001 Page 2 of 68

SPM4A815Q0001 Page 3 of 68

SPM4A815Q0001 Page 4 of 68

SPM4A815Q0001 Page 5 of 68

SPM4A815Q0001 Page 6 of 68

SPM4A815Q0001 Page 7 of 68

SPM4A815Q0001 Page 8 of 68

SPM4A815Q0001 Page 9 of 68

SPM4A815Q0001 Page 10 of 68

SPM4A815Q0001 Page 11 of 68

SPM4A815Q0001 Page 12 of 68

SPM4A815Q0001 Page 13 of 68

SPM4A815Q0001 Page 14 of 68

SPM4A815Q0001 Page 15 of 68

SPM4A815Q0001 Page 16 of 68

SPM4A815Q0001 Page 17 of 68

SPM4A815Q0001 Page 18 of 68

SPM4A815Q0001 Page 19 of 68

SPM4A815Q0001 Page 20 of 68

SPM4A815Q0001 Page 21 of 68

SPM4A815Q0001 Page 22 of 68

SPM4A815Q0001 Page 23 of 68

SPM4A815Q0001 Page 24 of 68

SPM4A815Q0001 Page 25 of 68

SPM4A815Q0001 Page 26 of 68

SPM4A815Q0001 Page 27 of 68

SPM4A815Q0001 Page 28 of 68

SPM4A815Q0001 Page 29 of 68

SPM4A815Q0001 Page 30 of 68

SPM4A815Q0001 Page 31 of 68

SPM4A815Q0001 Page 32 of 68

SPM4A815Q0001 Page 33 of 68

SPM4A815Q0001 Page 34 of 68

SPM4A815Q0001 Page 35 of 68

SPM4A815Q0001 Page 36 of 68

SPM4A815Q0001 Page 37 of 68

SPM4A815Q0001 Page 38 of 68

SPM4A815Q0001 Page 39 of 68

SPM4A815Q0001 Page 40 of 68

SPM4A815Q0001 Page 41 of 68

SPM4A815Q0001 Page 42 of 68

SPM4A815Q0001 Page 43 of 68

SPM4A815Q0001 Page 44 of 68

SPM4A815Q0001 Page 45 of 68

SPM4A815Q0001 Page 46 of 68

SPM4A815Q0001 Page 47 of 68

SPM4A815Q0001 Page 48 of 68

SPM4A815Q0001 Page 49 of 68

SPM4A815Q0001 Page 50 of 68

SPM4A815Q0001 Page 51 of 68

SPM4A815Q0001 Page 52 of 68

SPM4A815Q0001 Page 53 of 68

SPM4A815Q0001 Page 54 of 68

SPM4A815Q0001 Page 55 of 68

SPM4A815Q0001 Page 56 of 68

SPM4A815Q0001 Page 57 of 68

SPM4A815Q0001 Page 58 of 68

SPM4A815Q0001 Page 59 of 68

SPM4A815Q0001 Page 60 of 68

SPM4A815Q0001 Page 61 of 68

SPM4A815Q0001 Page 62 of 68

SPM4A815Q0001 Page 63 of 68

SPM4A815Q0001 Page 64 of 68

SPM4A815Q0001 Page 65 of 68

SPM4A815Q0001 Page 66 of 68

SPM4A815Q0001 Page 67 of 68

SPM4A815Q0001 Page 68 of 68

SPM4A8-15-Q-0001/ O. Garcia Questionnaire: Page 1 of 2

* RETURN DIRECTLY TO THE GOVERNMENT PROCUREMENT OFFICE AT FAX NO. 804-279-5948 *

PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Defense Logistics Agency - Aviation is collecting past performance information on the company listed below as part of its best value determination on an active procurement. Please complete the evaluation and return directly to the Government. The information is considered sensitive and will not be released to the Offeror.

Company Name:_______________________________________________________

Company Address:_____________________________________________________

RATING SCALE: Please use the following ratings to answer the questions, by placing an “X” in the appropriate box.

If you are unable to rate an item because it was not a requirement, never an issue, or you have no knowledge of the item in question, then you should mark “NA.”

EVALUATION CRITERIA:

Exceptional - The company’s performance was consistently superior. Performance was entirely favorable and you wouldn’t hesitate to do business with them again.

Very Good - The company’s performance was better than average, and you would willingly do business with them again. The contractual performance was mostly favorable and corrective actions, if any, that were taken by the contractor were effective.

Satisfactory - The company’s performance was adequate for the project and you would consider doing business with them again. There were minor performance problems which were corrected.

Marginal – The company’s performance was below average and you would be hesitant to do business with them again. There were some significant performance issues and the vendor had some difficulty taking corrective action.

Unsatisfactory – The company’s performance was entirely unsatisfactory and you would not do business with them again under any circumstances. There were serious performance issues with the contractor for which the contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.

FOR AREAS INDICATING EITHER EXCEPTIONAL OR UNSATISFACTORY PERFORMANCE, PLEASE PROVIDE AN

EXPLANATION IN THE COMMENTS SECTION OF THE SURVEY.

QUALITY OF PRODUCT Unsatisfactory Marginal Satisfactory Very Good Exceptional

Provided a service that conformed to contract requirements, specs, and standards of good workmanship.

Submitted accurate reports.

Utilized personnel appropriate to the effort performed.

COST CONTROL Unsatisfactory Marginal Satisfactory Very Good Exceptional

Performed the effort within the estimated cost/price.

Submitted accurate invoices on a timely basis.

Demonstrated cost efficiencies in performing the required effort.

Actual costs/rates realized closely reflected the negotiated costs/rates.

SCHEDULE Unsatisfactory Marginal Satisfactory Very Good Exceptional

Tasks were performed in a timely manner and within the period of performance of the contract.

SPM4A8-15-Q-0001/ O. Garcia Questionnaire: Page 2 of 2

* RETURN DIRECTLY TO THE GOVERNMENT PROCUREMENT OFFICE AT FAX NO. 804-279-5948 *

Contractor was responsive to technical and/or contractual direction.

BUSINESS RELATIONSHIPS Unsatisfactory Marginal Satisfactory Very Good Exceptional

Demonstrated effective management over the effort performed.

Maintained an open line of communication so that the Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) or technical POC were apprised of technical, cost, and scheduling issues.

Presented information and correspondence in a clear, concise, and businesslike manner.

Promptly notified the COR, technical POC, and/or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent issues.

Cooperated in providing flexible, proactive, and effective recommended solutions to critical program issues.

Demonstrated effective management of its subcontractors

CUSTOMER SATISFACTION Unsatisfactory Marginal Satisfactory Very Good Exceptional

Products/services adequately met the needs of the contract.

Contractor was able to perform with minimal or no direction from the COR or technical POC.

I am satisfied with the performance of the contractor.

Expectation that we would award another contract to this firm.

Was the contract terminated for default? [ ] Yes [ ] No. If you answered yes, provide an explanation:

COMMENTS: (Required for all EXCEPTIONAL and UNSATISFACTORY ratings)

THIS EVALUATION WAS COMPLETED BY:

BUSINESS NAME:______________________________ POINT OF CONTACT:__________________________

ADDRESS: _________________________________________________________________________________

PHONE: _________________________________ EMAIL: __________________________________________

SIGNATURE: _____________________________________________ DATE: __________________________