21R0203 - Amendment 0011.pdf

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

FACILITY CODE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required) copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15C. DATE SIGNED

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

PAGE OF PAGES

6. ISSUED BY CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X)

CODE

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

Previous edition unusable

Amendment 0011 Solicitation Number SPE608-21-R-0203 Page 2 of 4

This amendment is hereby issued as follows:

A. Changes to Section L 1.2 FORMAT FOR PROPOSALS

1) Factor 3 - AIR Card® Electronic Access System (EAS)

FROM:

Factor 3 - AIR Card® Electronic Access System (EAS): Offerors shall submit, at a minimum, an equivalent to the Contractor’s Electronic Access System commercial product and enhanced to meet all of the DLA AIR Card® Program requirements and any additional requirements in using the system, as outlined in the Performance Work Statement. At a minimum, the Contractor shall demonstrate the EAS in alignment with requirements outlined in Performance Work Statement and Factor 3 subfactors to include its development, implementation, and maintenance (mainframes, data bases, operating systems and devices).

TO:

Factor 3 - AIR Card® Electronic Access System (EAS): Offerors shall submit, at a minimum, an equivalent to the Contractor’s Electronic Access System commercial product and enhanced to meet all of the DLA AIR Card® Program requirements and any additional requirements in using the system, as outlined in the Performance Work Statement. At a minimum, the Contractor shall demonstrate the EAS in alignment with requirements outlined in Performance Work Statement and items 1-9 as described below to include its development, implementation, and maintenance (mainframes, data bases, operating systems and devices).

B. Change to Section M

1) FAR 52.212-2 -- EVALUATION -- COMMERCIAL ITEMS (OCT 2014)

The six (6) evaluation factors are 1) Technical Approach, 2) Management Approach, 3) AIR Card® Electronic Access System (EAS), 4) Merchant Acceptance with Level III Data Plan, 5) Past Performance and 6) Price. To be considered for an award, an offeror must meet or exceed all non-price factors. When combined, the non-price factors of Technical Acceptability, Management Approach, AIR Card® Electronic Access System (EAS), Merchant Acceptance with Level III Data Plan, and Past Performance are significantly more important than Price.

The six (6) evaluation factors are 1) Technical Approach, 2) Management Approach, 3) AIR Card® Electronic Access System (EAS), 4) Merchant Acceptance with Level III Data Plan, 5) Past Performance and 6) Price. To be considered for an award, an offeror must meet or exceed all non-price factors. When combined, the non-price factors of Technical Approach, Management Approach, AIR Card® Electronic Access System (EAS), Merchant Acceptance with Level III Data Plan, and Past Performance are significantly more important than Price.

Amendment 0011 Solicitation Number SPE608-21-R-0203 Page 3 of 4

2) Adjectival Ratings and Descriptions, of the solicitation, as follows:

Combined Capability of the Offeror Subfactors /Risk Rating Adjectival Rating Description

Outstanding Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many (requirements) to the customer's benefit. Proposal meets requirements and indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements. Strengths far outweigh any weaknesses. Risk of unsuccessful performance is very low. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with minimal impact for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements. Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. Strengths and weaknesses are offsetting or will have little or no impact on contract performance. Risk of unsuccessful performance is low. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. Strengths and weaknesses are offsetting or will have little or no impact on contract performance. Risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate. The contractual performance of the element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear, or were, satisfactory.

Marginal Performance does not meet contractual requirements. Proposal does not clearly meet requirements and has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the Contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. The proposal has one or more weaknesses which are not offset by strengths.

Risk of unsuccessful performance is high.

Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the Contractor's corrective actions appear, or were, ineffective.

Proposal does not meet requirements of the solicitation and, thus, contains one or more deficiencies and is unawardable.

Combined Capability of the Offeror Subfactors /Risk Rating

Adjectival Rating Description

Outstanding (O) Proposal indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements and contains multiple strengths, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low.

Good (G) Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements and contains at least one strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low to moderate.

Amendment 0011 Solicitation Number SPE608-21-R-0203 Page 4 of 4

Acceptable (A) Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.

Marginal (M) Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is high.

Unacceptable (U) Proposal does not meet requirements of the solicitation, and thus, contains one or more deficiencies, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is unacceptable. Proposal is unawardable.

3) Subfactor 1a: Technical Capability, of the solicitation is changed to add the language in the yellow highlights as follows:

Subfactor 1a: Technical Capability. The Technical Capability evaluation will assess the offeror’s approach to meet all stated requirements indicated in the Performance Work Statement (PWS). The offeror must produce an overall solution description document that describes the business solution, including how it addresses the functional requirements detailed in the PWS. The offeror must demonstrate the ability of meeting or exceeding each requirement and their success. If the offeror is teaming with subcontractors, the offeror shall explain the relationships, duties, and responsibilities of each subcontractor.

The following sub-bullets are additional key areas and/or challenges under the AIR Card® program. The Offeror’s proposal shall provide a narrative for each sub-bullet reflecting a sound approach to minimize risk in performance and maximize success to the AIR Card® program offering solutions as part of their response for the Government to evaluate this subfactor.

• Customer Invoicing

• Delinquency Control

• Risk Mitigation Assistance

• Government-Wide Shut Down

• Tax Exemption &Tax Reclamation

• Streamlining Payments

• Program Analytics & Monitoring Tools

• Data System Management

• Data Reliability

• Purchase Solutions

• Card Requirements

4) Factor 3: AIR Card® Electronic Access System (EAS), of the solicitation, is changed to add the language in the yellow highlights as follows:

Factor 3: AIR Card® Electronic Access System (EAS): The Government intends to evaluate the offeror’s approach to meet all stated requirements indicated in the Performance Work Statement (PWS) to include subfactors under Factor 3 – AIR Card® Electronic Access System (EAS). The Government will assess the offeror’s EAS’s ability to perform auditability functions, fully itemized priced ticket copies; dispute transactions to include but not limited to price reasonableness, separate delivery tickets without “bundling” transactions; contract data acceptance and loading, manage contract and non-contract fuel and non-contract ground fuel services transactions; fraud prevention, cardholder support functions; approving official and agency program coordinator tasks.

Amendment 0011 Solicitation Number SPE608-21-R-0203 Page 5 of 4

Factor 3: AIR Card® Electronic Access System (EAS): The Government intends to evaluate the offeror’s approach to meet all stated requirements indicated in the Performance Work Statement (PWS) and addresses all nine (9) items as set out in Section L, page 122 under Factor 3 – AIR Card® Electronic Access System (EAS). The Government will assess the offeror’s EAS’s ability to perform auditability functions, fully itemized priced ticket copies; dispute transactions to include but not limited to price reasonableness, separate delivery tickets without “bundling” transactions; contract data acceptance and loading, manage contract and non-contract fuel and non-contract ground fuel services transactions; fraud prevention, cardholder support functions; approving official and agency program coordinator tasks. The offeror’s oral presentation will be evaluated in accordance with L 1.3 Instructions for Oral Presentations and will be evaluated as part of this Factor.

5) Factor 6: Price

Factor 6: Price: The Government intends to evaluate the offeror’s approach to meet all stated requirements indicated in the Performance Work Statement (PWS) to include subfactors under Factor 6 – Price. Price evaluation will be conducted for all transactions for the returns in refunds indicated in the pricing structure.

TO:

Factor 6: Price: The Government intends to evaluate the offeror’s approach to meet all stated requirements indicated in the Performance Work Statement (PWS) to include subfactors under Factor 6 – Price. Price evaluation will be conducted for all transactions for the returns in refunds indicated in the pricing structure.

D. All other terms and conditions for this solicitation SPE608-21-R-0203 remain unchanged.

See Continuation Sheets

ATTN: Daisy Williams/Mark Davis

8725 JOHN J. KINGMAN ROAD, SUITE 3826

FORT BELVOIR, VA 22060-6222