SPE4A614R1336s_Redacted.pdf
PDF 185 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Cable Assembly, Special Purpose, Electrical Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- SPE4A6-14-R-1336
- Issued by
- Defense Logistics Agency Aviation
View the file
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
DLA AVIATION FORM P-53 FEB 2011 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
AMSC A. The Government’s right to use data in its possession is questionable. This code is under review and will be updated when the review is complete.
AMSC B. This must be acquired from a manufacturing source(s) specified on a source control drawing.
AMSC C. This part required engineering source approval by the design control activity in order to maintain the quality of the part.
AMSC D. The data needed to acquire this part is not economically available.
AMSC H. The Government does not have sufficient, accurate, or legible data to purchase this part from other than the current source. This code is under review and will be updated when the review is complete.
AMSC K. This part must be produced from class 1 castings under MIL-STD-2175.
AMSC L. The annual buy value of this part falls below the screening threshold established by DoD.
AMSC M. Manufacture of this part requires use of master or coordinated tooling.
AMSC N. Manufacture of this part requires special test and/or inspection facilities to maintain function or system integrity.
AMSC P. The rights to use the data needed to purchase this part from additional source(s) are not owned by the Government and cannot be purchased, developed, or otherwise obtained.
AMSC Q. The Government does not have adequate data, lacks rights to data, or both. It is not economical to buy the data or rights to the data.
AMSC R. The Government does not own the data or rights to the data needed to purchase this part from another source.
It is not economical to procure the data or rights to the data.
AMSC S. Acquisition of this item is restricted to Government approved source(s) because the item involves military sensitive technology.
AMSC U. The cost to the Government to breakout this part and acquire it competitively has been determined to exceed the projected savings over the life span of the part.
AMSC V. This part has been designated a high reliability part. Probability of failure would be unacceptable. The engineering activity has determined that data to define and control reliability limits cannot be obtained.
AMSC Y. The design of this part is unstable. Engineering, manufacturing, or performance characteristics indicate that the required design objectives have not been achieved.
AMSC Z. This part is a commercial/no-developmental/off-the-shelf item.
The requisitioner has assigned a priority designator within Issue Priority Group (IPG) I.
The requisitioner has also cited an expedited handling signal of 999, N__, or E__ or an Office of the Secretary of Defense/Joint Chiefs of Staff project code beginning with a "9".
Procurement from a specified source or agency is authorized by statute ______________ (list statute).
Other___________________________________________________________________________________________.
6. Efforts to ensure that offers are solicited from as many sources as practicable are:
The acquisition will be synopsized on or about ___________ and any firm requesting a solicitation copy will be provided one.
9 JAN 2014✔
DLA AVIATION FORM P-53 FEB 2011 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Manufacturers of similar products identified in the market survey will be solicited.
Dealers of the manufacturers will be solicited.
A synopsis exception cited in FAR 5.202 applies (Explain):
Other (Explain): __________________________________________________________________________________
7. I hereby determine that the anticipated cost to the Government will be fair and reasonable. Discuss relevant pricing issues, including the basis for determining that the anticipated price/cost will be fair and reasonable. Also include here, or elsewhere as appropriate, length of contract, quantity, and other contract particulars bearing on the price/cost._____________________________________________________________________________________________________
8. A market survey as defined by FAR 10 was conducted, and firms indicating an interest in the acquisition will be solicited. Market research efforts, include:
was not conducted due to the unusual and compelling urgency of the requirement.
was not conducted due to:____________________________________________________________________________
9. Additional facts supporting other than full and open competition are:
Based upon the technical certification on file, technical data is not available and cannot be developed to permit full and open competition. The data presently available reflects the minimum needs of the Government.
As stated in the attached certification by the requiring activity, the Military Services will be seriously injured if contract award is delayed. The extent and nature of harm are detailed in the attached certification.
When FAR 6.302-1 is cited for follow-on acquisitions as described in 6.302-1(a)(2)(ii), an estimate of the cost to the Government that would be duplicated and how the estimate was derived.
Other: ___________________________________________________________________________________________
10. A listing of sources, if any, indicating an interest in writing in the acquisition are (if none, so state):
11. The actions, being taken to overcome barriers to competition before any subsequent acquisitions are made are (if none, so state and explain why not) .
APPROVAL
APPROVAL LEVELS OF THE JUSTIFICATION – FAR 6.304
not exceeding $650,000 Contracting Officer over $650,000 to $12,500,000 Competition Advocate
Only one source exist and the possibility of competition, for the porpose of price reasonableness, is not expected. The overall cost of this acquisition is anticipated to be fair and reasonable based upon FAR 15 negotiation procedures IAW cost data provided by the vendor.
There is one approved source and the market situation does not appear to have changed since the previous acquisition.
Any potential offer will have to be submitted to the Engineering Support Activity (ESA)
Alternate Offers PROVISION 52 217-9002 NCLUDED IN THE SOLICITATION TO ALLOW POTENTIAL SOURCES TO SUBMIT A SOURCE APPROVAL REQUEST (SAR)
FOR EVALUATION SO THAT COMPETITION MAY BE EXPANDED FURTHER. SYNOPSIS POSTED.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .