SPE2DX-20-R-0001 AMENDMENT 0003.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO.

See Block 14

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE SPE2DX 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code)

CODE FACILITY CODE

SPE2DX20R0001

X

2021 JUN 03

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of OffersX is extended, X is not extended.

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER NO.

IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc. ) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

Previous edition unusable

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning

DLA TROOP SUPPORT

MEDICAL SUPPLY CHAIN FSB

700 ROBBINS AVENUE

PHILADELPHIA PA 19111

15C. DATE SIGNED 16C. DATE SIGNED

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

11/19/2021

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

See Attached Continuation Sheet(s).

(X)

CHECK ONE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

13. THIS APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CONTINUATION SHEET REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED:

CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE

PAGE 2 OF 3 PAGES

SPE2DX20R0001 - 0003

The purpose of this amendment is to incorporate the changes to the solicitation included in the attachment "Amendment 3 Language"

All other terms and conditions remain the same.

CONTINUATION SHEET REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED: PAGE 3 OF 3 PAGES

SPE2DX20R0001 - 0003

Attachments

List of Attachments

Description File Name ATTACH_Amendment_3_L anguage Amendment 3 Final.pdf

As per FAR 15.206(c), this amendment is issued to all offerors that have not been eliminated from the competition. This solicitation is not being re-opened for proposal submission.

The following revisions to the solicitation are as follows:

1. Page 92-93 of the Solicitation is changed from:

Tab 1(C): Offeror's Subcontracting Plan for Small, Small Disadvantaged, Women-Owned, Veteran Owned Small Business, Service-Disabled Veterans Owned Business and Small HUBZone Business Concerns (if required). A Subcontracting Plan shall be submitted only by offerors who are large business concerns. Offerors must comply with FAR 52.219-9 (JUN 2020). Plan must meet a minimum of 2.5% for overall small business concern utilization for total projected sales (Refer to sections 1(C) and 8(B) of the Statement of Work).

To:

Tab 1(C): Offeror's Subcontracting Plan for Small, Small Disadvantaged, Women-Owned, Veteran Owned Small Business, Service-Disabled Veterans Owned Business and Small HUBZone Business Concerns (if required). A signed and approved Subcontracting Plan shall be submitted only by offerors who are large business concerns. Offerors must comply with FAR 52.219-9 (JUN 2020). Plan must meet a minimum of 2.5% for overall small business concern utilization for total projected sales (Refer to sections 1(C) and 8(B) of the Statement of Work).

2. Page 93-94 of the solicitation is changed from:

Applies to Primary

Supplier Only

Minimum Solicitation Requirements Table

See Statement of Work for details regarding each Technical Requirement

Meet Minimum Solicitation

Requirement (“yes or no”)

DOCUMENTS REQUIRED – Solicitation Requirements #1-4

Offeror provided signed and completed SF 1449 and amendments

Offeror completed representations and certifications

Offeror provided Veteran Affairs (VA) approved subcontracting plan

Offeror provided authorized negotiators and points of contact

STATEMENT OF WORK REQUIREMENTS

Products Distributed are FDA approved.

Add Ordering Sites (Not to Exceed 12 Ordering Sites)

YES Manage two separate ordering accounts (brand/ generic & specialty) per ordering account

YES Manage Customer Usage Data

YES War Readiness Materiel Backup Supplier Requirements

Expiration Dating – minimum 6 months or if manufactured with less than 6 months, 75% of full manufacturer’s dating shall remain at time of delivery.

YES MMC Addition and NDC Change Request Tracking

Delivery FOB Destination to anywhere in CONUS within the next business day after receipt of order.

Delivery of Emergency Orders (excluding drop ship items) to the TPharm ordering facility within 6 hours following receipt of the order

Facilitate Drop Shipments (FOB Destination)

EDI Requirements

Catalog Requirements

Product Recall Notification

Shipment Packing/Packaging/Labeling/Marking

Implementation Plan

Quarterly In-Process Reviews (QPR) with DLA and Site Visits with the TPharm Contractor

To:

Applies to Primary

Supplier Only

Minimum Solicitation Requirements Table

See Statement of Work for details regarding each Technical Requirement

Meet Minimum Solicitation

Requirement (“yes or no”)

DOCUMENTS REQUIRED – Solicitation Requirements #1-4

Offeror provided signed and completed SF 1449 and amendments

Offeror completed representations and certifications

Offeror provided a signed and approved subcontracting plan

Offeror provided authorized negotiators and points of contact

STATEMENT OF WORK REQUIREMENTS

Products Distributed are FDA approved or otherwise in compliance with FDA regulations (i.e. Emergency Use Authorization)

Add Ordering Sites (Not to Exceed 12 Ordering Sites)

YES Manage two separate ordering accounts (brand/ generic & specialty) per ordering account

YES Manage Customer Usage Data

YES War Readiness Materiel Backup Supplier Requirements

Expiration Dating – minimum 6 months or if manufactured with less than 6 months, 75% of full manufacturer’s dating shall remain at time of delivery.

YES MMC Addition and NDC Change Request Tracking

Delivery FOB Destination to anywhere in CONUS within the next business day after receipt of order.

Delivery of Emergency Orders (excluding drop ship items) to the TPharm ordering facility within 6 hours following receipt of the order

Facilitate Drop Shipments (FOB Destination)

EDI Requirements

Catalog Requirements

Product Recall Notification

Shipment Packing/Packaging/Labeling/Marking

Implementation Plan

Quarterly In-Process Reviews (QPR) with DLA and Site Visits with the TPharm Contractor

3. Page 94 is changed from:

Tab 1(I): The past performance evaluation result is an assessment of the offeror’s probability of meeting the minimum solicitation requirements. This assessment is based on the offeror’s record of relevant and recent past performance relating to pricing accuracy, contractual fill rate, and data submission accuracy. Contractor’s performance is validated through monthly, quarterly, and semi-annual post award audits. Additionally, The Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), and Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) data as well as reports generated by Corporate Data for Medical Intelligence Applications (CDMIA) will be reviewed as part of the criteria to evaluate the contractor’s past performance over each of the past 12 months. To be considered relevant, vendors must be commercial wholesalers that have past performance in similar size and scope to this acquisition. Offeror’s may provide any pertinent past performance data in Tab 1(I) of their proposal. (see Addendum #4).

To:

Tab 1(I): The past performance evaluation result is an assessment of the offeror’s probability of meeting the minimum solicitation requirements. This assessment is based on the offeror’s record of relevant and recent past performance information that pertain to the products outlined in the solicitation requirements. Past performance information may be obtained from any other sources available to the Government, to include, but not limited to, Supplier Performance Risk System (SPRS), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), Experian (formally the Dunn & Bradstreet (D&B)), Contractor Performance Assessment Report System (CPARS), or other databases. These systems will be reviewed as part of the criteria to evaluate the contractor’s past performance over the past twenty-four months. To be considered relevant, vendors must be commercial wholesalers that have past performance in similar size and scope to this acquisition. Relevancy includes similarity, recency, types of items supplied, contract length, and dollar value.

The offeror may provide past performance information, as follows, for consideration in evaluating past performance: A list of contracts, commercial or government, performed within the past twenty-four (24) months preceding the closing date of the solicitation, limited to three (3) government and three (3) commercial contracts for the same or similar items. The offeror shall provide or include a point of contact (POC), address, telephone number, an estimated contract dollar value, the total contract length, and a sample listing of the items provided for under the contracts. For any government contracts, provide the government agency, a (POC), telephone number, appropriate contract number, estimated contract dollar value, the total contract length, and a sample listing of the items provided, if applicable. The Government reserves the right to limit the number of references it decides to contact. Also provide a listing of any problems or discrepancies (includes shortages, overages, damages, defects, or mis-shipments, etc.) experienced within the past twenty-four months (twenty-four months preceding the closing date of the solicitation) for the contracts or customers reported in the paragraph above. Include a brief description of how these problems were addressed and remedied. Offeror’s may provide this pertinent past performance data in Tab 1(I) of their proposal. (see Addendum #4).

4. Page 99 is changed from:

FAR 52.212-1 ADDENDUM #4

PAST PERFORMANCE

There are three aspects to the past performance evaluation. The first is to evaluate whether the offeror’s present/past performance is relevant or not relevant to the effort to be acquired.

The second is to evaluate whether the offeror’s past performance is recent or not recent to the effort to be acquired. The third aspect of Past Performance is to determine how well the contractor performed on the contract criteria as indicated in the remainder of this addendum.

Past performance will be evaluated in accordance with FAR 15.101-2(b). Since this is an LPTA acquisition, all offers will be given an “acceptable” or “unacceptable” rating. Offers with no pertinent past performance shall be determined to have “unknown” past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, “unknown” shall be considered “acceptable.”

The past performance evaluation results are an assessment of the offeror’s probability of meeting the minimum past performance solicitation requirements for each of the past 12 months. This assessment is based on the offeror’s record of relevant and recent (for each of the past 12 months) past performance information relating to the following:

1. Pricing Accuracy – historical data will be collected to measure if the offeror has provided acceptable pricing accuracy for support similar to that required by this solicitation.

2. Contractual Fill Rate (delivery/quality) – historical data will be collected to measure if the offeror has met an acceptable fill rate percentage for similar requirements.

3. Data Submission Accuracy – historical data will be collected to measure if the offeror has provided an acceptable level of data submission relating to the NPV or similar program for the data submitted as a contractor via the ACCEPTANCE STAGE report and the VALIDATION STAGE report. Accuracy is based on empty fields as well as fields that include bad data. These reports are generated by Corporate Data for Medical Intelligence Applications (CDMIA).

To be considered relevant, vendors must be commercial wholesalers that have past performance in similar size and scope to this acquisition.

Note: Contractor’s performance is validated through monthly, quarterly, and semi-annual post award audits. Additionally, The Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), and Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) data, Historical Fill-Rate Data, as well as reports generated by Corporate Data for Medical Intelligence Applications (CDMIA) will be reviewed as part of the criteria to evaluate the contractor’s past performance over each of the past 12 months.

All data may be validated by the government.

Offeror’s may provide any pertinent past performance data in Tab 1(I). If nothing is provided, performance will be validated by reports generated from FAPIIS, PPIRS, CPARS, and CDMIA.

To:

FAR 52.212-1 ADDENDUM #4

Proposals will be evaluated in accordance with FAR 15.101-2, FAR 15.305, and DFARS

215.305. This assessment is based on the offeror’s record of relevant and recent past performance information that pertain to the products and/or services outlined in the solicitation requirements. However, the comparative assessment in FAR 15.305(a)(2)(i) does not apply.

In order to be considered for award an offeror must meet or exceed the acceptability standards for the following non-cost factors: Past Performance and Compliance with the terms and conditions in the solicitation.

Sources of Past Performance Information for Evaluation are as follows:

-Past performance information may be provided by the offeror, as solicited.

-Past performance information may be obtained from questionnaires tailored to the circumstances of the acquisition

-Past performance information may be obtained from any other sources available to the Government, to include, but not limited to, Supplier Performance Risk System (SPRS), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), Experian (formally the Dunn & Bradstreet (D&B)), Contractor Performance Assessment Report System (CPARS), or other databases, if applicable.

An offeror with SPRS scores that are excessively low will not meet acceptability standards.

The offeror may provide past performance information, as follows, for consideration in evaluating past performance: A list of contracts, commercial or government, performed within the past twenty-four (24) months preceding the closing date of the solicitation, limited to three (3) government and three (3) commercial contracts for the same or similar items. The offeror shall provide or include a point of contact (POC), address, telephone number, an estimated contract dollar value, the total contract length, and a sample listing of the items provided for under the contracts. For any government contracts, provide the government agency, a (POC), telephone number, appropriate contract number, estimated contract dollar value, the total contract length, and a sample listing of the items provided. The Government reserves the right to limit the number of references it decides to contact. Also provide a listing of any problems or discrepancies (includes shortages, overages, damages, defects, or mis-shipments, etc.) experienced within the past twenty-four months (twenty-four months preceding the closing date of the solicitation) for the contracts or customers reported in the paragraph above. Include a brief description of how these problems were addressed and remedied.

If the contracts/accounts submitted were performed by a predecessor company, subsidiary, subcontractor, or other affiliate entity (see FAR 2.101), the offeror must clearly demonstrate that the predecessor, subsidiary, subcontractor, or affiliate will perform major or critical aspects of the resultant contract in order for the submitted contract/account to be considered.

5. Page 102-103 of the solicitation is changed from:

Past Performance will be evaluated in accordance with FAR 15.305 and DFARS 215.305.

This assessment is based on the offeror’s record of relevant and recent past performance information that pertain to the products and/or services outlined in the solicitation requirements. However, the comparative assessment in FAR 15.305(a)(2)(i) does not apply.

Past Performance will first be evaluated to determine if the offeror has relevant or non-relevant and recent or not-recent past performance for each of the areas of Pricing Accuracy, Contractual Fill-Rate, and Data Submission Accuracy.

The NPV (GEN-IV) Past Performance Evaluation Criteria are as follows: an offeror must receive an acceptable for each criterion for which it has relevant and recent past performance in order to receive an overall acceptable past performance rating:

1. Pricing Accuracy- at a minimum offeror has provided accurate prices 97.9% of the time for each of the past 12 months for support similar to that required by this solicitation.

2. Contractual Fill-Rate (including but not limited to delivery/quality): at a minimum offeror has met fill rate requirements 90% of the time for each of the past 12 months for similar requirements.

3. Data Submission Accuracy: at a minimum, offeror submitted accurate data 90% of the time for each of the past 12 months relating to the NPV or a similar program for data submitted as a contractor via the ACCEPTANCE STAGE report and the VALIDATION STAGE report. Accuracy is based on empty fields as well as fields that include bad data.

These reports are generated by Corporate Data for Medical Intelligence Applications

(CDMIA).

To be considered relevant, vendors must be commercial wholesalers that have past performance in similar size and scope to this acquisition.

To:

PAST PERFORMANCE

Past Performance will be evaluated in accordance with FAR 15.101-2 Lowest Price Technically Acceptable Source Selection Process, FAR 15.305, and DFARS 215.305. This assessment is based on the offeror’s record of relevant and recent past performance information that pertain to the products and/or services outlined in the solicitation requirements. However, the comparative assessment in FAR 15.305(a)(2)(i) does not apply.

The past performance evaluation results are an assessment of the offeror’s probability of meeting the solicitation requirements. This assessment is based on the offeror’s record of relevant and recent past performance information that pertain to the products outlined in the solicitation requirements.

There are two aspects to the past performance evaluation. The first is to evaluate whether the offeror’s present/past performance is relevant or not relevant to the effort to be acquired.

Relevancy includes similarity, recency, types of items supplied and contract length in comparable size and scope to this acquisition. An effort will be considered recent if performance occurred within the twenty-four months period preceding the closing date of the solicitation.

Past Performance on the relevancy of the contractor’s experience will be evaluated and rated on a relevant/recent or not-relevant/not-recent basis.

Acceptable: The offeror’s past performance effort involved recent (each of the past 24-months) and similar size and scope of effort based on the past performance criteria above.

Unacceptable: The offeror’s past performance record involved not-recent (each of the past 24-months) and little or none of the size and scope of effort based on the past performance evaluation criteria above.

The second aspect of the past performance evaluation is to determine how well the contractor performed on the relevant contracts. The evaluation will include whether the offeror timely delivered requirements and met quality standards, as well as problems encountered, and the effectiveness of any corrective action taken in addressing those problems. For purposes of this aspect of the evaluation, performance that occurred within the 24-month period preceding the closing date of the solicitation will be considered. Performance data outside of that 24-month period will not be considered.

Past Performance on how well the contractor performed on relevant contracts will be evaluated and rated on an acceptable/unacceptable basis.

Acceptable: Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown.

Unacceptable: Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government does not have a reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Note: In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (See FAR 15.305 (a)(2)(iv). Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, “unknown” shall be considered “acceptable”.

All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.