SPE1C1-15-R-0025_12.12.14.pdf

10. FOR

INFORMATION

CALL:

13. DISCOUNT FOR PROMPT PAYMENT

(See Section I, Clause No. 52.232-8)

SOLICITATION, OFFER AND AWARD 1. THIS CONTRACT IS A RATED ORDER

UNDER DPAS (15 CFR 700)

RATING

2. CONTRACT No.

SPE1C1-15-R-0025

3. SOLICITATION No. 4. TYPE OF SOLICITATION

SEALED BID (IFB)

NEGOTIATED (RFP)X

2014 DEC 12

5. DATE ISSUED

1000030250

6. REQUISITION/PURCHASE No.

7. ISSUED BY 8. ADDRESS OFFER TO (If other than Item 7)

NOTE : In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".

9. Sealed offers in original and copies for furnishing the supplies or services in the Schedule will be received at the place specified in Item 8, or if handcarried, in the depository located in local time

CAUTION - LATE Submissions, Modifications, and Withdrawals: See Section L, Provision No. 52.214-7 or 52.215-1. All offers are subject to all terms and conditions contained in this solicitation.

11. TABLE OF CONTENTS

DESCRIPTION

25. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY

CODE

SOLICITATION

until (Hour) (Date)

AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION

PREVIOUS EDITION NOT USABLE

STANDARD FORM 33 (Rev.9-97) Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.214 (c)

OFFER (Must be fully completed by offeror ) NOTE: Item 12 does not apply if the solicitation includes the provisions at 52.214-16, Minimum Bid Acceptance Period.

AWARD (To be completed by Government)

16. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN OFFER

(Type or print)

14. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMEND-

MENTS (The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the SOLICITATION for offerors and related documents numbered and dated):

12. In compliance with the above, the undersigned agrees, if this offer is accepted within period is inserted by the offeror) from the date for receipt of offers specified above, to furnish any or all items upon which prices are offered at the price set opposite each item, delivered at the designated point(s), within the time specified in the schedule.

CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION DATA L INSTRS., CONDS., AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS

SPECIAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS M EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

IMPORTANT - Award will be made on this Form, or on Standard Form 26, or by other authorized official written notice.

(X) PAGE(S) SEC. DESCRIPTION PAGE(S)

SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES/COSTS PART III - LIST OF DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS AND OTHER ATTACH.

PART I - THE SCHEDULE PART II - CONTRACT CLAUSES

I CONTRACT CLAUSESSOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM

DESCRIPTION/SPECS./WORK STATEMENT J LIST OF ATTACHMENTS

INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE

PACKAGING AND MARKING PART IV - REPRESENTATIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS

DELIVERIES OR PERFORMANCE

K REPRESENTATIONS, CERTIFICATIONS AND OTHER

STATEMENTS OF OFFERORS

AMENDMENT NO. DATEAMENDMENT NO. DATE

G

H

SEC.

B

A

C

E

D

F

(X)

FACILITY

CODE

15C. CHECK IF REMITTANCE ADDRESS IS

DIFFERENT FROM ABOVE - ENTER SUCH

ADDRESS IN SCHEDULE

17. SIGNATURE

19. ACCEPTED AS TO ITEMS NUMBERED

23. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN22. AUTHORITY FOR USING OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION:

24. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 7) CODE CODE

27. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer )

26. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print) calendar days (60 calendar days unless a different

15A. NAME AND

ADDRESS

OF OFFER-

OR

10 U.S.C. 2304 (c) ( 41 U.S.C. 253 (c) () )

DLA TROOP SUPPORT

C AND T SUPPLY CHAIN

700 ROBBINS AVENUE

PHILADELPHIA PA 19111-5096

USA

See Block 7

Business Opportunities Office, Bldg 36-2-S 3:00PM 2015-Jan-12

Gina Parisi DGP0000

A. NAME

Phone: 215-737-3292

B. PHONE/FAX (NO COLLECT CALLS)

Gina.Parisi@dla.mil

C. EMAIL ADDRESS

X 1

X 2

X 20

X 21

X 22

X 23

X 23

X 31

X 31

X 37

X 38

15B. TELEPHONE NUMBER 18. OFFER DATE

28. AWARD DATE

20. AMOUNT

10 CALENDAR DAYS (%) 20 CALENDAR DAYS (%) CALENDAR DAYS (%)30 CALENDAR DAYS (%)

21. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION

ITEM

SPE1C1

EXT.NUMBERAREA CODE

PAGE OF PAGES

(4 copies unless otherwise specified)

CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE

Page left intentionally blank.

PAGE 2 OF 38 PAGESCONTINUATION SHEET REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED:

SPE1C1-15-R-0025

SECTION B - SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES OR COSTS

--------- This solicitation is a TOTAL SMALL BUSINESS SET ASIDE ---------

CAUTION NOTICE

All Offers Must Be Mailed To:

DLA TROOP SUPPORT

ATTN: Bid Opening Room, BLDG 36 700 Robbins Avenue Philadelphia, PA 19111

The contract will contain a twelve month base term and four (4) one-year option terms. Failure to offer on all terms will result in rejection of the entire proposal.

This acquisition is utilizing the BEST VALUE TRADEOFF Source Selection Procedures, FAR 15.101-1. As such, the Government intends to make an award to the firm that demonstrates the greatest probability of success and that will perform in a manner which will best meet the Governments stated requirements. See Sections L&M for technical evaluation factors and criteria.

Period for acceptance of offers: If this offer is accepted within 150 calendar days from the date for receipt of offers specified above, signee agrees to furnish any or all items upon which prices are offered, delivered to the designated points, within the time specified in the schedule.

Product Demonstration Models (PDMs) are required as follows: five (5) pairs of size 10 (NSN: 8415- 01-013-7382). See Section C of the solicitation for further PDM requirements.

The first article requirement is SIX (6) pairs representative of EACH SIZE on the contract, totaling thirty (30) pairs. First article samples will be required within thirty (30) calendar days from the date of this contract. First Article samples shall be pre-production samples.

Offerors are hereby notified that no domestic source exists for this item and therefore foreign offers will be considered and are encouraged. The provisions of the Berry clause will not apply to this acquisition; however, they may be incorporated via amendment if a domestic offer satisfying the Government’s requirement is received.

DLA Troop Support has developed a web-based system that allows manufacturers the ability to request specifications, patterns, and drawings on its contracting page. To request technical data for this solicitation use the following link to the DLA Troop Support C&T Technical Data Repository area:

http://www.troopsupport.dla.mil/Portal/sreqfrm.aspx.

NOTICE:

Please note that the Patient Protection and Affordable Health Care Act ("the Act"), 124 Stat. 119, imposes duties upon employers concerning the provision of health care to their employees. Health insurance costs, including any costs associated with compliance with changes in the applicable law, are the sole responsibility of the offeror. Offerors are advised that their proposals should include any costs associated with the implementation of the Act. Any changes in health coverage costs and/or costs associated with compliance, occurring after award of a contract pursuant to this solicitation will not form the basis for an equitable adjustment of the contract price.

CAUTION NOTICE - C&T ELECTRONIC INVOICING (MAR 2013) DLA TROOP SUPPORT

The Directorate of Clothing and Textiles (C&T) requires electronic invoicing on all contracts unless another method is mutually agreed to by the Contractor, the Contracting Officer, the contract administration office, and the payment office.

UTILIZATION OF WIDE AREA WORKFLOW - RECEIPTS AND ACCEPTANCE (WAWF-RA) IN CONJUNCTION WITH DFARS 252.232-7003, Electronic Submission of Payment Requests.

The Directorate of Clothing and Textiles utilizes VIM-ASAP, which is short for DLA Virtual Item Manager ARN Supply-Chain Automated Processing, to transmit data to WAWF-RA. VIM-ASAP is the only

PAGE 3 OF 38 PAGESCONTINUATION SHEET REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED:

http://www.troopsupport.dla.mil/Portal/sreqfrm.aspx authorized method to electronically process requests for payment to WAWF-RA for the Directorate of Clothing and Textiles. VIM-ASAP will give you visibility of contract information, track production status and print labels. VIM-ASAP pre-populates contract data on your invoices, such as unit price, contract numbers, item numbers, addresses, and many other fields that will save you labor and time.

Advanced Shipment Notifications (ASNs) associated with DFARS clause 252.211-7006, Radio Frequency Identification are sent via VIM-ASAP to WAWF-RA processes.

Please contact the VIM-ASAP help desk at 888-940-7348 to get started today!

For questions about invoice preparation, just call the DFAS Customer Service Resource Center at 1- 800-756-4571, or Check out these resources:

http://www.dfas.mil/contractorsvendors.html ...under the "Contractor/Vendor Pay" link.

http://www.dfas.mil/ecommerce/wawf/info.html... information regarding bill paying process and how to use Wide Area Workflow http://www.dfas.mil/ecommerce/myInvoice/gettingstarted.html my Invoice is an interactive web application developed specifically for contractors/vendors and government/military employees to obtain invoice status. It is available 24/7.

C A U T I O N N O T I C E – C H A N G E C O M I N G T O V I M Please note: Vendors under contract with DLA Troop Support Clothing & Textiles are able to use a web-based application called VIM, or Virtual Item Manager (https://vim.dla.mil). VIM allows manufacturers to generate and transmit contract documents such as Delivery Orders (DD1155s) and Material Inspection and Receiving Reports (DD250s). Previously, vendors registered using a user ID and password; however, soon all vendors must use an ECA certificate to access VIM. Please see below for more information.

Why is VIM requiring access via ECA certificate?

DoDI 8520.2 Mandates the use of DoD PKI identity certificates when accessing DoD information systems. The DoD established the External Certification Authority (ECA) program to support the issuance of DoD- approved certificates to industry partners and other external entities and organizations. ECA certificates enable contractors to securely communicate with the DoD and authenticate themselves to DoD Information Systems.

What are ECA Certificates?

ECA Certificates are individually issued digital identity credentials. The DoD relies upon these credentials to ensure the identity of the user in online environments or when a certificate holder tries accessing DoD Information Systems. ECA Certificates are stored either on hardware devices (smart cards or USB devices) or software versions (stored on your computer’s hard drive). You will use your certificate to:

1) Establish your identity when trying to access a protected site

2) Legally "sign" a document, form or application

3) Encrypt messages (email) or documents to ensure confidentiality Much like a driver’s license or a passport, they are unique to each individual, and cannot be shared. It is against DoD Regulations to share a username and password or allow someone to access another's ECA certificate for any reason. Violation of this policy will result in the immediate revocation of the original owner’s certificate.

How can I obtain an ECA Certificate?

The following are the three entities authorized by the DoD to issue ECA Certificates. Review and apply for an ECA Certificate from one of the below organizations to access your VIM account:

1) IdenTrust: http://www.identrust.com/certificates/eca/index.html

2) ORC (Operational Research Consultants): http://eca.orc.com/

3) VeriSign: https://eca.verisign.com/ I have an ECA Certificate, how do I access VIM now?

Simply log into VIM with your existing User ID and Password as usual and then follow the steps:

1) Under Menu, click the “Certificate Registration” option

2) Read the brief instruction and then click “Continue”

3) Your certificate will display in a pop-up. Select the certificate and click “Continue”

4) You will be prompted to enter your current password for confirmation and click “OK”

5) The message displays “Your Certificate has been successfully registered…” Click “OK” to complete the process. You will be logged out of VIM and prompted to login with your certificate.

6) Click “Accept” to the Terms and then select “Certificate Login”.

7) Your certificate will display in a pop-up. Select the certificate and click “OK” and you will be logged into your VIM account.

Remember, your old login credentials will no longer be valid and you will use your certificate to login into

VIM.

Foreign Military Sales (FMS) requisitions may be satisfied through the resultant IDPO award.

PAGE 4 OF 38 PAGESCONTINUATION SHEET REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED:

SPE1C1-15-R-0025

http://www.dfas.mil/contractorsvendors.html http://www.dfas.mil/ecommerce/wawf/info.html http://www.dfas.mil/ecommerce/myInvoice/gettingstarted.html

ISSUE: Editing capability in Wide Area Workflow (WAWF) and VIM-ASAP Electronic submission and processing of Payment Request and Receiving Reports (RR) Vendor mandate 252.232-7003 Action: Depending on status in WAWF and VIM-ASAP Submitted Status (WAWF) Rejected Status (WAWF) Vendor must contact VIM-ASAP Help desk at 1-888-940-7348 Recognized mistakes submitted to VIM-ASAP within the 1 st hour can be removed

Vendors can recall shipments not signed (accepted) by Quality Assurance Representative (QAR) After voiding submission, Modulant will “un-finish” the submission and vendor will enter correction.

Vendor must contact DFAS to ask for a rejection of invoice submission Call 1-800-756-4571 option 2 then option 2 DFAS representatives may request an e-mail with contract specifics DFAS will reject invoices NOT the RR

SECTION B – SUPPLIES/SERVICES

**Total Price equals Annual Order Limitation Quantity times FOB DESTINATION Unit Price

FOB Terms: Destination

Destinations for Delivery:

UY0157 / VSTG

Peckham Inc.

OCIE-North 5408 W. Grand River Ave. Bldg. B Lansing, MI 48906

TERM GUARANTEED

MINIMUM

ANNUAL

ESTIMATED

QUANTITY

ANNUAL ORDER

LIMITATION

QUANTITY

UNIT

OF

ISSUE

UNIT

PRICE

FOB

DEST.

TOTAL PRICE

Base 17,129 51,779 64,724 PR

Option 1 11,550 46,200 57,750 PR

Option 2 11,550 46,200 57,750 PR

Option 3 11,550 46,200 57,750 PR

Option 4 11,550 46,200 57,750 PR

PAGE 5 OF 38 PAGESCONTINUATION SHEET REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED:

UY0159 / VSTJ

LVI-OCIE SE

Pendergrass Distribution Center 596 Bonnie Valentine Way – DOOR 28 Pendergrass, GA 30567

SD0131 / VSTZ

Travis Association for the Blind 2301 E. St. Elmo Rd. Bldg. 2, Suite 220 Austin, TX 78744

The term “Annual Estimated Quantity” refers to the Government’s good faith estimate of the requirement for each period.

The Total Annual Estimated Quantity for the base and option terms is 236,579 PR.

The term “Annual Order Limitation Quantity” refers to the maximum order quantities for purposes of clauses 52.216-19, Order Limitations and 52.217-5, Evaluation of Options.

The Total Contract Maximum Quantity for the base and option terms is 295,724 PR.

OFFERORS ARE ADVISED THAT THE GOVERNMENT INTENDS TO MAKE AN AWARD BASED ON INITIAL OFFERS WITHOUT CONDUCTING DISCUSSIONS. HOWEVER, THE GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO CONDUCT NEGOTIATIONS IF

NECESSARY.

NOTE:

1. OFFERORS MUST SUBMIT A SINGLE UNIT PRICE FOR EACH SIZE/NSN AND THE GOVERNMENT WILL MAKE AN EVALUATION BASED ON THE ANNUAL ORDER LIMITATION QUANTITY. DO NOT PROPOSE SEPARATE PRICES FOR EACH SIZE/NSN. ONLY ONE UNIT PRICE SHALL BE PROPOSED FOR ALL SIZES/NSNs PER TERM. THE

GOVERNMENT IS ONLY BOUND TO ORDER THE MINIMUM QUANTITY.

2. PRICES ARE TO BE BASED ON FOB DESTINATION ONLY.

3. THIS SOLICITATION CONTAINS FOUR (4) ONE YEAR TERM OPTIONS. FAILURE TO OFFER ON THESE

QUANTITIES WILL RESULT IN THE REJECTION OF YOUR ENTIRE OFFER.

4. SUCCESSFUL AWARDEE WILL BE REQUIRED TO SCHEDULE AN APPOINTMENT WITH THE RECEIVING DEPOT PRIOR

TO EACH SHIPMENT.

5. DELIVERY ORDERS MAY REQUIRE CONCURRENT DELIVERIES; SUBSEQUENT TO DELIVERY ORDER 0001, THE

GOVERNMENT WILL NOT REQUIRE THE DELVIERY OF MORE THAN 7,191 PR IN ANY GIVEN 30 DAY PERIOD.

6. PRODUCTION LEAD TIME IS 195 DAYS, WHICH INCLUDES FIRST ARTICLE SUBMISSION WITHIN 30 DAYS.

ANY DEPOT ORDER PLACED SUBSEQUENT TO DO #0001 WILL BE REQUIRED TO BEGIN DELIVERIES 120 DAYS

AFTER DATE OF THE ORDER.

7. ALL OFFERS MUST BE MAILED TO:

DLA TROOP SUPPORT

ATTN: BID OPENING ROOM, BLDG 36

700 ROBBINS AVENUE

PHILADELPHIA, PA 19111

8. ACCELERATION OF DELIVERY IS NOT AUTHORIZED UNLESS PERMITTED IN WRITING BY THE CONTRACTING

OFFICER. IF PERMITTED, ACCELERATION OF DELIVERIES WILL BE CONDUCTED AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO

THE GOVERNMENT.

SECTION C- DESCRIPTION/SPECIFICATION

PAGE 6 OF 38 PAGESCONTINUATION SHEET REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED:

CHEMICAL AND OIL PROTECTIVE GLOVE (OTTO FUEL)

Updated: 11/21/14 DD

IAW THE FOLLOWING:

NSN(S) THIS PROCUREMENT

PGC00561

8415-01-147-6263 Size 7 8415-01-147-9540 Size 8 8415-01-012-9294 Size 9 8415-01-013-7382 Size 10 8415-01-013-7384 Size 11

SHELF LIFE ITEM: Proper marking applies to unit pack, intermediate, and exterior package.

ITEM DESCRIPTION:

GLOVES, CHEMICAL AND OIL PROTECTIVE TECH DATA In accordance with NAVSEA PD-87066, 31 July 2014

Quality Assurance Requirements:

Product Demonstration Model (PDMs):

The Product Demonstration Model will be subjected to examination for conformance to the material verification, visual examination, dimensional examination, and end item test requirements of NAVSEA PD-87066 dated 31 July, 2014.

Please submit five (5) pairs of size 10 gloves to the following address for evaluation:

DLA Troop Support Attn: Gina Parisi Bldg 3B, Station 4193 700 Robbins Avenue Philadelphia, PA 19111

First Article Inspection/Testing (FAT):

FAT will be performed in accordance with sections 3.1, 4.2, 6.2 and 6.3 of NAVSEA PD-87066 dated 31 July, 2014.

FAT will take 45 days to be performed. FAT samples, along with a DD1222 form, shall be sent to the below address. A copy of that DD1222 shall be sent to the Government email, troopsupportchemteam@dla.mil: (Please include Manufacture/Cure Date in Block 15 of the DD1222).

ATTN: Gina Parisi Building 3B, Station 4193 700 Robbins Street Philadelphia, PA 19111

First Article Samples:

First Article Testing Sample Size: 30 pairs total Otto fuel testing: 10 pairs (2 pairs of gloves for each size ordered on the contract) Remaining tests: 20 pairs (4 pairs of gloves for each size ordered on the contract)

Production Lot Testing:

End Item pairs of gloves (packaged) shall be inspected as follows:

Visual examination: General Inspection Level II; AQLs shall be 2.5 combined major and minor defects.

PAGE 7 OF 38 PAGESCONTINUATION SHEET REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED:

Dimensional examination: Inspection Level S-3; AQL shall be 4.0

Otto Fuel penetration resistance testing: Sample size shall be 2 (two) pairs of gloves for each size ordered per lot.

Porosity testing: The sample unit for this test shall be one (1) pair and the inspection level shall be S-2

Physical testing: The sample unit shall be six (6) pairs of gloves. The sample size shall be specified as below. The lot shall be unacceptable if one or more sample units fail to meet any of the requirements specified.

Lot Size Sample Size

800 or less 2

801 up to and including 22,000 3

22,001 and over 5

Conformance Inspection Samples (Production Lot Testing, PLT):

The Conformance inspection samples along with a DD1222 form shall be sent to the below address, and a copy of that DD1222 shall be sent to the Government email, troopsupportchemteam@dla.mil: (Please include Manufacture/Cure Date in Block 16 of the DD1222)

DLA Product Testing Center Analytical 700 Robbins Avenue Philadelphia, PA. 19111 Attn: Bldg. 5D

Conformance acceptance and rejection:

Testing results, along with the receipted DD1222 shall be provided to the Government at troopsupportchemteam@dla.mil.

The Government will then provide a notification of acceptance or rejection based on the tests results. The contractor will receive notification of acceptance/rejection from the Government not to exceed 50 calendar days. Once the Contractor receives PASSING test results and the QAR releases the lot with their signature on Wide Area Work Flow (WAWF), the Contractor can then ship the lot.

If FAILING results are received, a rejection notification of that lot shall be provided to the Contractor. That lot is to be segregated from all other production lots to prevent intermingling with conforming product. The Contractor will conduct and provide a root cause analysis and provide Corrective Action Report (CAR) to the Government.

Shelf Life This is a Type II Shelf Life item With a Shelf Life of 60 months Extendable twice; Lab testing at five (5) years (60 months) and ten (10) years (120 months) For a total of 15 years (180 months)

Interim Changes to NAVSEA PD-87066, 31 July 2014:

MIL-DTL-32075: LABEL FOR CLOTHING, EQUIPAGE,

AND TENTAGE, GENERAL USE REPLACES DDD-L-20

(Ref. T0451 - June 19, 2007)

INTERIM SPECIFICATION CHANGES TO MIL-DTL-32075:

PAGE 4, PARA. 3.3.5, AFTER "TYPE III OR IV, CLASS 4 OF" DELETE "DDD-L-20" AND REPLACE "MIL-DTL- 32075,".

PAGE 8 OF 38 PAGESCONTINUATION SHEET REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED:

PAGE 6, TABLE I, "PHYSICAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE

TYPE VI FINISHED LABEL." UNDER "TEARING

STRENGTH" DELETE: "(LB.) MINIMUM" AND

SUBSTITUTE: "(GNS) MINIMUM."

PAGE 12, PARA 3.3.2.17, AFTER "NSN" ADD

"AND THE UNIVERSAL PRODUCT CODE (UPC)

SUPPLIED BY THE GOVERNMENT, FOR ALL NSNs."

SECTION D – PACKAGING AND MARKING

Preservation-packaging:

Each pair of gloves shall be inserted in a flat style, clear polyethylene film bag, of 0.0015 inch thickness ( + 20%) tolerance. The polyethylene bag shall be formed with heat sealed seams that are straight, continuous, and parallel to each other and the formed edges of the bag, and may be fabricated from polyethylene film tubing or sheeting. The final closure of the bag shall be heat sealed, with the seal made as close as possible to the open end. Prior to or during the closure operation, excess air within the bag shall be expelled.

Packaging:

Packing shall be Level B of MIL-STD-2073. Forty-Five (45) glove sets of one size, one type, and one lot shall be packed in a fiberboard shipping container, conforming to type CF, class weather-resistant, variety DW, grade V15c, style RSC of ASTM D5118/D5118M. Preservation-packaged gloves shall be packed flat, three in length, one in width, and fifteen in depth within the shipping container. Each container shall be securely closed in accordance with ASTM D1974.

Markings:

Shelf-Life items will be marked for identification and control as stated in DoD 4140.27M Shelf Life Management Manual (see 2-13). Markings, for the item identification data and required on all unit, intermediate, and exterior packs or unpacked items, shall be per MIL-STD-129, MIL-STD-130, or FED-STD-123, (references (m) through (p)) respectively.

NSN:

Cage Code:

Part Number:

Size:

Unit of issue:

Contract Number:

Lot NO.:

Cure date: (earliest quarter the first glove in the production lot was produced) Inspect test date: (5 years after cure date)

Each unit pack label shall be specified by Cure Date and Inspection Date.

Shipping containers shall be marked in accordance with MIL-STD-129.

MIL-STD-129 CURRENT REVISION UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED

- DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE STANDARD PRACTICE

- MILITARY MARKING FOR SHIPMENT AND STORAGE

INTERIM CHANGES:

OMISSION OF MARKINGS ON EXTERIOR SHIPPING CONTAINERS OF ITEMS

IN THE DLA TROOP SUPPORT CLOTHING AND TEXTILE (C&T) DIRECTORATE:

THE NOMENCLATURE AND MANUFACTURER'S NAME (WHEN THE NAME IDENTIFIES THE MATERIAL) SHALL BE OMITTED FROM ALL EXTERIOR SHIPPING CONTAINERS OF DLA TROOP SUPPORT C&T ITEMS, REGARDLESS OF MODE OF

SHIPMENT.

PAGE 9 OF 38 PAGESCONTINUATION SHEET REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED:

IF THE MANUFACTURER'S NAME DOES NOT IDENTIFY THE MATERIAL AS BEING CLOTHING, IT MAY REMAIN. NSNS SHALL BE SHOWN ON ALL SHIPPING CONTAINERS OF C&T ITEMS, THE PACKING LIST SHALL BE PLACED INSIDE THE LAST CONTAINER TO BE LOADED FOR EACH SHIPMENT. THE WORDS "PACKING LIST HERE" SHALL BE STENCILED, NOT HAND LETTERED, ON THE CONTAINER.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR MIL-STD-130:

NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOLLOWS.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR FED-STD-123:

NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOLLOWS.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR MIL-STD-2073-1:

SUPPLEMENTAL INSTRUCTIONS - PRES/PACK C/C TO MIL-STD-2073-1D,

DATED MAY 10, 2002

THE PRESERVATION AND PACK SHALL MEET THE

REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM 3951 FOR SHIPMENTS

TO THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, RECOMMEND

THE USE OF A BOX, TYPE CF, VARIETY SW,

CLASS DOMESTIC, GRADE 275 WITH A DOUBLE

WALL LINER, MADE TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF

ASTM D5118 TO INSURE MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS

OF A PACK THAT WILL SUPPORT RE-TRANSPORT,

STORAGE, STACKING, ETC FOR A PERIOD OF 18 MONTHS

THE PACKAGING AND CONTAINER SHALL BE SUFFICIENT

TO PROVIDE PROTECTION DURING TRANSPORT AND

STORAGE AND ARRIVE AT DESTINATION IN THE SAME

CONDITION AS ORIGIN. BULK PACK DOES NOT APPLY

TO THIS PROCUREMENT.

THE CARTONS SHALL BE SIZED TO ALLOW THE FOLDED

ITEM TO SNUGLY FIT AND PROVIDE SUPPORT TO THE

SIDES AND TOP OF THE CARTON WHEN THE CARTON'S

LID IS CLOSED. THE CARTON DIMENSIONS SHALL BE

SIZED TO ALLOW FOR A MAXIMUM YIELD CARTONS TO

BE CONTAINED ON THE PALLETIZED LOAD.

THERE SHALL BE NO HANGOVER OF THE PALLET LOAD

BEYOND THE TOP SURFACE OF THE PALLET. WHEN

SPECIFIED, COMPONENTS SHALL BE PALLETIZED ON

A 4-WAY ENTRY PALLET IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOAD

TYPE I OR IA, AS APPLICABLE, OF MIL-STD-147.

IN ADDITION TO SPECIAL MARKING, IF ANY, UNIT

PACKS, SHIPPING CONTAINERS, AND UNIT LOADS

SHALL BE MARKED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D3951

AND MIL-HDBK-129N, 15 MAY 1997.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR ASTM-D1974:

NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOLLOWS.

PAGE 10 OF 38 PAGESCONTINUATION SHEET REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED:

MIL-STD-147 IS HEREBY REINSTATED AS FOLLOWS:

MIL-STD-147E DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

16 MAY 2008 STANDARD PRACTICE

PALLETIZED UNIT LOADS

STANDARDS (COMMERCIAL)

ASME-MH1 American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Pallets, Slip Sheets, and Other Bases For Unit Loads, for construction of pallets.

SECTION F – DELIVERIES OR PERFORMANCE

Gloves, Chemical and Oil Protective (Otto Fuel) NSN: 8415-01-012-9294(s)

PGC: 00561

Unit of Issue: PAIR (PR)

Delivery Schedule:

NSN SIZE DESTINATION

DAYS

ADA

DAYS

ADA

DAYS

ADA

DAYS

ADA

DAYS

ADA

DAYS

ADA

TOTAL

QUANTITY

(PR)

8415010129294 9 VSTG 875 875 875 875 875 875 5250

8415010137382 10 VSTG 778 778 778 777 777 777 4665

8415010137384 11 VSTG 473 473 473 472 472 472 2835

8415011476263 7 VSTG 30 30 30 30 30 30 180

8415011479540 8 VSTG 430 430 430 430 429 429 2578

Total VSTG 2586 2586 2586 2584 2583 2583 15508

8415010129294 9 VSTJ 875 875 875 875 875 875 5250

8415010137382 10 VSTJ 778 778 778 777 777 777 4665

8415010137384 11 VSTJ 473 473 473 472 472 472 2835

8415011476263 7 VSTJ 30 30 30 30 30 30 180

8415011479540 8 VSTJ 430 430 430 429 429 429 2577

Total VSTJ 2586 2586 2586 2583 2583 2583 15507

8415010129294 9 VSTZ 875 875 875 875 875 875 5250

8415010137382 10 VSTZ 778 778 778 777 777 777 4665

8415010137384 11 VSTZ 473 473 473 472 472 472 2835

8415011476263 7 VSTZ 30 30 30 30 30 30 180

8415011479540 8 VSTZ 430 430 430 429 429 429 2577

Total VSTZ 2586 2586 2586 2583 2583 2583 15507

Total Quantity

(PR) 7,758 7,758 7,758 7,750 7,749 7,749 46,522

Delivery Destinations:

UY0157 / VSTG

Peckham Inc.

OCIE-North 5408 W. Grand River Ave. Bldg. B Lansing, MI 48906

UY0159 / VSTJ

PAGE 11 OF 38 PAGESCONTINUATION SHEET REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED:

LVI-OCIE SE

Pendergrass Distribution Center 596 Bonnie Valentine Way – DOOR 28 Pendergrass, GA 30567

SD0131 / VSTZ

Travis Association For The Blind 2301 E. St. Elmo Rd. Bldg. 2, Suite 220 Austin, TX 78744

Note: This solicitation will result in an indefinite quantity contract. The schedule above is indicative of the sizes/quantities for the first delivery order. However, this is only an estimate and may change. The exact quantities and sizes will be set forth in each delivery order.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR SECTION L

NOTICE TO OFFERORS

Proposals will be evaluated for both technical merit and price reasonableness following the evaluation procedures in Section M of this solicitation. Instructions for Preparing Proposals are included in this section and have been formatted to assist you in preparing a complete technical proposal. In order to provide full consideration of your qualification for contract award, you are encouraged to ensure the information furnished in support of your technical proposal is factual, accurate, and complete.

The Department of Defense (DOD) is committed to applying Best Value Trade-Off contracting as a means to rely on industry for timely delivery of quality products, while reducing the Government's administrative costs associated with contractor oversight. To this end, we are evaluating factors in addition to price under this solicitation. Since effective production and quality control practices translate into better quality products, fewer delinquencies, reduced administrative costs, and lower overall costs to the Government, we will use your technical proposal to assess the effectiveness of your production methods and the effectiveness of your quality control procedures.

Moreover, those offerors who consistently demonstrate an ability to deliver on time while consistently providing a quality product will receive more favorable consideration than those who do not.

You may provide additional technical information you believe will enhance your proposal; however, overly elaborate presentations are not desired. Failure to provide the information requested may render the offeror’s proposal technically unacceptable. The Government reserves the right to verify the information provided for evaluation purposes.

Offerors are required to submit a technical proposal consisting of the following:

Non-Cost/Price Evaluation Criteria:

The most important evaluation factor for this acquisition is the Product Demonstration Model (PDM), followed by Past Performance Confidence Level.

a. Product Demonstration Model (PDM)

1) Manufacturing Operations

2) Visual Requirements Importance

3) Dimensional Requirements

Note: The PDM sub factors are of equal importance.

b. Past Performance Confidence Level

1) Aspect 1: Past Performance Compliance

a) Quality of Items

b) Delivery Performance

Note: The first 2 elements of Aspect 1 are of equal importance. Special measurements and IDPO orders will not be evaluated as part of the past performance.

2) Aspect 2: Experience/Relevancy

PAGE 12 OF 38 PAGESCONTINUATION SHEET REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED:

Information provided under past performance compliance will be used to determine the relevancy to the instant acquisition to provide an overall Past Performance Confidence Level.

The similarity in scope, complexity, dollar value, contract type, quality of terms and delivery performance, will be evaluated to determine the relevancy of the past performance.

Note: Aspects 1 and 2 are of equal importance.

NOTE:

1) The PDM is the most important factor and will provide the Government with the opportunity to determine whether the offeror possesses the ability to manufacture the item in accordance with the specification.

2) It is believed that past performance is indicative of future performance. The evaluation factor of Past Performance Confidence Level will provide the means to ensure that the contractor is able to meet with the Government’s requirement of the timely delivery of a quality product.

INSTRUCTIONS FOR PREPARING PROPOSALS

Proposal Organization

1. Your proposal shall be prepared in two separate volumes and provided in the quantities shown below. Proposals that do not provide the required information in the prescribed format may be excluded from further consideration.

VOLUME

VOLUME TITLE

COPIES

SUGGESTED

PAGE LIMIT

I TECHNICAL PROPOSAL 2 NONE

II BUSINESS PROPOSAL

(NOT REQUIRED WITH INITIAL

OFFER)

0 NONE

2. Each volume will be reviewed separately during proposal evaluation. All cost/price data/information, if required, must be in Volume II. No reference to cost/price data/information shall be included in the technical proposal. Each volume shall be separately bound / stapled to facilitate evaluation.

3. Volume I, Technical Proposal

a. The technical proposal must demonstrate the offeror’s ability to meet the Government’s requirements as set forth in this solicitation. To be considered acceptable, the offeror’s technical proposal must provide, at a minimum, the information requested in Section L. Failure to provide the information requested by any of the technical evaluation factors identified in Section L may be considered a “no response,” and a rating of “unacceptable” will be given to the applicable factor, sub-factor, element, or sub-element. Offerors are advised to indicate, when appropriate, that they have no relevant past performance.

b. Offerors are required to prepare and submit their proposal aligned with the evaluation factors specified in Section M of the solicitation to facilitate Government review and evaluation. Continuation sheets shall clearly identify the solicitation number and the firm’s name on each page.

4. Volume II, Business Proposal. Although submission of a Business Proposal is not required with initial offer, offered prices must be annotated in the Section B Supplies or Services and Prices/Costs of the solicitation.

PAGE 13 OF 38 PAGESCONTINUATION SHEET REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED:

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

(To be addressed in Volume I of the offeror’s proposal in accordance with Instructions for Preparing Proposals)

Non-Cost/Price Evaluation Criteria

a. Product Demonstration Model

52.215-9020 Instructions for Submitting Product Demonstration Models (PDMs) for Supply Chains at DLA Troop Support (formerly DSCP) (APR 2008) – DLAD

The offeror shall submit PDMs, as specified below, as part of their proposal. PDMs will be submitted at no expense to the Government and must be received prior to the time and date set forth for closing of offers. PDMs will be returned at the offeror’s request and expense so long as the PDMs are not destroyed by testing, retained by the Government as a manufacturing standard, and/or unless otherwise specified by the solicitation. PDMs will become Government property unless return is requested within 30 days after date of award.

ITEM NUMBER Size NUMBER REQUIRED

8415-01-013-7382 10 5

Models will be tested or evaluated to determine compliance with all characteristics specified for such test or evaluation as referenced in FAR 15.3. Failure of models to conform to all such characteristics may result in the rejection of the entire offer. Failure to furnish models by the time and date specified in the solicitation may be cause for rejection of the entire offer if not otherwise acceptable under the provisions for considering late offers.

The following applies only when checked as paragraph b):

[ ] If the PDM will be used as a manufacturing standard, for the successful offeror(s), the Government will return one approved PDM which will serve as a manufacturing standard.

Products delivered under any resulting contract shall conform to the approved model as to the characteristics listed for test or evaluation and shall conform to the specification/commercial product description characteristics.

[X] It is preferred that the materials used to manufacture the PDMs be in accordance with any specifications defined in Section C of this solicitation. However, if the offeror uses alternate materials to manufacture the PDMs, a letter must be supplied with them stating

(i) which materials depart from the end item specification, and (ii) that, although the materials used in producing the PDMs differ from those specified, the materials required by the specification will be used under any resultant contract.

NOTE: The use of alternate materials will not affect the rating of the PDM, either favorably or negatively when the use of the alternate materials is identified in accordance with the requirements of this section. However, the Government reserves the right to give a negative rating to PDMs that are made with materials that depart from the end item specification and the use of those alternate materials was not identified in accordance with the requirements of this section. Accordingly, to preclude a negative assessment of a PDM that is comprised of materials that are not in accordance with the specifications, it is in the offeror's best interest to identify any and all alternate materials that have been used.

Although the offeror is permitted to use alternate materials to construct the PDMs, the offeror is not permitted to use alternate manufacturing operations or change the construction/design of the PDM. The PDM must be manufactured (i) at the same facility where the production quantity will be manufactured, and (ii) must be in accordance with applicable specifications, including the placement of the labels, unless otherwise identified. However, labels need not be printed for the purpose of the PDM, but there must be an indication as to the size of the PDM, when applicable. Prospective vendors must identify the facility or facilities were the PDMs were manufactured.

PAGE 14 OF 38 PAGESCONTINUATION SHEET REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED:

[X] NOTE: PDMs MAY ONLY BE FURNISHED WITH THE OFFEROR’S PROPOSAL AT THE TIME AND DATE OF THE CLOSING OF THE SOLICITATION. SUBSEQUENT SUBMISSIONS WILL NOT BE PERMITTED, EVEN IF DEFICIENCIES EXIST IN THE PDM(s) SUBMITTED; THEREFORE, THE OFFEROR MUST FURNISH ITS BEST EFFORT AT THIS TIME. CORRECTIONS OF THE PDM WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED BY THE GOVERNMENT.

b. Past Performance Confidence Level

Both past performance compliance and relevancy will be evaluated to formulate a final past performance confidence assessment rating. The Government will consider the offeror’s past performance under U.S. Government contracts or other contracts in the two years prior to the solicitation closing, as well as relevant information from any other source. In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available, the offeror will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance and will receive a neutral rating.

There are two aspects to the past performance evaluation factor:

1) Aspect 1: Past Performance Compliance

a) Quality of Items: For each contract identified in response to this paragraph, the offeror shall describe the quality of items delivered. For substandard quality, the offeror shall specifically address any warranty actions taken, quality deficiency reports issued, or merchandise returned (including one-for-one exchanges). The description of the problem shall also include an explanation for its occurrence, a clear plan or evidence of measures taken to preclude a recurrence, and whether or not it was the offeror’s fault or subject to mitigating circumstances.

b) Delivery Performance: The offeror shall describe the extent of performance within two years preceding the solicitation closing date and specifically indicate whether the items were delivered on time, ahead of schedule, or behind schedule. If the items were not delivered on time, the offeror shall also provide the number of days delivered ahead of or behind schedule, whether revised delivery schedules were granted, and an explanation for any delivery extensions. For delinquent deliveries, the description shall also include an explanation for its occurrence, a clear plan or evidence of measures taken to preclude a recurrence, and whether or not the problem was the offeror’s fault, otherwise excusable, or subject to mitigating circumstances. Special measurement and IDPOs orders will not be evaluated.

Reference paragraphs a and b above, you are required to fill out the below information for each contract and to fill out a row on each chart for each delivery order that is in the current evaluation period.

Contract Number:

Item(s):

Award Date:

Current Term on Contract (e.g. Base Year, Option Year x):

Date of award of current contract term:

Date of expiration of current contract term:

DELIVERY

ORDER

NUMBER

DATE DO

WAS

ISSUED

DOLLAR

VALUE

ITEM TOTAL

QUANTITY

DELIVERY

SCHEDULE

STATUS

Below is an example of how to fill out the information for both a long-term contract and small

PAGE 15 OF 38 PAGESCONTINUATION SHEET REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED:

purchase.

Long-Term Contract Sample:

Contract Number: SPM1C1-XX-D-1234 Item(s): Webbing PGC 20204 (list all that apply to contract and/or delivery order) Award Date: 10/1/2007 Current Year on Contract (e.g. Base Year, Option Year x): Option Year Two Date of award of current contract term: 10/1/2009 Date of expiration of current contract term: 9/30/2010 Point of Contract (name, title, address, and work number):

ORDER

NUMBER

DATE DO

WAS

ISSUED

DOLLAR

VALUE

ITEM

TOTAL

QUANTITY

SCHEDULE

STATUS

0001 12/5/2007 $12,345 WEBBING 50,000

YDS

2/5/2008- 4/5/2008

FINISHED

SHIPPING ON

4/4/2008, 1

DAY AHEAD OF

SCHEDULE.

QUALITY:

(INSERT ANY

QUALITY

CONCERNS)

2) Aspect 2: Experience/Relevancy

The above information will be used to determine the relevancy to the instant acquisition to provide an overall Past Performance Confidence Level. The similarity in scope, complexity, dollar value, contract type, etc., will be evaluated to determine the relevancy of the past performance.

Cost and Pricing Data: A full cost and pricing proposal is not required. However, the offeror may be required to submit additional cost and pricing data during discussions. Therefore, offerors are cautioned to retain cost proposal worksheets, vendor quotations, and related support information.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR SECTION M

EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR AWARD

The Government will make award to the responsible offeror whose offer conforms to the solicitation and is most advantageous to the Government, cost or price and other evaluation factors considered.

The Government will award a contract only to a concern whose technical proposal establishes that they can meet the requirements of the Government. For this solicitation, all evaluation factors other than cost or price, when combined, are significantly more important than cost or price. The most important evaluation factor for this acquisition is the PDM, followed by the Past Performance Confidence Level.

Non-Cost/Price Evaluation Criteria:

1. Product Demonstration Model

a. Manufacturing Operations

b. Visual Requirements

c. Dimensional Requirements

Note: The PDM sub factors are of equal importance.

2. Past Performance Confidence Level

a. Aspect 1: Past Performance Compliance

PAGE 16 OF 38 PAGESCONTINUATION SHEET REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED:

1.) Quality of Items 2.) Delivery Performance

Note: The first two elements are of equal importance. Special measurements and IDPO orders will not be evaluated as part of the past performance.

b. Aspect 2: Experience/Relevancy

Information provided under Past Performance Compliance will be used to determine the relevancy to the instant acquisition to provide an overall Past Performance Confidence Level. The similarity in scope, complexity, dollar value, contract type, quality of items and delivery performance, will be evaluated to determine the relevancy of the past performance.

Note: Aspects 1 and 2 of the past performance assessment will be combined to form a Confidence Assessment Rating.

NOTES:

1. Product Demonstration Model

An “Unacceptable” rating in any of the elements will be cause for an overall Unacceptable rating of the PDM.

The offeror shall produce both the PDM and the production quantity at the same facility and certify to this effect by submission of the PDM.

Approval of the PDM as part of this technical proposal does not relieve the potential awardee from the requirements of the RFP.

2. Past Performance Confidence Level

a. There are two aspects to the past performance confidence level evaluation factor: Past Performance Compliance and Relevancy. Both aspects will be combined to form the assigned Past Performance Confidence Level. The Government will consider the offeror’s past performance under U.S. Government contracts or other contracts in the two years prior to the solicitation closing, as well as relevant information from any other source. The offeror's degree of conformance to contractual requirements, responsiveness and effectiveness in addressing issues and quality of customer service will be evaluated in the qualitative past performance ratings. In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available, the offeror will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance and will receive a neutral rating. For relevancy, the similarity of an offeror’s prior projects to the current requirement (via offeror’s written proposal) will be evaluated. The relevancy of the vendor’s past performance will be evaluated based on the similarity to contract type, length, and dollar value, similarity of items to be provided, complexity, and customers supported.

b. For the period two years prior to the solicitation closing date, the Government will assess offeror-submitted past performance information, as well as relevant information from any other sources, for use as an indicator to successful contract performance. Specific elements to be evaluated under the first aspect, Past Performance Compliance, are:

1. Quality of Items

2. Delivery Performance

c. Offeror’s past performance will also be evaluated for Relevancy (Aspect 2).

NOTE: Special measurement purchase/delivery orders will NOT be included in the Past Performance Evaluation. The currency and relevance of the information, source of the information, context of the data, volume of business, and general trends in performance

PAGE 17 OF 38 PAGESCONTINUATION SHEET REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED:

will be considered. Offerors may be given an opportunity to address especially unfavorable reports of past performance and the offeror's response or lack thereof will be taken into consideration.

RATINGS

Non-Cost/Price Evaluation Criteria - Product Demonstration Model (PDM)

Outstanding: Proposal meets requirements and indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements. Strengths far outweigh any weaknesses. Risk of unsuccessful performance is very low. The PDM meets the stated requirements of the acquisition documentation (i.e. specifications, commercial item description, purchase description, etc.) and has no weaknesses.

Good: Proposal meets requirements and indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements. Proposal contains strengths which outweigh any weaknesses. Risk of unsuccessful performance is low. The proposal’s strengths outweigh any weaknesses when the PDM substantially meets the stated requirements of the acquisition documentation (i.e. specifications, commercial item description, purchase description, etc.), but the PDM contains a weakness or weaknesses that are not significant and are very easily correctable during production.

Acceptable: Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. Strengths and weaknesses are offsetting or will have little or no impact on contract performance. Risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate. The proposal’s strengths and weaknesses are offsetting or will have little or no impact on contract performance when the PDM substantially meets the stated requirements of the acquisition documentation (i.e. specifications, commercial item description, purchase description, etc.), but the PDM contains a weakness or weaknesses that require preventative corrective action in production.

Marginal: Proposal does not clearly meet requirements and has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. The proposal has one or more weaknesses which are not offset by strengths. Risk of unsuccessful performance is high. The PDM does not meet all stated requirements of the acquisition documentation (i.e. specifications, commercial item description, purchase description, etc.), but has potential to become acceptable through significant corrective action. The PDM exhibits a significant weakness or weaknesses that indicate that the offeror did not completely understand the technical requirements and exhibits a low probability to produce an acceptable item.

Unacceptable: Proposal does not meet requirements and contains one or more deficiencies.

Proposal is unawardable. The PDM substantially fails to meet many significant designs related to and/or other requirements of the acquisition documentation (i.e. specifications, commercial item description, purchase description, etc.), and is indicative of a lack of understanding of the technical requirements. The PDM exhibits a very significant weakness or weaknesses determined by the evaluation team to render the PDM completely unacceptable for its intended function. The PDM cannot become acceptable without extensive corrective action or remedy that would be tantamount to a new PDM.

NOTE: Weaknesses are defined as deviations from the requirements as detailed in the specification, commercial item description, purchase description, etc. PDMs will be rated based on the severity of weaknesses.

Non-Cost/Price Evaluation Criteria – Past Performance Confidence Level – Aspect 1: Past Performance Compliance

Outstanding: Past performance (for quality of product/service, workmanship, delivery, and if an unrestricted acquisition, contractual socioeconomic subcontracting and mentoring goals) demonstrates that the offeror meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the Government’s benefit. Contractual performance is accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the offeror were highly effective.

PAGE 18 OF 38 PAGESCONTINUATION SHEET REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED:

Good: Past performance (for quality of product/service, workmanship, delivery, and if an unrestricted acquisition, contractual socioeconomic subcontracting and mentoring goals) meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. Contractual performance is accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the offeror were effective.

Acceptable: Past performance (for quality of product/service, workmanship, delivery, and if an unrestricted acquisition, contractual socioeconomic subcontracting and mentoring goals) meets some contractual requirements. Contractual performance includes some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the offeror appear or were satisfactory

Marginal: Past performance (for quality of product/service, workmanship, delivery, and if an unrestricted acquisition, contractual…