__SOWV.pdf
PDF 195 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 250440
- Issued by
- Orange County, California
About this file
This Scope of Work Verification form pertains to the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) and documents certification requirements for a Synchro 12 Upgrade and Support/Maintenance project (Requisition No. R002279). The project involves procurement of Synchro 12 upgrades with support and maintenance services for a three-year term effective September 1, 2026 through August 31, 2029. The RFQ solicits quotes from authorized Synchro 12 resellers, with delivery to be provided by electronic download only. Questions and clarifications must be submitted in writing no later than 11:00 a.m. on July 9, 2026, with OCTA responding to all written questions by issuing a written addendum no later than July 17, 2026. The award will be made to the lowest responsive and responsible firm on a lump sum basis, and all pricing shall remain firm for the contract term.
The budget allocated for this procurement is $13,642. All bidding firms must be authorized Synchro 12 resellers for U.S. Government Accounts only, with proof of authorization required prior to award. Unauthorized quotes and alternative manufacturer submissions will be deemed non-responsive and ineligible for consideration. Bidders must certify compliance with all Ukraine/Russia-related economic sanctions imposed by the State of California and the United States Government, including Presidential Executive Orders 13660, 13661, 13662, 13685, and 14065. The Scope of Work Verification form confirms that the SOW was independently prepared to invite competition and does not include brand name references or unreasonable restrictions favoring any specific vendor or product.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SCOPE OF WORK VERIFICATION
This Form Must Be Submitted with Scope of Work (SOW)
FA-CAMM-071.docm ( 05/16/16) Page 1 of 1
The following general rules shall apply when preparing scopes of work and specifications:
a) Provide a clear and concise Scope of Work (SOW) and not impose unreasonable requirements.
b) Specif ications and Scopes of Work shall identify all characteristics and specif ic tasks and functions of the items or services to be procured, and meet the Authority’s requirements.
c) Whenever possible, the expected quality of services to be provided or the performance characteristics of the item shall be specif ied.
d) The requestor shall identify all optional items, and the solicitation documents shall set forth the expected needs and the manner in which the related bid prices will be considered.
e) Brand name specif ications must be accompanied by an explanation that clearly indicates that the specif ication is not intended to be restrictive.
f ) The salient characteristics represented by the brand names shall be identif ied to allow for evaluation of possible “or equal” material.
g) Because standard specif ications and requirements allow for more ef f icient operations and result in lower prices, they shall be used wherever suitable.
h) Industry, federal, state and local government specif ications and requirements can be used.
Consultants are prohibited from writing the Scope of Work or assisting in the development or writing the Scope of Work in which they may bid.
INSTRUCTIONS
Project Managers (PM) must select one of the following certifications and submit this form with the scope of work/specifications. This form must be signed by the Project Manager and one of the following: the PM’s Department Manager or Director or Executive Director.
Project Description: Synchro 12 Upgrade and Support/Maintenance Requisition No: R002279 o I certify that the attached SOW/specifications was independently prepared to invite competition;
does not include reference to a brand name, or include unreasonable restrictions or an intent to favor any specific vendor or brand product.
*See Memo OR o The SOW/specifications prepared includes a “brand name or equal” description because it was determined to be “impractical or uneconomical” (as referenced in FTA Circular 4220.1F -revised March 18, 2013) to write a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements of the goods or services to be acquired. However, the specific features or salient characteristics of the named brand which must be met by offerors of “an equal” proposal have been clearly stated, as required by Federal Transit Administration regulations. (FTA Circular 4220.1F – revised March 18, 2013)
Project Manager Signature Dept. Manager/Director/Executive Director Signature
Information Systems 05/22/26 Department Date
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .