SOW Duel ECDIS Upgrade Purchase TS SOMI - Attachment 1.pdf

STATEMENT OF WORK

TS STATE OF MICHGAN - DUAL ECDIS UPGRADE

Contract:

TPOC: Jon Crampton

Period of Performance: Award to February 29, 2024

1. ABSTRACT:

1.1. Replacement/Upgrade Procure, a Dual Electronic Chart Display Information Systems (ECDIS) on the MARAD Training Ship TS State of Michigan. The existing ECDIS systems on board are antiquated, unserviceable, and no longer approved for use by the Maritime Administration (MARAD) and/or the United States Coast Guard (USCG). The replacement is to ensure compliance IAW USCG regulations regarding ship's navigational capabilities and required enhancements.

2. REFERENCES / ENCLOSURE

2.1. Existing Navigation Bridge JRC ™ RADAR(s)

2.1.1. JRC Mdl.: JMR-9272-S / Ser. No.: LC73113

2.1.2. JRC Mdl.: 9225-6X / Ser. No. LC72860

2.2. None

3. ITEM LOCATION / DESCRIPTION

3.1. TS State of Michigan, IMO No. 8835451

3.2. Physical Address:

3.2.1. TS State of Michigan c/o NMC

1701 East Front Street Traverse City, MI 49686 Attn. Stephen Sedlacek

4. GOVERNMENT FURNISHED EQUIPMENT / MATERIAL / SERVICES

4.1. None

5. CONTRACTOR FURNISHED EQUIPMENT / MATERIAL / SERVICES

5.1. The Contractor shall procure and deliver two (2) US. Coast Guard Approved ECDIS systems, each with the following components:

5.1.1. One, (1) but possibly Two (2) Primary & Secondary ECDIS JRC™ (JAN-9201C)

• 26” Master Display

• Deckstand

• Keyboard

• Trackball

• Central Control Unit (CCU)

• Power Supply (P/S)

• Junction Box

• Battery Backup – 24VDC

• LAN Hub

• LAN Cable

STATEMENT OF WORK

TS STATE OF MICHGAN - DUAL ECDIS UPGRADE

Contract: Version: Draft

TPOC: Jon Crampton Period of Performance: Award to February 29, 2023

5.1.2. However, only one (1) of the unit specified in Para if the lead time is reasonable on a Secondary ECDIS JRC™ (JAN-7201C)

• 26” Secondary Display

• Deckstand

• Keyboard

• Trackball

• Central Control Unit (CCU)

• Power Supply (P/S)

• Junction Box

• Battery Backup – 24VDC

6. STATEMENT OF WORK

6.1. Procurement Identification, selection and delivery including all freight and delivery charges of a suitable JRC ECDIS systems as per paragraph 5. Negotiation of pricing, delivery terms, and warranties with qualified suppliers.

6.2. Contractor shall assume all liability for damages to the unit(s) that occur during shipment. The contractor may include in their quote, the cost of insurance. The unit(s) must be delivered in an undamaged condition ready to be unpacked and installed.

6.3. Item(s) Must be delivered to the address Ref. Para 3.2.1

6.3.1. The project timeline will be determined upon the selection of the supplier and the availability of the ECDIS systems. The goal is to have the system delivered No Later than 29 February 2024, so that the system can be installed PRIOR TO; May 2024 and the beginning of the 2024 Cadet Summer Cruise, Phase I. The contractor will make every effort to ensure that timeline is met. Any delays, or anticipated delays beyond that date will be conveyed to MARAD promptly.

7. Deliverables:

7.1. Prepare and deliver comprehensive documentation for the new ECDIS systems, including user manuals, technical specifications, and maintenance guidelines.

7.2. Submit all necessary records and certificates to MARAD for approval.

Memorandum U.S. Department of Transportation

Maritime Administration

BRAND NAME REQUIREMENT JUSTIFICATION

1. DESCRIPTION OF THE SUPPLIES/SERVICES REQUIRED

JRC™ (Japan Radio Company) Dual ECDIS (Electronic Chart Display System) for the TS State of Michigan.

2. JUSTIFICATION FOR SOLICITING A BRAND NAME

Interoperability and Integration:

If the current radar system(s) in use aboard the TS State of Michigan are manufactured by JRC™ (Japan Radio Company), opting for JRC™ ECDIS will ensure better interoperability and seamless integration between different maritime navigation systems. This can enhance overall system efficiency and reduce potential compatibility issues.

Market Research indicates, only one other brand is acceptable other than JRC, which is Furuno™, however, in order to make a Furuno ECDIS compatible, modifications would have to be made by the installer to ensure the current RADAR’s to communicate reliably, which would increase the cost, schedule and risk of malfunctions. Technical modifications outside the manufacturer’s operating system introduce a degree on unreliability, which in the case of navigation and safety creates an unacceptable risk. Additionally, according to market research the lead time on Furuno equipment had been determined to be several months and the TS SOMI needs to have the equipment installed before it can sail. The JRC equipment can be delivered within weeks.

3. EFFORTS TO OBTAIN COMPETION

JRC and FURUNO are the standard for MARAD vessels and the industry at large with regards to RADAR Navigation Electronics. Other name brands, i.e.. Sperry, cater more to direction navigational and electronic control systems, such as Compasses and Steering systems. Furuno was considered, but a market research determined there is a 6-month lead time for their system, which is not viable for a ship that MUST sail in 5 months. JRC is available within weeks.

4. STEPS TO PRECULE FUTURE BRAND NAME AWARDS

In the future, Furuno could be considered a viable option depending on the need and lead time necessary when purchasing. All other brands are not viable due to compatibility and adherence to international standards and regulations needed to ensure the safety and efficiency of maritime operations.

5. OTHER FACTORS

System Familiarity: The Training Ship’ RADAR(s), the Officer’s, Crew, already in-place and familiar with the JRC™ (RADAR(s), that adopting JRC™ ECDIS’ will lead be a smoother transition and acceptance among ship operators, navigators, and other stakeholders.

6. REQUIRING ACTIVITY DETERMINATION

As the technical or requirement personnel and subject matter expert, I certify that the evidence of the supporting data that forms the basis of this justification is complete and accurate.

__Jon Crampton, MARAD DGO Marine Surveyor_____________

REQUISTIONER PRINTED NAME & TITLE

_______________________________________ SIGNATURE & DATE

7. CONTRACTIG OFFICER’S DETERMINATION

I have determined, in accordance with FAR 13.106-1(b)(1), that the circumstances of this procurement action deem only a brand name is reasonably available.

CONTRACTING OFFICER SIGNATURE & DATE

JON TELFORD

CRAMPTON

Digitally signed by JON TELFORD

CRAMPTON

Date: 2023.12.05 08:48:50 -06'00'

BRIDGET MOREHISER BONNECARRERE Digitally signed by BRIDGET MOREHISER BONNECARRERE Date: 2023.12.05 11:02:27 -06'00'