SOW.docx

STATEMENT OF WORK (SOW)

For the

TF33 CARBON SEALS

PURCHASE REQUEST NUMBER:

FD2030-21-01863

REV. 0

PREPARATION DATE: 12 August 2021

PREPARING ORGANIZATION:

421st Supply Chain Management Squadron (SCMS)/GUME Oklahoma Air Logistics Center And Air Force Life Cycle Management Center (AFLCMC) TF33 Technical Services Flight (LPSAD)

TINKER AFB, OK 73145-3031

TABLE OF CONTENTS Page

TABLE OF CONTENTS 1

SECTION I

SECTION II

SECTION III

APPENDIX “A”

ACRONYMS 11

SECTION I

1.0 DESCRIPTION OF DELIVERIBLES

The contractor shall provide remanufacturing requirements for the TF33 Carbon Seals that applies to the following National Stock Numbers (NSN) and Part Numbers (P/Ns).

TF33 CARBON SEALS

Contractor shall perform disassembly, cleaning, inspection and remanufacture, if applicable, rework and re-identification of the TF33 Carbon Seals. The contractor shall be a rated repair facility to remanufacture TF33 engine components; contractor must have the remanufacture capabilities to include appropriate technical data, repair documents, and license agreements, required to accomplish remanufacture of TF33 Carbon Seals. The contractor is responsible for the production, remanufacture and scheduled delivery of a quality product.

1.1 Receiving: The contractor shall perform a receiving visual inspection upon receipt of each TF33 CARBON SEALS for serviceability or remanufacture able condition for remanufacture In Accordance With (IAW) Technical Order (T.O) 2J-TF33-53-6 and 2J-TF33-53-7 previously re-worked/ remanufactured in a manner that would cause the finished part to exceed remanufacture limits described in the Technical Order as received shall be reported to 421/GUME, Production Management Specialist/Wholesale Supply Planner, for review and disposition. Disposition provided by AFLCMC/LPSEA. The contractor shall perform a receiving visual inspection for any shipping or packaging damage. The Contractor shall report to the Procurement Contracting Officer (PCO) and obtain disposition instructions for any received assets which are misidentified, misdirected, have a variation in quantity, non-requisitioned items, lost or damaged parcel post or incorrect shipments. The Contractor shall initiate a Supply Discrepancy Report (SDR) formerly called Report of Discrepancy (ROD) for such shipments or any assets as describe above or received in packaging other than the contracted packaging requirements through WEB SDR. The WEB SDR is located at: https://www.transactionservices.dla.mil/daashome/websdr.asp. If applicable, the Contractor shall provide the PCO, ES and PMS with an estimated parts list required should missing parts be determined. If the Contractor cannot initiate a SDR electronically, a manual form will be required to be submitted. Assistance with this process can be obtained by calling the help desk number located on the web site of the web address shown above.

This system of reporting an SDR has been developed in compliance with DoD regulations 4140.1-R, Supply Chain Material Management Regulation and 4000.25-M, Defense Logistics Management System (DLMS) Supply Standards and Procedures, which requires automated SDR processing and IAW Contractor Asset Visibility for the Air Force (CAV AF) Reporting Requirements. The prime packaging specialist may authorize exceptions to these requirements.

1.2 Disassembly: No disassembly required for TF33 CARBON SEALS.

1.3 Remanufacture Procedures: Contractor shall remanufacture the TF33 CARBON SEALS as follows:

1.3.1 Inspection: Contractor shall visually and dimensionally inspect for serviceability or reparable condition using Engine Shop Maintenance (ESM) inspection requirements as follows: the parts shall be cleaned IAW Technical Order (T.O.) 2J-TF33-53-5 and inspected in accordance with T.O. 2J-TF33-53-6 WP 062 00.

1.3.2 Remanufacture Documentation: Contractor shall document all inspections and remanufacture requirements for each part. This documentation shall have the correct part number and/or assembly part number, serial number and work accomplished annotated. Source of repair (SOR) shall provide complete documentation with each part that has been remanufactured with the intent of returning part to serviceable condition. Contractor shall re-manufacture parts in accordance with T.O. 2J-TF33-53-7 WP 062 00 and T.O. 2-1-111.

1.3.3 Remanufacture Deviations: Prior to Contractor’s use in remanufacture of the TF33 CARBON SEALS, the Contractor shall obtain written approval from the PCO for any deviations from the processes, materials, material processes or procedures on DD Form 1694.

1.3.4 Designated Engineering Representative (DER) Processes and Procedures: Contractor shall obtain written approval from the PCO for all DER processes and procedures.

1.4 Quality System and Quality Assurance: Each TF33 CARBON SEALS identified as serviceable shall be delivered to the government free of defects. The contractor shall develop and maintain a system that adheres to the requirements of Special Areas of Emphasis (SAE) AS9100, ISO 9001-2000, North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), Allied Quality Assurance Provision (AQAP) 2070 or equivalent and product or process specific quality standards such as North American Aerospace and Defense Contractors Accreditation Program (NADCAP) certified or Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) certification for significant industrial processes and supplement requirements imposed by this contract. The quality system will include a clear and complete set of work documents for all maintenance required by this contract. The quality program shall be designed to promptly detect and correct conditions adverse to quality.

1.4.1 First Time Defect Detection Ratio: This is the identification element of a Quality Measurement System (QMS) to determine who typically finds and documents a contractual non-conformity. To receive a score of 0 or meets standard, the contractor must identify the same number of contractual non-conformities (defects) as the COR/QAR or miss no more than 4 defects. To receive a score of -1 or unacceptable, will be assessed if the contractor misses more than 4 defects than the COR/QAR detects.

1.4.2 Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) Quality/Surveillance: The Contractor shall allow quality assurance reviews to be conducted at the site of remanufacture at the request of the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) throughout the contract period.

The Contractor shall allow a quality acceptance review by the DCMA representative at the site of remanufacture for each End Item generated under the terms of this contract.

The Contractor shall support quality acceptance inspections of each End Item and shall be performed prior to packaging and transportation. Quality acceptance will be performed by DCMA at the remanufacture site. Quality acceptance documentation for each end-item shall be maintained by the Contractor as part of the item document package.

1.5 Deficiency Report (DR) Investigation: At the Government’s request, the Contractor shall investigate the procedures of re-manufacture, as outlined in the T.O. 2J-TF33-53-7, IAW T.O. 00- 35D-54 and submit findings to include root causes and a corrective action against all DRs submitted to Contractor against items re-manufactured by this contract which are reported to be defective. The Contractor shall investigate returned exhibit within 30 days from time of exhibit receipt and submit a Deficiency Report IAW CDRL A005 (DID) DI-PSSS-81535A.

1.6 Condemned Assets: The Contractor shall condemn, at the Contractor’s facility, any TF33 CARBON SEALS that do not meet present and inspection limits. The Contractor shall process all condemned assets through Plant Clearance Automated Reutilization Screening System (PCARSS).

Condemnations will be reported to 421 SCMS/GUME, Air Force Sustainment Center (AFSC) to establish usage rates and cost planning by reporting quantities by P/N and NSN, as well as the reason for condemnation, of reparable components condemned and annotate on Contract Depot Maintenance (CDM) Production Report IAW CDRL A002 (DID) DI-PSSS-81995 and Commercial Asset Visibility Air Force (CAVAF) End Item Reporting IAW CDRL A001 (DID) DI-MGMT-81634C.

1.7 Counterfeit Prevention Plan (CPP): Contractors that supply electronic parts or systems that contain electronic parts will establish policies and procedures to avoid, detect, mitigate and disposition counterfeit electronic parts to prevent such parts from entering the USAF/DoD supply chain. These policies and procedures will be documented in a CPP for submission and approval in accordance with (DID) DI-MISC-81832 IAW CDRL A004 and accomplished for all specified contract items. DI-MISC-81832 is applicable to Parts, Material and Processes Selection (PMPS) associated with delivery of systems and assemblies to the USAF and DoD. The requirements established by DI-MISC-81832 also apply to electronics components procured in sustainment of such systems and assemblies. The requirements of the recently DoD-adopted SAE 5553, Aerospace Standard, Counterfeit Electronics Parts; Avoidance, Detection, Mitigation and Disposition will also apply.

1.7.1 At a minimum, the CPP will address:

1.7.1.1 Applicability. The Contractor shall identify all Business locations and programs to which the CPP applies. The CPP will address materials, hardware, electronic parts, and procured assemblies.

1.7.1.2 Definitions. The Contractor shall utilize definitions per AS 5553 to ensure consistency. Any Contractor-derived definitions must be included in an appropriate CPP Appendix or annex. (Ref. AS5553, paragraph 3, 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, Appendix H)

1.7.1.3 Parts Availability and Use of Parts Brokers. The Contractor shall not procure materials, systems, assemblies, subassemblies or parts from parts Brokers when available from Original Manufacturers (OM) or their Authorized Distributors. In cases where materials, systems, assemblies, subassemblies or parts are no longer available from the OM or their Authorized Distributors, procurement from Brokers may be authorized as defined by the Contractor's policy and their CPP. (Ref. AS5553, paragraph 4.1.1, 4.1.2.e., Appendix A)

1.7.1.4 Procurement Policies. The Contractor shall provide and implement policy directing development and implementation of business practices and procedures, and processes to prevent procurement of Counterfeit materials and parts. The Contractor shall identify the appropriate office(s), business units, functional organizations, and programs, which shall have responsibility for development, maintenance and implementation of the CPP. The CPP will identify the specific roles and responsibility for each. (Ref. AS5553, paragraph 4.1.2, 4.1.3, Appendix B, C, D)

1.7.1.5 Risk Assessment. The contract shall address the risk of using unknown sources and or unauthorized suppliers in the CPP. Application or technical risk assessments will establish the effect that counterfeit parts may have on performance. Vendor or source of supply risk assessments shall establish the potential for obtaining counterfeit parts. Using any risk analysis tool acceptable to the

Government, the Contractor shall conduct a risk assessment based upon item characteristics and how likely it is that a counterfeit part will be received. The Contractor shall identify and describe in the CPP how parts are selected for assessment and what risk is acceptable based upon the parts design, construction, material and functional requirements. As a minimum, analysis will be completed for flagging high risk items, such as items that are obsolete, is discontinued, rare, etc. The Contractor shall require completion of a trade study, documented within the CPP that will facilitate determining whether 100% testing of parts procured from after-market sources is more cost effective than qualification or requalification of a manufacturer. (Ref. AS5553, paragraph 4.1.2, 4.1.3, Appendix B, C, D)

1.7.1.6 Detection and Avoidance Responsibilities. The Contractor shall establish processes for the re7iew and approval of Contractor and applicable subcontractor systems for the detection and avoidance of counterfeit electronic parts and suspect counterfeit electronic parts, which processes will be comparable to the processes established for Contractor business systems under section 893 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111-383; 124 Stat. 4311; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note). The Contractor shall flow down such requirements and processes to their subcontractors per ODASD Memo titled "Overarching DoD Counterfeit Prevention Guidance", dated 16 March 2012. (Ref. AS5553, paragraph 4.1.4, 4.1.5, Appendix E)

1.7.1.7 Testing and Verification. The Contractor shall establish and accomplish testing and verification processes for items not received from an original equipment manufacturer, original component manufacturer, or authorized distributor that are identified as having high risk for counterfeit potential. These processes apply to prime contracts, and to subcontracts or suppliers below the prime contracts. The Contractor shall provide a list of acceptable test facilities if the subcontractor or supplier does not have the capability to perform required testing. Submittal of Certificates of Compliance indicating the parts are not counterfeit will be acceptable for verification of testing. (Ref. AS5553, paragraph 4.1.4, Appendix E)

1.7.1.8 Configuration Identification and Traceability. The Contractor shall identify and control the configurations of all systems, assemblies, subassemblies and parts, and enable mechanisms to provide traceability of parts. The Contractor shall report to the Government when control of the configurations of all systems, assemblies, subassemblies and parts, and mechanisms to provide traceability of parts are not possible. The Contractor shall identify the specific systems, assemblies, subassemblies and parts beyond the Contractors' control. The Contractor shall be responsible for detecting and avoiding the use or inclusion of counterfeit materials and parts, to include procured assemblies and subassemblies, in such products and will be responsible for the rework or corrective action that may be required to resolve the use or inclusion of counterfeit materials and parts. The cost of counterfeit electronic parts and suspect counterfeit electronic parts and the cost of rework or corrective action that may be required to remedy the use or inclusion of such parts are not allowable costs under Department contracts , unless: a) the Contractor has established a counterfeit avoidance/detection system approved by the DoD, b) the counterfeit parts were procured from a DoD-accredited trusted supplier or provided as Government property, and c) the Contractor has provide timely notification to the Government. (Ref. AS5553, paragraph 4.1.6, Appendix F)

1.7.1.9 Counterfeit Notification and Reporting. The Contractor shall report in writing to the Procuring Activity within 30 calendar days of determining any end item, component, part, or material contained in supplies purchased by the Department of Defense, or purchased by a Contractor or subcontractor for delivery to, or on behalf of, the Department, contains counterfeit electronic parts or suspect counterfeit electronic parts for the purpose of investigation and notification of the Air Force Office of Special Investigations (AFOSI). The Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO) will coordinate reporting to the appropriate Program Management/Item Management, System Engineering Management, the AFMC Discrepant Materiel Reporting Program (DMRP) Office in 406 SCMS/GULAB, and the AFOSI. Additionally, the Contractor shall within the same 30 day period ensure all suspected or confirmed counterfeit items are entered into the Government-Industry Data Exchange Program (GIDEP) system, which will serve as the DoD central reporting repository. (Ref. AS5553, paragraph 4.1.7, Appendix G)

1.7.1.10 Counterfeit Prevention Training. The Contractor shall provide appropriate training and shall require all personnel working procurement within their company, to include at a minimum their supply chain management specialists, receiving inspectors, and engineers, to complete said training.

The Contractor shall determine the appropriate training required. Training may be developed in-house or may be other Industry accepted training. The CPP will describe and list the training provided by the Contractor to their personnel.

1.8 Item Unique Identification (IUID): The contractor shall follow the latest DoD instructions to install IUID compliant marks. TOs and drawings will be complied with for any component where direction is currently called out in the TO or drawings. Unless otherwise directed, the following Number Structure will be used as the IUID, in the order specified, in accordance with UII Construct #2 specified in MIL-STD-130N Table IV “UII construct business rules and supplemental data”. This number shall be incorporated into the box label, affixed or attached to the exterior of the item packaging, and shall not be affixed or attached to the part itself. Issuing Agency Code (IAC), Enterprise Identifier (CAGE Code, DUNs number or DODAAC), Original Part Number and Serial number.

1.9 Reporting CDRLs: The contractor shall provide completed Certificate of Conformance documentation with each asset and its component parts that have been remanufactured with the intent of returning these assemblies or component parts to service. This documentation shall have part number, serial number, work accomplished, Service Bulletins complied with on serviceable tag DD Form 1574. The contractor shall ensure that all reporting as specified under the following Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL’s) is accomplished:

A001: Commercial Asset Visibility Air Force (CAVAF) Reporting Requirement – DID: DI-MGMT- 81838

A005: Deficiency Report (DR) – DID: DI-PSSS-81535A A006: Annual Inventory Report – DID: DI-MGMT-80441C

A003: Report of Shipping (Item) and Packaging Discrepancy (SDR) CDRL – This report enables the Contractor to notify the Government when freight contents do not agree with shipping documents and IAW CDRL DD Form 1423-1. In addition, the Contractor shall submit Supply Discrepancy Reports (SDRs) when required IAW the contract’s CAVAF PWS, “End Item and Government Furnished Equipment Management.” Contractor shall process SDRs when required IAW Section 1.2 of this PWS.

1.10 Packaging and Handling: The Contractor shall be responsible for the preservation and packaging of the TF33 CARBON SEALS IAW the Special Packaging Instructions specified on AFMC Form 158. The Contractor shall place a serviceable tag, Department of Defense (DD) Form 1574, inside the package along with the assembly as well as outside the package.

In addition, all marking and labeling of unit and shipping containers shall be in accordance with MIL-STD-129R, Department of Defense Standard Practice, Military Marking for Shipment and Storage. Use additional guidance for preparation and shipment IAW T.O. 00-20-1, 00-20-3, MIL-STD-2073-1E, MIL-STD-129, AFPAM 24-237, and AFMAN 24-206. This contract does not allow for Commercial Packaging.

1.11 Shipping and Transportation: The Contractor shall meet the delivery schedule as outlined in the contract. The Contractor shall ship or transport applicable assets as appropriate in order to have the assets available to support the customer’s operational requirements and IAW the contract. The Contractor shall not destroy reusable shipping containers, and will reuse them for return shipment.

In addition, the Contractor shall submit Supply Discrepancy Reports (SDRs) related to shipment of misidentified items, variations in quantity, non-requisitioned items, lost or damaged parcel post, and items in dubious condition. These discrepancies shall be reported and resolved using the DoD web-based application WebSDR (Supply Discrepancy Report), located at: https://www.daas.dla.mil/websdr/home.asp. This system of reporting an SDR has been developed in compliance with DoD regulations 4140.1-R, Supply Chain Material Management Regulation and 4000.25-M, DLMS Supply Standards and Procedures, which requires automated SDR processing. The Prime Packaging Specialist may authorize exceptions to these requirements.

1.12 Preservation: The Contractor shall not destroy reusable shipping containers, and will reuse them for return shipment.

1.13 Document Storage: All records and reports outlined in this SOW will be prepared for each part and a copy kept on file by the Contractor for five (5) years.

1.14 Safety: All records and reports outlined in this SOW shall be prepared for each part and a copy kept on file by the contractor for five (5) years. All Contractor personnel and technicians shall comply with system safety engineering principles during all levels of re-manufacturing. While performing work under this contract the Contractor shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local regulations regarding occupational safety and health. The Contractor shall notify the PCO within eight (8) hours, in writing by email, of any damage to Government property where the dollar value exceeds $500,000.00 and within two workdays, for any damage to Government property less than $500,000.00 during the execution of the contract.

Mishap notifications shall contain, as a minimum, the following information:

a. Contract, Contract Number, Name and Title of Person(s) Reporting

b. Date, Time and exact location of accident/incident

c. Brief Narrative of accident/incident (Events leading to accident/incident)

d. Cause of accident/incident, if known

e. Estimated cost of accident/incident (material and labor to remanufacture/replace)

f. Nomenclature of equipment and personnel involved in accident/incident

g. Corrective actions (taken or proposed)

h. Other pertinent information

If requested by the designated PCO, the contractor shall immediately secure the mishap scene/damaged property and impound pertinent maintenance and training records, until released by the Procuring Safety Office.

The Government Technical Representative reserves the right to request and view any records at any time.

SECTION II

2.0 SERVICE SUMMARY (SS): Contractor performance shall be measured and assessed using the Performance Objectives listed in the TF33 CARBON SEALS Service Summary, Table 2-1.

2.1 Service Summary Requirements: The Contractor shall ensure the performance objectives and thresholds are achieved as follows:

2.1.1 Performance Objectives and Thresholds: The Contractor shall achieve performance thresholds identified in Table 2-1 of this PWS. The Contractor service requirements are summarized into performance objectives that relate directly to the mission essential items.

The performance threshold describes the minimum acceptable levels of service for each requirement. The government will use the surveillance methods contained in the performance plan to evaluate the Contractor’s performance for the performance objectives listed below. In the event the performance objective is not met, the Contractor will be given a reasonable time after notification to correct the unacceptable performance, if such correction is possible.

The Contractor shall immediately take corrective action in accordance with the performance threshold(s). In cases where the Contractor fails to implement corrective action, the PCO will take appropriate measures.

NOTE: The TF33 CARBON SEALS government PMS and PCO will exercise surveillance over the performance thresholds. The absence of any contract requirement from the SS shall not detract from this enforceability nor limit the rights or remedies of the government under any other provision of the contract.

2.1.2 Surveillance Methods: The Contractor shall support the Quality Assurance Representative (QAR)/ Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) surveillance methods as identified below:

a. Periodic Inspection of Process or Output

b. Random Sampling of Recurring Service Output

c. One Hundred (100) Percent Inspection of Output

d. Customer Observation or Complaint.

NOTE 1: The method of surveillance may include one or more of the methods specified above.

NOTE 2: The government will use the methods contained in the Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) to evaluate the Contractor’s performance for the listed performance objectives. The TF33 CARBON SEALS government PMS and/or PCO will monitor Contractor performance to determine if it meets the contract thresholds as set forth in the performance measures and this PWS.

2.2 TF33 CARBON SEALS Service Summary:

Table 2-1

/ Paragraph (Para) Performance Threshold

Quality Product:

The Contractor shall delivery all TF33 CARBON SEALS defect free.

PWS

Para. 1.4 100% of TF33 CARBON SEALS delivered shall be defect free.

Delivery Performance:

The Contractor shall meet the delivery schedule.

PWS

Section 1.11 IAW Contractual Delivery Schedule.

100% of TF33 CARBON SEALS shall be delivered IAW the contractual delivery schedule.

Quality Measurement System (QMS) for SSF, Reference AFI 63-138 Chapter 6 Para 6.7.3.3 Performance Objective: First Time Defect Detection Ratio: This is the identification element of a QMS to determine who typically finds and documents a contractual non-conformity, the CORs or the contractor’s quality system

detects 21)

2.3 Contractor Performance Evaluation: Evaluation will occur when the TF33 CARBON SEALS QAR or DCMA evaluates the service of the Contractor to determine whether or not it meets the SS objectives of the contract. In the event the performance measure is not met, the QAR or DCMA will issue written notification to the Contractor. In cases where the Contractor fails to implement corrective action, the QAR or DCMA will take appropriate measures.

SS -1: The Contractor's failure to meet this requirement shall result in a negative Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting (CPAR) rating and remedies as allowed under FAR 52.212-4 Inspection/Acceptance.

SS - 2: The Contractor's failure to meet this requirement shall result in a negative CPAR rating and remedies as allowed under FAR 52.212-4 Inspection/Acceptance.

SS -3: The Contractor's failure to meet this requirement shall result in a negative Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting (CPAR) rating and remedies as allowed under FAR 52.212-4 Inspection/Acceptance.

SECTION III

3.0 GOVERNMENT PROPERTY

3.1 Government Furnished Material (GFM): NONE. All parts and components required to accomplish the intent of the CMM, PWS or Service Bulletin’s (SB) shall be Contractor furnished material.

Contractor furnished material and parts used for replacement shall be parts specified in CMM 75-21-30 Illustrated Parts Catalog (IPC), SB’s or has written approval from the AFMC AFLCMC/LPSAD and/or in writing through the PCO.

3.2 Government Furnished Property (GFP): All parts to be remanufactured will be shipped to the Contractor.

ACRONYMS

File Number: FD2030-21-01863