SOW.docx
DOCX document 25 KB Posted
- Attached to
- 0426-01 - Laser Target Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- N0017821Q6958
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| N0017821Q6958 (SF18).pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
LASER TARGET ENGINEERING EVALUATION
STATEMENT OF WORK
1.0 BACKGROUND
The Naval Surface Warfare Center, Dahlgren Division (NSWCDD) requires a laser target engineering evaluation/cost analysis to be conducted in support of the High Energy Laser Counter-Anti Ship Cruise Missile Project (HELCAP). Currently, there is not a known threat representative, low cost, and versatile capability for super-sonic laser targets. This assessment will identify laser target options, and will identify a design approach for a super-sonic laser target solution that will meet the current timeline and requirements of the HELCAP Project.
2.0 REQUIREMENTS
| 2.1 | The contractor shall furnish an engineering evaluation/cost analysis to fulfill the minimum requirements of this statement of work (SOW). This assessment shall include the following: |
| 2.1.1 | The contractor shall identify existing, available laser target capabilities. |
| 2.1.2 | The contractor shall define at least three alternatives for development of a laser target for HEL Weapon System engagement. Alternatives should include: (1) Use existing capability, without modification, (2) Develop a minimally-instrumented supersonic laser target for direct engagement (standard target), and (3) Develop a fully-instrumented and recoverable supersonic laser target for diagnostic engagement (smart target). |
| 2.1.3 | The contractor shall identify technical, cost, and schedule requirements and associated risks for supersonic laser target development and approval. |
| 2.1.4 | The contractor shall establish a project schedule, including key milestones for supersonic laser target approval that meet the laser weapon system demonstration timeline. |
| 2.1.5 | The contractor shall assess the ability of each of the laser target alternatives to meet laser weapon system requirements. This assessment should identify shortfalls in existing laser targets that require additional government investment to meet laser weapon system requirements. |
| 2.1.6 | The contractor shall conduct a comparison of alternatives with respect to: |
· Effectiveness – Degree to which each alternative meets program requirements.
· Implementability – Relative ease with which each alternative can be successfully completed, considering technical maturity and identified risks.
· Cost – Relative cost of each alternative.
· Schedule – Ability to meet program timeline.
2.2 For this engineering evaluation/cost analysis, a smart target shall include the following characteristics:
· The smart target would not be considered a consumable. It should be fully instrumented to include irradiance measurement.
· The smart target should be launched and recovered without damage after each test scenario.
· The smart target should be versatile and able to provide threat representative profiles from an on-station condition that is ready to support the test scenario.
· The smart target should send test data to the test site ground control station real time for recording during each test scenario.
· The data from the smart target should be GPS time stamped real time when being recorded.
2.3 For this engineering evaluation/cost analysis, a standard target shall include the following characteristics:
· The standard target would be considered a consumable. It should contain minimal/inexpensive instrumentation to monitor temperature and detect burn through.
· The standard target should support testing from an on-station condition where it is ready to support the test scenario.
· The standard target should send test data to the test site ground control station real time for recording during each test scenario.
· The data from the standard target should be GPS time stamped real time when being recorded.
· The standard target should be able to be recovered if not damaged during testing.
3.0 DELIVERABLES
| 3.1 | The contractor shall deliver the following reports to include: |
| 3.1.1 | Status Report IAW CDRL A001. |
| 3.1.2 | Technical Report IAW CDRL A002. |
| 3.1.3 | Final Technical Report IAW CDRL A003. |
4.0 TRAVEL
The contractor will be required to travel in performance of this contract. The number of trips and types of personnel traveling shall be limited to the minimum required to accomplish work requirements and shall be coordinated with the technical point of contact. All travel shall be conducted in accordance with the Federal Travel Regulations (FTR). The following travel is anticipated: up to three (3) personnel to the NSWCDD in Dahlgren, Virginia for two (2) days to sit in on a classified lethality brief, and discuss target and instrumentation requirements.
5.0 GOVERNMENT TECHNICAL POINTS OF CONTACT (TPOC)
David Carter
E43/NSWCDD
Email: david.a.carter3@navy.mil Phone: (540) 653-0379
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .