South GA ORC PWS_DRAFT_USACE_CLEAN.docx

PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT

FOR

South Georgia (GA) Group

OPTIMIZED REMEDIATION CONTRACT

AT

Moody AFB, GA Robins AFB, GA

CONTRACT NUMBER: TBD

25 AUGUST 2026

Table of Contents

1.0 SCOPE

This requirement is for environmental remediation activities at Moody Air Force Base (AFB) and Robins AFB. This Performance Work Statement (PWS) defines the scope of environmental services necessary to conduct site restoration under the Optimized Remediation Contract (ORC). The range of activities includes investigation, design, construction of remedial systems, operation and maintenance of established remedies, optimization at applicable sites, and achievement of site-specific objectives. The Contractor shall undertake Environmental Remediation activities to achieve Performance Objectives (POs) at 26 Installation Restoration Program (IRP) sites and 1 Military Munitions Response Program (MMRP) site.

NOTE: For purposes of this ORC, the term “Government” includes the Air Force (AF) and United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). While regulators are a governmental entity, they are also a third party over whom the AF has no control and, as such, will be referred to as “regulators.”

1.1 Introduction

Moody AFB Moody AFB is located about 10 miles northeast of Valdosta, GA. The current mission of the 23rd Wing at Moody AFB is to organize, train, and equip Flying Tigers to rapidly deploy and execute the Global Precision Attack (GPA), Personnel Recovery (PR), and Agile Combat Support (ACS) Service Core Functions to meet worldwide Combatant Commander requirements. The total land area at Moody AFB is approximately 11,587 acres, including the main base (5,224 acres) on the western half of the installation, the Grand Bay Weapons Range (5,874 acres) to the east, and the Grassy Pond Recreational Annex (489 acres) located 25 miles southwest of the installation.

Remediation activities at Moody AFB are being conducted pursuant to Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) requirements. Regulatory oversight is provided by the GA Environmental Protection Department (GA EPD).

The installation is being managed under Hazardous Waste Corrective Action Permit No. HW-077(CA), issued on 20 September 2024. This permit expires 10 years from the issuance date, on 20 September 2034. The ORC Contractor is not responsible for permit renewal.

Robins AFB Robins AFB is an 8,800-acre AF installation located in Houston County, in central Georgia, at the eastern edge of the city of Warner Robins. Robins AFB operates as a worldwide logistics management center for aircraft, missiles, and support systems for the AF, and as a repair center for aircraft and airborne electronics systems.

Remediation activities at Robins AFB are being conducted pursuant to RCRA requirements, with the exception of sites LF004 and TS882, which are being conducted pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), as amended by the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA), and in accordance with National Oil and Hazardous Substances Contingency Plan (NCP) requirements.

All RCRA sites are being administered under RCRA Permit No. HW-064(S) dated 25 September 2018. The permit expires in 2028. The ORC contractor is not responsible for permit renewal. Site LF004 was placed on the National Priorities List (NPL) on 22 July 1987 and is being administered under a Federal Facilities Agreement (FFA) signed on 14 June 1989.

Regulatory oversight for LF004 is provided by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Region 4 and GA EPD. Regulatory oversight for all other sites is provided by GA EPD.

GA EPD considers cleanup levels for groundwater the maximum contaminant levels (MCL) for those constituents with MCLs, and background or a risk-based level (calculated through a GA EPD approved risk assessment) for those constituents without MCLs. Clean-up levels have been established in each site's respective Corrective Action Plan (CAP). Additionally, GA EPD considers remediation complete once the site Constituents of Concern (COCs) have decreased below their respective site clean-up levels and have remained below those clean-up levels for three (3) consecutive years of semi-annual sampling (or other frequency per that site's CAP) before granting No Further Action (NFA).

1.2 Overview of ORC Scope and Requirements

The Contractor shall perform all the necessary environmental remediation activities needed to achieve the performance requirement described in Table 1: Performance Table, and additional scope in 1.3.2. This PWS and enclosures listed below detail the project requirements needed to meet the AF objectives:

Enclosure 1 – Acronyms and Definitions Enclosure 2 – Government Furnished Information (GFI) Enclosure 2A – Administrative Record Spreadsheet Enclosure 2B – NOT APPLICABLE Enclosure 3 – Government Systems and Components (GFP) Enclosure 4 – Community Involvement Plan (CIP) Guidance version 4 The intent of the ORC initiative is to advance site cleanup during the Period of Performance (PoP) in the most efficient and cost-effective manner, as supported by a cost-benefit analysis and exit strategy that achieves the greatest reduction in life-cycle cost (LCC). The AF is interested in substantial reduction of long-term environmental liabilities and total LCC. Technical approaches should present a clear and achievable strategy for meeting the POs while minimizing disruption to ongoing operations. Proposed approaches should include appropriate contingencies and execution planning that support continuity of work efforts, limit the potential for change orders, and provide the Government confidence in successful performance. The AF is required to implement remedies, as necessary, to enable the mission, protect human health and the environment, and comply with laws and regulations. The goal of the ORC initiative is to ensure the AF continues to fulfill all facets of its Environmental Restoration Program (ERP) Mission by effectively and efficiently managing the program in a performance-based, results-oriented, and cost-conscious framework.

The AF requires all sites to be remediated to meet standards that support the current or reasonably anticipated future land use of the property. Accurate documentation and reporting of contaminant removal and cost savings are essential components to optimization success. In accordance with Defense Environmental Restoration Program (DERP) and Air Force Instruction (AFI) 32-7020, the AF defines optimization under the ORC as the reducing contaminant mass and concentrations, reducing LCC, or any combination of activities that accelerates Response Complete (RC)/Site Closeout (SC) resulting from the remedial implementation undertaken by the Contractor, exceeding what is required to maintain compliance with an approved Decision Document (DD)/Corrective Action Plan (CAP).

The Contractor shall maintain compliance with all DDs/Records of Decision (RODs)/Proposed Plans/RCRA Permits currently in place until they are no longer required, or an alternate approach is approved. The contractor shall conduct DD/ROD amendments or Explanations of Significant Differences (ESDs) as required to implement new approaches.

The Contractor shall function as an integral team member in support of the Air Force Civil Engineer Center (AFCEC) mission, to include the sharing of information with USACE, other AFCEC Contractors, and AF personnel, in cooperation with community stakeholders, regulators, and other Government entities.

Requirements for efficient management of this contract include achieving the POs within the Performance Period (PP) as outlined in Table 1 and the work detailed in Section 1.3.2 of this PWS. Requirements include timely identification and resolution of impediments to successful project execution. The Contractor shall provide all personnel, equipment, supplies, tools, materials, and other items necessary to perform the tasks defined in this PWS. The Contractor is solely responsible for reviewing all available information and forming independent, professional conclusions and interpretations of site conditions and requirements to achieve the POs of this contract within the PoP specified in accordance with Section 3.0. AFCEC will rely on the Contractor’s expertise in recognizing and addressing problematic issues during the execution of this contract. The Contractor shall perform all work in accordance with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations. The Contractor shall also comply with all applicable installation regulations. Remedies shall conform to environmental permits, DD requirements, or other legal requirements. The Contractor shall continue work throughout the entire duration of the PoP. The Contractor’s local office presence will be relied upon to provide rapid-response actions for field activities and on-site meetings.

1.2.1 Specific Scope Discussion and Limits

The scope of this contract is to perform environmental remediation services for the sites listed in Table 1 and Section 1.3.2. The ORC Contractor shall assume contractual liability and responsibility for achieving the POs. If the selected technical approach is not effective, as demonstrated by the trends in the performance model, the Contractor shall develop and implement a revised technical approach to achieve the POs, including DD amendments, if required, to implement the remedial approach. This scope includes all known contaminants linked to the specific sites per Table 1 of the PWS (including contaminants on, under, or sourced at/migrating from the specific sites) without regard to quantity (e.g., plume size, concentrations). See reference to Section 1.3.2 of this PWS for exclusions. The AF remains statutorily responsible for all sites listed in Table 1 and the work described in Section 1.3.2.

1.2.2 Preliminary Assessment/Site Inspection, Remedial Investigation or Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study (including Supplemental Investigations), and Decision Document

NOT APPLICABLE

1.2.3 Response Complete or Site Closeout

Table 1 of the PWS identifies RC or SC as the PO for selected sites. The Contractor is responsible for achieving these objectives as identified in Table 1 and the work described in Section 1.3.2. See PO definitions in Enclosure 1, Acronyms and Definitions. The performance components, including the need for a performance model, are described in Section 8.1.3.

1.2.4 Remedial Action-Operation with Optimization

Table 1 of the PWS identifies the following POs, which include optimization as follows: 1. Remedy in Place (RIP) and Remedial Action-Operation (RA-O) with Optimization, 2. DD Amendment (or ESD) with Remedy Implementation and RA-O with Optimization, or 3. RA-O with Optimization. The Contractor is responsible for achieving these POs as identified in Table 1and additional scope described in Section 1.3.2. See PO definitions in Enclosure 1, Acronyms and Definitions.

The optimization and performance components, including the need for a performance model showing interim and final performance payment milestones, are described in Section 8.1.3. Optimization goals may include one or more of the following:

1. Shorten time to RC, SC, or other Department of Defense (DoD) goals.

2. Improve remedy performance and/or accelerate the progress of the remediation.

3. Enhance source or plume control for engineering systems.

1.2.5 Remedial Action-Operation and Reduce Life Cycle Cost; Long Term Management and Reduce Life Cycle Cost Table 1 of the PWS identifies RA-O and Reduce LCC or Long-Term Management (LTM) and Reduce LCC as the PO for selected sites. The goal of these POs is to minimize future AF liability and cost to the greatest degree feasible. Reduce LCC sites have achieved RIP or RC, have remedies that are effective (source control, risk mitigation, and plume stability), and have the potential for LCC reduction by optimizing some component of the existing remedy, by, for example:

Reducing sampling frequency Reducing system operations Reducing number of wells sampled per event Reducing number of analytes per sampling event The Contractor shall achieve the following objectives for each Reduce LCC site:

Maintain compliance with all DDs and permits (currently in place or to be approved) throughout the PoP.

For RA-O sites, develop performance models showing interim and final performance payment milestones, addressing all Contaminants of Concern (COCs) and breakdown products. Refer to Section 4.3 and Section 8.1.3.1.

Deliver a Reduce LCC Plan, as a stand-alone plan or in the Project Management Plan (PMP), that identifies opportunities to improve cost efficiency of RA-O or LTM activities, and the planned approach for implementation. The Reduce LCC Plan shall:

Provide a basis for proposed reductions in LCC throughout the PoP compared to the cost of status-quo RA-O activities (those required to maintain compliance). The planned reduction can be illustrated using a line graph (current, planned, achieved) or verbiage describing the current and planned reductions.

Document risk and mitigation strategies for implementing optimization activities to reduce LCC.

Update or revise site-specific work plans, monitoring plans, and/or DDs, as appropriate.

Deliver Reduce LCC Report(s) to document progress in achieving the planned reductions when those reductions are achieved. Reduce LCC Reports may be combined with monitoring reports. Reductions in required RA-O activities are contingent upon regulatory approval.

Deliver an RA-O & Reduce LCC Summary and Forecasting Report two years prior to the PoP end date. The Reduce LCC Summary and Forecasting Report shall:

Document cost-saving activities to date and forecast remaining activities and assumptions to further reduce LCC 10 years post-PoP.

Provide a realistic projection to achieve SC or RC after the PoP (the Contractor shall identify which PO is the optimal endpoint). See PO definitions in Enclosure 1, Acronyms and Definitions.

1.2.6 Remedial Action-Operation or Long-Term Management (as appropriate) Table 1 of the PWS identifies RA-O or LTM in accordance with the approved DD/CAP as the PO for selected sites. The Contractor shall achieve the following objectives for each RA-O and LTM site:

Maintain compliance with all DDs and permits (currently in place or to be approved) throughout the PP. Update or revise site-specific work plans, monitoring plans, and/or DDs, as appropriate.

For RA-O sites, develop performance models addressing all COCs and breakdown products. Refer to Section 8.1.3.1, Performance Models.

· Provide a realistic projection to achieve SC or RC after the PoP (the Contractor shall identify which PO is the optimal endpoint).

1.2.7 Alternate Objectives

NOT APPLICABLE

1.2.7.1 Advanced Site Characterization

NOT APPLICABLE

1.2.7.1.1 Supplemental Site Investigation

NOT APPLICABLE

1.2.7.1.2 Conceptual Site Model

NOT APPLICABLE

1.2.7.1.3 Groundwater Monitoring Program Update

NOT APPLICABLE

1.2.7.2 Remedy Evaluation and Recommendation

NOT APPLICABLE

1.2.7.2.1 Cost/Benefit Analysis

NOT APPLICABLE

1.2.7.3 Decision Document Amendment

NOT APPLICABLE

Table 1 presents the POs, PPs, and performance standards associated with all installations/sites under this ORC. The PP specified in Table 1 starts from the Obligation Date of the first Sub-CLIN for the site unless otherwise specified. All approvals (both Government and regulator) as required by the performance standard, must be provided in writing. Additional scope discussion and limits can be found in Section 1.3.2.

Table 1: Performance Table

1) Draft PMP

2) Final PMP

3) Updates as necessary

The PMP should be maintained with accuracy and completeness based on the current technical approach for each site, management structure, etc.

Moody AFB

AF and USACE approval of Performance Model Evaluation Report.

Propose meeting SC

AF and USACE approval of Performance Model Evaluation Report.

AF and USACE approval of Performance Model Evaluation Report.

AF and USACE approval of Performance Model Evaluation Report.

Propose meeting SC

AF and USACE approval of Performance Model Evaluation Report.

Propose meeting SC

AF and USACE approval of Performance Model Evaluation Report.

AF and USACE approval of Performance Model Evaluation Report.

AF and USACE approval of Performance Model Evaluation Report.

AF and USACE approval of Performance Model Evaluation Report.

Robins AFB

CG028

SWMU 28

AF and USACE approval of Performance Model Evaluation Report.

CG501

SWMU 59

AF and USACE approval of Performance Model Evaluation Report.

CG502

SWMU 60

AF and USACE approval of Performance Model Evaluation Report.

CG503

SWMU 61

CG504

SWMU 47

AF and USACE approval of Performance Model Evaluation Report.

DC034

SWMU 36

Achieve Construction Completion

AF and USACE approval of Performance Model Evaluation Report.

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of RA-O documentation (e.g., Annual CAP PR).

DC034

SWMU 36

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of RA-O documentation (e.g., Annual CAP PR).

LF001

SWMU 1

LF002

SWMU 2

LF003

SWMU 3

AF and USACE approval of Performance Model Evaluation Report.

LF004

SWMU 4

AF and USACE approval of Performance Model Evaluation Report during RA-O.

OT017

SWMU 17

Achieve Construction Completion

AF and USACE approval of Performance Model Evaluation Report.

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of RA-O documentation (e.g., Annual CAP PR).

OT017

SWMU 17

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of RA-O documentation (e.g., Annual CAP PR).

OT020

SWMU 20

Achieve Construction Completion

OT020

SWMU 20

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of RA-O documentation (e.g., Annual CAP PR).

OT023

SWMU 23

OT037

SWMU 62

AF and USACE approval of Performance Model Evaluation Report.

OT041

SWMU 57

Achieve Construction Completion

OT041

SWMU 57

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of RA-O documentation (e.g., Annual CAP PR).

SS040

SWMU 10B

Achieve Construction Completion

SS040

SWMU 10B

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of RA-O documentation (e.g., Annual CAP PR).

SS043

SWMU 79

TS882

(Former Skeet Range)

* The Performance Period is from the date of award of the first performance Sub-CLIN.

1.3.2 Additional Scope Discussion and Limits

In addition to the requirements identified in Table 1, the Contractor shall be responsible for:

a. Operations and Maintenance (O&M) of all remediation equipment to include all wells associated with requirements in this PWS and well abandonment with AF, USACE, and regulatory approval (if required) when the well is no longer necessary.

I. Keeping systems operating as intended throughout the contract PoP. If a system becomes non-operational, the Contractor shall submit, in writing, the plan to get the system operating again to the COR and installation RPM within 10 days. The plan shall include the timeline for repairs.

b. Establishing a quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) process to ensure documents are of an acceptable quality and do not contain typos, formatting issues, contradictory information in tables and text, etc.

c. Contaminants for which there are promulgated federal, state, or local standards.

d. Additional sites or work may be added to the contract via modification if AFCEC determines during the PoP, that clean-up needs to be accomplished at a site where Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are present, and there is a promulgated State Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) that is approved for use by the DoD as an Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirement standard.

e. Conducting 1,4-Dioxane investigations is not required for Moody AFB and Robins AFB.

f. Management and disposal of investigation-derived waste (IDW) media associated with PFAS in accordance with AF Guidance Memorandum “Updated Interim Guidance on Destruction or Disposal of Materials Containing Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances in the United States” dated 20 February 2026, and Section 4.14.2 of this document. The following sites are validated PFAS sites; therefore, the Contractor shall test waste media for PFAS and dispose of it in accordance with the guidance.

I. No applicable sites under this ORC.

g. Analyzing IDW for PFAS using EPA Standard Method 1633 as required for waste acceptance. This includes, but is not limited to, sites:

I. Moody AFB: FT007, SS024 and SS038 II. Robins AFB: CG028, LF004, OT020, and OT023

h. Wastewater treatment sites that may be retrofitted for PFAS during the ORC PoP by a non-ORC contractor, along with ongoing O&M activities such as filter changeouts and the collection of influent, mid, and effluent samples for evaluation, may be added to the ORC contract via modification.

i. Ensuring that remedial actions do not negatively impact the distribution of any other contaminants and/or emerging contaminants (e.g., PFAS, 1,4-dioxane).

j. Conducting Restoration Advisory Board (RAB)-interest assessments and meetings; performing community outreach activities; and preparing CIPs or updates as described in sections 4.6.1, 4.6.2, and Enclosure 4.

k. Completing and updating a comprehensive monitoring well inventory, and a comprehensive well condition assessment at Moody AFB and Robins AFB.

I. Moody AFB: Every 2 years prior to state inspection.

II. Robins AFB: Maintained as Table 1-1 in the annual Corrective Action Plan Progress Report (CAPPR). The ORC contractor updates this list annually when CAPPR is prepared for regulatory submittal.

l. Evaluating Monitored Natural Attenuation (MNA) at Moody AFB, including collecting necessary parameters (e.g. iron, nitrate, sulfate, and manganese), and completing an MNA evaluation, is required to achieve regulatory concurrence to transition any of the sites from the current remedy to an MNA remedy, if appropriate. A CAP Addendum is required to officially transition the site even if it has achieved Remediation Performance Standards (RPSs) /Active Remediation Standards (ARSs) identified in the CAP.

m. Maintaining infrastructure in place (fences and wells) at Moody AFB.

n. Brush and tree clearing once per year for all sites at Moody AFB.

o. Providing site trailer/office at Moody AFB.

p. Replacement of aging equipment at Robins AFB for the following sites:

I. CG501, CG502, CG503, DC034, LF003, LF003-Ground Water Treatment Plant (GWTP), OT020, OT041, SS040.

q. Land Use Controls (LUC)s for Building 647 are included in OT017 at Robins AFB.

The Contractor shall NOT be responsible for:

r. Reasonably unanticipated contaminants at sites identified in Table 1 (e.g., previously undetected mercury within a TCE plume); however, Contractors would be responsible for reasonably anticipated contaminants (e.g., vinyl chloride in a TCE plume).

s. Remediation or treatment of contaminants for which there are no promulgated federal, state, or local standards or AF agreements at the time of contract award, unless included via modification.

t. Official regulatory changes occurring after contract award, as documented in Administrative Code, laws, and regulations, e.g., decrease in residential Soil Cleanup Target Levels, Groundwater Cleanup Target Levels, etc.

u. Sites not identified in Table 1.

v. Sites containing radiological waste.

w. Remediation of sites with unexploded ordnance (UXO), Discarded Military Munitions (DMMs), munitions constituents (MCs) present in high enough concentrations to pose an explosive hazard, and chemical warfare material (CWM).

2.0 APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS

The Contractor shall identify and comply with all applicable federal, state, and local statutes; DoD and AF instructions, manuals, handbooks, regulations, guidance, and policy letters (including AF policy and guidance for IRP and MMRP); Executive Orders (EOs), American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standards, American Petroleum Institute Codes, National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Standards, Association for Materials Protection and Performance, National Electric Codes (NEC), Uniform Fire Codes, and International Building Codes, including all changes and amendments in effect on the date of issuance of this contract. It is the Contractor’s responsibility to identify and comply with all applicable requirements. In addition, the Contractor shall refer to the current versions of the DoD Policy and Guidelines for Acquisitions Involving Environmental Sampling or Testing and the United States AF Construction Management Implementation Guide.

The Contractor shall identify and comply with all applicable documents for the Installations including RODs, ROD Amendments, ESDs, RCRA Permits and subsequent modifications, Risk Evaluation Corrective Action Program (RECAP) documents, the Endangered Species Act, other DDs, Deeds, waste management guidance, and conveyance notices.

3.0 GOVERNMENT FURNISHED INFORMATION

GFI is contained in the Administrative Record (https://ar.cce.af.mil/) or listed in Enclosure 2. The documentation provided represents the most recent and appropriate documentation available for the Installation(s) and sites identified in this PWS. Electronic format is not guaranteed.

The Contractor shall properly account for and manage all new and existing components and parts of any and all systems and site components, procured and utilized at the Installations as-is where-is, in accordance with the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR). Lists of current components and parts are provided in Enclosure 3. All Real Property installed during the contract shall be turned over to the Government consistent with procedures identified in Section 8.3.2.

The Contractor is responsible for providing all other supplies and equipment, not already installed and not listed in Enclosure 3, that are required to achieve the POs of this contract. All AF-owned property, including real property used for remediation purposes, must be maintained by the Contractor in accordance with applicable maintenance requirements and usability for the intended purpose. The Contractor is responsible for disposal of unneeded, unusable, or obsolete components and parts as required, and transfer of remaining components and parts to the Government at the end of the contract PoP. Prior to the disposal of excess or unserviceable equipment listed in Enclosure 3, the Contractor shall coordinate activities with the Contracting Officer (CO/KO) for disposition instructions.

4.0 MANAGEMENT, PLANNING, AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS

The Contractor shall implement a full range of environmental remediation activities as required to meet POs of this contract and in accordance with all applicable or relevant and appropriate federal, state, and local laws and regulations; DoD policies; and Installation-specific orders, agreements, or rules. The Contractor shall supply all labor, equipment, and materials necessary to accomplish the work through the entire PoP of the contract. The Contractor shall perform management and planning functions, including performance measurement and fund status reporting.

The PMP, IMS, and MPS documents shall be fully integrated and consistent. Consistency shall be maintained throughout the PoP by fully implementing programmatic change control processes compliant with EC 5.2.1 (Execution of Change Control Boards) and PMP guidance. It is the Contractor’s responsibility to clearly demonstrate an applied understanding and compliance with ORC requirements, application of guidance/requirements, and consistency between the PMP, IMS, and MPS. The Contractor shall create the IMS and MPS files and deliver them as separate files as required.

4.1 Project Management Plan

The Contractor shall develop and maintain a detailed PMP. The PMP shall specify the project’s resources and tasks corresponding to the Sub-CLINs for this contract as required for the planning, execution, control, and completion of the stated POs. At a minimum, the PMP shall include the following sections: technical approach for achieving the POs in accordance with the PWS; management approach, including sub-contractor management, organization and integration of the project team; schedule management; project controls; transitional activities; risk management; quality management; health and safety management; procurement management; security management; and communications plans. The Contractor is responsible for complying with the ORC PMP Guidance in effect at the time of ORC issuance, as well as standard industry practices. Clarification on PMP content and the level of detail required to address the ORC program shall be provided by the COR.

The PMP shall demonstrate a comprehensive decomposition of each work package/PO deliverable and exhibit a clear and concise correlation between the PWS, IMS, and MPS. The Contractor is responsible for complying with the guidance for the development of Contract Line-Item Number (CLIN) Structures, IMS, and MPS per the ORC PMP Guidance at the time of ORC issuance.

The first draft of the PMP shall be submitted in accordance with Table 1. The Draft PMP and subsequent revisions shall be subject to AF and USACE review and approval. The Final PMP shall be due within fourteen (14) calendar days of receipt of AF and USACE comments on the Draft versions. The Contractor shall maintain the PMP throughout the duration of the contract, utilizing dated page changes and track change deletions and insertions (electronic copies) as practicable. Whole document PMP updates during the life of the ORC may be necessary based on the accumulation of small incremental changes or significant changes (e.g., contract requirements, technical approaches, risk and issue management, or key personnel). The Contractor shall prepare two whole document updates during the PoP of the ORC. The AF and USACE will determine when PMP updates are warranted.

4.2 Schedule and Planning Requirements – Integrated Master Schedule The Contractor shall prepare and submit an IMS in both hardcopy and electronic format (Microsoft Project and Adobe Acrobat portable document file). The IMS will be finalized during the development of the PMP, and the Contractor shall update it monthly.

The following are minimum AF requirements for the IMS:

Present a realistic sequence and timing of all activities and documents necessary to demonstrate achievement of the PO within the PP. The IMS shall demonstrate full compliance with the PWS, including achieving POs within the required PP.

Utilize a realistic calendar (i.e., work week of five, eight-hour days, no submittals on Federal holidays, etc.), appropriate logic ties, clearly defined constraints, and identify key points where risk mitigation/contingency actions may need to be taken.

Include the following columns in the exact order as shown below:

Installation Name: Identify EESOH-MIS Installation Name per Table 1. The Installation name must be included in every line of every Sub-CLIN.

Site Number: Identify EESOH-MIS Site ID per Table 1 and Site Alias, if applicable. The EESOH-MIS Site ID must be included on every line of the IMS where applicable.

CLIN/Sub-CLIN: Identify CLIN and/or Sub-CLIN per Section B of the contract. The CLIN or Sub-CLIN must be included on every line of the IMS, as appropriate.

Note: Sub-CLINs for compliance activities (routine regulatory requirements to comply with binding agreements) are denoted as ####CX, and Sub-CLINs for performance activities (remedial advancement or progress towards the PO) are denoted as ####AX. For example, for POs of RA-O with Optimization, the Performance Goal “A” Sub-CLINs are specifically for reporting progress in achieving the performance goal identified in the performance model (separate reports for each year). This requires a separate report identifying the most recent result for the performance indicator(s), usually a COC concentration, and how that compares with the projected value of the performance indicator in the performance model. The “C” Sub-CLINs are specifically for operating the remedy and reporting all required results, such as COC concentrations, geochemical, groundwater elevations, etc.

Task Description: Include a detailed description of all activities (e.g., meetings, permitting, site access, work plans, mobilization, field work, documents, reviews, coordination with stakeholders, etc.) associated with achievement of the PO, and a clear indication of regulatory CERCLA/RCRA/State Program phase completions (e.g., RIP Achieved, RC Achieved, etc.) and PO achievement.

· Activities should not be grouped together; every activity must have a separate entry. For example, the IMS must show separate activities for sample collection, sample analysis, data validation, Environmental Resources Program Information Management System (ERPIMS) upload, injections (mobilization, substrate injection, demobilization), and well installation (mobilization, drilling/well completion, demobilization).

Start and Finish Dates: Document Start date and Finish date for each required activity and document, including appropriate durations and Government and Regulatory review periods, in accordance with Section 6.2 of the PWS.

· Include an obligation date, notice to proceed date, or projected award date as the first activity for each Sub-CLIN. Ensure that the obligation/notice to proceed date is in the same fiscal year (FY) as the first line item of work.

· Include a clearly identified final field work (e.g., FINAL FIELD ACTIVITY) Start date and Finish Date for each site (i.e., indicate when the final set of field activities, such as injections, groundwater sampling, or others, will be complete).

Milestone Payment Amount: Include negotiated amount consistent with the approved MPS, ensuring the sum of all milestone payments equals the value of the CLIN/Sub-CLIN per Section B of the contract. Include both summary and non-summary payments.

Percent Complete: Record completion status of all activities and documents as approved by the COR.

Predecessor and Successor: Define relationships and constraints associated with activities and documents.

The Contractor shall prepare and maintain the IMS in accordance with the ORC PMP Guidance and USACE ER 1-1-11 (Project Schedules). The Contractor shall maintain and submit an IMS monthly in electronic format in accordance with the requirements above and include updates to progress and approved changes (e.g., Government or regulatory review periods, technical approaches, milestone payment updates, or contract requirements). The IMS shall be submitted electronically to the Contractor’s ORC document repository and in accordance with instructions from the COR.

4.3 Milestone Payment Schedule

The Contractor shall prepare and submit an IMS, from which they will extract the information required to generate an MPS and submit them as two separate files. NOTE: The MPS is not part of the proposal. Award of the contract does not equate to final acceptance of the IMS. The IMS and MPS, including payment milestones and percentages, will be discussed and agreed upon among the Government (AF and Contracting Agent) and Contractor during the review of the initial PMP/IMS/MPS and approved by the COR.

The following are minimum AF requirements for the MPS:

Present appropriate milestone payments considered integral and necessary to the achievement of the POs.

Tie interim and final milestone payments to performance models as described in Section 8.1.3.1 (also see Sections 1.2.4 through 1.2.5).

Include a reasonable number of milestone payments per CLIN/Sub-CLIN based on the scope and anticipated duration to achieve CLIN/Sub-CLIN objective and/or PO.

Align with the CLINs/Sub-CLINs in Section B of the award document and includes the following columns:

Installation Name: Identify EESOH-MIS Installation Name per Table 1.

EESOH-MIS Site ID: Identify EESOH-MIS Site ID per Table 1 and Site Alias, if applicable.

CLIN/Sub-CLIN: Identify CLIN and/or Sub-CLIN per Section B of the contract.

Note: Sub-CLINs for compliance activities (routine regulatory requirements to comply with binding agreements) are denoted as ####CX, and Sub-CLINs for performance activities (remedial advancement or progress towards the PO) are denoted as ####AX. For example, for POs of RA-O with Optimization, the Performance Goal “A” Sub-CLINs are specifically for reporting progress in achieving the performance goal identified in the performance model (separate reports for each year). This requires a separate report identifying the most recent result for the performance indicator(s), usually a COC concentration, and how that compares with the projected value of the performance indicator in the performance model. The “C” Sub-CLINs are specifically for operating the remedy and reporting all required results, such as COC concentrations, geochemical, groundwater elevations, etc.

Milestone Payment Identification Number: Include a unique number assigned to each milestone payment for tracking purposes.

Milestone Payment Description: Include a detailed description of a definable and measurable step considered integral and necessary to the achievement of the CLIN/Sub-CLIN objective and/or PO.

Milestone Payment Amount: Include negotiated amount, ensuring the sum of all milestone payments equals the value of the CLIN/Sub-CLIN per Section B of the contract.

Milestone Payment Percentage: Include percentage of the milestone payment in relation to the total CLIN/Sub-CLIN value. The final payment milestone(s) within a CLIN/Sub-CLIN demonstrating achievement of the CLIN/Sub-CLIN objective must be a minimum of 20% of the total CLIN/Sub-CLIN value. This may include both the AF and USACE-approved and the regulator-approved versions. Milestones should not be front-loaded but instead be commensurate with the work completed.

Completion Date: Document completion date for each milestone payment consistent with the Finish date presented in the IMS.

Percent Complete: Identify completion status (0% or 100%) of all milestone payments as approved by the COR.

Invoice Number: Clearly indicate the invoice number associated with the milestone payment as approved by the COR for the purposes of tracking payment. This information can be completed as invoices are prepared.

Exclude unacceptable milestone payments representing a “progress” payment or a monthly payment for level of effort expended, including:

Preparation and/or submittal of documents Site mobilization/demobilization (unless exempted by CO/KO) Accomplishment of field activities, including the following:

· Substrate/chemical injection

· Injection letter work plans

· Injection summary memoranda

· Field documentation tech memos

· Semi-annual cap inspection tech memos

· Quarterly and monthly Land Use Controls (LUC)/LTM inspection reports

· Quarterly discharge reports

· Construction bond

· Draft reports

· Well construction logs

· Payments of less than 2% of Sub-CLIN cost Submittal of a monthly status Management and overhead costs (e.g., program/project management, monthly reporting, etc.)

Allocation of PMP, Base-wide Quality Program Plan (QPP), or other Base-wide costs to specific sites Multiple draft versions of a document before USACE/AF/Regulatory approval Refer to the ORC PMP Guidance, Section 4.2, for more detailed information on common errors in the preparation of the MPS.

The Contractor shall maintain and submit an MPS monthly, in electronic format in accordance with the requirements above and include updates to progress (e.g., Percent Complete, Invoice Number; see Section 4.4 Cost and Status Reporting).