Sources Sought Questionnaire - Davis Bldg Rehab (FINAL).docx

Sources Sought: Davis Building Rehabilitation

SOURCE SOUGHT QUESTIONNAIRE

Davis Building Rehabilitation

1. Company Information:

Company Name:

Company Address:

Unique Entity Identifier:

Cage Code:

Point of Contact (POC) Name:

POC Phone:

POC Email:

2. Business Size and Socio‐Economic Status (if applicable) for NAICS Code 237990 Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction that has a Small Business Size Standard of $45M in Average Annual Receipts (Check all that apply):

☐ Large Business ☐ Small Business ☐ Small Disadvantaged Business (SDB) ☐ 8(a) Small Business ☐ Veteran‐Owned Small Business (VOSB) ☐ Service‐Disabled Veteran‐Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) ☐ HUBZone Small Business ☐ Woman‐Owned Small Business (WOSB) ☐ Economically Disadvantaged Woman‐Owned Small Business (EDWOSB)

3. Company Capability: Please provide a company capability statement or a descriptive statement of the company’s core design and construction capabilities to include any experience with design-build capabilities, bonding, licenses, earthwork, water mitigation, fire suppression design and/or installation, and historic preservation.

4. Prior Project Examples: Please provide descriptions of three (3) or more projects that are similar to this project in scope. Experience on similar projects should demonstrate ability to rehabilitate, restore, and protect historic buildings and abatement of lead, mold, and asbestos during construction. Please include the following information in the project descriptions:

· Project Name:

· Contract Number (if applicable):

· Year Completed:

· Performance as a Prime Contractor or Sub-Contractor:

· Type and percentage of work self-performed (based on contract value):

· Contract Value (Dollar Amount): $

· General Description of the Project:

5. Historic Foundation & Water Management: The Davis Building (built early 1900s) features significant basement moisture intrusion, deteriorated underground storm drainage, and a deep central pump well shaft that must remain structurally undisturbed. Existing conditions of below-grade waterproofing and vapor barriers are unknown. Work is anticipated to include repairing existing underground stormwater piping. The Government is contemplating a basement-level addition requiring excavation immediately adjacent to the existing foundation and central shaft.

a. Please identify the primary risks associated with excavating adjacent to this historic structure and explain how your firm would protect the integrity of the building and the central shaft during construction if included in the design.

b. What diagnostic testing and modern waterproofing/moisture-mitigation technologies would you propose to resolve the basement moisture issues to achieve long-term moisture control without compromising the structural integrity and historical features of the building?

6. Cold-Climate, Remote Operations, and Other Site Challenges: This project requires executing complex design-build construction within a remote northern climate, on a secure site with highly restricted access and ongoing active construction with limited on-site laydown or material placement areas.

a. Cold-Climate Operations: What challenges (such as winter construction, enclosure practices, freeze-thaw conditions, condensation/vapor control, etc.) are anticipated for this project over the period of performance?

b. Remote Operations: What logistical hurdles are anticipated regarding barge-based transport, winter mobilization, and material delivery to the project site?

c. Other Site Challenges: What challenges are anticipated regarding crane/load handling placement, staging, and material storage? How would approach site management to ensure operations do not disrupt active lock operations or adjacent construction?

7. Subcontracting: For this requirement, please indicate what percentage of this work would be subcontracted.

a. If subcontracting is anticipated, what work would be planned to be subcontracted and would you plan to subcontract to large and/or small businesses?

b. If subcontracting is anticipated to small businesses, are these small businesses within a socio-economic sub-category (e.g. HUBZone, 8(a), SDVOSB, WOSB, VOSB, etc.)?

8. Schedule: The anticipated Period of Performance (PoP) is estimated to be 36 months (12-months for design and 24-months for construction). Please indicate if the duration of the PoP, as broken down, is appropriate for this requirement. If not, please explain.

9. Interest: If this requirement is advertised, do you anticipate submitting an offer? (Select below). If selecting “Undecided”, please state why.

☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ Undecided

10. Additional Comments: Please provide any additional information you feel is necessary.