Solicitation Attachment 2 - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 55 KB Posted Aug 12, 2021

Attached to: Cell Sorting MaxV
Solicitation number: W81XWH-21-R-0086
Issued by: Department of the Army Medical Command

About this file

Written by GovTribe AI · Dec 28, 2023

This document contains a past performance questionnaire for the evaluation of contractors under solicitation number W81XWH-21-R-0074. The past performance questionnaire requests a government point of contact to evaluate a contractor's performance on factors including quality of products and services, schedule adherence, conduct of business relations, and effectiveness of cost and price management. The government point of contact is asked to assess the contractor's performance as considerably surpassing expectations, generally exceeding expectations, meeting expectations, or not meeting expectations for each evaluation criteria. Space for comments is provided for assessments of considerably surpassing or did not meet expectations. Additional information questions address cost overruns, contract terminations, and strengths and weaknesses. Respondent information requires the evaluator's name, title, organization, and signature.

View the file

Other files

File	Type	Posted
21R0089 solicitation.docx	DOCX document	Aug 12, 2021
Solicitation Attachment 1 .docx	DOCX document	Aug 12, 2021

On GovTribe

Work with this file

Download the original file
Contacts named in this file
Similar government files
Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

PERFORMANCE QUESTIONS (To be completed by a Government POC)

The Government POC/addressee is requested to answer the following questions by placing a check mark in the box that best describes the quality of the contractor’s performance in relation to the question being asked. For any assigned descriptions of “considerably surpassed” or “did not meet/less than minimum”, please provide additional comments supporting these assessments. For any assessment of a “did not meet/less than minimum”, please indicate in the comments whether or not the contractor has been previously advised that his performance had not met minimum requirements. If so, please attach the substantiating documentation.

QUALITY OF PRODUCTS/SERVICES

1. To what extent does/did the contractor meet the technical objectives/requirements of the contract/task order?

Considerably surpassed minimum technical objectives/requirements

Generally exceeded minimum technical objectives/requirements

Met minimum technical objectives/requirements

Did not meet minimum technical objectives/requirements

Comments:_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

2. How responsive is/was the contractor in responding to changes in technical direction and/or in the technical environment in which the effort was performed?

Considerably surpassed Government expectations

Generally exceeded Government expectations

Met Government expectations

Did not meet Government expectations

3. To what extent does/did the contractor identify and proactively mitigate technical risks associated with the required effort without Government intervention?

Generally exceeded Government expectations

Met Government expectations

Did not meet Government expectations

4. How effective was the contractor in the timely resolution of technical problems without Government intervention?

Considerably surpassed Government expectations

Generally exceeded Government expectations

Met Government expectations

Did not meet Government expectations

5. What is/was the level of the contractor’s technical personnel qualifications in relation to the minimum qualification requirements of the contract/task order? If minimum qualifications were not required, what is/was the level of qualifications in relation to that which would be expected to successfully achieve technical objectives?

Considerably surpassed minimum/expected qualifications

Generally exceeded minimum/expected qualifications

Met minimum/expected qualifications

Less than minimum/expected qualifications

SCHEDULE ADHERENCE

1. To what extent does/did the contractor adhere to original contract/task order delivery schedules, to include the delivery of products/services as well as deliverable reports?

Considerably surpassed required delivery schedules (routinely delivered ahead of schedule)

Generally exceeded required delivery schedules (occasionally delivered ahead of schedule)

Met Delivery Schedules

Did Not Meet Required Delivery Schedules

2. To what extent does/did the contractor identify and proactively mitigate schedule risks associated with the required effort without Government intervention?

Considerably surpassed Government expectations

Generally exceeded Government expectations

Met Government expectations

CONDUCT OF BUSINESS RELATIONS

1. How responsive is/was the contractor’s managerial personnel in responding to Government queries and requests?

Considerably surpassed Government expectations

Generally exceeded Government expectations

Met Government expectations

2. How effective is/was the contractor’s managerial personnel in communicating/interfacing with Government personnel?

Generally exceeded Government expectations

Met Government expectations

Did not meet Government expectations

3. To what extent does/did the contractor demonstrate initiative in teaming and/or collaborating with the Government customer, other contractors, or similar entities to promote synergy and innovation?

Considerably surpassed Government expectations

Generally exceeded Government expectations

Met Government expectations

Did not meet Government expectations

EFFECTIVENESS OF COST/PRICE AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

1. How effective is/was the contractor in accurately forecasting and allocating sufficient resources, including the appropriate types and numbers of qualified personnel, to successfully meet the technical objectives of the contract/task order in a timely manner?

Considerably surpassed Government expectations; personnel retention rates were maintained at 95% or better.

Generally exceeded Government expectations; personnel retention rates were maintained at 90% or better.

Met Government expectations; personnel retention rates were maintained at 80% or better.

Did not meet Government expectations; personnel retention rates were maintained at less than 80% (see Section 2E, Question 1 below)

2. How effective is/was the contractor in adhering to original cost/price and other resource estimates during the course of contract/task order performance?

Considerably surpassed Government expectations. For cost-reimbursement type contracts, actual cost of performance was maintained within original cost estimates.

Generally exceeded Government expectations. For cost-reimbursement type contracts, actual cost of performance was maintained within 105% of original cost estimates.

Met Government expectations. For cost-reimbursement type contracts, actual cost of task order performance was maintained within 110% of original cost estimates.

Did not meet Government expectations. For cost-reimbursement type contracts, actual cost of task order performance exceeded 110% of original cost estimate. (see Section 2E, Question 1 below)

3. How effective is/was the contractor in meeting cost/performance reporting requirements in terms of accuracy and content?

Considerably surpassed Government expectations

Generally exceeded Government expectations

Met Government expectations

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

1. If the contractor experienced cost overruns under this contract/task order, or required scope and/or ceiling increases as a result of a failure to adequately manage the effort, provide additional information below:

2. Has this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience? Yes No

a. If yes, termination was for: Default Convenience

b. If yes, explain basis for default

3. Are there any pending terminations? Yes No

If yes, explain and indicate the status:

4. Identify the contractor’s overall strengths and weaknesses:

5. Additional information not included above (attach additional page if necessary):

RESPONDENT INFORMATION (To be completed by Government POC)

EVALUATED BY: ________________________________________________________

Name and Title: ___________________________________________________________

Organization: _____________________________________________________________

Signature: ________________________________________________________________

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE SOLICITATION #W81XWH-21-R-0074

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated Aug 12, 2021.