SOLICITATION 19R0001.pdf

ACQR5607219

8(a) SMALL BUSINESS MULTIPLE AWARD CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT (MACC) FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION, REPAIR AND RENOVATION OF VARIOUS FACILITIES AT NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND (NAVFAC) WASHINGTON AREA OF RESPONSIBLITY INCLUDING BUT

NOT LIMITED TO WASHINGTON, DC, MARYLAND AND VIRGINIA

Competition Requirement: 8(a) Small Business Set-Aside

Source Selection Process: Best Value Source Selection Trade Off.

Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price

CYNTHIA Y. CROWDER 202-685-3157

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".

10. THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS

NEGOTIATED

18-Mar-2021

(RFP)

(IFB)

X

CALL:

B. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code) (NO COLLECT CALLS)

See Item 7

2. TYPE OF SOLICITATION

SEALED BID

3. DATE ISSUED

9. FOR INFORMATION A. NAME

SOLICITATION

X

NSN 7540-01-155-3212 1442-101 STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 4-85)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.236-1(e)

11. The Contractor shall begin performance w ithin _______15 calendar days and complete it w ithin ________380 calendar days after receiving aw ard, notice to proceed. This performance period is mandatory, negotiable. (See _________________________52.211-10

12 A. THE CONTRACTOR MUST FURNISH ANY REQUIRED PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS?

(If "YES," indicate within how many calendar days after award in Item 12B.)

X YES NO

13. ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS:

A. Sealed offers in original and __________1 copies to perform the w ork required are due at the place specif ied in Item 8 by ___________ local time ______________19 Apr 2021 (date). If this is a sealed bid solicitation, offers must be publicly opened at that time.

shall be marked to show the offeror's name and address, the solicitation number, and the date and time of fers are due.

B. An offer guarantee X is, is not required.

C. All offers are subject to the (1) w ork requirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated in the solicitation in full text or by reference.

D. Offers providing less than _______120 calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due w ill not be considered and w ill be rejected.

SOLICITATION, OFFER,

AND AWARD

(Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

1. SOLICITATION NO.

IMPORTANT - The "offer" section on the reverse must be fully completed by offeror.

4. CONTRACT NO.

7. ISSUED BY CODE

NAVAL FACILITIES ENG COMMAND WASHINGTON

1314 HARWOOD ST.

WASHINGTON DC 20374

N40080

PAGE OF PAGES

1 OF

CODE

(Title, identifying no., date):

12B. CALENDAR DAYS

02:00 PM (hour)

Sealed envelopes containing offers

5. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NO. 6. PROJECT NO.

8. ADDRESS OFFER TO (If Other Than Item 7)

FAX:TEL: TEL: FAX:

N4008019R0001 60

20B. SIGNATURE

(REV. 4-85)STANDARD FORM 1442 BACK

TO SIGN

NSN 7540-01-155-3212

SOLICITATION, OFFER, AND AWARD (Continued) (Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

CODE FACILITY CODE

17. The offeror agrees to perform the w ork required at the prices specif ied below in strict accordance w ith the terms of this solicitation, if this offer is accepted by the Government in w riting w ithin ________ calendar days after the date offers are due.

the minimum requirements stated in Item 13D. Failure to insert any number means the offeror accepts the minimum in Item 13D.)

AMOUNTS SEE SCHEDULE OF PRICES

18. The offeror agrees to furnish any required performance and payment bonds.

19. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS

(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the solicitation -- give number and date of each)

AMENDMENT NO.

DATE

20A. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN

OFFER (Type or print)

AWARD (To be completed by Government)

21. ITEMS ACCEPTED:

22. AMOUNT 23. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

24. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN ITEM

(4 copies unless otherwise specified)

CODE

(Insert any number equal to or greater than

20C. OFFER DATE

25. OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION PURSUANT TO

10 U.S.C. 2304(c) 41 U.S.C. 253(c)

CODE27. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY:26. ADMINISTERED BY

(Include ZIP Code)14. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR 15. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code)

See Item 14

(Include only if different than Item 14)16. REMITTANCE ADDRESS

30B. SIGNATURE

29. AWARD (Contractor is not required to sign this document.)

document and return _______ copies to issuing office.) Contractor agrees Your of f er on this solicitation, is hereby accepted as to the items listed. This award con-to f urnish and deliv er all items or perf orm all work, requisitions identif ied summates the contract, which consists of (a) the Gov ernment solicitation and on this f orm and any continuation sheets f or the consideration stated in this y our of f er, and (b) this contract award. No f urther contractual document is contract. The rights and obligations of the parties to this contract shall be necessary .

gov erned by (a) this contract award, (b) the solicitation, and (c) the clauses, representations, certif ications, and specif ications or incorporated by ref er-ence in or attached to this contract.

30A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTOR OR PERSON AUTHORIZED 31A. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

30C. DATE

(Type or print)

TEL: EMAIL:

31B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 31C. AWARD DATE

BY

CONTRACTING OFFICER WILL COMPLETE ITEM 28 OR 29 AS APPLICABLE

(Contractor is required to sign this28. NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT

(M ust be fully completed by offeror)OFFER

Section 00 01 10 - Table of Contents

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

SOLICITATION N40080-19-R-0001

8(A) MULTIPLE AWARD CONSTRUCTION

CONTRACT (8(A) MACC)

NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND

WASHINGTON, DC

1314 Harwood Street, SE Washington Navy Yard Building 212 Washington, DC 20374

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL

TABLE OF CONTENTS

DESCRIPTION SECTION NO.

SOLICITATION, OFFER AND AWARD SF 1442

INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS 00 21 16

1. POINT OF CONTACT

2. REQUEST FOR INFORMATION (RFI)

3. PROPOSAL DELIVERY INSTRUCTIONS

4. PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE/SITE VISIT

5. SEED PROJECT’S INFORMATION

6. EVALUATION CRITERIA

A. BASIC FOR AWARD

B. EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

7. ATTACHMENTS

GENERAL PROVISIONS 01010

1. GENERAL INTENT

2. SCOPE OF WORK

CONTRACT TYPE/PERFORMANCE 01020

1. CONTRACT TYPE

2. TERM OF CONTRACT

3. OPTIONS

4. MINIMUM GUARANTEE

5. COMMENCEMENT OF WORK

6. PLACE OF PERFORMANCE

7. CONTENT OF PROPOSALS

SPECIAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS 01030

1. PROPOSAL PREPARATION COSTS

2. BID BOND

3. PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS

4. INSURANCE

5. DAVIS BACON WAGE DETERMINATION

6. DRAWINGS

7. TASK ORDER PERFORMANCE PERIOD

8. LIQUIDATED DAMAGES

9. PREAWARD SITE INSPECTIONS

10. SUBCONTRACTING RESPONSIBILITIES

11. SUPERVISION

12. NOTICE OF CONSTRUCTIVE CHANGES

13. PAYMENTS

14. PRE-CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE

15. PARTNERING

16. PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS

17. WEBCM

18. CONTRACTOR SAFETY SELF-EVALUATION

CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION DATA 01040

1. CONTRACTING OFFICER/ORDERING OFFICER

2. TASK ORDER ADMINISTRATION

3. OMBUDSMAN

TASK ORDER ISSUANCE PROCEDURES 01050

1. GENERAL

2. COMPETITION

3. REQUIREMENT FOR PROPOSALS

4. SELECTION CRITERIA

REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS 00600

CONTRACT CLAUSES 00700

Section 00 10 00 - Solicitation

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

0001 93,750,000 Each

8(A)MACC BASE YEAR

FFP

FOB: Destination

PURCHASE REQUEST NUMBER: ACQR5607219

NET AMT

0002 93,750,000 Each

OPTION OPTION YEAR 1

FFP

0003 93,750,000 Each

OPTION OPTION YEAR 2

FFP

0004 93,750,000 Each

OPTION OPTION YEAR 3

FFP

0005 93,750,000 Each

OPTION OPTION YEAR 4

FFP

0006 93,750,000 Each

OPTION OPTION YEAR 5

FFP

0007 93,750,000 Each

OPTION OPTION YEAR 6

FFP

0008 93,750,000 Each

OPTION OPTION YEAR 7

FFP

DELIVERY INFORMATION

CLIN DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC /

CAGE

0001 N/A N/A N/A N/A

0002 N/A N/A N/A N/A

0003 N/A N/A N/A N/A

0004 N/A N/A N/A N/A

0005 N/A N/A N/A N/A

0006 N/A N/A N/A N/A

0007 N/A N/A N/A N/A

0008 N/A N/A N/A N/A

Section 00 21 13 - Instructions to Bidders

INSTRUCTION TO BIDDERS

1. The following paragraphs are supplemental instructions to bidders to be used in conjunction with the remaining sections.

2. PRIMARY POINT OF CONTACT: The primary point of contact for this project is Cynthia Crowder at Cyndi.crowder@navy.mil

3. SECONDARY POINT OF CONTACT: Janine Queen at janine.queen@navy.mil

4. All drawings, specifications and amendments shall be posted to the Government-Wide Point of Entry (GPE), at the beta.sam.gov website. Potential offerors will not be contacted regarding any changes posted.

5. OFFERORS ARE ADVISED THAT FUNDING MAY NOT BECOME AVAILABLE. IF FUNDS

ARE NOT AVAILABLE, NO AWARD WILL BE MADE AS A RESULT OF THIS SOLICITATION.

OFFERORS WILL NOT BE REIMBURSED FOR ANY EFFORT OR PROPOSAL COSTS

RESULTING FROM THIS SOLICITATION.

6. PRE-PROPOSAL INQUIRY (PPI)

All inquiries must be submitted in writing and received by the Contract Specialist fourteen calendar days prior to the solication closing date in order to permt adequate time to reply to the inquiry. There is no guarantee that PPI’s submitted after the cut-off date will be answered before the solicitation closes.

Submit all questions to Cynthia Crowder at cyndi.crowder@navy.mil. Use the PPI Form is required in WORD DOCUMENT (Attachment C). The PPI Form can be found on the BETASAM website.

7. ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS

Contractors shall send their Electronic Proposal submission to Cynthia Crowder at cyndi.crowder@navy.mil through the DOD Safe Site (safe.apps.mil)

a. The contractor shall send the contract specialist Cynthia Crowder, the contractor’s email address who will be receiving the Drop-Off invitation to upload proposals to the DOD Safe Site no later than 5 days prior to the submission due date. Note: only two emails addresses may be provided per Offeror.

b. The Contractor will then follow the invitation drop off link sent to those specificied email addresses to upload their electronic proposal submission by the stated due date and time, unless the date and time are changed via solicitation amendment, using the reference code sent by the contract specialist via DOD Safe.

c. The maximum file zie of a package is 8 GB. Up to 25 packages may be uploaded per link.

8. MAILED HARD COPY:

Hard copies shall be in separate 3-ring binders in accordance with the factors. All pages shall be numbered and binders shall be appropriately tabbed, conforming to the proposal submittal requirements’ structure for each evaluation factor. Price and Non-Price Factors proposals must be submitted in sealed envelopes or boxes. Any pricing information included in the Non-Price Factors proposal will not be considered. Similarly, any Non-Price information included in the Price Proposal will not be considered. Proposal shall be labeled “PRICE PROPOSAL OR NON-PRICE FACTORS

PROPOSAL FOR RFP N4008019R0001, NAVFAC WASHINGTON 8(A)MACC: ATTN:

CYNTHIA CROWDER; DO NOT OPEN IN MAIL ROOM”.

The offeror’s proposal must include all data and information required and must be submitted in accordance with these instructions. The offeror shall be compliant with the requirements as stated herein, for the non-conformance may result in an unfavorable proposal evaluation.

All hard copy proposals shall be mailed to the following address:

NAVFAC Washington Attn: Cynthia Crowder 1314 Harwood Street SE, Bldg. 212, Washington Navy Yard Washington, DC 20374

The proposal submission due date in Box 13 of the SF1442 is for ELECTRONIC PROPOSAL SUBMISSION. Hard Copy Proposals must be received no later than 19 APRIL 2021 AT 2:00 PM EST.

HAND DELIVERED PROPOSAL WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR THIS PROCUREMENT.

FACSIMILE COPIES OR EMAIL COPIES WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED. Please follow instruction submission above for Electronic and Hard Copy Submissions.

PROPOSALS SUBMITED IN RESPONSE TO THIS REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL MUST BE

RECEIVED NO LATER THAN THE DATE AND TIME SPECIFIED IN BLOCK 13A OF THE

SF1442. Electronic Proposals not received by the time and date specified shall be treated in accordance with FAR 52.215-1 “Instruction to Offerors-Competitive Acquisitions” and may be rejected.

BETA.SAM.GOV OPPORTUNITIES (BETASAM)

Amendments will be posted directly to BetaSam. The drawings and specifications will be posted on BetaSam under the Attachments section of this RFP. It is recommended contractors check the BetaSam listing periodically to see if additional postings have been made. It is the contractor’s responsibility to check BetaSam.GOV for all postings.

N4008019R0001

9. PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE AND SITE VISIT:

WILL BE ISSUED VIA AN AMENDMENT IN PHASE II

10. DESCRIPTION OF MACC SEED PROJECT:

Project Title: NRL 57 1st and 2nd Floor Bathroom Renovation

Project Description: The project is Building 57 Renovate Bathrooms, 1st and 2nd Floor, at Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC

Magnitude of Construction: Between $1,000,000 to $5,000,000

Contract Completion Date: WILL BE ISSUED VIA AN AMENDMENT IN PHASE II

Wage Determination: WILL BE ISSUED VIA AN AMENDMENT IN PHASE II

Liquidated Damages: WILL BE ISSUED VIA AN AMENDMENT IN PHASE II

RFP ATTACHMENTS

ATTACHMENT A – Construction & Design Experience Project Data Sheet ATTACHMENT B – Past Performance Questionnaire ATTACHMENT C – Pre-Proposal Inquiry Form (PPI Form) ATTACHMENT D – Safety Data Sheet

A. BASIS FOR AWARD

1. The Government reserves the right to eliminate from consideration for award any or all offers at any time prior to award of the contracts; to negotiate with offerors in the competitive range; and to award the contracts to the offerors submitting the proposals determined to represent the best value—the proposals most advantageous to the Government, cost/price and other factors considered.

2. As stated in the solicitation, the Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a)). The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary. In addition, if the Contracting Officer determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the Contracting Officer may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals.

3. The tradeoff process is selected as appropriate for this acquisition. The Government considers it to be in its best interest to allow consideration of award to other than the lowest priced offeror or other than the highest technically rated offeror.

4. As stated in the solicitation, all technical factors when combined are of equal importance to the performance confidence assessment (past performance) rating; and all technical factors and the performance confidence assessment (past performance) rating, when combined are approximately equal to price.

5. Any proposal found to have a deficiency in meeting the stated solicitation requirements or performance objectives will be considered ineligible for award, unless the deficiency is corrected through discussions. Proposals may be found to have either a significant weakness or multiple weaknesses that impact either the individual factor rating or the overall rating for the proposal. The evaluation report must document the evaluation board’s assessment of the identified weakness(s) and the associated risk to successful contract performance resulting from the weakness(s). This assessment must provide the rationale for proceeding to award without discussions.

6. Award of the contracts shall be based on the Offerors whose proposal provides the best value to the Government considering all stated criteria. This procurement will be conducted in two phases.

OFFERORS ARE ADVISED THAT AN AWARD MAY BE MADE WITHOUT DISCUSSIONS. Therefore, proposals should be submitted initially on the most favorable terms. Offerors should not assume that they will be contacted or afforded an opportunity to qualify, discuss or revise their proposals prior to award.

Information received under Phase I of the procurement will be evaluated to determine whether the Offerors possess the experience and capability required to successfully perform the requirements of the solicitation.

Following the evaluation of Phase I submissions, the Contracting Officer may determine the number of offers that might otherwise be included in the competition exceeds the number by which an efficient competition can be conducted. Potential Offerors are hereby notified that the maximum number of Offerors invited to participate in Phase II is ten (10). However, the Government reserves the right to change this number if the Contracting Officer determines it to be in the best interest of the Government.

It is the Government’s intent that the potential Offerors who are invited to participate in Phase II, shall be invited by the Government solely on the evaluation of their responses to Phase I factors WITHOUT discussions.

Phase II information will only be submitted by those Offerors considered by the Government to be the most highly qualified under Phase I. Phase II submissions shall include responses to Factor 5 and Price.

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

1. The solicitation requires the evaluation of price and the following non-price factors:

The distinction between experience and past performance is experience pertains to the types of work and volume of work completed by a contractor that are comparable to the types of work covered by this requirement, in terms of size, scope, and complexity. Past performance pertains to both the relevance of recent efforts and how well a contractor has performed on the contracts.

Non-Cost/Price Evaluation Factors:

Phase I:

Factor 1 – Management Approach Factor 2 – Experience Factor 3 – Safety Factor 4 – Past Performance

Phase II:

Factor 5 – Technical Solution

PRICE

1. This is a two-phase procurement. Factors 1-4 will be evaluated in Phase I and Factor 5 and Price will be evaluated in Phase II. Factor 1 will only be rated Acceptable or Unacceptable.

Offerors that are rated Unacceptable for Factor 1 will not be invited to participate in Phase II. In making the best value award decision after Phase II, the Government will consider Factors 2-5 and price.

2. The relative order of importance of the non-cost/price evaluation factors is the technical factors (Factors 2, 3 and 5) are equal in importance to each other and when combined, are equal in importance to Factor 4 – Past Performance. When the proposal is evaluated as a whole, the technical factors and past performance factor combined are approximately equal to price.

The importance of price will increase if the Offerors’ non-cost/price proposals are considered essentially equal in terms of overall quality, or if price is so high as to significantly diminish the value of a non-cost/price proposal’s superiority to the Government. Award will be made to the responsible Offeror(s) whose offer conforms to the solicitation and represents the best value to the Government, price and non-price factors considered.

3. Basis of Evaluation and Submittal Requirements for Each Factor.

NON-COST/PRICE FACTORS

PHASE I:

FACTOR 1 – MANAGEMENT APPROACH:

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

The composition and management of the firms proposed as the design-build (DB) team for this contract will be evaluated in this factor.

The Offeror SHALL submit the following information:

1. Provide a narrative describing the proposed primary construction firms and primary design firms for this contract and the rationale for proposing this arrangement. Provide the role, responsibilities, and contractual relationships between the various firms (see FAR Subpart 9.6).

2. The narrative shall also include a simple organizational chart that clearly identifies the lines of authority between the entities. If the experience of an entity is being claimed in Factor 2, that entity must be named in the above narrative and organizational chart.

The management approach narrative shall be limited to one (1) double-sided page (or two (2) single-sided pages) including the organizational chart. The information requested in item #3 below is not included in this page limitation.

3. In addition to the narrative, the Offeror shall submit a signed copy of a joint venture agreement, partnership agreement, teaming agreement, approved mentor protégé agreement (MPA), or letter of commitment for each member of the Offeror’s team identified above (e.g., joint venture member, partner, team member, subcontractor, parent company, subsidiary, or other affiliated company, etc.).

(ii) Basis of Evaluation:

The assessment of the Offeror’s management approach will be used as a means to evaluate the organizational structure and teaming relationships proposed by the Offeror and will be rated on an Acceptable or Unacceptable basis. An acceptable rating requires that the offeror provide each item listed in paragraphs, 1, 2 & 3 above in sufficient detail so as to fully articulate the information requested.

FACTOR 2 – EXPERIENCE:

The Offeror SHALL submit the following information:

1. Construction Experience:

Submit a maximum of FIVE (5) and a minimum of THREE (3) relevant construction projects for the

Offeror that best demonstrate your experience on relevant projects that are similar in size, scope, and complexity to the projects proposed for this MACC.

For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is defined as follow:

Size: A construction project with a FINAL contract value of $1,000,000 to $5,000,000. Projects submitted above or below this stated dollar range will not be considered relevant.

Scope/Complexity: A Design-Build and Design-Bid-Build construction project that includes new building construction or building renovation (interior or exterior) involving two or more disciplines.

AT LEAST THREE (3) relevant construction projects SHALL be submitted and SHALL collectively demonstrate the following experience:

a. At least one (1) relevant design-bid-build project.

b. At least two (2) relevant design-build projects.

Projects submitted for the Offeror shall have been completed within the past seven (7) years prior to the date of issuance of this solicitation. For the purposes of this solicitation, the definition of a “complete” project is ‘The stage of construction of a building or facility, at which its owner can occupy for the purpose it was constructed,’ or the owner has taken acceptance of the constructed building or facility.

A project is defined as a construction project performed under a single task order or contract. For multiple award and indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity type contracts, the contract as a whole shall not be submitted as a project; rather Offerors shall submit the work performed under a task order as a project.

In the context of this solicitation “Construction” is:

The erection, installation or assembly of a new real property facility requiring multiple-disciplines (e.g. structural, mechanical and civil) which includes architectural and or engineering efforts necessary to construct a facility and/or the addition, expansion, extension, alteration, conversion or replacement of a real property facility requiring multiple disciplines which includes architectural and or engineering efforts necessary to construct a facility.

Experience of proposed subcontractors will not be considered for construction experience.

2. Design Experience:

Submit a maximum of FIVE (5), and a minimum of THREE (3), relevant design projects for the design team that best demonstrates design experience on projects that are similar in size, scope, and complexity to the RFP.

For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is defined as follows:

Size: A complete design for a construction project with a FINAL contract value of $1,000,000 to $5,000,000.

Projects submitted below $1,000,000 will not be considered relevant.

Scope/Complexity: A complete design of a Design-Build and Design-Bid-Build construction project that includes new building construction or building renovation (interior or exterior) involving two or more disciplines, (e.g.

structural, mechanical and civil) which includes architectural and/ or engineering efforts.

AT LEAST THREE (3) relevant design projects SHALL be submitted and SHALL collectively demonstrate the following experience:

a. At least one (1) relevant design-bid-build project.

b. At least two (2) relevant design-build projects.

Projects submitted shall be completed within the past seven (7) years prior to the date of issuance of this solicitation.

For design-build projects, the design portion of the contract shall have been completed within the past seven (7) years of the date of issuance of this RFP.

A project is defined as a complete design effort performed under a single task order or contract/subcontract. For multiple award and indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity type contracts, the contract as a whole shall not be submitted as a project; rather Offerors shall submit the work performed under a task order as a project.

The Offeror may utilize experience of a design subcontractor to demonstrate design experience under this evaluation factor. The Offeror must provide the supporting subconctractor agreement, teaming agreement, or letter of commitment and an explanation of the meaningful involvement for the design subcontractor.

Meaningful involvement is described as follows. The specific commitments of technical resources (e.g. personnel, equipment) that the subcontractor commits to the performance of this contract. The proposal shall also describe specific roles of the subcontractor in terms of the work it will either self-perform or manage on behalf of the Offeror in performance of the contract. Offerors proposing multiple design firms should submit relevant project experience for all design firms. Failure to submit this information may result in a lower rating.

A maximum of two (2) design firms is allowed. Offerors are still limited to a total of five (5) design projects combined.

3. The attached Construction & Design Experience Project Data Sheet (Attachment A) is MANDATORY and SHALL be used to submit project information. If the same project is being used to demonstrate construction and design experience, the Offeror may submit separate Project Data Sheets for construction and design projects.

Except as specifically requested, the Government WILL NOT consider information submitted in addition to this form. Individual blocks on this form may be expanded; however, total length for each project data sheet shall not exceed one (1) double-sided page (or two (2) single-sided pages).

For all submitted projects, the description of the project SHALL clearly describe the scope of work performed and the relevancy to the project requirements of this RFP (i.e., unique or sustainable features, area, construction methods). In addition, the description should also address any sustainable features for the project, including specific descriptions of those features. Provide applicable documentation on projects that were validated or certified through an acceptable sustainable third party certifier as per UFC 1-200-02 Sustainability.

Joint Ventures:

If the Offeror is a Joint Venture (JV), relevant project experience should be submitted for projects completed by the Joint Venture entity. If the Joint Venture does not have shared experience, at least one relevant project shall be submitted for each Joint Venture member; however, JV entities with no shared relevant experience may be considered less favorably. Each Joint Venture entity shall submit at least one (1) design-build and one (1) design-bid-build projects. If a project was performed by a JV, and not all partners from that JV are on the JV proposed for this contract, the offeror shall clearly demonstrate what portion of the work was performed by the JV member offering on this contract and shall not include work performed by the JV as a whole. The JV member proposed for this shall specifically address field work performed by that JV member including field staffing and direct field work oversight. The JV member proposed for this contract shall also address home office management performed by that JV member including the number/percentage of employees provided for the overall contract by the JV members as well as the overall percentage of work performed by the JV member. This same information shall also be provided for the task orders listed under IDIQ contracts on Attachment C. Offerors are limited to a total of five (5) projects combined. The Offeror shall submit a SIGNED copy of the Joint Venture agreement indicating the proposed participation of each Joint Venture member. Failure to submit the required Joint Venture Agreement may result in a lower rating, Joint Ventures of an SBA approved mentor/protégé Agreement:

If the Joint Venture is an SBA approved mentor/protégé, relevant project experience should be submitted for projects completed either by the mentor, the protégé, or the Joint Venture entity. The Offeror shall submit a signed copy of the Joint Venture agreement indicating the proposed participation of each Joint Venture member. Offerors contemplating a Joint Venture shall show evidence in their proposal that the joint venture agreement has been received by the SBA prior to proposal due date if SBA's approval is required. Failure to submit evidence in their proposal that the joint venture agreement has been received by the SBA prior to proposal due date if SBA's approval is required may result in a lower rating.

Teaming arrangements are not considered Joint Venture agreements.

Experience of proposed subcontractors will not be considered for construction experience. Evidence of proposed subcontractors may be used to demonstrate design experience providing the offeror provides a supporting joint venture agreement, partnership agreement, teaming agreement, or letter of commitment and an explanation of the meaningful involvement for the design subcontractor(s).

If an Offeror is utilizing experience information of affiliates/subsidiaries/parent/LLC/LTD member companies (name is not exactly as stated on the SF1442), the proposal shall clearly demonstrate that the affiliate/subsidiary/parent firm will have meaningful involvement in the performance of the contract. The proposal shall state specific commitments of technical resources (e.g. personnel, equipment) that the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD member companies commit to the performance of this contract. In particular, the proposal will clearly state the specific commitments of resources of the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD member that will be located at the worksites and company offices in the city/area of the project. The proposal shall also describe specific roles of the affiliate/subsidiary/ parent/LLC/LTD member companies in terms of the work it will either self-perform or manage on behalf of the Offeror in performance of the contract. Failure to submit this information may result in a lower rating.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation:

The basis of evaluation will include the Offeror’s demonstrated experience and depth of experience in performing relevant construction and design projects as defined in the solicitation submittal requirements. The assessment of the Offeror’s relevant experience will be used as a means of evaluating the capability of the Offeror to successfully meet the requirements of the solicitation. The Government will only review five projects for construction and five for design. Offerors may provide the same project for construction and design submissions.

Experience may be strengthened, and considered more favorably, by demonstrating the following:

1. Submitting five relevant construction projects.

2. Amount of relevant projects where the Offeror and the proposed design firm(s) have previously worked together.

3. Experience as the Prime Contractor on all three (3) construction projects.

4. Relevant projects that demonstrate experience with renovation of existing facilities.

5. Relevant projects that demonstrate experience with essential facilities, per IBC definition.

6. Relevant projects that demonstrate experience with sustainable features, which are validated through the requirements of UFC 1-200-02 Sustainability.

7. Relevant projects that demonstrate experience with construction of new or the renovation of State Historical Preservation Office properties.

8. Offerors who submit relevant projects that demonstrate experience self-performing significant, definable features of work (i.e., Concrete Placement or HVAC Installation).

FACTOR 3 – SAFETY

(a) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

The Offeror shall submit the following information: The Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) Rate; and Total Case Rate (TCR) for the specified five (5) Calendar Years (CY), as well as a safety narrative, as described further below. For a partnership or joint venture, the Offeror shall submit separate DART rates and TCR for the specified five (5) CY for each contractor who is part of the partnership/joint venture; however, only one safety narrative is required. Any fatalities experienced within this 5-year timeframe must be explained in detail, to include root cause and corrective actions.

NOTE: DART and TCR shall not be submitted for subcontractors

1. DART Rate: Submit five (5) previous complete calendar years’ [CY2019, CY2018, CY2017, CY2016, and CY2015] worth of data (not an overall average). If the Offeror has no DART rate, for any year, affirmatively state so and explain why. Should a negative trend occur above moderate risk levels, an acceptable/detailed explanation is required that includes any corrective actions taken for improvement.

a. DART cases include injuries or illnesses resulting in death, days away from work, and/or restricted work or transfer to another job days beyond the day of injury/illness.

b. Calculation of DART rate: Multiply the total number of DART cases by 200,000, and then divide by the number of employee labor hours worked.

𝑫𝑨𝑹𝑻 𝑹𝑨𝑻𝑬 =

Number of DART Incidents x 200,000

Total Number of Employee Labor Hours Worked

2. TCR Rate: Submit five (5) previous complete calendar years’ [CY2019, CY2018, CY2017, CY2016, and CY2015] worth of data (not an overall average). If the Offeror has no TCR rate, for any year, affirmatively state so and explain why. Should a negative trend occur above moderate risk levels, an acceptable/detailed explanation is required that includes any corrective actions taken for improvement.

a. TCR cases include injuries or illnesses resulting in death, days away from work, restricted work or transfer to another job days beyond the day of injury/illness, medical treatment beyond first aid, or loss of consciousness.

b. Calculation of TCR rate: Multiply the total number of TCR incidents by 200,000, and then divide by the number of employee labor hours worked.

𝑻𝑪𝑹 𝑹𝑨𝑻𝑬 =

Number of TCR Incidents x 200,000

Total Number of Employee Labor Hours Worked

3. Technical Approach to Safety: Submit a narrative that addresses the following:

a. Describe the Offeror’ s approach to implementing and executing a Safety Management System (SMS) including Management/Leadership involvement, Employee involvement, Hazard prevention, Hazard control, Worksite analysis, and Safety and health training, to include the standard(s) used to benchmark the SMS.

b. Describe the evaluation process used to select potential subcontractors.

c. Describe the processes of how the Offeror will oversee safety compliance of subcontractors at all levels throughout performance of the contract (to include the Offeror’s own in-house workforce).

d. The Technical Approach to Safety narrative shall be limited to two (2) single-sided pages or one (1) double-sided page.

4. The Government reserves the right to review other available sources (public/Government internal) of information. These may include but are not limited to OSHA data, NAVFAC’s Contractor Incident Reporting System (CIRS), Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), Electronic Contract Management System (eCMS), etc.

(b) Basis of Evaluation:

The Government is seeking to determine that the Offeror has consistently demonstrated a commitment to safety and that the Offeror plans to properly manage and implement safety procedures for itself and its subcontractors. The evaluation will collectively consider the DART rate, TCR, Technical Approach to Safety, and other sources of information available to the Government as part of such collective evaluation. The board will evaluate the DART rates and TCR to determine if the Offeror has demonstrated a history of safe work practices taking into account any negative trends and extenuating circumstances that impact the rating.

1. DART Rate: The board will evaluate trends over the last five years considering changes that take it from one risk level (or more) to the next up or down. Negative trends occurring above moderate risk levels require the offeror to provide a detailed explanation that includes any corrective actions taken for improvement.

a. Missing data without an explanation is considered a deficiency.

b. Declining trends that push the risk levels from Moderate Risk (MR) or higher to Low Risk (LR) or Very Low Risk (VLR) would indicate a strength.

c. An increasing DART rate trend could be considered a weakness (i.e. MR or better to High Risk (HR) or Extremely High Risk EHR)) if an acceptable explanation is not provided for any trends that rise above Moderate.

d. This chart correlates the DART rate to the level of risk:

Risk DART Rate Very Low Risk Less Than 1.0 Low Risk From 1.0 to 1.99 Moderate Risk From 2.0 to 2.99 High Risk From 3.0 to 4.0 Extremely High Risk Greater than 4.0

2. TCR Rate: The board will evaluate trends over the last five years considering changes that take it from one risk level (or more) to the next up or down. Negative trends occurring above moderate risk levels require the offeror to provide a detailed explanation that includes any corrective actions taken for improvement.

a. Missing data without an explanation is considered a deficiency.

b. Declining trends that push the risk levels from Moderate Risk (MR) or higher to Low Risk (LR) or Very Low Risk (VLR) would indicate a strength.

c. An increasing TCR rate trend could be considered a weakness (i.e. MR or better to High Risk (HR) or Extremely High Risk EHR)) if an acceptable explanation is not provided for any trends that rise above Moderate.

d. This chart correlates the TCR rate to the level of risk:

Risk TCR Rate Very Low Risk Less Than 2.49 Low Risk From 2.5 to 3.49 Moderate Risk From 3.5 to 4.49 High Risk From 4.5 to 5.99 Extremely High Risk Greater than 6.0

3. The Technical Approach to Safety Narrative. To determine the degree to which the Offeror:

a. Describes a viable SMS that addresses elements; such as Management/Leadership involvement, Employee involvement, Hazard prevention, Hazard control, Worksite analysis, and Safety and health training, to include the standard(s) used to benchmark the SMS.

b. Describes a methodical process of evaluating subcontractor’s safety performance in their selection process.

c. Describes a logical management plan to hold themselves and their subcontractors accountable for adhering to the safety requirements of the contract.

d. The Technical Approach to Safety narrative shall be limited to two (2) single-sided pages or one (1) double-sided page. Information on pages beyond this will not be considered.

4. The Government reserves the right to review other available sources (public/Government internal) of information. These may include but are not limited to OSHA data, NAVFAC’s Contractor Incident Reporting System (CIRS), Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), Electronic Contract Management System (eCMS), etc.

FACTOR 4 – PAST PERFORMANCE:

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

IF A COMPLETED CPARS EVALUATION IS AVAILABLE, IT SHALL BE SUBMITTED WITH THE

PROPOSAL. IF THERE IS NOT A COMPLETED CPARS EVALUATION, the Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) included in the solicitation is provided for the offeror or its team members to submit to the client for each project the offeror includes in its proposal for Factor 2 Experience. AN OFFEROR SHALL NOT SUBMIT A

PPQ WHEN A COMPLETED CPARS IS AVAILABLE.

IF A CPARS EVALUATION IS NOT AVAILABLE, ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. Completed PPQs should be submitted with your proposal. If the offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the offeror should complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ (Attachment B), which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government’s point of contact, Cynthia Crowder, via email at mail to: Cyndi.crowder@navy.mil prior to proposal closing date.

Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs or CPARS previously submitted for other RFPs.

However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation.

Offerors may provide any information on problems encountered and the corrective actions taken on projects submitted under Factor 2 – Experience. Offerors may also address any adverse past performance issues.

Explanations shall not exceed two (2) double-sided pages (or four (4) single-sided pages) in total.

The Government reserves the right to contact references for verification or additional information. The Government’s inability to contact any of the Offeror’s references or the references unwillingness to provide the information requested may affect the Government’s evaluation of this factor.

Performance award or additional information submitted will not be considered.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation:

For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is further defined as follows:

Building construction or renovation project with a final contract price of $1M or greater completed within the seven

(7) years prior to issuance of the RFP.

The degree to which past performance evaluations and all other past performance information reviewed by the Government (e.g., PPQs, CPARS, Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), performance recognition documents, and information obtained from any other source) reflect a trend of satisfactory performance considering:

- A pattern of successful completion of tasks;

- A pattern of deliverables that are timely and of good quality;

- A pattern of cooperativeness and teamwork with the Government at all levels (task managers, contracting officers, auditors, etc.); and

- Recency of tasks performed that are identical to, similar to, or related to the task at hand

Offerors lacking relevant past performance history will receive a NEUTRAL Confidence rating.

PHASE II

FACTOR 5 – TECHNICAL SOLUTION:

1. Provide a short basis of design narrative to include architectural design approach to the building plan and layout and building exterior materials.

2. Provide a short basis of design narrative to include engineering technical design approach for structure, HVAC, plumbing, fire protection, site layout, civil design, AT/FP, and sustainability as applicable.

3. Provide a comprehensive design through construction schedule in GANTT format, incorporating salient activities, including but not limited to: phasing scheme, primary design and construction activities, government design reviews, utility coordination, long lead items and permit approvals as applicable.

4. Provide a short narrative explaining approach to utility identification and coordination between existing and new construction as applicable.

Narrative shall not exceed four (4) double-sided pages (or eight (8) single-sided pages).

(ii) Basis of Evaluation:

The Government will evaluate the narrative and conceptual drawings (if included) considering the extent to which the Offeror demonstrates a clear understanding of the architectural and engineering requirements of the project. The Government will evaluate the Offeror's technical solution to determine adherence to the technical requirements of the RFP.

PRICE:

(1) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

The price proposals shall be submitted in Phase II along with Phase II technical proposals. The Offeror shall submit (1) original, marked “Original”, and (1) copy, marked “copy”, in a separate three ring binder with the following:

o Text pages 8 ½ x 11 format, minimum 10 point font.

o Completed SF 1442 signed with all amendments acknowledged.

o Price Schedule.

o Copy of Online Representation and Certifications and proof of registration in System for Award Management (SAM) o Confirmation of filing of Veterans' Employment and Training (VETS) VETS 4212 and/or VETS report for the cycle.

o Bid Guarantee in accordance with FAR Clause 52.228-1 Bid Guarantee. Amount shall be at least 20 percent of the bid price but shall not exceed $3 million.

o Include a cover page with Solicitation Number, Solicitation Title, Prime Contractor Name, Address, Phone Number, Fax Number, DUNS, Cage Code, Point of Contact, phone number, and email address.

o A complete electronic copy of the price proposal as a single .pdf file on a CD-ROM.

(2) Basis of Evaluation: The Government based on the total price. Total price consists of the basic requirements, and all option items. The Government intends to evaluate all options and has included the provision FAR 52.217-5, Evaluation of Options (JUL 1990) in Section 00100 of the solicitation. In accordance with FAR 52.217-5, evaluation of options will not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s). analysis will be performed by one or more of the following techniques to ensure a fair and reasonable price:

(i) Comparison of proposed prices received in response to the RFP.

(ii) Comparison of proposed prices with the IGCE.

(iii) Comparison of proposed prices with available historical information.

(iv) Comparison with market survey results

Section 00 45 00 - Representations and Certifications

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

52.203-11 Certification And Disclosure Regarding Payments To

Influence Certain Federal Transactions

SEP 2007

52.204-19 Incorporation by Reference of Representations and Certifications.

DEC 2014

52.215-22 Limitations on Pass-Through Charges--Identification of Subcontract Effort

OCT 2009

52.223-1 Biobased Product Certification MAY 2012 52.225-25 Prohibition on Contracting with Entities Engaging in Certain

Activities or Transactions Relating to Iran-- Representation and Certifications.

JUN 2020

252.203-7005 Representation Relating to Compensation of Former DoD Officials

NOV 2011

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT

52.204-8 ANNUAL REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS (MAR 2020)

(a)(1) The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code for this acquisition is 236220.

(2) The small business size standard is $39,500,000.

(3) The small business size standard for a concern which submits an offer in its own name, other than on a construction or service contract, but which proposes to furnish a product which it did not itself manufacture, is 500 employees.

(b)(1) If the provision at 52.204-7, System for Award Management, is included in this solicitation, paragraph (d) of this provision applies.

(2) If the provision at 52.204-7, System for Award Management, is not included in this solicitation, and the Offeror has an active registration in the System for Award Management (SAM), the Offeror may choose to use paragraph (d) of this provision instead of completing the corresponding individual representations and certifications in the solicitation. The Offeror shall indicate which option applies by checking one of the following boxes:

( ) Paragraph (d) applies.

( ) Paragraph (d) does not apply and the offeror has completed the individual representations and certifications in the solicitation.

(c) (1) The following representations or certifications in SAM are applicable to this solicitation as indicated:

(i) 52.203-2, Certificate of Independent Price Determination. This provision applies to solicitations when a firm-fixed-price contract or fixed-price contract with economic price adjustment is contemplated, unless—

(A) The acquisition is to be made under the simplified acquisition procedures in Part 13;

(B) The solicitation is a request for technical proposals under two-step sealed bidding procedures; or

(C) The solicitation is for utility services for which rates are set by law or regulation.

(ii) 52.203-11, Certification and Disclosure Regarding Payments to Influence Certain Federal Transactions. This provision applies to solicitations expected to exceed $150,000.

(iii) 52.203-18, Prohibition on Contracting with Entities that Require Certain Internal Confidentiality Agreements or Statements--Representation. This provision applies to all solicitations.

(iv) 52.204-3, Taxpayer Identification. This provision applies to solicitations that do not include the provision at 52.204-7, System for Award Management.

(v) 52.204-5, Women-Owned Business (Other Than Small Business). This provision applies to solicitations that—

(A) Are not set aside for small business concerns;

(B) Exceed the simplified acquisition threshold; and

(C) Are for contracts that will be performed in the United States or its outlying areas.

(vi) 52.204-26, Covered Telecommunications Equipment or Services--Representation. This provision applies to all solicitations.

(vii) 52.209-2, Prohibition on Contracting with Inverted Domestic Corporations--Representation.

(viii) 52.209-5, Certification Regarding Responsibility Matters. This provision applies to solicitations where the contract value is expected to exceed the simplified acquisition threshold.

(ix) 52.209-11, Representation by Corporations Regarding Delinquent Tax Liability or a Felony Conviction under any Federal Law. This provision applies to all solicitations.

(x) 52.214-14, Place of Performance--Sealed Bidding. This provision applies to invitations for bids except those in which the place of performance is specified by the Government.

(xi) 52.215-6, Place of Performance. This provision applies to solicitations unless the…