SOLE SOURCE-University of Arkansas MLR 2 MLR CO(vm).pdf
PDF 195 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Water Quality Analysis projected sole source Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 12405B24Q0195SS
About this file
This document is a Sole Source Justification for a federal procurement under the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. The requirement is for water quality analysis services from the University of Arkansas Water Quality Laboratory at an estimated value of $28,000 per year for up to 5 years. The laboratory has been providing these services for nearly 30 years and is considered an expert in this area. The justification states that continuing the current research project requires using the incumbent vendor to avoid negative impacts.
The related federal contract opportunity is a combined synopsis/solicitation for the water quality analysis services, issued as a Request for Quote under Solicitation Number 12405B24Q0195SS. The requirement is under NAICS code 221310 with a small business size standard of $41.0 million. Quotes are due by June 7, 2024 and the basis for award is Lowest Price Technically Acceptable. The Government anticipates awarding a Firm Fixed Price contract.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| SOW water quality lab.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SOLE SOURCE JUSTIFICATION
MANDATORY TEMPLATE FOR FEDERAL PROCUREMENTS UNDER THE SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION THRESHOLD
1. Estimated Dollar Value: $28,000 per year (based on approximately 800 samples @ $35.00/sample)
2. Anticipated Period of Performance: 5 years
3. Does the anticipated Period of Performance include option years? If no, explain. Yes No
4. Sources Sought Notice posted to Contract Opportunities and attached to this document? Yes No
5. Market Research conducted and attached to this document? If not, explain. Yes No
6. Is this a new requirement or a follow-on to an expiring award?
New requirement Follow-on to an expiring award
7. Describe the requirement. Please note that the requirement is the minimum acceptable specification or capability and is not necessarily the best in the industry. Please note whether any additional follow-on work is anticipated in response to the current proposed effort.
Laboratories must operate under an approved Quality Assurance Plan that meets or exceeds all requirements for certification by the Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality. Samples must be processed in a timely and efficient manner with the appropriate quality controls in place.
8. List the proposed vendor and contact information.
University of Arkansas, Water Quality Laboratory
9. Describe why the proposed vendor is the only vendor from which the requirement can be obtained. Examples of acceptable justifications include but are not limited to sole manufacturer and seller, adherence to warranty provisions, urgency, etc. If other vendors can provide similar products or services, describe why they cannot meet our particular requirement.
This laboratory has been serving the state for nearly 30 years and is an expert in the area of water quality analysis. Their commitment to providing high quality defensible data is widely recognized. In addition, the current research project started with the 2 years, but was supposed to extend through 5 years. To continue this research with no negative effects to the ongoing research we would need to go with University of Arkansas, Water Quality Laboratory.
10. Certification:
I hereby certify that the information provided above is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief.
SOLE SOURCE JUSTIFICATION
MANDATORY TEMPLATE FOR FEDERAL PROCUREMENTS UNDER THE SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION THRESHOLD
Technical Representative Date
11. CO Certification:
I hereby determine that the circumstances of this procurement action deem only one source reasonably available. Also, the quoted price is determined to be fair and reasonable as documented on the SAP e-File Checklist and Award Summary.
Contracting Officer Date
12. Reviewed By: Based on the above information provided by the requesting office and the Contracting Officer’s determination and Findings, I concur with sole sourcing this requirement.
Signature of Section Head Date
| 2024-05-20T13:16:41-0500 | |
| Michele L Reba |
| 2024-05-20T13:29:38-0500 | |
| Lynn Hults |
| 2024-05-31T14:46:00-0500 | |
| VICTOR MCCOY |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .