Annex_2_-_USAID_FTF_Indicators.pdf
PDF 179 KB Posted
- Attached to
- The Cereal Value Chains Award contributes to the achievement of the Feed the Future objectives.
- Solicitation number
- SOL-688-13-000004
About this file
RFP Annex 2 - Feed the Future Indicators
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| CVC_RFP_Amendment_1.pdf | ||
| Annex_-_3_-_FTF_IEE_101112.pdf | ||
| Mali_CVC_RFP.pdf | ||
| Annex_1_-_FtF_Result_Framework.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
USAID/Mali FTF Indicators
Goal: Sustainably Reduce Global Poverty and Hunger 3—1 Prevalence of underweight children under five years of age***
4—1 Prevalence of Poverty: Percent of people living on less than $1.25/day***
Key Objective: Improved Nutritional Status Especially of Women and Children 3—2 Prevalence of stunted children under five years of age***
3—3 Prevalence of wasted children under five years of age***
3—4 Prevalence of underweight women***
Key Objective: Inclusive Agricultural Sector Growth 4.5‐1 Per capita income (as proxied by expenditures) of USG targeted beneficiaries***
4.5‐3 Percent change in agricultural GDP***
AGRICULTURE:
IR 1: Improved Agricultural Productivity
1) 4.5‐x Women's Empowerment in Agriculture Index *** (pending WOG)
2) 4.5‐4 Gross margin per unit of land, kilogram, or animal of selected product (crops/animals/fisheries selected varies by country)*
| Sub | IR | 1.1: | Enhanced | human | and | institutional | capacity | development | for | increased | sustainable | agriculture |
| sector | productivity |
Score, in percent, of combined key areas of organization capacity amongst USG direct and indirect local implementing partners
4.5.2‐5 Number of farmers and others who have applied new technologies or management practices as a result of USG assistance*/**
4.5.2‐6 Number of individuals who have received USG supported long‐term agricultural sector productivity or food security training
4.5.2‐7 Number of individuals who have received USG supported short‐term agricultural sector productivity or food security training*/**
4.5.2‐11 Number of private enterprises, producers organizations, water users associations, women’s groups, trade and business associations, and community‐based organizations (CBOs) receiving USG assistance*/**
4.5.2‐27 Number of members of producer organizations and community based organizations receiving USG assistance
4.5.2‐28 Number of private enterprises, producers organizations, water users associations, women’s groups, trade and business associations and community‐based organizations (CBOs) that applied new technologies or management practices as a result of USG assistance*/**
4.5.2‐34 Number of stakeholders implementing risk‐reducing practices/actions to improve resilience to climate change as a result of USG assistance
Sub IR 1.2: Enhanced Technology Development, Dissemination, Management and Innovation 4.5.1‐21 Number of climate vulnerability assessments conducted as a result of USG assistance
4.5.2‐2 Number of hectares under improved technologies or management practices as a result of USG assistance*/**
4.5.2.8 Number of technologies or management practices in one of the following phases of development:
…in Phase I: under research as a result of USG assistance
…in Phase II: under field testing as a result of USG assistance
…in Phase III: made available for transfer as a result of USG assistance
4.5.2‐13 Number of rural households benefiting directly from USG interventions
Sub IR 1.3: Improved Agricultural Policy Environment 4‐‐8 Ease of Doing Business rank
4.5.1‐9 Number of policies/regulations/administrative procedures in each of the following stages of development as a result of
USG assistance in each case:
Stage 1: Analyzed
Stage 2: Drafted and presented for public/stakeholder consultation
Stage 3: Presented for legislation/decree
Stage 4: Passed/approved
Stage 5: Passed for which implementation has begun
IR 2: Expanding Markets and Trade 4.5.2‐23 Value of incremental sales (collected at farm‐level) attributed to FTF implementation*
4.5.2‐35 Percent change in value of intra‐regional trade in targeted agricultural commodities*
4.5.2‐36 Value of exports of targeted agricultural commodities as a result of USG assistance
Sub IR 2.1 Enhanced Agricultural Trade 4.5.1‐18 Average number of days required to trade goods across borders (average of export/import time)
| Sub | IR | 2.4: | Improved | access | to | business | development | and | sound | and | affordable | financial | and | risk |
| management | services |
4.5.2‐29 Value of Agricultural and Rural Loans*/**
4.5.2‐30 Number of MSMEs receiving USG assistance to access bank loans
4.5.2–37 Number of MSMEs receiving business development services from USG assisted sources
IR 3: Increased investment in agriculture and nutrition‐related activities 4.5.2‐12 Number of public‐private partnerships formed as a result of FTF assistance
4.5.2‐38 Value of new private sector investment in the agriculture sector or food chain leveraged by FTF implementation*
Sub IR 3.1: Increased public sector investment 3.1‐5 Percentage of national budget invested in nutrition*
4.5‐10 Percentage of national budget invested in agriculture*
IR 4: Increased employment opportunities in targeted value chains 4.5‐2 Number of jobs attributed to FTF implementation*
BOTH AGRICULTURE AND NUTRITION:
IR 5: Increased resilience of vulnerable communities and households 3—5 Prevalence of households with moderate or severe hunger*
4.5.2‐14 Number of vulnerable households benefiting directly from USG assistance
4.5.2‐25 Number of people with a savings account or insurance policy as a result of USG assistance
NUTRITION:
IR 6: Improved Access to Diverse and Quality Foods 3.1.9‐2 Prevalence of children 6‐23 months receiving a minimum acceptable diet*
Number of beneficiaries with access to home or community garden
IR 6.1: Dietary diversity for women and children under five is improved
3.1.9‐12 Women’s Dietary Diversity: Mean number of food groups consumed by women of reproductive age
IR 7: Improved nutrition‐related behaviors % of households with soap and water at a hand washing station commonly used by family members
IR 7.1: Household have adopted improved dietary and care practices 3.1.9‐4 Prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding of children under six months of age*
IR 7.2: Household have adopted improved key hygiene behaviors
% of households practicing correct use of recommended household water treatment technologies
IR 8: Improved utilization of maternal and child health and nutrition services 3.1.9‐6 Prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age*
3.1.9‐9 Prevalence of anemia among children 6‐59 months
IR 8.1: Access, quality, and use of nutrition promotion and treatment services improved
3.1.9‐1 Number of people trained in child health and nutrition through USG‐supported programs
3.1.9‐7 Number of health facilities with established capacity to manage acute under‐nutrition
3.1.9‐10 (formerly 3.1.6‐10) Number of children under five who received Vitamin A from USG‐supported programs
3.1.9‐11 (formerly 3.1.6‐9) Number of children under five reached by USG‐supported nutrition programs
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .