Annex-A_-_ERAC.docx
DOCX document 35 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- SOL-391-16-000018
About this file
Annex-A
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amendment_01.pdf | ||
| RFQ_-_MSPKP_-_Final.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Environmental Review and Assessment Checklist
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW AND ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST
Location: (Attach a location map as well as site photos in color)
Type of Project/Activity:
Project/Activity Description: (One or two paragraphs to present activity description for impact analysis purpose)
Name of reviewer: (attach a letter to show that this person has been approved by the MEO) Date of Review:
Baseline Condition: (use the Baseline Identification Checklist presented in Attachment 4.)
The purpose of this Environmental Assessment Checklist (EA Checklist) is to determine whether the proposed action (scope of work) encompasses the potential for environmental pollution or damage and, if so, to determine the scope and extent of additional environmental evaluation, mitigation, and monitoring necessary to fulfill federal U.S. environmental requirements. The EA Checklist is intended to be used by Cognizant Technical Officer (CTO) to ensure that environmental consequences are taken into account.
A. CHECKLIST FOR ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES: Check appropriate column as Yes (Y), Maybe (M), No (N) or Beneficial (B). Briefly explain Y, M and B checks in next Section, "Explanations". A "Y" response does not necessarily indicate a significant effect, but rather an issue that requires focused consideration.
Y. M. N or B
1. Earth Resources
| a. grading, trenching, or excavation in cubic meters or hectare | ___ | |
| b. | geologic hazards (faults, landslides, liquefaction, un-engineered fill, etc.) | ___ |
| c. contaminated soils or ground water on the site | ___ | |
| d. offsite overburden/waste disposal or borrow pits required in cubic meters or tons | ___ | |
| e. loss of high-quality farmlands in hectares | ___ |
| 2. | Agricultural and Agrochemical |
| a. impacts of inputs such as seeds and fertilizers | ___ |
| b. impact of production process on human health and environment | ___ |
| c. other adverse impacts | ___ |
| 3. | Industries |
| a. impacts of run-off and run-on water | ___ |
| b. impact of farming such as intensification or extensification | ___ |
| c. impact of other factors | ___ |
| 4. | Air Quality | ||
| a. | substantial increase in onsite air pollutant emissions (construction/operation) | ___ | |
| b. | violation of applicable air pollutant emissions or ambient concentration standards | ___ | |
| c. | substantial increase in vehicle traffic during construction or operation | ___ | |
| d. | demolition or blasting for construction | __ | |
| e. | substantial increase in odor during construction or operation | ___ | |
| f. | substantial alteration of microclimate | ___ |
| 5. | Water Resources and Quality | ||
| a. | river, stream or lake onsite or within 30 meters of construction | ___ | |
| b. | withdrawals from or discharges to surface or ground water | ___ | |
| c. | excavation or placing of fill, removing gravel from, a river, stream or lake | ___ | |
| d. | onsite storage of liquid fuels or hazardous materials in bulk quantities | ___ |
| 6. | Cultural Resources | ||
| a. | prehistoric, historic, or paleontological resources within 30 meters of construction | ___ | |
| b. | site/facility with unique cultural or ethnic values | ___ | |
| 7. | Biological Resources | ||
| a. | vegetation removal or construction in wetlands or riparian areas in hectare | ___ | |
| b. | use of pesticides/rodenticides, insecticides, or herbicides in hectare | ___ | |
| c. | construction in or adjacent to a designated wildlife refuge | ___ |
8. Planning and Land Use
| a. | potential conflict with adjacent land uses | ___ |
| b. | non-compliance with existing codes, plans, permits or design factors | ___ |
| c. | construction in national park or designated recreational area | ___ |
| d. | create substantially annoying source of light or glare | ___ |
| e. | relocation of >10 individuals for +6 months | ___ |
| f. | interrupt necessary utility or municipal service > 10 individuals for +6 months | ___ |
| g. | substantial loss of inefficient use of mineral or non-renewable resources | ___ |
| h. | increase existing noise levels >5 decibels for +3 months | ___ |
9. Traffic, Transportation and Circulation
| a. increase vehicle trips >20% or cause substantial congestion | ___ | ||
| b. | design features cause or contribute to safety hazards | ___ | |
| c. | inadequate access or emergency access for anticipated volume of people or traffic | ___ |
10. Hazards
| a. | substantially increase risk of fire, explosion, or hazardous chemical release | ___ |
| b. | bulk quantities of hazardous materials or fuels stored on site +3 months | ___ |
| c. create or substantially contribute to human health hazard | ___ |
11. Other Issues (to be used for categories not captured under1 through 10 above)
| a. | Substantial adverse impact | ___ |
| b. | Adverse impact | ___ |
| c. | Minimal impact | ___ |
B. EXPLANATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES: explain Y, M and B responses
C. RECOMMENDED ACTION (Check Appropriate Action):
1. The project has no potential for substantial adverse environmental effects. No further environmental review is required.
2. The project has potential for adverse environmental effects; however the recommended Standard Conditions for Small Scale Construction (less than USD 50,000) will be integrated into design, and construction. A monitoring report to the MEO will be provided to document these conditions have been implemented and that there is no residual environmental impact.
3. The project has substantial but mitigable adverse environmental effects and required measures to mitigate environmental effects including social environmental impacts. Mitigation and Monitoring (M&M) Plan must be developed and approved by the MEO and/or his designee prior to implementation. Alternatively EDF and EMMP used during the past may be used. M&M Plan (or EDF and EMMP) is to be attached to the Scope of Work.
4. The project has potentially substantial adverse environmental effects, but requires more analysis to form a conclusion. A Scoping Statement must be prepared and be submitted to the BEO for approval. Following BEO approval an Environmental Assessment (EA) will be conducted. Project may not be implemented until the BEO approves the final EA.
5. The project has potentially substantial adverse environmental effects, and revisions to the project design or location or the development of new alternatives is required.
6. The project has substantial and unmitigable adverse environmental effects. Mitigation is insufficient to eliminate these effects and alternatives are not feasible. The project is not recommended for funding.
D. IDENTIFIED SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (including physical, biological and social), if any: (Use ER tools such as Leopold Matrix to identify significant environmental impacts)
E. RECOMMENDED MITIGATION MEASURES (if any):
F. RECOMMENDED MONITORING MEASURES (if any):
APPROVAL:
Implementer Project Director/COP: _________________________ Date: __________
USAID/ Project COTR/AOTR ____________________________ Date: __________
USAID Mission Environmental Officer:_____________________ Date: __________
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .