Sol_140L1724Q0065.pdf

140L1724Q0065

1. REQUEST NO.

5a. ISSUED BY

NAME

a. NAME

c. STREET ADDRESS

d. CITY

10. PLEASE FURNISH QUOTATIONS TO

THE ISSUING OFFICE IN BLOCK 5a ON

OR BEFORE CLOSE OF BUSINESS (Date)

2. DATE ISSUED 3. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NO. 4. CERT. FOR NAT. DEF.

UNDER BDSA REG. 2

AND/OR DMS REG.1

RATING

6. DELIVERY BY (Date)

7. DELIVERY

9. DESTINATION

a. NAME OF CONSIGNEE

b. STREET ADDRESS

PAGE OF PAGES

5b. FOR INFORMATION CALL: (No collect calls)

TELEPHONE NUMBER

AREA CODE NUMBER

8. TO:

b. COMPANY

e. STATE f. ZIP CODE

c. CITY

d. STATE e. ZIP CODE

IMPORTANT: This is a request for information, and quotations furnished are not offers. If you are unable to quote, please so indicate on this form and return it to the address in Block 5a. This request does not commit the Government to pay any costs incurred in the preparation of the submission of this quotation or to contract for supplies or services. Supplies are of domestic origin unless otherwise indicated by quoter. Any representations and/or certifications attached to this Request for Quotations must be completed by the quoter.

11. SCHEDULE (Include applicable Federal, State and local taxes)

THIS RFQ

REQUEST FOR QUOTATION

(THIS IS NOT AN ORDER)

IS IS NOT A SMALL BUSINESS SET ASIDEX

08/16/2024 0040675605

1 5

Denver Federal Center Building 40 Lakewood CO 80225

COLORADO STATE OFF

10/01/2025

BLM-CO WHITE RIVER FIELD OFFICE

220 E MARKET STREET

MEEKER

CO 81641

303 916-0211Courtni Strickland

09/13/2024 1700 ED

FOB DESTINATION

OTHER

(See Schedule)X

ITEM NO.

(a)

SUPPLIES/SERVICES

(b)

QUANTITY

(c)

UNIT

(d)

UNIT PRICE

(e)

AMOUNT

(f)

BLM-CO WRFO SPRING GULCH 1-22 SOIL SAMPLING AND

RECLAMATION PLAN

This is a solicitation for soil sampling and reclamation planning at Spring Gulch in accordance with the terms and conditions of your Bipartisan Infrastructure Law Federal Orphaned Well Program Support Services IDIQ and the attachments.

Basis for Award: Lowest Price Technically Acceptable This award will be made based off of Lowest-Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) as detailed in FAR 15.101-2. The LPTA process is a simplified best value source selection strategy that permits the Continued ...

12. DISCOUNT FOR PROMPT PAYMENT

a. 10 CALENDAR DAYS (%) b. 20 CALENDAR DAYS (%) c. 30 CALENDAR DAYS (%) d. CALENDAR DAYS

NUMBER PERCENTAGE

NOTE: Additional provisions and representations

13. NAME AND ADDRESS OF QUOTER

b. STREET ADDRESS

c. COUNTY

d. CITY e. STATE f. ZIP CODE

14. SIGNATURE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO

SIGN QUOTATION

16. SIGNER

a. NAME (Type or print)

c. TITLE (Type or print)

a. NAME OF QUOTER

AREA CODE

NUMBER

15. DATE OF QUOTATION

b. TELEPHONE are are not attached

AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION

Previous edition not usable

STANDARD FORM 18 (REV. 6-95)

Prescribed by GSA - FAR (48 CFR) 53.215-1(a)

ITEM NO. SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

NAME OF OFFEROR OR CONTRACTOR

2 5

CONTINUATION SHEET

REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED PAGE OF

(A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F)

140L1724Q0065 best value to result from the selection of the technically acceptable proposal with the lowest price. While evaluating quotes utilizing LPTA, price and technical are the two evaluation factors. Price and Technical Acceptability when evaluated are weighted equally.

If the lowest priced evaluated is considered a technically acceptable offer that offer represents the best value for the government and the evaluation process stops at this point. Award shall be made to that offeror without further consideration of any other offers. If the lowest priced offeror is not considered technically acceptable, the next lowest priced offeror will be evaluated, and the process will continue (in order by price) until an offeror is determined to be technically acceptable or until all offerors are evaluated. The Contracting Officer shall then make an integrated assessment best value award decision.

Evaluation Factors

Evaluation Approach.

Price Reasonableness Evaluation. The offerors

Price Quote will be evaluated based upon the total price proposed. Price will be ranked from lowest to highest price.

Technical Qualifications. Technical submissions will be evaluated utilizing the table as shown below.

Adjectival Rating Description

Acceptable Information provided demonstrates the offeror has the technical know-how to meet the requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Information provided does not demonstrates the offeror has the technical know-how to meet the requirements of the solicitation.

Vendor Responsibility. Federal Databases such as

FAPIIS/CPARS will be utilized. Information recorded in FAPIIS and SAM and will be used to determine a contractor's responsibility.

The evaluation process shall proceed as follows.

Step 1 - Rank all proposals by price and evaluate price reasonableness from lowest price to highest price.

Step 2 - Evaluate the lowest-priced proposal for

Continued ...

NSN 7540-01-152-8067 OPTIONAL FORM 336 (4-86)

ITEM NO. SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

NAME OF OFFEROR OR CONTRACTOR

3 5

CONTINUATION SHEET

REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED PAGE OF

(A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F)

140L1724Q0065 technical acceptability. The technical portion of the quote will be rated based on the table below as either acceptable or unacceptable.

Step 3 - Determine the responsibility of the vendor.

POC CS Courtni Strickland c1strickland@blm.gov

Period of Performance: 10/01/2024 to 10/01/2025

00010 Soil Sampling and Reclamation Planning

Product/Service Code: F011

Product/Service Description: NATURAL

RESOURCES/CONSERVATION- SURFACE MINING

RECLAMATION (NON-CONSTRUCTION)

Delivery: 10/01/2025

All invoices must be submitted directly to www.ipp.gov and include a matching invoice attachment, certification for progress payments, certified payroll and for the final invoice a release of claims.

NSN 7540-01-152-8067 OPTIONAL FORM 336 (4-86)

Federal Orphaned Well Program – Support Services Multiple Award Indefinite Quantity Indefinite Delivery (IDIQ) Contracts

DATE:

BLM-CO WRFO SPRING GULCH 1-22 SOIL SAMPLING AND RECLAMATION PLAN

08/15/2015

REFERENCE: RFQ 140L1724Q0065

The purpose of this RFP is to support the above referenced requirement. The intent of the Government is to award a Firm Fixed Price Task Order (TO) for these services. Resultant proposals shall be in accordance with all terms and conditions identified in the attached Statement of Work and the base Indefinite Delivery / Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract.

Basis for Award: Lowest Price Technically Acceptable

This project will be awarded based on Lowest-Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) as detailed in FAR 15.101-2. The LPTA process is a simplified best value source selection strategy that permits the best value to result from the selection of the technically acceptable proposal with the lowest price. While evaluating quotes utilizing LPTA, price and technical are the two evaluation factors. Price and Technical Acceptability when evaluated are weighted equally.

If the lowest priced evaluated is considered a technically acceptable offer that offer represents the best value for the government and the evaluation process stops at this point. Award shall be made to that offeror without further consideration of any other offers. If the lowest priced offeror is not considered technically acceptable, the next lowest priced offeror will be evaluated, and the process will continue (in order by price) until an offeror is determined to be technically acceptable or until all offerors are evaluated. The Contracting Officer shall then make an integrated assessment best value award decision.

Evaluation Factors Evaluation Approach.

Price Reasonableness Evaluation. The offeror’s Price Quote will be evaluated based upon the total price proposed. Price will be ranked from lowest to highest price.

Technical Qualifications. Technical submissions will be evaluated utilizing the table as shown below.

Adjectival Rating Description Acceptable Information provided demonstrates the offeror has the technical know-how to meet the requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Information provided does not demonstrates the offeror has the technical know-how to meet the requirements of the solicitation.

Vendor Responsibility. Federal Databases such as FAPIIS/CPARS will be utilized. Information recorded in FAPIIS and SAM and will be used to determine a contractor’s responsibility.

The evaluation process shall proceed as follows.

Step 1 – Rank all proposals by price and evaluate price reasonableness from lowest price to highest price.

Step 2 – Evaluate the lowest-priced proposal for technical acceptability. The technical portion of the quote will be rated based on the table below as either “acceptable” or “unacceptable”.

Step 3 – Determine the responsibility of the vendor.

Price Offerors shall calculate their proposed pricing based upon their established IDIQ prices. Offerors shall identify any items in their quote that are not based upon their established prices. Offerors are requested to provide rates that are discounted from their established rates. All travel costs should be in accordance with the Federal Travel Regulations.

Final negotiated prices shall be valid for a minimum of 60 calendar days from the date submitted.

Submittal Instructions Please submit your proposal/quote by email to Contracting Officer (CO) Robert Hall at rhall@blm.gov and Contract Specialist (CS) Courtni Strickland at c1strickland@blm.gov by September 5, 2023, at 1700 MT. Submissions are limited to a total of ten pages, inclusive of all supporting graphics, cover letters, and the SF-18.

Attachments:

1. Task Order Statement of Work

2. SF-18 140L1724Q0065

3. Wage Determination 2015-5439