Single Source.pdf

PDF 1 MB Posted

Attached to
Rosendale Waterfowl Production Area
Opportunity number
F19AS00176
Issued by

About this file

Single Source

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
PKG00249834-instructions.doc DOC document
NOFO.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

FWS 3-2452

11/25/2013

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Determination for Issuing a Single Source Financial Assistance Award

Instructions: In accordance with Service policy 516 FW 6, Issuing Discretionary Grant and Cooperative Agreement Awards without Competition, complete this form to document the justification for issuing a single source grant or cooperative agreement award. This form must be signed by both a program representative and the employee with signature authority for the award to be issued (see 516 FW 3, Signature Authority for Grant and Cooperative Agreement Awards). The completed and signed form must be maintained in the official award file.

Recipient Name:

Project Title:

Program Contact:

Select all criteria that apply (from 505 DM 2):

(1) Unsolicited Proposal: The proposed award is the result of an unsolicited application that represents a unique or innovative idea, method, or approach that is not the subject of a current or planned award, but is found to be advantageous to program objectives.

(2) Continuation: The activity to be funded is necessary for the satisfactory completion of, or is a continuation of, an activity we are funding and holding a competition would have a significant adverse effect on continuing or completing the activity.

(3) Legislative Intent: The language in the applicable authorizing legislation or legislative history clearly indicates the intent of Congress to restrict the award to a particular recipient or purpose.

(4) Unique Qualifications: The applicant is uniquely qualified to perform the activity based on a variety of demonstrable factors such as location; property ownership; voluntary support capacity; cost-sharing ability, if applicable; technical expertise; or other such unique qualifications.

(5) Emergencies: Because of a compelling and unusual urgency, or substantial danger to health or safety, there is not enough time to follow adequate competitive procedures.

Explain below why competition for this award is not practical. As applicable, summarize the program legislative history, unique capabilities of the proposed recipient, and any cost-sharing contribution offered by the proposed recipient. Be brief and specific:

I have determined that this project meets the requirements for a single source award and recommend that it be awarded to the recipient named above.

I, as the Service employee with signature authority for this award under 516 FW 3, have reviewed this program recommendation and find that it meets the requirements for a single source award.

Program Representative Sign and Date Authorized Signator Sign and Date

Printed Name of Program Representative Printed Name of Signator

Rest:
Save Form:
Recipient Name: Ducks Unlimited
Project Title: Rosendale Waterfowl Production Area
Program Contact: Bruce Luebke
Check Box1: Yes
Check Box2: Off
Check Box3: Off
Check Box4: Off
Check Box5: Off
offered by the proposed recipient Be brief and specific: Competition for the award is not practical, as DU is familiar with this tract, has completed the design and engineering work as part of a prior agreement to provide engineering services to USFWS and other agencies for wetland restoration projects, and is highly qualified to perform the activity based on technical expertise and unique knowledge of wetland restoration to achieve specific habitat goals.
Printed Name of person signing: Bruce Luebke
Printed Name of person signing_2: Daniel D. Lovdahl
2018-10-23T08:32:38-0500
BRUCE LUEBKE
2019-04-08T13:38:07-0500
DANIEL LOVDAHL

File details come from the government source that posted it.