Single Source Determination.pdf
PDF 939 KB Posted
- Attached to
- 15.658
- Opportunity number
- F18AS00334
- Issued by
-
Department of the Interior
About this file
Single Source
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| NOFO Template-plt 8-3-18.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FWS 3-2452
11/25/2013
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Determination for Issuing a Single Source Financial Assistance Award
Instructions: In accordance with Service policy 516 FW 6, Issuing Discretionary Grant and Cooperative Agreement Awards without Competition, complete this form to document the justification for issuing a single source grant or cooperative agreement award. This form must be signed by both a program representative and the employee with signature authority for the award to be issued (see 516 FW 3, Signature Authority for Grant and Cooperative Agreement Awards). The completed and signed form must be maintained in the official award file.
Recipient Name:
Project Title:
Program Contact:
Select all criteria that apply (from 505 DM 2):
(1) Unsolicited Proposal: The proposed award is the result of an unsolicited application that represents a unique or innovative idea, method, or approach that is not the subject of a current or planned award, but is found to be advantageous to program objectives.
(2) Continuation: The activity to be funded is necessary for the satisfactory completion of, or is a continuation of, an activity we are funding and holding a competition would have a significant adverse effect on continuing or completing the activity.
(3) Legislative Intent: The language in the applicable authorizing legislation or legislative history clearly indicates the intent of Congress to restrict the award to a particular recipient or purpose.
(4) Unique Qualifications: The applicant is uniquely qualified to perform the activity based on a variety of demonstrable factors such as location; property ownership; voluntary support capacity; cost-sharing ability, if applicable; technical expertise; or other such unique qualifications.
(5) Emergencies: Because of a compelling and unusual urgency, or substantial danger to health or safety, there is not enough time to follow adequate competitive procedures.
Explain below why competition for this award is not practical. As applicable, summarize the program legislative history, unique capabilities of the proposed recipient, and any cost-sharing contribution offered by the proposed recipient. Be brief and specific:
I have determined that this project meets the requirements for a single source award and recommend that it be awarded to the recipient named above.
I, as the Service employee with signature authority for this award under 516 FW 3, have reviewed this program recommendation and find that it meets the requirements for a single source award.
Program Representative Sign and Date Authorized Signator Sign and Date
Printed Name of Program Representative Printed Name of Signator
| Rest: |
| Save Form: |
| Recipient Name: Mississippi State University |
| Project Title: Development of Bird Restoration Monitoring Guidance |
| Program Contact: Pete Tuttle |
| Check Box1: Off |
| Check Box2: Off |
| Check Box3: Off |
| Check Box4: Yes |
| Check Box5: Off |
| offered by the proposed recipient Be brief and specific: The DWH NRDA Cross-TIG MAM Workgroup has been directed to develop MAM guidance for restoration projects implemented as part of the Deepwater Horizon NRDA, including bird restoration projects. GOMAMN, a coalition of Agency, academic, and Non-Governmental Organization bird experts, are in the process of developing bird monitoring protocols for the Gulf of Mexico. MSU has a lead role in this effort and has hired a Post Doctorate researcher to coordinate development of monitoring plans and protocols for various bird guilds. In an effort to maximize efficiencies and avoid unnecessary costs, the Cross-TIG MAM Workgroup seeks to utilize the expertise and products of GOMAMN to develop DWH NRDA MAM guidance for bird restoration projects (i.e., avoid “re-inventing the wheel”). Accordingly, we would like to develop a cooperative agreement with MSU to have the Post Doctorate researcher facilitate adaption of GOMAMN monitoring recommendations and protocols to suit the needs of DWH NRDA bird restoration monitoring. The delivered product will be written guidance for NRDA MAM bird restoration monitoring for inclusion in the DWH NRDA MAM Manual. |
| Printed Name of person signing: Pete Tuttle |
| Printed Name of person signing_2: |
File details come from the government source that posted it.