Serv P22-057 justification_and_approval_document REDACTED.pdf

PDF 292 KB Posted

Attached to
Verification and Validation of MRO Tool
Solicitation number
FA813223P0023
Issued by

About this file

This document is a Justification and Approval for Other Than Full and Open Competition. The Air Force Sustainment Center awarded a firm fixed price purchase order contract valued at $504514.33 to RGBSI Aerospace & Defense LLC on May 19, 2023. The contract is for RGBSI to provide validation and verification of an MRO Tool they originally developed under a previous contract, along with engineering analysis, recommendations to enhance shop capabilities, and minimal tool modifications. A sole source award was justified as RGBSI holds proprietary data rights to the MRO Tool, and developing it with another contractor would result in duplication of the $375,000 original development costs.

View the file

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Justification and Approval (J&A) for Other Than Full and Open Competition

CONTROLLED UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION

11 Jul 2022 CONTROLLED UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION Page 2 of 411 Jul 2022 CONTROLLED UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION Page 2 of 4

I. Agency and Contracting Activity.

AFSC/PZIMC

II. Nature and/or description of the action being approved.

This "individual" Sole Source Justification will be a new Firm Fixed Price (FFP) Purchase Order type contract.

III. Description of supplies/services required to meet agency needs.

Requested Services:

- Provide validation and verification of the Maintenance Repair and Overhaul Tool (MRO)i Tool utilizing 3 engine subcomponents and 3 engine major components/subassemblies

- Validation and verification to include minimal tool modifications to reflect corrections to the methodology as assessed by the contractor Provide engineering analysis and consulting services for76 PMXG shop processes to include:

- Identify shop-based constraints (personnel, process, equipment, etc.)

- Improve shop flow days

- Reduce maintenance costs

- Effectively manage shop WIP

- Provide objective metrics, including cost effective metrics or `best value', for analysis of future workload activation Provide recommendations to enhance 76 PMXG frontshop and backshop capabilities including:

- Automation of manual tasks

- WIP/Inventory Control

- Overall shop/process efficiency

IV. Demonstration that the contractor's unique qualifications or the nature of the acquisition requires use of the authority cited above.

RGBSI Aerospace & Defense LLC (RGBSI) has worked with PMXG to develop the MRO. RGBSI is the Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) for the MRO Tool and due to proprietary data rights RGBSI is the only source entity that is capable of completing the MRO Tool without seeking another source that would have to start anew and would incur additional time and money to PMXG and would delay PMXG from identifying, optimize, and prioritize various workload that will be beneficial to pursue or prioritize for PMXG. The initial development of the MRO Tool was three hundred & seventy-five thousand ($375,000.00) it would not be feasible for the Government to start anew and incur additional cost.

V. Description of efforts made to ensure that offers are solicited from as many potential sources as practicable, including whether a notice was or will be publicized as required by subpart 5.2 and, if not, which exception under

FAR 5.202 applies.

We will posting a Combined Synopsis and Solicitation (CSS) to SAM.gov in order to notify industry of the Government's requirements in case any other contractor can perform this action they can notify us and submit a proposal.

11 Jul 2022 CONTROLLED UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION Page 3 of 411 Jul 2022 CONTROLLED UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION Page 3 of 4

VI. Determination by the Contracting Officer that the anticipated cost to the Government will be fair and reasonable.

The Government intends to request Other than Certified Cost or Pricing data at the time of proposal submission. The Government will then conduct Cost and Price analysis using Weighted Guide Lines to establish the Government objective. The Government's Fair and Reasonable Determination will be documented in the Contracting File.

VII. Description of the market research conducted and the results, or a statement of the reasons market research was not conducted.

Market research was performed reviewing Dynamic Small Business Search and System for Award Management databases using North American Industry Classification System Code 541490 looking for companies that could the item(s) listed above. A review of small businesses to include 8(a), HUBZone, Service Disabled Veteran Owned Business, and Women Owned Small Business was conducted. In review, due to proprietary data rights this requirement will be sole source to the vendor who has done the initial development of the MRO Tool and holds the proprietary data rights.

VIII. Any other facts supporting the use of Other Than Full and Open Competition.

Bringing on a different contractor would result in extreme duplication of costs of roughly $375,000.00.

This project was started on a different contract vehicle and delivered. This is the validation piece of the tool so this will be a one off contract. The Government intends to maintain the tool organically after this contract.

IX. List of any sources that expressed, in writing, an interest in the acquisition.

RGBSI Aerospace & Defense LLC

DBA: RGBSI A&D

Address: 2850 Presidential Dr. Ste 120 Fairborn, OH 45324 POC: Paul L. Hartman, Ph.D.

Telephone: (937) 232-3592 Cage Code: 8CGW6 Type of Business: Other Minority Owned, Subcontinent Asian American, Women- Owned Small Business, Woman Owned

X. A statement of the actions, if any, the agency may take to remove or overcome any barriers to competition before any subsequent acquisitions for the supplies or services required.

The Government will post it's requirements to SAM.gov before the project is started whenever possible in order to avoid being in this situation where a there is only one responsible source that will be able to complete our requirements.

XI. Certification by the Contracting Officer.

As evidenced by my signature above, I certify that this justification is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief.

XII. Certification by the technical/requirements personnel.

As evidenced by my (our) signature(s) above, I (we) certify that any supporting data contained herein, which is my (our) responsibility, is both accurate and complete.

11 Jul 2022 CONTROLLED UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION Page 4 of 4

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .