Section L Attachment L-1 Past Performance Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 25 KB Posted

Attached to
CH-53K Program O-Level Bag Group C
Solicitation number
N68335-26-R-1031
Issued by

About this file

This file is a past performance questionnaire template used to evaluate contractor performance on previous contracts. The form collects information about a contractor's performance across three primary categories: Quality of Product and Processes, Timeliness of Performance, and Customer Satisfaction. Each category uses a five-point rating scale ranging from Unsatisfactory to Outstanding, with space for detailed comments. The questionnaire also asks whether the customer would select the firm again and requires explanation.

The template captures essential contract information including contractor and customer names, contract number, period of performance, contract type (Negotiated, Sealed Bid, Fixed Price, Cost Reimbursement, IDIQ, or Other), and work complexity designation (Difficult or Routine). The form requires signatures and contact information from both the interviewer and interviewee, along with dates. As a template document, it provides no specific evaluation data but serves as the standardized instrument for assessing past performance on the CH-53K Program O-Level Bag Group C solicitation (N68335-26-R-1031), a Firm Fixed Price, 100% Small Business Set-Aside contract issued by the Naval Air Warfare Center Aircraft Division for Peculiar Support Equipment procurement supporting CH-53K aircraft maintenance operations.

View the file

Other files

Show all 13

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

SECTION L ATTACHMENT (L-1)

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONAIRE

1.Contractor:

2.Customer:

3.Contract Number: Period of Performance:

4.Contract Type:Negotiated|_|Sealed Bid|_|
Fixed Price|_|Cost Reimbursement|_|
IDIQ|_|Other|_|

5.Complexity of Work: Difficult: |_| Routine: |_|

Ratings: Summarize contractor performance and circle the appropriate rating for each category.

Quality of Product and Processes: Rating: Unsatisfactory Marginal Satisfactory

Highly Satisfactory Outstanding

(Compliance with contract requirements, accuracy of reports, appropriateness of personnel, and technical excellence)

Comments:

Timeliness of Performance: Rating: Unsatisfactory Marginal Satisfactory

Highly Satisfactory Outstanding

(Met interim milestones, reliable, responsive to technical direction, and completed on time)

Customer Satisfaction: Rating: Unsatisfactory Marginal Satisfactory

Highly Satisfactory Outstanding

(Satisfaction of end users with contractor’s service and product)

Would you select this firm again? Please explain.

Interviewee Name:Signature:
Phone Number: Fax Number:
Date:
Interviewer Name:Signature:
Phone Number:Fax Number:
Date:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .