SDGG 2017 Application Template.docx

USDA Value-Added Producer Grant FY2013 Application Toolkit for Working Capital

Socially-Disadvantaged Groups Grant Program 2017

APPLICATION TEMPLATE

A 2017 SOCIALLY-DISADVANTAGED GROUPS GRANT APPLICATION

Submitted by:

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

ELIGIBILITY DISCUSSION

SECTION 1: APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY

SECTION 2: USE OF FUNDS

SECTION 3: PROJECT AREA

SECTION 4: GRANT PERIOD

SECTION 5: SATISFACTORY PERFORMANCE (if applicable)

SCORING CRITERIA

SECTION A: TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE

SECTION B: EXPERIENCE

SECTION C: COMMITMENT

SECTION D: WORK PLAN/BUDGET

SECTION E: LOCAL SUPPORT "page #"

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION MEASURES

APPENDICES

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Provide a summary of the proposal, not to exceed one page, describing the Project, tasks to be completed, and other relevant information that provides a general overview of the Project.

ELIGIBILITY DISCUSSION (4 page max)

Applicant Eligibility

Describe how you meet the definition of a Cooperative, Group of Cooperatives, or Cooperative Development Center. Your application must show that a majority of the board of directors or governing board is comprised of individuals who are members of Socially-Disadvantaged Groups. Your application must include a list of your board of directors/governing board and the percentage of board of directors/governing board that are members of Socially-Disadvantaged Groups.

Use of Funds

Discuss how the proposed Project activities meet the definition of Technical Assistance and identify the Socially-Disadvantaged Groups that will be assisted.

Project Area

You must provide specific information that details the location of the Project area and explain how the area meets the definition of “Rural Area.”

Grant Period

Provide a time frame for the proposed Project and discuss how the Project will be completed within that time frame. Applications must have a time frame of one year or less. Your proposed time frame should begin no earlier than the grant award date and end no later than December 31, 2018.

Satisfactory Performance

If applicable, you must discuss the status of your existing SDGG and/or RCDG award at application time and be performing satisfactorily to be considered for a new SDGG award.

SCORING CRITERIA

Technical Assistance (3 page limit)

(a) Technical Assistance (maximum score of 25 points). A panel of USDA employees will evaluate your application to determine your ability to assess the needs of and provide effective Technical Assistance to Socially-Disadvantaged Groups. You must discuss the:

(1) Needs of the Socially-Disadvantaged Groups to be assisted and explain how those needs were determined,

(2) Proposed Technical Assistance to be provided to the Socially-Disadvantaged Groups; and

(3) Expected outcomes of the proposed Technical Assistance, including how Socially-Disadvantaged Groups will benefit from participating in the Project. You will score higher on this criterion if you provide examples of past projects that demonstrate successful outcomes in identifying specific needs and providing Technical Assistance to Socially-Disadvantaged Groups.

Experience (3 page limit)

(b) Experience (maximum score of 25 points). A panel of USDA employees will evaluate your experience, commitment and availability for identified staff or consultants in providing Technical Assistance, as defined in this Notice. You must describe the Technical Assistance experience for each identified staff member or consultant, as well as years of experience in providing that assistance. You must also discuss the commitment and the availability of identified staff, consultants, or other professionals to be hired for the project—especially those who may be consulting on multiple SDGG/RCDG projects. If staff or consultants have not been selected at the time of application, you must provide specific descriptions of the qualifications required for the positions to be filled. In addition, resumes for each individual staff member or consultant must be included as an attachment in Appendix B. The attachments will not count toward the maximum page total. We will compare the described experience in this section and in the resumes to the work plan to determine relevance of the experience. Applications that do not include the attached resumes will not be considered for funding.

Applications that demonstrate strong credentials, education, capabilities, experience and availability of Project personnel that will contribute to a high likelihood of Project success will receive more points than those that demonstrate less potential for success in these areas.

Commitment (3 page limit)

(c) Commitment (maximum of 10 points). A panel of USDA employees will evaluate your commitment to providing Technical Assistance to Socially-Disadvantaged Groups in Rural Areas. You must list the number and location of Socially-Disadvantaged Groups that will directly benefit from the assistance provided. You must also define and describe the underserved and economically distressed areas within your service area and provide current and relevant statistics that support your description of the service area. Projects located in persistent poverty counties as defined by USDA’s Economic Research Service will score higher on this factor.

Work Plan / Budget (6 page limit)

(d) Work Plan /Budget (maximum of 25 points). Your work plan must provide specific and detailed descriptions of the tasks and the key project personnel that will accomplish the project’s goals. Budget will be reviewed for completeness. You must list what tasks are to be done, when it will be done, who will do it, and how much it will cost. Reviewers must be able to understand what is being proposed and how the grant funds will be spent. The budget must be a detailed breakdown of estimated costs. These costs should be allocated to each of the tasks to be undertaken. The amount of grant funds requested will be reduced if the applicant does not have justification for all costs.

A panel of USDA employees will evaluate your work plan for detailed actions and an accompanying timetable for implementing the proposal. Clear, logical, realistic, and efficient plans that allocate costs to specific tasks using applicable budget object class categories provided on the Form SF-424A will result in a higher score. You must discuss at a minimum:

(i) Specific tasks to be completed using grant funds;

(ii) How customers will be identified;

(iii) Key personnel; and

(iv) The evaluation methods to be used to determine the success of specific tasks and overall project objectives. Please provide qualitative methods of evaluation. For example, evaluation methods should go beyond quantitative measurements of completing surveys or number of evaluations.

The following task budget format is strongly recommended to ensure all required budgetary information is provided. Please note, your work plan should provide an explanation for each task budget, including the basis for budget figures.

Task Budget Format Edit budget categories and add additional tasks as needed.

Task Description

Task 1

Personnel: $ Fringe Benefits: $ Travel: $ Supplies: $ Contractual: $ Other: $ Task 1 Total: $

Task 1 – Narrative budget justification

Task 2

Personnel: $

Travel: $ Supplies: $ Contractual: $

Task 2 Total: $

Task 2 – Narrative budget justification

Task 3

Personnel: $

Travel: $ Supplies: $ Contractual: $

Task 3 Total: $

Task 3 – Narrative budget justification

Task 4

Personnel: $

Travel: $ Supplies: $ Contractual: $

Task 4 Total: $

Task 4 – Narrative budget justification

TOTAL

Local Support (3 page limit)

(e) Local support (maximum of 10 points). A panel of USDA employees will evaluate your application for local support of the Technical Assistance activities. Your discussion on local support should include previous and/or expected local support and plans for coordinating with other developmental organizations in the proposed service area or with state and local government institutions. You will score higher if you demonstrate strong support from potential beneficiaries and other developmental organizations. You may also submit a maximum of 10 letters of support or intent to coordinate with the application to verify your discussion.

Support letters should come from potential beneficiaries and other local organizations. Letters received from Technical Assistance providers and Congressional members will not be included in the count of support letters received. Additionally, identical form letters signed by multiple potential beneficiaries and/or local organizations will not be included in the count of support letters received. Support letters should be included as an attachment to the application and will not count against the maximum page total.

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION MEASURES

You must provide estimates on the following performance evaluation measures as part of your narrative:

· Number of cooperatives assisted; and

· Number of socially disadvantaged groups assisted.

Appendix A

If applying as a Cooperative or a Group of Cooperatives, you must verify your incorporation and status in the State that you have applied by providing the State’s Certificate of Good Standing and your Articles of Incorporation. You may also submit your By-laws if they provide additional information not included in your Articles of Incorporation that will verify your status as a Cooperative or a Group of Cooperatives. If applying as a nonprofit corporation, you must provide evidence of your status as a nonprofit corporation in good standing and your Articles of Incorporation. If applying as an institution of higher education, you must qualify as an Institution of Higher Education as defined at 20 U.S.C. 1001. You must apply as only one type of applicant. If the requested verification documents are not included, your application will not be considered for funding.

Appendix B

Resumes for each individual staff member or consultant must be included as an attachment, listing their experience for the type of Technical Assistance proposed. The attachments will not count toward the maximum page total. We will compare the described experience to the work plan to determine relevance of the experience. Applications that do not include the attached resumes will not be considered for funding.

Appendix C

You may submit a maximum of 10 letters of support. Support letters should come from potential beneficiaries and other local organizations. Letters received from Technical Assistance providers and Congressional members will not be included in the count of support letters received. Additionally, identical form letters signed by multiple potential beneficiaries and/or local organizations will not be included in the count of support letters received.

image1.png