Scoring Criteria.pdf
PDF 57 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- PE-61200-NONST-2027-000000009
- Issued by
- Bleckley County, Georgia
About this file
This is a Statement of Qualifications Scoring Criteria document used by a state or local government agency to evaluate architectural and/or engineering firms for contract consideration. The evaluation framework assesses firms across five key criteria, each scored on a scale of 0 to 2 points (Poor, Good, or Excellent): the firm's ability to provide necessary disciplines for the project; the firm's and key personnel's experience with the project type; quality of reference information provided; demonstrated experience with similar projects including examples; and price competitiveness. The document includes space for the reviewer to record the firm's contact information, name, and address, as well as verification fields confirming whether the firm can meet PER/PAR deadlines and whether the firm maintains Errors and Omissions insurance coverage. A total points section allows evaluators to calculate the combined score across all criteria.
The scoring document does not contain information regarding pricing terms, set-asides, incumbent status, contract funding sources, or specific contract amounts. The form is designed as an objective evaluation tool with space for reviewer comments, name, and review date. This appears to be a standard assessment template rather than a complete solicitation document, and additional contract details would be found in accompanying bid documents or requests for proposals.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Bleckley RFP.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS
SCORING
CONTACT:
NAME OF FIRM:
FIRM ADDRESS:
Evaluate the Architectural and/or Engineering Firm based on the points assigned to each selected criterion.
CIRCLE POINTS
CRITERION POOR GOOD
EXCELLENT
POINTS
ASSIGNED
1. Ability to provide the disciplines necessary for this project.
0 1 2
2. The Firm’s and Key personnel experience with this type of Project
0 1 2
3. Quality of reference information. 0 1 2
4. Has the Firm had experience with similar projects (provides examples)?
0 1 2
5. Is the price competitive? % 0 1 2
TOTAL POINTS
Firm can meet PER/PAR deadline? Yes No
Firm carries Errors and Omissions insurance? Yes No
REVIEW COMMENTS: ______________________________________________________________
NAME:
DATE OF REVIEW:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .