SCBGP_2019_RFA_FINAL_3-7-19.pdf

OMB No. 0581‐0240

Specialty Crop Block Grant Program

Fiscal Year 2019 Request for Applications

Funding Opportunity Number: USDA‐AMS‐TM‐SCBGP‐G‐19‐0003

Publication Date: March 7, 2019

Application Due Date: 11:59 PM Eastern Time on May 24, 2019

Program Solicitation Information

Funding Opportunity Title: Specialty Crop Block Grant Program – Farm Bill

Funding Opportunity Number: USDA‐AMS‐TM‐SCBGP‐G‐19‐0003

Announcement Type: Initial

Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Number: 10.170

Dates: Applications must be received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May 24, 2019, through Grants.gov.

Applications received after this deadline will not be considered for funding.

Executive Summary: The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS), requests applications for the fiscal year (FY) 2019 Specialty Crop Block Grant Program (SCBGP) to award grants to eligible State departments of agriculture to carry out projects that enhance the competitiveness of specialty crops.

Approximately $72.4 million, less USDA administrative costs, will be available to fund applications under this solicitation.

This announcement identifies the eligibility criteria for SCBGP projects and applicants, and the application forms and associated instructions needed to apply for a SCBGP award.

Stakeholder Input: AMS seeks comments about this Request for Applications (RFA). We will consider the comments when we develop the next RFA for the program. Submit written stakeholder comments by the deadline set forth in the DATES portion of this Notice via e‐mail to: AMSGrants@ams.usda.gov. This e‐mail address is intended only for receiving comments regarding this RFA and not requesting information or forms. In your comments, please state that you are responding to the Specialty Crop Block Grant Program RFA.

https://beta.sam.gov/fal/d122b75dfa694a43ad6ece34d5eb8ad3/view?keywords=10.170&sort=-relevance&index=cfda&is_active=true&page=1 http://www.grants.gov/ mailto:AMSGrants@ams.usda.gov

Highlights and Changes for 2019

Below are highlights of major changes to the program since last year.

• The RFA has been updated to align with the program changes in section 10107 of the Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018, Public Law 115‐343. These changes are provided throughout, but particularly in 1.2 Purpose, 3.2 Solely Enhance the Competitiveness of Specialty Crops, 3.5 Performance Measures, and 4.7.2 Allowable and Unallowable Costs and Activities.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 Funding Opportunity Description

1.1 Legislative Authority

1.2 Purpose

1.3 Project Types

1.4 Development of Proposals

2.0 Award Information

2.1 Type of Federal Assistance

2.2 Type of Applications

2.3 Available Funding

2.4 Federal Award Period Duration

2.5 Block Grant Amounts Available to Each Applicant

3.0 Eligibility Information

3.1 Eligible Applicants

3.2 Enhance the Competitiveness of U.S. or U.S. Territory Grown Specialty Crops

3.3 Benefit More Than One Product or Organization

3.4 Cost‐Sharing and Matching

3.5 Performance Measures

3.6 Projects Attempting to Disparage the Work of Another Organization

3.7 Supplanting

4.0 Application and Submission Information

4.1 Obtaining an Application Package

4.2 Application Checklist

4.3 Content and Form of Application Submission

4.4 Submission Date and Time

4.5 Intergovernmental Review

4.6 Funds Not Applied For

4.7 Funding Restrictions

4.8 Grants.gov Application Submission and Receipt Procedures and Requirements

5.0 Application Review Information

6.0 Award Administration Information

6.1 Award Notices

6.2 Administrative and National Policy Requirements

6.3 Reporting

7.0 Agency Contacts

7.1 Team Lead

7.2 Grants Management Specialists

7.3 Address

7.4 Grants.gov Questions

8.0 Other Information

8.1 Equal Opportunity Statement

8.2 Freedom of Information Act Requests

8.3 Prohibition on Using Funds under Grants and Cooperative Agreements with Entities that Require Certain Internal Confidentiality Agreements

8.4 Paperwork Reduction

1.0 FUNDING OPPORTUNITY DESCRIPTION

1.1 LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITY

Legislative authority is provided under section 101 of the Specialty Crops Competitiveness Act of 2004 (7 U.S.C. § 1621 note) and amended under section 10107 of the Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018, Public Law 115‐343 (the Farm Bill). SCBGP is currently implemented under 7 CFR § 1291 (published March 27, 2009; 74 FR 13313).

1.2 PURPOSE

The Specialty Crop Block Grant Program (SCBGP) assists State departments of agriculture in the 50 States, American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the District of Columbia, Guam, and the U.S. Virgin Islands to enhance the competitiveness of specialty crops by—

(1) leveraging efforts to market and promote specialty crops;

(2) assisting producers with research and development relevant to specialty crops;

(3) expanding availability and access to specialty crops; and

(4) addressing local, regional, and national challenges confronting specialty crop producers.

Specialty crops are fruits and vegetables, dried fruit, tree nuts, horticulture, and nursery crops (including floriculture). A State department of agriculture is the agency, commission, or department of a State government responsible for agriculture within the State.

1.3 PROJECT TYPES

States are encouraged to develop projects pertaining to the following issues affecting the specialty crop industry:

• enhancing food safety;

• improving the capacity of all entities in the specialty crop distribution chain to comply with the requirements of the Food Safety Modernization Act (21 U.S.C. Chapter 27), for example, developing “Good Agricultural Practices,” “Good Handling Practices,” “Good Manufacturing Practices,” and in cost‐ share arrangements for funding audits of such systems (including USDA GroupGAP) for small farmers, packers and processors;

• investing in specialty crop research, including research to focus on conservation and environmental outcomes;

• developing new and improved seed varieties and specialty crops;

• pest and disease control;

• increasing child and adult nutrition knowledge and consumption of specialty crops;

• improving efficiency and reducing costs of distribution systems; and

• sustainability.

1.3.1 PROJECTS MORE RELEVANT FOR OTHER FEDERAL GRANT PROGRAMS

Entities that engage in projects that support the increased consumption of fruits and vegetables in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) by providing incentives at the point of purchase and/or include technologies for benefit redemption systems should consider submitting those projects to the Food Insecurity Nutrition Incentive (FINI) Grant Program.

http://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=(title:7%20section:1621%20edition:prelim)%20OR%20(granuleid:USC-prelim-title7-section1621)&f=treesort&edition=prelim&num=0&jumpTo=true http://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=(title:7%20section:1621%20edition:prelim)%20OR%20(granuleid:USC-prelim-title7-section1621)&f=treesort&edition=prelim&num=0&jumpTo=true https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/7/part-1291 https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2009/03/27/E9-6816/specialty-crop-block-grant-program-farm-bill http://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title21/chapter27&edition=prelim http://nifa.usda.gov/funding-opportunity/food-insecurity-nutrition-incentive-fini-grant-program http://nifa.usda.gov/funding-opportunity/food-insecurity-nutrition-incentive-fini-grant-program

Entities that engage in projects that support domestic farmers’ markets, roadside stands, community‐supported agriculture programs, agritourism activities, other direct producer‐to‐consumer market opportunities, and local and regional food business enterprises that process, distribute, aggregate, or store locally or regionally produced food products should consider submitting those projects to the Farmers Market Promotion Program and Local Food Promotion Program.

Entities that engage in projects that support biobased products and bioenergy and energy programs, including biofuels and other alternative uses for agricultural and forestry commodities (development of biobased products), should see the USDA energy website at http://www.usda.gov/energy/matrix/home for information on how to submit those projects for consideration to the energy programs supported by USDA.

1.4 DEVELOPMENT OF PROPOSALS

1.4.1 STATE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE RESPONSIBILITIES

State departments of agriculture are responsible for developing proposals and overseeing funded projects.

Applicants must structure proposals so that the State department of agriculture maintains control of the project objectives, sets policy, and ensures that projects are carried out in accordance with all applicable Federal statutes and regulations as well as with the Grant Agreement Terms and Conditions. State departments of agriculture are also responsible for ensuring that subrecipients maintain appropriate records and follow all applicable Federal statutes and regulations as well as the Grant Agreement and AMS General Terms and Conditions.

State departments of agriculture must ensure that proposals are appropriate for the SCBGP by reviewing section

1.2 Purpose. Contact a specialist listed in section 7.2 Grants Management Specialists if there is any question about whether or not the project qualifies for SCBGP.

1.4.2 GROWER‐LEVEL PROJECTS

State departments of agriculture are encouraged to prioritize and expand funding to projects that are supported by and address the needs of U.S. specialty crop growers. For example, if a State department of agriculture receives multiple research or marketing project proposals, SCBGP encourages it to prioritize the proposals supported by grower‐level groups.

1.4.3 OUTREACH TO IDENTIFY FUNDING PRIORITIES

State departments of agriculture are encouraged to perform outreach prior to the development and release of the State’s request for proposals or applications to interested parties, including beginning and socially disadvantaged farmers, through a transparent process of receiving and considering public comment to identify State SCBGP funding priorities. The State department of agriculture should conduct this outreach to ensure that the grant applications it submits to the SCBGP have been developed with proven and justified public support.

Beginning Farmer or Rancher is an individual or entity that has not operated a farm or ranch for more than 10 years and substantially participates in the operation.

Socially Disadvantaged Farmer or Rancher is a farmer or rancher who is a member of a Socially Disadvantaged Group. A Socially Disadvantaged Group is a group whose members have been subject to discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and, where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program.

http://www.ams.usda.gov/services/grants/fmpp http://www.ams.usda.gov/services/grants/lfpp http://www.ams.usda.gov/services/grants/lfpp http://www.usda.gov/energy/matrix/home https://www.ams.usda.gov/sites/default/files/media/AMSGrantsTermsandConditions.pdf

1.4.4 COMPETITIVE GRANT APPLICATION REVIEW PROCESS

State departments of agriculture are encouraged to develop their State Plans through a competitive review process to ensure maximum public input and benefit. The competitive review process should follow State policies and procedures and include the use of an independent review panel of experts or qualified individuals, overseen by State officials. This review should include the factors and reasons for selecting an applicant and any changes in project proposal ranks/scores that may occur during the review process. All documentation affecting the decision to approve, disapprove, defer, or otherwise not fund an application should be maintained in an accessible, centralized program file.

State departments of agriculture must abide by 2 CFR § 400.2. Review panel members must be free from conflicts of interest and conduct fair and impartial reviews.

In addition, the SCBGP encourages State departments of agriculture to notify successful and unsuccessful grant applicants about the outcome of the competitive process as it relates to the applicants’ proposals.

Finally, the SCBGP encourages State departments of agriculture during their competitive review process to review funding requests carefully for activities funded previously to ensure:

• The projects are likely to become self‐sustaining and not indefinitely dependent upon publicly and privately granted funds;

• Funding decisions are based on the applicant’s/subrecipient’s past performance; and

• Specialty crop stakeholders, other than the applicant, individuals, and organizations involved in the project, support the continuation of the project.

1.4.5 MULTI‐STATE PARTNERSHIPS

A multi‐state partnership is a project that implements activities with measurable outcomes that benefit two or more U.S. States and/or Territories. Multi‐state partnerships are encouraged and should provide solutions to problems that cross state boundaries including, but not limited to, food safety; plant pests and disease; research;

crop‐specific projects addressing common issues; and marketing and promotion. State departments of agriculture with multi‐state partnership projects can also consider submitting those projects to the Specialty Crop Multi‐State Program (SCMP).

1.4.6 DEFINITION OF A PROJECT

A project is a set of interrelated tasks with a cohesive, distinct, specified, and defined goal. It follows a planned, organized approach over a fixed period of time and within specific limitations (cost, performance/quality, etc.).

Additionally, it uses resources that are specifically allocated to the work of the project and usually involves a team of people.

Projects are different from other ongoing operations in an organization because, unlike operations, projects have a definitive beginning and end ‐ they have a limited duration. One way to think about this is that a project has an overarching goal that the applicant wants to accomplish through a series of individual activities or tasks. Examples of projects include:

• Researching new cultivars

• Providing outreach opportunities on specialty crops to youth, families, seniors, and the overall community

• Marketing apples through a targeted promotional campaign https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=6735db3b9d2817dee43801dad07bf6de&mc=true&node=pt2.1.400&rgn=div5#se2.1.400_12 http://www.ams.usda.gov/services/grants/scmp http://www.ams.usda.gov/services/grants/scmp

Activities or tasks that could be a part of such projects might include:

• Hiring personnel

• Purchasing special purpose equipment

• Holding an educational workshop

• Planting specialty crops

• Distributing product promotional materials

2.0 AWARD INFORMATION

2.1 TYPE OF FEDERAL ASSISTANCE

AMS will use a Grant Agreement to provide support to successful SCBGP applications.

2.2 TYPE OF APPLICATIONS

New application. The SCBGP will review all new applications for conformance with the criteria in section 5.0 Application Review Information and may require the applicant to provide additional information or clarification by a specified date.

2.3 AVAILABLE FUNDING

It is anticipated that approximately $72.4 million will be available to fund applications in FY 2019. Enactment of additional Federal continuing resolutions or appropriations may affect the availability or level of funding for this program.

2.4 FEDERAL AWARD PERIOD DURATION

SCBGP projects must be completed within 3 years. The grant period must begin no later than September 30, 2019, and end no later than September 29, 2022. The applicant must indicate the start and end dates on the SF‐424, “Application for Federal Assistance” in block 17. SCBGP encourages State departments of agriculture to allow ample time for completion of all projects.

2.5 BLOCK GRANT AMOUNTS AVAILABLE TO EACH APPLICANT

Subject to the amount of available funding as set forth above in section 2.3 Available Funding, each eligible State department of agriculture applicant that submits an application that the SCBGP reviews and accepts is eligible to receive the available grant allocation as indicated below. Each State department of agriculture is eligible to receive an estimated base grant of approximately $241,627 and an amount based on the average of the most recent available value of specialty crop cash receipts in the State (2017 calendar year estimates) and the acreage of specialty crop production in the State (2012 Census of Agriculture). The data source for specialty crop cash receipts and acreage is the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, and National Agricultural Statistics Service.

State Department of Agriculture Available Grant Allocation Alabama 481,892.53 Alaska 253,013.30 American Samoa 282,186.41 Arizona 1,563,242.39 Arkansas 353,212.50

State Department of Agriculture Available Grant Allocation California 22,977,072.25 Colorado 838,918.68 Connecticut 424,053.39 Delaware 359,015.95 District of Columbia 241,627.00 Florida 4,330,555.23 Georgia 1,229,606.95 Guam 243,680.35 Hawaii 580,650.77 Idaho 2,113,390.96 Illinois 712,443.43 Indiana 515,166.88 Iowa 343,082.64 Kansas 373,540.47 Kentucky 339,567.16 Louisiana 405,823.10 Maine 639,462.20 Maryland 504,763.05 Massachusetts 426,768.65 Michigan 2,207,993.79 Minnesota 1,365,760.94 Mississippi 425,781.99 Missouri 459,351.38 Montana 1,521,883.17 Nebraska 732,945.46 Nevada 298,709.24 New Hampshire 296,249.42 New Jersey 839,198.94 New Mexico 612,172.32 New York 1,382,381.54 North Carolina 1,337,057.99 North Dakota 2,947,339.84 Northern Mariana Islands 243,470.05 Ohio 746,982.10 Oklahoma 621,048.78 Oregon 2,154,939.28 Pennsylvania 1,141,581.31 Puerto Rico 521,716.10 Rhode Island 275,548.72 South Carolina 543,640.02 South Dakota 342,880.50 Tennessee 534,884.50

State Department of Agriculture Available Grant Allocation Texas 2,107,370.91 U.S. Virgin Islands 242,765.64 Utah 352,811.01 Vermont 330,404.12 Virginia 541,379.12 Washington 4,790,520.85 West Virginia 295,919.25 Wisconsin 1,376,928.49 Wyoming 362,862.65

3.0 ELIGIBILITY INFORMATION

3.1 ELIGIBLE APPLICANTS

Eligible applicants are State departments of agriculture in the 50 States, American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the District of Columbia, Guam, and the United States Virgin Islands. A State department of agriculture is the agency, commission, or department of a State government responsible for agriculture within the State.

SCBGP expects that State departments of agriculture will consult with specialty crop growers, processors, and/or distributors before developing SCBGP project applications to ensure maximum public input and benefit. These stakeholders should play an important role in development of project goals and objectives, in implementing the project plan, and in evaluating and disseminating project results and outcomes.

3.2 ENHANCE THE COMPETITIVENESS OF SPECIALTY CROPS

Project(s) must enhance the competitiveness of U.S. or U.S. territory‐grown specialty crops in either domestic or foreign markets. See the SCBGP website for a definition of specialty crops and processed products, including a list of eligible specialty crops and ineligible commodities. Each project must identify at least one expected measurable outcome that specifically demonstrates the project’s impact on enhancing the competitiveness of eligible specialty crops.

3.3 BENEFIT MORE THAN ONE PRODUCT OR ORGANIZATION

Applications for grant funds should describe how the project potentially affects and produces measurable outcomes for the specialty crop industry and/or the public rather than a single organization, institution, or individual.

SCBGP will not award grant funds for projects that solely benefit a particular commercial product or provide a profit to a single organization, institution, or individual. In addition, recipients and subrecipients cannot use grant funds to compete unfairly with private companies that provide equivalent products or services. Single organizations, institutions, and individuals are encouraged to participate as project partners.

The following are some examples of acceptable and unacceptable projects:

Examples of Acceptable Projects http://www.ams.usda.gov/services/grants/scbgp/specialty-crop

A non‐profit organization requests funds to demonstrate the viability of organic small fruit production and partners with Cooperative Extension to publicize the working model of diversification to other regional growers.

A single farmer erects high tunnels on his/her property to extend the growing season of tomatoes and lettuce and conducts a field day and farm tour to encourage other small family farmers to adopt the production methods.

Examples of Unacceptable Projects

A company requests grant funds to purchase starter plants or equipment used to plant, cultivate, and grow a specialty crop to make a profit or to expand production of a single business or organization.

A single specialty crop organization requests grant funds to market its organization so that it can increase its membership.

3.4 COST‐SHARING AND MATCHING

The SCBGP does not have a Federal cost‐sharing or matching requirement.

3.5 PERFORMANCE MEASURES

AMS is required to report on the outcomes of the SCBGP on a national scale to demonstrate the performance of this program. To fulfill this requirement, AMS collaborated with stakeholders, including the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), to develop a listing of measurable outcomes and indicators that quantifiably measure performance toward fulfilling the program’s purpose of enhancing the competitiveness of specialty crops. By collecting, aggregating, and reporting performance data across all States and Territories, AMS can share the impact of the SCBGP with all stakeholders, including OMB, U.S. Congress, the agricultural community, and the public.

Each project submitted in the State Plan must include at least one of the eight outcomes listed in the SCBGP Evaluation Plan and at least one of the indicators listed in the selected outcome(s). The progress of the one or more outcomes and indicators selected will need to be reported in the Annual Performance Report, and the results will be reported in the Final Performance Report. Please refer to the SCBGP Evaluation Plan for more information.

3.6 PROJECTS ATTEMPTING TO DISPARAGE THE WORK OF ANOTHER ORGANIZATION

It is unallowable for projects to disparage the mission, goals, and/or actions of another organization.

3.7 SUPPLANTING

Funds must supplement the expenditure of State funds in support of specialty crops grown in that State, rather than replace State funds. Additionally, Federal funding may not replace State funding that is required under section 101(d)(3) of the Specialty Crops Competitiveness Act of 2004 (7 U.S.C. § 1621 note). In instances where a question of supplanting arises, the applicant or recipient will be required to substantiate that the reduction in non‐ Federal resources occurred for reasons other than the receipt or expected receipt of Federal funds.

General Supplanting Definition. A State organization reduces State funds for an activity specifically because Federal funds are available (or expected to be available) to fund that same activity.

• Example: State funds are appropriated for a stated purpose and Federal funds are awarded for that same purpose. (If a State has $50.00 budgeted for a specialty crop program and the Federal government awards http://www.ams.usda.gov/sites/default/files/media/SCBGP%20FY15%20PerformanceFINAL_10272015.pdf http://www.ams.usda.gov/sites/default/files/media/SCBGP%20FY15%20PerformanceFINAL_10272015.pdf http://www.ams.usda.gov/sites/default/files/media/SCBGP%20FY15%20PerformanceFINAL_10272015.pdf a $100.00 grant for the same specialty crop program, the total project must expend $150.00 – the State cannot remove the original $50.00 and use it for something else).

4.0 APPLICATION AND SUBMISSION INFORMATION

4.1 OBTAINING AN APPLICATION PACKAGE

Only electronic applications may be submitted via Grants.gov in response to this RFA. We urge applicants to submit early to the Grants.gov system. For an overview of the Grants.gov application process, see Grants.gov’s Apply for Grants webpage. This RFA contains the information needed to obtain and complete required application forms and AMS‐specific attachments. More information about applying through Grants.gov can be found in section

4.8 Grants.gov Application Submission and Receipt Procedures and Requirements.

Applicants can find the opportunity under either the CFDA number “10.170” or the SCBGP Funding Opportunity Number “USDA‐AMS‐TM‐SCBGP‐G‐19‐0003.”

4.2 APPLICATION CHECKLIST

The application must include the following:

☐ Standard Form (SF) 424 – Application for Federal Assistance

☐ Standard Form (SF) 424B – Assurances for Non‐Construction Programs

☐ State Plan Narrative

4.3 CONTENT AND FORM OF APPLICATION SUBMISSION

4.3.1 SF‐424 APPLICATION FOR FEDERAL ASSISTANCE

Required: The SF‐424 is available via the opportunity at Grants.gov. Most information blocks on the required form are either self‐explanatory or adequately explained in the instructions. However, you must use the following supplemental instructions associated with specific blocks on the SF‐424.

http://www.grants.gov/web/grants/applicants/apply-for-grants.html

Block Instruction #1 Type of Submission Check Application.

#2 Type of Application Check New.

#4 and #5 Not applicable.

# 8c Organizational Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS)

Applicant DUNS# for the Organization submitting the application.

See D&B Request a DUNS Number.

#8d Address Enter the State department of agriculture street address as it appears in SAM.gov. P.O. Boxes will not be accepted. Enter a 9‐ digit zip code.

#10 Name of Federal Agency AMS, USDA #11 Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number

Enter 10.170 – Specialty Crop Block Grant Program – Farm Bill.

#12 Funding Opportunity Number Enter USDA‐AMS‐TM‐SCBGP‐G‐19‐0003.

#13Competition Identification Number Not applicable.

#14 Areas Affected by Project Enter cities, counties, States affected by project.

#15 Descriptive Title of Applicant’s Project

A detailed description of each project is not necessary.

#16a Congressional Districts for Applicant

Enter the Congressional district where your main office is located.

#16b Congressional Districts for Program/Project

Enter the Congressional district where your project will be performed. Write “All” if the projects will be performed in more than one location.

#17 Proposed Project Start Date and End Date

Your grant period cannot be more than 3 years in length. Start date must begin no later than September 30, 2019 and end no later than September 29, 2022.

#18 Estimated Funding Federal =Total SCBGP funds requested.

#19 Is Applicant Subject to Review by State Under Executive Order 12372 Process?

This initiative is subject to intergovernmental review. Consult the official Single Point of Contact (SPOC) list to determine applicability in your State.

4.3.2 SF‐424B ASSURANCES FOR NON‐CONSTRUCTION PROGRAMS (REQUIRED)

Required: The SF‐424B is available via the opportunity at www.Grants.gov .

4.3.3 STATE PLAN NARRATIVE (REQUIRED)

The applicant must submit a State Plan that includes the content required in the Grant Administration Template and Project Profile Template. The Grant Administration Template will be provided once at the beginning of the State Plan; the applicant will use the Project Profile Template for each project submitted through the State Plan.

Narrative Format

Page size for the narrative must be 8.5 inches by 11 inches. The acceptable font size is 11 or 12 pitch with all margins at 1 inch. The State Plan should include a series of project profiles that detail the necessary information to fulfill the goals and objectives of the project. For examples of acceptable formats, please see Grant Administration, Project Profile, and the Sample State Plan.

The State department of agriculture’s Grant Administration Budget Narrative should include travel for the attendance of at least one staff member who directly implements the SCBGP at a national SCBGP coordinators’ meeting during the life of the grant agreement.

http://fedgov.dnb.com/webform https://www.fws.gov/policy/library/rgeo12372.pdf https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/SPOC-July2018.pdf http://www.grants.gov/ http://www.ams.usda.gov/sites/default/files/media/SCBGP_SDOA_Template_2-12-15.docx http://www.ams.usda.gov/sites/default/files/media/SCBGP_ProjectProfile_Template_2-12-15%20%289%29.docx http://www.ams.usda.gov/sites/default/files/media/SCBGP_SDOA_Template_2-12-15.docx http://www.ams.usda.gov/sites/default/files/media/SCBGP_ProjectProfile_Template_2-12-15%20%289%29.docx https://www.ams.usda.gov/sites/default/files/media/SCBGPSampleStatePlan.pdf

4.4 SUBMISSION DATE AND TIME

Applicants must submit applications via Grants.gov by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May 24, 2019. SCBGP cannot consider applications received after this deadline for funding.

4.5 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW

SCBGP is subject to Executive Order 12372, “Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs.” Refer to the official SPOC list.

4.6 FUNDS NOT APPLIED FOR

Eligible State department of agriculture applicants who do not apply for or do not request all available funding during the specified grant application period will forfeit all or that portion of available funding not requested.

SCBGP will allocate funds not applied for, by a date determined by SCBGP, pro rata to the remaining State department of agriculture applicants.

4.7 FUNDING RESTRICTIONS

4.7.1 LIMIT ON ADMINISTRATION COSTS

Administration costs are defined as indirect costs and are limited to 8 percent of the total Federal funds provided under the award per section 101(k)(2) of the Specialty Crops Competitiveness Act of 2004 (7 U.S.C. § 1621 note), as amended by section 10010, Pub. L. 113‐79 (Feb. 7, 2014). The State department of agriculture must notify sub‐ applicants of the limit on indirect costs in its request for proposals/applications so that indirect costs requested by sub‐applicants plus indirect administration costs requested by the State department of agriculture do not exceed 8 percent of the State’s grant request. If the State department of agriculture does not take the full 8 percent of indirect costs, individual subapplicants may claim the remaining portion of these costs at the discretion of the State. State‐approved indirect costs in subapplicant projects may not exceed 8 percent of that project’s budget.

See the information below on presenting direct and indirect costs consistently.

Presenting Direct and Indirect Costs Consistently

Applicants are responsible for presenting direct and indirect costs appropriately and consistently and must not include costs associated with their organization’s indirect cost rate agreement as direct costs. In addition, a cost may not be allocated as an indirect cost if also incurred as a direct cost for the same purpose and vice versa. For further information on how to determine if a cost is indirect or direct, please see the Indirect Cost Decision Tree.

Direct costs are costs that can be identified specifically with a particular award, project or program, service, or other organizational activity or that can be directly assigned to such an activity relatively easily with a high degree of accuracy. Typically, direct costs include, but are not limited to, compensation of employees who work directly on the award to include salaries and fringe benefits, travel, equipment, and supplies directly benefiting the grant‐supported project or program.

Indirect costs (also known as “facilities and administrative costs”) defined at 2 CFR § 200.56 are costs incurred for a common or joint purpose benefitting more than one cost objective, and not readily assignable to the cost objectives specifically benefitted without effort disproportionate to the results achieved. Refer to 2 CFR §§ 200.413 and 414 for additional information on determining if costs charged to the award are direct or indirect.

http://www.grants.gov/ https://www.fws.gov/policy/library/rgeo12372.pdf https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/SPOC-July2018.pdf https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/SPOC-July2018.pdf http://www.ams.usda.gov/sites/default/files/media/SCBGP%20IndirectCosts.pdf http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?node=2:1.1.2.2.1&rgn=div5#se2.1.200_156 http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?node=2:1.1.2.2.1&rgn=div5#se2.1.200_1413 http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?node=2:1.1.2.2.1&rgn=div5#se2.1.200_1414

The salaries of administrative and clerical staff should typically be treated as indirect costs. However, charging these costs as direct costs may be appropriate where all the following conditions are met:

(1) administrative or clerical services are integral to a project or activity;

(2) individuals involved can be specifically identified with the project or activity;

(3) such costs are explicitly included in the budget or have the prior written approval of the Federal awarding agency; and

(4) the costs are not also recovered as indirect costs.

Typical Indirect Costs by Organization Type Type of Organization Typical Indirect Costs Non-Profits General administration and general expenses, such as the salaries and expenses of executive officers, personnel administration, and accounting, depreciation or use allowances on buildings and equipment, and the costs of operating and maintaining facilities.

Colleges and Universities Equipment and capital improvements, operation and maintenance expenses, library expenses, general administration and general expenses, departmental administration, sponsored projects administration, student administration and services, depreciation and use allowances, and interest on debt associated with certain buildings.

State and Local Governments State/local‐wide central service costs, general administration of the applicant department or agency, accounting and personnel services performed within the applicant department or agency, depreciation or use allowances on buildings and equipment, and the costs of operating and maintaining facilities.

4.7.2 ALLOWABLE AND UNALLOWABLE COSTS AND ACTIVITIES

All SCBGP awards are subject to the most recent AMS General Terms and Conditions, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (2 CFR part 200), and other laws and regulations affecting Federal assistance.

Applicants that have questions concerning the allowability of costs after reviewing the associated Federal cost principles should contact the SCBGP using the contact information listed under

7.0 Agency Contacts.

Item Description

Advisory Councils Unallowable for costs incurred by advisory councils or committees.

Alcoholic Beverages Unallowable for alcoholic beverages.

Allowable for projects under the SCBGP when the costs are associated with enhancing the competitiveness of an eligible processed product (products prepared or created for http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/retrieveECFR?gp=&SID=988467ba214fbb07298599affd94f30a&n=pt2.1.200&r=PART&ty=HTML

Item Description the purposes of promoting a specialty crop but that require other ingredients are considered a processed product). A processed product is defined as a product that constitutes greater than 50% of the specialty crop by weight, exclusive of added water.

Aquaponics Allowable as long as the cultivated crops are eligible specialty crops and the focus of the project is on the specialty crops and not the fish.

Projects that are Acceptable

• A project to determine whether carp, catfish, or tilapia are best for growing lettuce is acceptable.

• A project to compare the quality of lettuce grown in water to lettuce grown in a greenhouse is acceptable.

Projects that are NOT Acceptable

• A project to study whether lettuce or tomato produced the highest yield of tilapia is not acceptable.

• A project to grow specialty crops where both the specialty crops and the fish are sold is not acceptable.

For more information on constructing or purchasing an aquaponics system, see Equipment.

Buildings and Land – Construction

Unallowable for the acquisition of buildings, facilities, or land or to make additions, improvements, modifications, replacements, rearrangements, reinstallations, renovations, or alterations of an existing building or facility (including site grading and improvement and architecture fees). This also includes construction and construction‐ related materials, which may include, but are not limited to, the purchase of building materials such as wood, nails, concrete, asphalt, roofing, gravel, sand, paint, insulation, drywall, or plumbing.

Allowable for rental costs of land and building space. However, lease to own agreements (i.e., lease‐to‐own or rent‐to‐own) are not allowable. The lease or rental agreement must terminate at the end of the grant cycle.

A building is any permanent structure designed or intended for support, enclosure, shelter, or protection of people, animals, or property and having a permanent roof supported by columns or walls.

Conferences Allowable for costs of conferences as defined in 2 CFR § 200.432. Allowable conference costs paid by the non‐Federal applicant or subapplicant as a sponsor or host of the conference may include rental of facilities, speakers’ fees, costs of meals (see Meals for restrictions) and refreshments, local transportation, and other items incidental to such conferences with the exception of entertainment costs that are unallowable. If http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?node=2:1.1.2.2.1&rgn=div5#se2.1.200_1432 registration fees are collected, the applicant or subapplicant must report fees as program income.

The SCBGP encourages the use of technologies such as webinars, teleconferencing, or videoconferencing as an alternative to renting a building or a room.

Contingency Provisions Unallowable for miscellaneous and similar rainy‐day funds for events the occurrence of which cannot be foretold with certainty as to the time or intensity, or with an assurance of their happening. Unallowable for working capital for activities/items not already in place.

Contractual/Consultant Costs (Professional Services)

Allowable subject to limitations below. Contractual/consultant costs are the expenses associated with the purchase of goods and/or the procurement of services performed by an individual or organization other than the applicant in a procurement relationship.

Allowable for contractor/consultant employee rates that do not exceed the salary of a GS‐15 step 10 Federal employee in your area (for more information please go to https://www.opm.gov/policy‐data‐oversight/pay‐leave/salaries‐wages/). This does not include fringe benefits, travel, indirect costs, or other expenses. Please note that any statutory limitations on indirect costs also apply to contractors and consultants.

If rates exceed this amount, one of the following justifications must be provided:

• A description of the steps you took to hire a contractor, which includes obtaining a cost/price analysis. The purpose of the analysis is to review and evaluate each element of cost to determine reasonableness, allocability, and allowability.

OR

• Due to the complexity or uniqueness of the project, the pool of available and qualified contractors is limited. Therefore, the selected contractor’s specialized qualifications necessitate hiring at a rate beyond a GS‐15 step 10. (Please outline the unique qualifications of the contractor.)

Contributions and Donations

Unallowable for contributions or donations, including cash, property, and services, from the applicant or subapplicant to other entities.

• A non‐profit entity using grant funds to purchase produce to donate to other entities and individuals is unallowable.

Entertainment Costs Unallowable. Entertainment costs include amusement, diversion, social activities, and any costs directly associated with such costs (such as bands, orchestras, dance groups, tickets to shows, meals, lodging, rentals, transportation, and gratuities).

Equipment Unallowable for acquisition costs of general purpose equipment or lease to own agreements (i.e., lease‐to‐own or rent‐to‐own).

https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/pay-leave/salaries-wages/

Allowable for rental costs of general purpose equipment. Vehicles may be leased, but not purchased. The lease or rental agreement must terminate at the end of the grant cycle.

For vehicle and equipment leases or rentals with an acquisition cost that equals or exceeds $5,000, rates should be in light of such factors as: rental costs of comparable vehicles and equipment, if any; market conditions in the area; alternatives available;

and the type, life expectancy, condition, and value of the vehicle or equipment leased.

Allowable for acquisition costs and rental costs of special purpose equipment provided the following criteria are met:

1) Necessary for the research, scientific, or other technical activities of the grant award;

2) Not otherwise reasonably available and accessible;

3) The type of equipment is normally charged as a direct cost by the organization;

4) Acquired in accordance with organizational practices;

5) Must be used only to meet the legislative purpose of the grant program and objectives of the grant award;

6) More than one single commercial organization, commercial product, or individual must benefit from the use of the equipment;

7) Must not use special purpose equipment acquired with grant funds to provide services for a fee to compete unfairly with private companies that provide equivalent services; and

8) Equipment is subject to the full range of acquisition, use, management, and disposition requirements under 2 CFR § 200.313 as applicable.

Definitions

Equipment is defined as tangible personal property (including information technology systems) having a useful life of more than one year and a per‐unit acquisition cost that equals or exceeds the lesser of the capitalization level established by the non‐Federal entity for financial statement purposes, or $5,000.

Acquisition cost means the cost of the asset, including the cost to prepare the asset for its intended use. Acquisition cost for equipment includes the net invoice price of the equipment, including any modifications, attachments, accessories, or auxiliary apparatus necessary to make it usable for its acquired purpose.

General Purpose Equipment means equipment that is not limited to technical activities.

Examples include office equipment and furnishings, modular offices, telephone networks, information technology equipment and systems, air conditioning equipment, reproduction and printing equipment, and motor vehicles.

Special Purpose Equipment is equipment used only for research, scientific, or technical activities.

http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/retrieveECFR?gp=&SID=27767ced17852a0f709e351009375919&n=pt2.1.200&r=PART&ty=HTML#se2.1.200_1313

Equipment – Information Technology Systems

Unallowable for information technology systems having a useful life of more than one year and a per‐unit acquisition cost that equals or exceeds the lesser of the capitalization level established in accordance by Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) by the recipient for financial statement purposes or $5,000.

Acquisition costs for software include those development costs capitalized in accordance with GAAP.

Information technology systems include computing devices, ancillary equipment, software, firmware, and similar procedures, services (including support services), and related resources. Computing devices means machines used to acquire, store, analyze, process, and publish data and other information electronically, including accessories (or “peripherals”) for printing, transmitting and receiving, or storing electronic information.

Examples of unallowable information technology systems include service contracts, operating systems, printers, and computers that have an acquisition cost of $5,000 or more.

Allowable for website development, mobile apps, etc., that are not considered to be information technology systems, but rather social media applications.

Fines, Penalties, Damages and Other Settlements

Unallowable for costs resulting from violations of, alleged violations of, or failure to comply with, Federal, State, tribal, local, or foreign laws and regulations.

Fixed Amount Subawards

Allowable with prior written approval from AMS. A pass‐through entity may provide subawards based on fixed amounts up to the Simplified Acquisition Threshold, provided that the subawards meet the requirements for fixed amount awards in 2 CFR § 200.201.

Fundraising and Investment Management Costs

Unallowable for organized fundraising, including financial campaigns, solicitation of gifts and bequests, and similar expenses incurred to raise capital or obtain contributions, regardless of the purpose for which the funds will be used. This includes salaries of personnel involved in activities to raise capital.

General Costs of Government

Unallowable for:

1) Salaries and expenses of the Office of the Governor of a State or the chief executive of a local government or the chief executive of an Indian tribe;

2) Salaries and other expenses of a State legislature, tribal council, or similar local governmental body, such as a county supervisor, city council, school board, etc., whether incurred for purposes of legislation or executive direction;

3) Costs of the judicial branch of a government;

4) Costs of prosecutorial activities unless treated as a direct cost to a specific program if authorized by statute or regulation (however, this does not preclude the allowability of other legal activities of the Attorney General as http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/retrieveECFR?gp=&SID=988467ba214fbb07298599affd94f30a&n=pt2.1.200&r=PART&ty=HTML#se2.1.200_1201 described in 2 CFR § 200.435 Defense and prosecution of criminal and civil proceedings, claims, appeals, and patent infringements); and

5) Costs of other general types of government services normally provided to the general public, such as fire and police, unless provided for as a direct cost under a program statute or regulation.

Goods or Services for Personal Use

Unallowable for costs of goods or services for personal use of the applicant’s or subapplicant’s employees regardless of whether the cost is reported as taxable income to the employees.

Health and Nutrition Messaging

Allowable when health and nutrition information complies with regulations and policies of the:

Federal Trade Commission http://www.ftc.gov/about‐ftc/bureaus‐offices/bureau‐consumer‐protection

AND

U.S. Food and Drug Administration https://www.fda.gov/food/ingredientspackaginglabeling/default.htm.

Nutrition and health claims must be truthful, not misleading or deceptive, and include adequate disclaimers if appropriate.

Health and nutrition information should align with the most up‐to‐date Dietary Guidelines.

Insurance and Indemnification

Allowable as indirect costs for insurance and indemnification.

Lobbying Unallowable as defined in 2 CFR § 200.450.

Meals Unallowable for business meals when individuals decide to go to lunch or dinner together when no need exists for continuity of a meeting. Such activity is considered an entertainment cost.

Unallowable for breakfasts for conference attendees because it is expected these individuals will have sufficient time to obtain this meal on their own before the conference begins in the morning.

Unallowable for meal costs that are duplicated in meeting participant’s per diem or subsistence allowances.

Allowable for lunch or dinner meals if the costs are reasonable and a justification is provided that such activity maintains the continuity of the meeting and to do otherwise will impose arduous conditions on the meeting participants.

http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/retrieveECFR?gp=&SID=27767ced17852a0f709e351009375919&n=pt2.1.200&r=PART&ty=HTML#se2.1.200_1435 http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/retrieveECFR?gp=&SID=27767ced17852a0f709e351009375919&n=pt2.1.200&r=PART&ty=HTML#se2.1.200_1435 http://www.ftc.gov/about-ftc/bureaus-offices/bureau-consumer-protection https://www.fda.gov/food/ingredientspackaginglabeling/default.htm http://health.gov/dietaryguidelines/ http://health.gov/dietaryguidelines/ https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=1eb223610ea5e852c8df8a0af34c78f8&mc=true&node=se2.1.200_1450&rgn=div8

Allowable for meals consumed while in official travel status. They are considered per diem expenses and should be reimbursed in accordance with the organization’s established written travel policies.

Memberships, Subscriptions, and Professional Activity Costs

Unallowable for costs of membership in any civic or community organization.

Allowable for costs of membership in business, technical, and professional organizations.

Organization Costs Unallowable for costs of investment counsel and staff and similar expenses incurred to enhance income from investments.

Allowable with prior approval for organization costs per 2 CFR § 200.455.

Participant Support Costs

Allowable for such items as stipends or subsistence allowances, and registration fees paid to or on behalf of participants or trainees (but not employees) in connection with approved conferences, training projects, and focus groups.

Political Activities Unallowable for development of or participation in political activities in accordance with provisions of the Hatch Act (5 U.S.C. §§ 1501‐1508 and 7324‐7326).

Pre-Award Costs Allowable, if such costs are necessary for efficient and timely performance of the scope of the project work. Such costs are allowable only to the extent that they would have been allowable if incurred after the date of the Federal award.

A recipient may incur pre‐award costs up to 90 calendar days before SCBGP makes the award without prior approval from SCBGP. Expenses more than 90 calendar days pre‐ award require SCBGP prior approval. All costs incurred before SCBGP makes the award are at the applicant’s risk.