ATTACHMENT A-RIC PP Questionnaire.doc

DOC document 47 KB Posted

Attached to
REGIONAL INNOVATION CLUSTERS (RICs) Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
SBAHQ-10-R-0021
Issued by
Small Business Administration Office of Performance Management and the Chief Financial Officer

About this file

RFP Attachment A-RIC Past Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to REGIONAL INNOVATION CLUSTERS (RICs), newest first.
File Type Posted
ATT D to RIC AMEND 4 - Master RIC and ADT Q As.pdf PDF
RIC Amend 4-RFP Changes.pdf PDF
Amend 000004 to SBAHQ10R0021-R1.pdf PDF
ATT C - RIC FAQ's —
ATT B - RIC FAQ's —
Amend 000003 to SBAHQ10R0021.pdf PDF
RIC AMEND 3-Section L.4.doc DOC document
Amend 000002 to SBAHQ10R0021.pdf PDF
Amend 00001 to SBAHQ10R0021.pdf PDF
RIC RFP - B thru M-Rev 3.doc DOC document
SF30-10-R-0021pdf.pdf PDF
Show all 11

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

RFP #SBAHQ-10-R-0021

ATTACHMENT A

PROCUREMENT SENSITIVE

PAST PERFORMANCE

THIS FORM IS PROVIDED FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING TO

AND SUBMITTAL BY THE OFFEROR’S REFERENCES

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE FOR

RFP NUMBER SBAHQ-10-R-0021:

REGIONAL INNOVATION CLUSTERS

The contractor listed below is being considered in a Source Selection by the Small Business Administration, Division of Procurement & Grants Management, 409 Third St., S.W., Washington, DC 20416. It would be appreciated if you would provide us with comments regarding the contractor's past performance. Your comments are considered Source Selection Sensitive.

This form shall be faxed or emailed NLT 4:00 PM, EDT on August 16, 2010 to:

Gary Fontaine at (202) 292-3737, or email to gary.fontaine@sba.gov.

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION (SBA)

CONTRACTOR’S PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Section I - Details of Company Being Evaluated A. Contractor’s Information:

1. Company Name:

2. Address:

3. Company POC’s Name:

4. POC’s Title:

5. POC’s Phone #:

6. POC’s Fax #:

7. POC’s Email:

B. Information regarding Past Contract(s*) being evaluated: *(attach additional pages if necessary)

1. Contract #:

2. Customer (Firm Name):

3. Performance Period :

4. Location(s) of Work Performed:

5. Scope of Contract (i.e. Brief Description of Work Performed):

6. Total dollar ($) amount:

SECTION II - Details of Evaluator (Person providing Evaluation of Contractor)

1. Evaluator’s Name:

2. Title:

3. Organization:

4. Evaluator’s Phone #:

5. Evaluator’s Fax #:

6. Evaluator’s Email:

SECTION III (A) - Quality of Services Provided:

KEY: 5 = unsatisfactory, 4 = Marginal, 3 = satisfactory, 2 = Superior, 1 = No Rating (Note: Key defined on Page 22 of PPQ).

1. To what degree did this Contractor conform to your contract’s requirements and to standards of good workmanship?
(5 (4 (3 (2 (1
2. To what extent did the contractor respond to and attempt to correct any concerns, issues, or problems that appeared during performance of your contract?
(5 (4 (3 (2 (1
3. How would you rate the effectiveness of the contractor’s problem resolution efforts?
(5 (4 (3 (2 (1
4. How would you rate the ability of the contractor to provide personnel with the requisite qualifications to accomplish contract/task order requirements?
(5 (4 (3 (2 (1
5. How would you rate the Contractor in regards to compliance with Privacy Act and Security requirements if applicable to your project?
(5 (4 (3 (2 (1

SECTION III (B.) - Timeliness of Services Provided:

KEY: 5 = Unsatisfactory 4 = Marginal 3 = Satisfactory 2 = Superior 1 = No Rating

6. To what extent did the Contractor adhere to the overall schedule of your project/ contract?
(5 (4 (3 (2 (1
7. In addition to completion of your overall project, to what extent did the Contractor meet the major interim milestones of your project?
(5 (4 (3 (2 (1
8. How would you rate the Contractor’s timeliness in providing periodic status reports on your project?
(5 (4 (3 (2 (1
9. How would you rate the Contractor in implementing program requirements?
(5 (4 (3 (2 (1

SECTION III (C.) – Cost Control:

10. Did the contractor complete your requirement within the Forecasted/negotiated amount? (If “No,” was this due to the contractor’s fault?)
( Yes ( No

SECTION III (D.) – Technical Performance

11. Did the contractor use its quality control program effectively and follow contract quality assurance requirements adequately in order to complete your requirement within the Forecasted/negotiated timeframes? (If “No, was this due to the contractor’s fault?)

( Yes ( No

SECTION III (E.) – Program Management KEY: 5 = Unsatisfactory 4 = Marginal 3 = Satisfactory 2 = Superior 1 = No Rating

12. Effectiveness of overall contract management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)
(5 (4 (3 (2 (1
13. How would you rate the Contractor in Understanding/complying with customer objectives and technical requirements?
(5 (4 (3 (2 (1
14. How would you rate the Contractor in implementing program requirements?
(5 (4 (3 (2 (1

SECTION IV CLOSING COMMENTS

Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?

Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.

Key Defined No Rating – The Contractor has no relevant past performance.

Superior – One or more examples where past performance significantly exceeded requirements.

Satisfactory – Past performance met requirements.

Marginal – One or more examples where past performance failed to meet requirements due to fault of contractor.

Unsatisfactory – One or more examples where past performance significantly failed to meet requirements due to fault of contractor.

PAGE

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .