SATPC0037607 Tab 06 BNJ..pdf
PDF 29 KB Posted
- Attached to
- padlocks, lever locks Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 80NSSC25895336Q
About this file
This is a Brand Name Justification form from NASA Shared Services Center recommending procurement of locksmith supplies specifically from LOCKMASTERS/BEST brand. The document justifies the brand name requirement based on compatibility with existing equipment and configurations, with a delivery timeline of 30 days.
The justification indicates that using other brands would require additional parts or alterations to achieve compatibility, potentially causing delays and increased costs. The document emphasizes that selecting another brand risks compliance issues, incompatibility with existing systems, and higher costs. The form is dated February 12, 2025, and is version 2.0 from March 15, 2017.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| SATPC0037607 Tab 04 4 SOW..pdf | ||
| SATPC0037607 Tab 10 RFQ Open Market Template.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Page 1 V2.0 3-15-2017
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
NASA SHARED SERVICES CENTER
RECOMMENDATION AND DETERMINATION TO SOLICIT FROM ONE SOURCE
OR BRAND NAME
Sole Source:
☐I recommend that NASA, NASA Shared Services Center negotiate with __________only for________.
The total estimated cost of this effort is $ and the estimated period of performance or lead-time for delivery is _________.
Brand Name Justification:
☒I recommend that NASA, NASA Shared Services Center negotiate with only with vendors who can provide the subject brand name from LOCKMASTERS/BEST for locksmith supplies. The total estimated cost of this effort is and the estimated period of performance or lead-time for delivery is 30 days .
This recommendation is for the acquisition of supplies or services determined to be reasonably available from only one source/only one manufacture. Competition is impractical for the following reasons (please answer the questions below):
1. What are the reasons for soliciting only the suggested source/suggested brand name? Please provide the unique characteristics of the items or services along with the supporting rationale and the market research performed to substantiate your reason for the suggested source/brand name.
LMK brand series is required as it is the brand compatible with existing equipment and configurations. Other comparable items may require additional parts or alternations to achieve compatibility. As a result, may cause time delays and increased costs for project/task completion.
2. What is the impact to the government if another vendor/brand is used? Include any dollar, schedule, or compatibility impacts if possible.
As stated above, the brand lock is required to work with the existing equipment and configurations. Another brand will not be compatible. Selecting another brand risks compliance, incompatibility and increased costs.
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
12 February 2025
Date
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .