SATPC0037003 Tab 06 BNJ_Redacted.pdf
PDF 140 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Panduit Electrical Renovations Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 80NSSC25888014Q
About this file
This document is a Brand Name Justification (BNJ) for the procurement of Panduit electrical items for NASA's Shared Services Center. NASA is recommending a sole source acquisition from Panduit Corporation, citing compatibility requirements with existing installed hardware, the need for trained installation personnel, and the requirement to maintain product performance guarantees and warranties.
The related federal contract opportunity is for Panduit Electrical Renovations, a solicitation set aside for small businesses to provide Panduit electrical items. The total estimated cost is undisclosed, with a 30-day period of performance. Vendors must be authorized resellers of Panduit products.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| SATPC0037003 Tab 10 RFQ Open Market.pdf | ||
| SATPC0037003 Tab 04 4 SOW_Redacted.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Page 1 V2.0 3-15-2017
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
NASA SHARED SERVICES CENTER
RECOMMENDATION AND DETERMINATION TO SOLICIT FROM ONE SOURCE
OR BRAND NAME
PICK ONE
Sole Source:
☐I recommend that NASA, NASA Shared Services Center negotiate with Vendor only for . The total estimated cost of this effort is Enter Dollar amount and the estimated period of performance or lead-time for delivery is Date.
OR
Brand Name Justification:
☒I recommend that NASA, NASA Shared Services Center negotiate only with vendors who can provide the subject brand name from Panduit Corp. for Panduit Electrical Items. The total estimated cost of this effort is and the estimated period of performance or lead-time for delivery is 30 Days ARO.
This recommendation is for the acquisition of supplies or services determined to be reasonably available from only one source/only one manufacture. Competition is impractical for the following reasons (please answer the questions below):
1. What are the reasons for soliciting only the suggested source/suggested brand name? Please provide the unique characteristics of the items or services along with the supporting rationale and the market research performed to substantiate your reason for the suggested source/brand name.
These specific part numbers/items are used for all network installations across MSFC and the NASA Agency. All items are recognized as part of a system solution that assures performance and warranty guarantees. Compatibility is required with other hardware already installed in Building 4207.
Installation personnel have been trained on all products specified on this request.
2. What is the impact to the government if another vendor/brand is used? Include any dollar, schedule, or compatibility impacts if possible.
The use of other products could cause compatibility issues with existing hardware. The lack of training on other products could cause installation problems and lead to performance issues. Any product substitution or lack of training will also nullify any system performance guarantees and qualified installation product warranties.
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
Technical User Name Date
Title
Office
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .