SATPC0036950 Tab 06 BNJ..pdf
PDF 141 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 80NSSC25887448Q-1
About this file
This is a Brand Name Justification form from NASA Shared Services Center recommending procurement of specific Curtiss Wright Defense Solution products - the Parvus DuraMAR 6300 router and DuraNet 3300 Ethernet switch. The period of performance is 180 days ARO (After Receipt of Order).
The justification states that these specific products have been tested for aircraft integration, and using alternative vendors would require additional research to determine compatibility and functionality. The impact of choosing different products would result in approximately 6 months of schedule delay and additional Non-Recurring Engineering (NRE) costs for integration and testing. The form cites the ability to leverage knowledge from other users with similar applications as an additional benefit of using these specific brand name products. The document is dated 10/24/2024.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| SATPC0036950 Tab 04 Q-1C.pdf | ||
| SATPC0036950 Tab 04 4 SOW.pdf | ||
| SATPC0036950 Tab 10 RFQ Open Market Template 2.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Page 1 V2.0 3-15-2017
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
NASA SHARED SERVICES CENTER
RECOMMENDATION AND DETERMINATION TO SOLICIT FROM ONE SOURCE
OR BRAND NAME
PICK ONE
Sole Source:
☐I recommend that NASA, NASA Shared Services Center negotiate with Vendor Name only for Enter Supply or Service to be procured. The total estimated cost of this effort is Enter Dollar amount and the estimated period of performance or lead-time for delivery is Date.
OR
Brand Name Justification:
☒I recommend that NASA, NASA Shared Services Center negotiate with only with vendors who can provide the subject band name from Curtiss Wright Defense Solution for Parvus DuraMAR 6300 and DuraNet 3300. The total estimated cost of this effort is and the estimated period of performance or lead-time for delivery is 180 days ARO.
This recommendation is for the acquisition of supplies or services determined to be reasonably available from only one source/only one manufacture. Competition is impractical for the following reasons (please answer the questions below):
1. What are the reasons for soliciting only the suggested source/suggested brand name? Please provide the unique characteristics of the items or services along with the supporting rationale and the market research performed to substantiate your reason for the suggested source/brand name.
The router and switch specified have been tested for aircraft integration.
2. What is the impact to the government if another vendor/brand is used? Include any dollar, schedule, or compatibility impacts if possible.
The impact is researching a different manufacturer and working directly with the manufacturer to determine compatibility and functionality. My expectation would be an unacceptable additional 6 months of schedule and in NRE for integration and test. Further, we leverage knowledge from other users of the same equipment in a similar application.
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
10/24/2024
Technical User Name Date
Title
Office
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .