S02 Past Performance Survey.docx

DOCX document 15 KB Posted

Attached to
H365--612-24-2-6152-0004 Medical Physicist Service
Solicitation number
36C26124Q0252
Issued by

About this file

This document contains a past performance survey template and details of a related federal contract opportunity for medical physicist services. The past performance survey is to be completed by references for the offeror and includes questions regarding the quality, value, and any issues of previous contracts. It requests the name of the company being evaluated, reference contact information, contract details including value and dates of performance, and ratings and comments on quality.

The related federal solicitation is for medical physicist services through the Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Health Administration Veterans Integrated Service Network 21. It provides the solicitation number but does not include details on the required services, response date, or other contractual terms.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Past Performance Survey

RFQ 36C26124Q0252

Medical Physicist Service

OFFEROR INSTRUCTIONS: A separate survey must be completed for each reference. The completed surveys must be included with the quote.

EVALUATOR INSTRUCTIONS: The Department of Veterans Affairs is evaluating the company listed below for their past/current performance. Your comments would be appreciated regarding this company’s past/current performance. The name of the individuals providing reference information is confidential and will not be released or made publicly available.

Name of Company being evaluated:

Evaluator’s Name and signature:

Evaluator’s Company Name, Address and Phone number:

Indicate what contracts did this company provide for you? Provide the

· Total contract amount: $

· Dates of performance:

· Contract number.

Evaluation Questions

Please rate the overall quality of work using a scale of (Excellent, Good, Fair, Marginal, Unacceptable). Comments in support of the rating are welcome.

Were there any performance issues/concerns? If so, how were they handled?

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .