S02 Past Performance Questionnaire .docx
DOCX document 59 KB Posted
- Attached to
- C1DA--689-24-115, A-E Bulk Oxygen Tanks Site Prep Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 36C24124R0037
About this file
This document is a request for SF330 qualifications for an Architect-Engineer design services contract. The Department of Veterans Affairs is seeking an engineering firm to provide professional design services for Project Number 689-24-115, Bulk Oxygen Tanks Site Prep at the VA Connecticut Healthcare System campus in West Haven, Connecticut. The estimated value of construction is between $1 million to $5 million. Responses are due by February 16, 2024. The contract will be set aside for Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Businesses. Firms must be registered in the System for Award Management and Veteran-owned contracting programs databases. Submissions will be evaluated on professional qualifications, specialized experience, capacity, past performance, geographic location, construction period experience, and commitment to using small businesses. The selected firm may be invited to submit a cost proposal for negotiation.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| S02 Statement of Work Bulk Oxygen Tanks Site Prep Project 689-24-115 - Copy.doc | DOC document | |
| 36C24124R0037_1.docx | DOCX document | |
| S02 Limitations on Subcontracting Certificate of Compliance.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT 1 - PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE AND COVER LETTER
Complete one set of letters and forms for at least three projects identified in your firm’s Section F of the SF 330, which will best illustrate proposed team’s qualifications for this contract. Additional space or blank sheets may be added to answer any question.Transmittal letter to accompany Past Performance Questionnaire
FROM: [Insert Company Official Name, Title, and Company Name] SUBJECT: Past Performance Questionnaire for Contract(s):
[Insert Company Name] is currently responding to the Department of Veterans Affairs (NCO 1) request for SF 330 request for SF 330, Architect-Engineer Qualifications for the 689-24-115 A-E Bulk Oxygen Tanks Site Prep project. This Request for SF 330’s requires respondents to identify customers and solicit their response regarding [Insert Company Name] performance.
[Insert Company Name] is providing past performance data to NCO 1 relating to our performance on contract [Insert contract name/number] and have identified [Insert name of reference] as the point of contact for this contract.
The request for SF 330 instructs that respondent provide customers with the attached questionnaire. Please complete the questionnaire and email it by 4:00PM EST on February 23, 2024, directly to the NCO 1 Contracting Office.
E-mail: tamye.molinaro@va.gov The information contained in the completed Past Performance Questionnaire is considered sensitive and cannot be released to [Insert Company Name]. Please direct any questions about the acquisition or the attached questionnaire to the VISN 1 NCO point of contact identified above.
Thank you, [Insert Company Official Name and Title]
A. GENERAL INFORMATION
A-E FIRM TO BE EVALUATED:
Firm Name: Address:
Telephone: Email address: Point of Contact:
Firm Cage Code: Firm Tax ID Number: Firm DUNS Number:
Project Title:
Description of Project:
Description of A-E Firms’ Responsibilities:
Contract Number: Dollar Amount:
Contract Period of Performance:
The A-E Firm performed as the Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor/Consultant/Team Member
Percent of work performed by A-E Firm: Other (Please describe)
B. EVALUATOR INFORMATION:
Evaluator’s Company or Agency Name: Address:
Evaluator’s Name: Title of Evaluator: Telephone: E-mail:
C. SEND COMPLETED QUESTIONAIRE (SECTIONS B through D) TO:
Email: tamye.molinaro@va.gov
D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate rating that most accurately describes the A/E’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ALL RATINGS OF Marginal or Unsatisfactory on page 7 under Narrative Summary.
| Exceptional (5) |
| Very Good (4) |
| Satisfactory (3) |
| Marginal (2) |
| Unsatisfactory (1) |
| N/A |
| -Performance |
| -Performance meets |
| -Performance meets |
| -Performance |
| -Performance does |
| -Not applicable |
| meets or met |
| or met contractual |
| or met contractual |
| does or did not |
| or did not meet |
| or rater has not |
| contractual |
| requirements and |
| requirements. The |
| meet some |
| most contractual |
| observed |
| requirements and |
| exceeds or exceeded |
| contractual |
| contractual |
| requirements and |
| performance in |
| exceeds or |
| some of your |
| performance reflects |
| requirements. |
| recovery is not |
| this area. |
| exceeded many of |
| company’s |
| or reflected some |
| The contractual |
| likely or did not |
| your company’s |
| expectations. The |
| minor problems. |
| performance |
| occur. The |
| expectations. The |
| contractual |
| Corrective actions |
| reflects or |
| contractual |
| contractual |
| performance reflects |
| being taken by the |
| reflected serious |
| performance |
| performance |
| or reflected some |
| contractor appear to |
| problems(s) for |
| contains or |
| reflects or reflected |
| minor problems and |
| be effective or |
| which the |
| contained serious |
| few minor |
| corrective actions |
| Corrective actions |
| contractor has not |
| problem (s) for |
| problems and |
| being taken by the |
| taken were effective. |
| yet identified |
| which the |
| corrective actions |
| contractor appear to |
| acceptable |
| contractor’s |
| taken by the |
| be effective or |
| corrective actions |
| corrective actions |
| contractor appear |
| Corrective actions |
| or did not provide |
| appear ineffective |
| to be highly |
| taken were effective. |
| acceptable |
| or were |
effective or
| corrective |
| ineffective. |
corrective actions actions.
taken were effective.
A-E FIRM’S NAME: PROJECT NAME:
Contract Period of Performance:
Note: Include this information on each page of the questionnaire form to ensure there is no mix up in information among contracts surveyed for respective primes/subs, etc.
Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix on page 4.
Item
FACTORS TO BE RATED
| Exceptional (5) |
| Very Good (4) |
| Satisfactory (3) |
| Marginal (2) |
| Unsatisfactory (1) |
| N/A |
Design Services:
| 1. |
| Overall skill level and technical competence of A/E’s personnel. |
| 2. |
| A/E’s ability to identify and resolve design issues expeditiously. |
| 3. |
| A/E’s responsiveness to design review questions. |
| 4. |
| A/E’s ability to effectively coordinate, integrate and manage their consultants/subcontractors/team |
| 5. |
| A/E’s effectiveness and responsiveness in interfacing with the Client’s staff |
| 6. |
| Overall accuracy, completeness, and coordination of final design documents. (Quality) |
| 7. |
| A/E’s ability to provide detailed, accurate cost estimates. |
| 8. |
| A/E’s ability to meet contract schedule. |
Follow-On Construction Support Services:
| 9. |
| Thoroughness and timely review of construction submittals. |
| 10. |
| Timely resolution of construction design issues. |
| 11. |
| Overall quality, responsiveness, and timeliness of A/E follow- on construction support services. |
Item
FACTORS TO BE RATED
| Exceptional (5) |
| Very Good (4) |
| Satisfactory (3) |
| Marginal (2) |
| Unsatisfactory (1) |
| N/A |
LEED (If Applicable):
| 12. |
| Overall accuracy, completeness, timeliness, and coordination of LEED documentation. |
| 13. |
| A/E’s ability and understanding of the overall LEED process. |
BIM (If Applicable):
| 14. |
| Overall accuracy, completeness, timeliness, and coordination of BIM documentation. |
| 15. |
| A/E’s ability and understanding of the overall BIM process. |
Owner’s Representative on Design/Build Projects (If Applicable):
| 16. |
| Overall accuracy, completeness, timeliness, and coordination of requirements documents and bridging documents. |
| 17. |
| A/E’s ability, thoroughness, timeliness, and support as Owner’s Representative throughout the project. |
Overall:
| 18. |
| How would you rate the A/E’s ability to control cost? |
| 19. |
| How would you rate the A/E’s overall management performance on this contract? |
| 20. |
| How would you rate the A/E’s overall technical/quality performance on this contract? |
| 21. |
| Would you use this A/E again? (If “No”, please comment in the Narrative Summary) |
| YES |
| NO |
Number of A/E Design Errors & Omissions on Project:
Increased Project Cost Due to A/E Design Errors & Omissions:
CONTRACTOR’S NAME: PROJECT NAME
Contract Period of Performance:
Note: Include this information on each page of the questionnaire form to ensure there is no mix up in information among contracts surveyed for respective primes/subs, etc.
NARRATIVE SUMMARY (Use this section to explain any rating from the previous page)
| Item |
| COMMENTS |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .