S02 - D.1 ATTACHMENT A - QASP VASCULAR-THORACIC SURGICAL SERVICES.docx

DOCX document 35 KB Posted

Attached to
Q502--VASCULAR-THORACIC SURGICAL SERVICES FEDERAL HEALTH CARE CENTER (FHCC)
Solicitation number
36C25224Q0496
Issued by

About this file

This document is a Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) that outlines the government's plan for monitoring and evaluating the contractor's performance on a federal contract for Vascular-Thoracic Surgical Services at the Federal Health Care Center (FHCC).

The QASP defines the performance standards, quality metrics, and surveillance methods the government will use to assess the contractor's compliance with the contract requirements. Key performance areas include provider quality, patient access, patient safety, licensing/certification, mandatory training, invoicing, network access, qualifications of key personnel, and scope of practice. The government will use a variety of surveillance methods such as direct observation, periodic inspection, 100% review, and ongoing professional provider evaluation to monitor the contractor's performance against the specified standards and acceptable quality levels. The QASP also details the roles and responsibilities of the Contracting Officer (CO) and Contracting Officer's Representative (COR), as well as the process for documenting and addressing any performance deficiencies. This QASP is intended to be a "living document" that can be revised as needed over the course of the contract.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

1. PURPOSE

This Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) provides a systematic method to evaluate performance for the stated contract. This QASP explains the following:

· What will be monitored?

· How monitoring will take place.

· Who will conduct the monitoring?

· How monitoring efforts and results will be documented.

This QASP does not detail how the contractor accomplishes the work. Rather, the QASP is created with the premise that the contractor is responsible for management and quality control actions to meet the terms of the contract. It is the Government’s responsibility to be objective, fair, and consistent in evaluating performance.

This QASP is a “living document” and the Government may review and revise it on a regular basis. However, the Government shall coordinate changes with the contractor through contract modification. Copies of the original QASP and revisions shall be provided to the contractor and Government officials implementing surveillance activities.

2. GOVERNMENT ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES

The following personnel shall oversee and coordinate surveillance activities.

a. Contracting Officer (CO) – The CO shall ensure performance of all necessary actions for effective contracting, ensure compliance with the contract terms, and shall safeguard the interests of the United States in the contractual relationship. The CO shall also assure that the contractor receives impartial, fair, and equitable treatment under this contract. The CO is ultimately responsible for the final determination of the adequacy of the contractor’s performance.

Assigned CO:

Becky Cincotta Email: becky.cincotta@va.gov Phone: (414) 844-4822 Organization or Agency: VHA NCO 12, Great Lakes Acquisition Center (GLAC) Milwaukee, WI

b. Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) – The COR is responsible for technical administration of the contract and shall assure proper Government surveillance of the contractor’s performance. The COR shall keep a quality assurance file. The COR is not empowered to make any contractual commitments or to authorize any contractual changes on the Government’s behalf.

Assigned COR:

Veronica Knudtkins Email: veronica.knudtkins@va.gov Telephone: 224-610-2491 Fax: 224-610-3706

3. CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVES

The following employee(s) of the contractor serve as the contractor’s program manager(s) for this contract.

Primary:

Alternate:

4. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS

The contractor is responsible for performance of ALL terms and conditions of the contract. CORs will provide contract progress reports quarterly to the CO reflecting performance on this plan and all other aspects of the resultant contract. The performance standards outlined in this QASP shall be used to determine the level of contractor performance in the elements defined. Performance standards define desired services. The Government performs surveillance to determine the level of Contractor performance to these standards.

The Performance Requirements are listed below in Section 6. The Government shall use these standards to determine contractor performance and shall compare contractor performance to the standard and assign a rating. At the end of the performance period, these ratings will be used, in part, to establish the past performance of the contractor on the contract.

5. METHODS OF QA SURVEILLANCE

Various methods exist to monitor performance. The COR shall use the surveillance methods listed below in the administration of this QASP.

a. DIRECT OBSERVATION, PERIODIC INSPECTION, AND 100% REVIEW:

1. Patient Access

2. Patient Safety

3. Maintains licensing, registration, and certification

4. VA Mandatory Training (HIPAA, Confidentiality, VA Privacy, and BLS)

5. Invoicing

6. PIV and VA Network Access

7. Qualifications of Key Personnel

8. Scope of Practice/Privileging

b. ONGOING PROFESSIONAL PROVIDER EVALUATION (OPPE):

1. Provider Quality Performance

c. RANDOM SAMPLING

1. Scope of Practice/Privileging

6. QASP PERFORMANCE REPORT DATE: __________________

Measures
PWS

Reference

Performance Requirement

Standard
Acceptable Quality Level
Surveillance

Method & Frequency Met AQL/Did Not Meet AQL-

CPARS RATING/ADD COMMENTS

Provider Quality Performance
2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.2, 2.9.4.3, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4.4, 4.4.5, 4.6.4-5, & 4.6.6.1
Contractor’s physicians shall perform in accordance with clinical standards
All (100%) contractor’s physicians meet Standards
90% of contractor’s physicians meet Standards
OPPE

Semi-Annually

Patient Access
3.3 & 4.6.6.2
Contractor’s physicians shall be available and in location as needed to perform services as scheduled in accordance with this PWS.
All (100%) contractor’s physicians are on time and available to perform services in accordance with this PWS.
Contractor’s physicians are on time and available to perform services 95% of the time as scheduled
100% review of the Time and Attendance Sheets and Direct Observation

Quarterly

Patient Safety
4.5.1.5 & 4.6.6.3
All patient safety incidents shall be reported to the COR and into the FHCC Patient Safety Reporting System within 24 hours of the incident.
All (100%) patient safety incidents are reported to the COR and into the FHCC Patient Safety Reporting System within 24 hours of the incident.
95% of patient safety incidents are reported to the COR and into the FHCC Patient Safety Reporting System within 24 hours of incident.
Direct observation, Periodic Inspection, and 100% Review of any incidents
Maintains licensing, registration, and certification
2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.1.5, 2.1.9, & 4.6.6.4
Updated Licensing, registration, and certification shall be kept current and provided to the COR and CO as they are renewed.
All (100%) licensing, registrations, and certifications for contractor’s physicians shall be kept current and provided to the COR and CO as they are renewed.
90% of all licensing, registrations, and certifications for contractor’s physicians shall be kept current and provided to the COR and CO as they are renewed.
Periodic Inspection & 100% review of documentation
Mandatory Training
2.1.6, 4.6.6.5, 7.5.1 – 7.5.1.7
Contractor shall complete all required training per FHCC policy
All (100%) of required training is complete on time by contract physician(s).
95% of all mandatory training is completed on time
Periodic Inspection Quarterly of TMS Training System Records
Invoicing
6.2, 6.3, & 4.6.6.6
Accurate invoices shall be submitted by the 15th of the following month services were provided.
All (100%) of all invoices are accurate and submitted on time.
80% of all invoices are accurate and submitted on time
Periodic Inspection & 100% Review

Annually

PIV & VA Network Access
4.1.2 & 4.6.6.7
Contractor’s physicians must obtain and maintain a current (non-expired) PIV card and FHCC network access. Contractor’s physicians must login to the FHCC network once every 30-days.
All (100%) of Contractor’s physicians must obtain and maintain a current (non-expired) PIV card and login to the FHCC network once every 30-days.
No more than one occurrence of a reactivation request per contract provider for FHCC network access due to lack of timely logins. (Note: Contractor must develop a methodology to track logins. FHCC will not be tracking login dates).
Direct Observation of renewed access requests
Qualifications of Key Personnel
2.1.2. & 4.6.6.8
All Contractor’s physicians shall be Board Certified/Eligible in accordance with the American Board (ABTS or ABS) as applicable.
All (100%) of Contractor’s physicians are board certified/eligible.
100% of Contractor’s physicians are board certified/eligible.
Periodic Inspection of qualification documentation
Quarterly
Scope of Practice/Privileging
4.6.6.9
Contractor’s physicians perform within their individual scope of practice/privileging.
All (100%) of Contractor’s physicians perform within their individual scope of practice/ privileging 100% of the time.
100% of Contractor’s physicians perform within their individual scope of practice/ privileging.
Direct Observation or random sampling of records
Quarterly

36C25224Q0496

ATTACHMENT A

Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) Vascular-Thoracic Surgical Services – FHCC

7. CPARS RATINGS ASSIGNED TO QASP ITEMS:

Metrics and methods are designed to determine rating for a given standard and acceptable quality level. The following ratings shall be used (Reference: CPARS User Manual https://www.cpars.gov/documents/CPARS-Guidance.pdf:

EXCEPTIONAL:
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Note: To justify an Exceptional rating, you should identify multiple significant events in each category and state how it was a benefit to the GOVERNMENT. However, a singular event could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

VERY GOOD:
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Note: To justify a Very Good rating, you should identify a significant event in each category and state how it was a benefit to the GOVERNMENT. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

SATISFACTORY:
Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Note: To justify a Satisfactory rating, there should have been only minor problems, or major problems the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

MARGINAL:
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
Note: To justify Marginal performance, you should identify a significant event in each category that the contractor had trouble overcoming and state how it impacted the GOVERNMENT. A Marginal rating should be supported by referencing the management tool that notified the contractor of thecontractual deficiency (e.g., Management, Quality, Safety or Environmental Deficiency Report or letter).
UNSATISFACTORY:
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Note: To justify an Unsatisfactory rating, you should identify multiple significant events in each category that the contractor had trouble overcoming and state how it impacted the GOVERNMENT. However, a singular problem could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating. An Unsatisfactory rating should be supported by referencing the management tools used to notify the contractor of the contractual deficiencies (e.g., Management, Quality, Safety or Environmental Deficiency Reports, or letters).

8. DOCUMENTING PERFORMANCE

a. The Government shall document positive and/or negative performance. Any report may become a part of the supporting documentation for any contractual action and preparing annual past performance using CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT SYSTEM (CPARS).

b. If contractor performance does not meet the Acceptable Quality level, the CO shall inform the contractor. This will normally be in writing unless circumstances necessitate verbal communication. In any case the CO shall document the discussion and place it in the contract file. When the COR and the CO determines formal written communication is required, the COR shall prepare a Contract Report (CR), and present it to CO. The CO will in turn review and will present to the contractor's program manager for corrective action.

c. The contractor shall acknowledge receipt of the CR in writing. The CR will specify if the contractor is required to prepare a corrective action plan to document how the contractor shall correct the unacceptable performance and avoid a recurrence. The CR will also state how long after receipt the contractor has to present this corrective action plan to the CO. The Government shall review the contractor's corrective action plan to determine acceptability. The CO shall also assure that the contractor receives impartial, fair, and equitable treatment. The CO is ultimately responsible for the final determination of the adequacy of the contractor’s performance and the acceptability of the Contractor’s corrective action plan.

d. Any CRs may become a part of the supporting documentation for any contractual action deemed necessary by the CO. See Sample CR below.

9. COR AND CONTRACTOR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF QASP

SIGNED VA:

VERONICA KNUDTKINS, MPH, COR, BUSINESS MANAGER DATE

SURGICAL SERVICES, FHCC

SIGNED CONTRACTOR:

PRINTED NAME & TITLE: DATE

CONTRACT REPORT

1. CONTRACT NUMBER
2. REPORT NUMBER FOR THIS ISSUE
3. TO: (Contracting Officer)
4. FROM: (Name of COR)

5. DATES

a. CR PREPARED

b. RETURNED BY CONTRACTOR:
c. ACTION COMPLETE

6. Issue Identified (Describe in detail. Include reference to PWS Directive; attach continuation sheet if necessary.)

7. SIGNATURE OF COR
Date:
8. SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER
Date:
9a. TO (Contracting Officer)
9a. FROM (Contractor)

10. CONTRACTOR RESPONSE AS TO CAUSE AND ACTIONS TO PREVENT RECURRENCE. (Cite applicable quality control program procedures or new procedures. Attach continuation sheet(s) if necessary.)

11. SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVE
Date:

12. GOVERNMENT EVALUATION.

13. GOVERNMENT ACTIONS

14. CLOSE OUT

NAME
TITLE
SIGNATURE
DATE

CONTRACTOR NOTIFIED

COR

CONTRACTING OFFICER

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .