S02_Attachment Performance Questionaire.pdf

PDF 347 KB Posted

Attached to
618-24-501 AE Update Life Safety Drawings
Solicitation number
36C26325R0054
Issued by

About this file

The document is a Performance Questionnaire for two separate VA contract opportunities related to architectural and engineering (A/E) design services. The first opportunity (Solicitation Number 36C26325R0054) is a 100% Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) set-aside for updating life safety drawings for buildings 70, 76, 79, and 49SV at the Minneapolis VA Health Care Campus. The project requires a comprehensive code analysis based on NFPA 101 Life Safety Code and International Building Code, involving field surveys, document reviews, and production of updated floor plans showing fire-rated walls, smoke zones, exiting paths, and other critical safety infrastructure.

The solicitation requires interested firms to submit Standard Form 330 (SF-330) qualification packages electronically by July 11, 2025, at 10:00 AM CT. Evaluation criteria include professional qualifications, specialized experience, technical competence, capacity, past performance, geographic proximity, and subcontracting efforts. The three most highly qualified firms will be ranked, with the top-rated firm expected to receive a solicitation. Firms must be verified in the SBA Veteran Small Business Certification (VetCert) database, have in-house expertise across multiple disciplines including architectural design, structural engineering, mechanical engineering, and cost estimation, and demonstrate recent experience in healthcare facility design projects completed within the past four years.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PERFORMANCE QUESTIONAIRE

36C26325R0054, Project: 618-224-501, AE Update Life Safety

Drawings

INSTRUCTIONS TO CONTRACTOR

Complete the CONTRACTOR INFORMATION section, below (type answers into light blue shaded boxes). Save the document. Send an electronic or hard copy print of the form to each of your reference contacts, asking them to please complete the form and submit it according to the instructions, below.

INSTRUCTIONS TO REFERENCE CONTACT

The contractor named below is submitting an offer for a United States Department of Veterans Affairs contract requirement, and has sent this form to you, in your role as a past performance reference contact. Please complete this form in full (all areas shaded in light yellow, below). Once completed, please send the form to the Contracting Specialist via email at dwayne.brauch@va.gov.

Please return the completed form by July 11, 2025 at 10:00 am CT.

GENERAL INFORMATION [completed by Contractor]

Contractor Company Name Street Address

Contractor Point of Contact Name City

Point of Contact Phone Number State

Reference Project Title Zip Code

Contract Period of Performance (start to finish): Email

Contract Number Contract Dollar Value

Description of Work

Role of Contractor on This Project (check appropriate box) ☐ Prime Contractor ☐ Sub‐contractor ☐ Key Personnel

36C26325R0045, Project: 618-25-200, AE Upgrade Building 222

HVAC

RESPONDENT INFORMATION [completed by Reference Contact]

Company Name Street Address

POC Name City

Phone Number State

Fax Number Zip Code

Email

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the number on the scale of 1 to 5 that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF 1 OR 2 in the Remarks section, below (text box will expand to whatever extent is necessary).

1 2 3 4 5

UNSATISFACTORY MARGINAL SATISFACTORY VERY GOOD EXCEPTIONAL

Performance did not meet most contractual requirements. There were serious problems and the contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.

Performance did not meet some contractual requirements. There were problems, some of a serious nature, for which corrective action was only marginally effective.

Performance met contractual requirements. There were some minor problems and corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded some to the government’s benefit. There were a few minor problems, which the contractor resolved in a timely, effective manner.

Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded many to the government’s benefit. Problems, if any, were negligible and were resolved in a timely, highly effective manner.

The Contractor … 1 2 3 4 5

1. Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.

2. Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.

3. Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements.

4. Home office participated in solving significant local problems. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

5. Followed approved quality control plan. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

6. Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.

7. Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.

8. Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

9. Identified problems as they occurred. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

Suggested alternative approaches to problems. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

Displayed initiative to solve problems. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

36C26325R0045, Project: 618-25-200, AE Upgrade Building 222

HVAC

Developed realistic progress schedules. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

Met established project schedules. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

Provided timely resolution of warranty defects. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

Was responsive to contract changes. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

Provided adequate project supervision. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

Obtained consent of surety for increases in bonding as work‐in‐progress increased. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

Provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals including all aspects of work required for each task.

Cooperated with Government personnel after award. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

How would you rate the contractor's overall performance? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.”

YES

NO

23 Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, please explain in

“remarks.”

YES

NO

24 To the best of your knowledge, is the contractor rated in CPARS? ☐

YES

NO

REMARKS (Please use as much space as is needed – the box will expand as you type).

Name of Person Completing Form Signature

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .