Attachment C - Past Performance.docx
DOCX document 26 KB Posted
- Attached to
- F5 Big-IT Training Courses
- Solicitation number
- RFQ-OIT-11-0047
About this file
Attachment C
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| RFQ-OIT-11-0047 | — | |
| RFQ-OIT-11-0047(amd 1).pdf | ||
| ATTACHMENT B - PRICE LIST | — | |
| Attachment A - Capabilities.docx | DOCX document | |
| ORCA | — | |
| RFQ-OIT-11-0047.pdf | ||
| ATTACHMENT B - PRICE LIST.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT C
RFQ-OIT-11-0047
ATTACHMENT C
RFQ-OIT-11-0047
memorandum Department of the Treasury, Bureau of the Public Debt Division of Procurement
TO: PROSPECTIVE REFERENCES
FROM: Jane Oney, Contracting Officer
DATE: February 11, 2011
SUBJECT: Solicitation RFQ-OIT-11-0047 Past Performance Questionnaire
The Bureau of the Public Debt is conducting a proposal evaluation for the subject solicitation. The point of contact listed in the attached questionnaire has identified your office as a source to evaluate the contractor’s past performance and it also authorizes release of this information to our office.
The individual most knowledgeable of the Contractor’s day-to-day operations and overall condition of performance rendered should complete the survey.
Please complete the questionnaire as thoroughly as possible by indicating your ratings and providing comments wherever applicable. For any rating of Unsatisfactory (U), we request you provide an explanation.
Your time and effort in providing this information is greatly appreciated. The requested information is critical to our evaluation. Please complete and return the completed package as quickly as possible, but not later than 10:00 a.m. ET on Wednesday, February 23, 2011. You may e-mail a scanned copy to psb3@bpd.treas.gov with " RFQ-OIT-11-0047, ATTN: TAYERS" in the subject line, or fax it to 304-480-7203.
If you have any questions, please call Taten Ayers at 304-480-5366. Thank you for your cooperation and quick response to this request.
Quality of Product or Service Rating Guideline When responding to the descriptive statements, select the letter, which most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation.
| Unacceptable |
| Non-conformances are jeopardizing the achievement of contract requirements, despite use of Agency resources. Recovery is not likely. If performance cannot be substantially corrected, it constitutes a significant impediment in consideration for future awards containing similar requirements. |
| Acceptable |
| Overall compliance requires minor Agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements. |
| Excellent |
| The contractor has demonstrated an outstanding performance level that was significantly in excess of anticipated achievements and is commendable as an example for others, so that it justifies adding a point to the score. It is expected that this rating will be used in those rare circumstances where contractor performance clearly exceeds the performance levels described as "Excellent". |
| Not Applicable |
| The contractor was not required to perform or this was not covered under this contract. |
Solicitation: RFQ-OIT-11-0047 ATTN: TAYERS
Contractor Name:
REFERENCE: POINT OF CONTACT INFORMATION
| 1. | Company Name: |
| 2. | Name: |
| 3. | Office: |
| 4. | Email/Telephone: |
| QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE: |
| E |
| A |
| U |
| N/A |
| 1. |
| Compliance with contract requirements |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| 2. |
| Appropriateness of personnel assigned. |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| II. |
| COST CONTROL: |
| E |
| A |
| U |
| N/A |
| 1. |
| The Contractor submits proposals that accurately represent the work required. |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| 2. |
| The contractor’s supporting price/cost information for modifications is accurate, complete and reasonable (not over inflated or under estimated). |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| III. |
| TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE: |
| E |
| A |
| U |
| N/A |
| 1. |
| Contractor met established schedules to complete the task on time, as scheduled. |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| 2. |
| Contractor performed all work without the issuance of a CURE NOTICE or a SHOW CAUSE LETTER. |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| IV. |
| BUSINESS RELATIONS: |
| E |
| A |
| U |
| N/A |
| 1. |
| Contractor provided experienced/qualified instructors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements. |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| 2. |
| Contractor hired, maintained, and replaced as necessary, qualified personnel. |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| 3. |
| Contractor ensured the instructor had sufficient authority to make decisions and take actions during course performance to keep the course on schedule. |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| V. |
| OVERALL PERFORMANCE: |
| E |
| A |
| U |
| N/A |
| 1. |
| Rate the overall performance of this contractor. Would you rehire this contractor? |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
Additional Comments:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .