RFQ298- Attachment 5 - Contract Discrepancy Notice.docx
DOCX document 76 KB Posted
- Attached to
- TYPE III Barricade Hauling Trailers
- Solicitation number
- 298
- Issued by
- Lincoln County, Idaho
About this file
This document is a Contract Discrepancy Notice related to a state and local contract opportunity for TYPE III BARRICADE HAULING TRAILERS. The discrepancy notice identifies issues found by the contracting agency, the Idaho Transportation Department (ITD), while monitoring the contractor's performance. The notice requires the contractor to describe the corrective actions they will take to resolve the identified discrepancies and come into compliance with the contract requirements. The notice also includes observations made by ITD that may lead to future discrepancies if not addressed, though no response is required for the observations.
The related state and local contract opportunity is for the provision of TYPE III Barricade Hauling Trailers. The state involved is Idaho. No additional details are provided regarding the quantities, timelines, or other specifics of this contract opportunity.
View the file
Other files
Show all 31
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RFQ298 - Attachment 5 - Contract Discrepancy Notice
| Contract No: |
| TBD |
| Contract Name: |
| TYPE III BARRICADE HAULING TRAILERS |
Discrepancy Information: This Contract Discrepancy Notice identifies the Discrepancy(ies) found by ITD while monitoring the Contractor’s performance required per the referenced contract. Items identified as “Discrepancy” require a response from the Contractor. Items identified as “Observation” are areas of concern that may lead to a future Discrepancy if not addressed. Observations do not require a response unless otherwise noted in this notice.
ITD has identified the following Discrepancy(ies):
(Add additional tables for multiple discrepancies)
| Description of Discrepancy: |
| Describe the discrepancy in detail and explain how the contractor is out of compliance. Attach photos or other supporting documents and reference here. |
| Contract Reference: |
| Site the document name, attachment #, and section # of the requirement out of compliance. |
| Required Action: |
| Site the required corrective action from the contract. |
| Contractor’s Resolution: |
| Contractor to describe action that will be taken to correct the discrepancy in order to become compliant with the contract. |
| Estimated Resolution Date: |
| Contractor to provide estimated date it anticipates resolving the discrepancy by. |
ITD Contract Monitor - Check appropriate box with regard to Contractor’s resolution
| Accept ☐ |
| Partially Accept ☐ |
| Reject ☐ |
Reason for Rejection or Partially Accepted
Anticipated Follow Up Date on Resolution
ITD Contract Monitor Signature
Date
Contractor - Sign below to indicate your understanding of the Discrepancy(ies) and your responsibility for resolution.
Contractor Printed Name
Title
Contractor Signature
Date
Resolution
ITD Contract Monitor – Sign below to indicate that each Discrepancy has been resolved based on the actions detailed in the Contractor’s Resolution for each Discrepancy.
ITD Contract Monitor Signature
Date
ITD has identified the following Observations (no response required):
| Description of Observation: |
| Describe the observation in detail and explain how it may lead to a non-compliance issue in the future. Attach photos or other supporting documents and reference here. |
| Contractor’s Response (optional): |
| Contractor to describe action that will be taken to correct the discrepancy in order to become compliant with the contract. |
1 | Page dhb
RFQ298 TYPE III BARRICADE HAULING TRAILERS 01/24
image1.png
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .