rfq2505postt00078.pdf

PDF 2 MB Posted Oct 22, 2025

Attached to: TxDOT Aviation Division- Notice to Consultants
Solicitation number: RFQ2505POSTT00078
Issued by: Galveston County, Texas

About this file

Written by GovTribe AI · Oct 23, 2025

Summary

This is a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) solicitation issued by the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) Aviation Division on behalf of the City of Post and Garza County for professional engineering services related to Post-Garza County Municipal Airport (Project No. 2505POSTT). The scope encompasses engineering and design services with optional construction administration for nine major projects: reconstruction and decoupling of Runway 06/24, replacement of medium intensity runway lights, apron reconstruction, demolition of Taxiway C, reconstruction/extension/realignment of Taxiway A, rehabilitation of Runway 17/35 and its turnaround, rehabilitation of hangar access taxiway, and installation of wildlife exclusion fencing. The response deadline is November 20, 2025, at 2:00 PM CST. Submissions must be made through the TxDOT Aviation eGrants system. The Qualifications Statement is limited to nine single-sided 8.5x11-inch pages and must demonstrate the firm's project understanding, technical approach, relevant experience on comparable airport projects within the past ten years, proposed design schedule in weeks, and construction management experience. The project manager must be a Professional Engineer licensed in Texas by submission deadline, and an Architect must be registered in Texas if applicable. TxDOT Project Manager Steve Harp, P.E. will oversee the engagement.

Evaluation criteria totaling 100 points assess recent comparable airport project experience (25 points), proposed technical approach (30 points), project design schedule and ability to meet deadlines (25 points), and construction management experience (20 points). All responses must include an up-to-date HUB (Historically Underutilized Business) Subcontracting Plan with a 23.7 percent participation goal for professional services contracts, which is mandatory regardless of subcontracting intent. The solicitation requires respondents to verify they are not listed in Section 889 of the 2019 National Defense Authorization Act, Section 1260H of the 2021 National Defense Authorization Act, or owned/controlled by foreign adversary governments. A single prime provider response limit is enforced; submission of multiple responses renders the provider non-responsive. A draft professional services agreement will be provided to the selected firm to begin fee proposal and negotiation phases; the proposed design schedule may establish basis for contract deadlines.

View the file

On GovTribe

Work with this file

Download the original file
Contacts named in this file
Similar government files
Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

POST-GARZA COUNTY MUNICIPAL AIRPORT

SOLICITATION NO.: RFQ-2505POSTT-00078

1. REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS SOLICITATION WITH HISTORICALLY UNDERUTILIZED

BUSINESS PARTICIPATION

2. EVALUATION CRITERIA

3. INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESPONDING TO A SOLICITATION IN EGRANTS

4. PROJECT EXHIBIT

5. AIRPORT LAYOUT DRAWING

Texas Department of Transportation Aviation Division

Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for Professional Engineering Services

The City of Post and Garza County, through its agent, the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT), intends to engage a qualified firm for professional services pursuant to Chapter 2254, Subchapter A, of the Government Code. TxDOT Aviation Division will solicit and receive responses for the current aviation project as described below.

Current Project: City of Post and Garza County; TxDOT CSJ/Project No.: 2505POSTT.

The TxDOT Project Manager is Mr. Steve Harp, P.E.

Scope: Provide engineering and design services, and at the agent’s discretion, construction administration to:

1. Reconstruct and Decouple Runway 06/24

2. Replace Runway 06/24 Medium Intensity Runway

Lights

3. Reconstruct Apron

4. Demolish and Remove Taxiway C

5. Reconstruct, Extend and Realign Taxiway A

6. Rehabilitate Runway 17/35

7. Rehabilitate Runway 17 Turnaround

8. Rehabilitate Hangar Access Taxiway

9. Install Wildlife Exclusion Fence

In accordance with Texas Government Code §2161.252, responses that do not contain an up to date “HUB Subcontracting Plan (HSP)” are non-responsive and will be rejected without further evaluation. In addition, if TxDOT determines that the HSP was not developed in good faith, it will reject the response for failing to comply with material specifications based on the RFQ.

To assist in your response preparation, the criteria, 5010 drawing, project diagram, and most recent Airport Layout Drawing is available online at http://www.txdot.gov/inside-txdot/division/aviation/projects.html by selecting “Post-Garza County Municipal Airport.” The response should address a technical approach for the current scope only.

Response Procedure:

The successful firm will be selected on the basis of a Response. A prime provider may only submit one Response. If a prime provider submits more than one Response, that prime provider will be deemed non-responsive. The Response must contain the required information, and should address the recommended information, as listed below.

Response submissions will be scored accordingly. If the Response is non-compliant with any of the following requirements, the Response may be deemed non-responsive.

1. Qualifications Statement (QS) – The QS shall contain no more than nine 8.5x11-inch single-sided pages.

a. QS Format:

i. Readability – The submitter has latitude in formatting the QS for visual effectiveness. Graphics, tables, photos, and other visual aids are permitted within the nine allotted pages, except that Quick Response (QR) codes or other external link(s) are not permitted. There is no specific font, font size, color, or other formatting requirements, although a font size smaller than 10 is not recommended. Selection committee members may consider legibility and readability when scoring. Unreadable text will not be considered and may cause the QS to be deemed non-responsive. It is the submitter’s responsibility to provide a legible, readable document.

b. QS Content - It is recommended the QS include:

i. The RFQ number, airport name, name of firm, firm address, email address, telephone number and contact information for key personnel. The response shall also identify each proposed project team member, each proposed member’s time commitment to this project as a percentage of their total work week, and whether the proposed member is an employee of the responding firm or a sub-contractor to that firm.

c. QS Content – For scoring purposes, the QS must include:

i. Information showing the firm’s project understanding and technical approach, including similar project-related experience of the project manager and each task leader responsible for a major work category. For each project referenced, identify either the project manager’s or the task leader’s specific role(s) and work contributed. The project manager is required to be a Professional Engineer registered or licensed in Texas, by the submission deadline. If applicable to project, an Architect, is required to be registered or licensed in Texas, by the submission deadline. License number(s) must be included in the response submission.

ii. In addition to individual project-related experience of the project manager and task leaders required under (ii), list no more than ten relevant projects performed by the responding firm within the last 10 years. This shall include project start date, airport name, location, phone number, and airport contact person’s name, title, and phone number. It shall also include the original project completion time estimate vs. the actual completion time for the cited design project, as well as a brief narrative description of the project and whether or not your firm served as the prime or the sub on each project cited.

iii. Project Design Schedule: Indicate the number of weeks (not months) necessary to design the project in accordance with “Project Design Schedule Information” below.

Respondent must include on the first page of its Response a written certification that the responding Company, or any of its holding companies or subsidiaries, is not

(a) Listed in Section 889 of the 2019 National Defense Authorization Act.

(b) Listed in Section 1260H of the 2021 National Defense Authorization Act: or

(c) Owned by the government of a country on the U.S. Department of Commerce’s foreign adversaries list under 15 C.F.R Section 791.4;

(d) Controlled by any governing or regulatory body located in a country on the U.S. Department of Commerce’s foreign adversaries list under 15 C.F.R Section 791.4.

The Response must be submitted in eGrants following the Submission Procedures at the end of this notice.

PROJECT DESIGN SCHEDULE

Based on the published project scope and your technical approach, indicate below the number of weeks (not months) necessary for each phase and total design time to design the project. Some of the basic responsibilities within each design phase are included for reference. Do not include TxDOT review time. Assume, however, that your work will require some revision after TxDOT review, and that the time required to address these comments should be included within your schedule. If time is required for specialized studies, indicate the additional time.

NOTE: This proposed schedule may set the basis for the contract deadlines in the professional services agreement if your firm is selected. A draft contract will be sent out to the selected firm to begin the fee proposal/negotiations phase.

Preliminary Report Phase Attend pre-design conference Obtain and analyze necessary survey data Obtain and analyze necessary geotechnical data Prepare comprehensive report

Preliminary Design Phase Attend project meeting(s) Prepare project drawings (70%) Provide all technical specifications Provide project cost estimate

Final Design Phase Attend project meeting(s) Finalize drawings and contract documents (100%) Provide a revised opinion of probable total project costs Prepare a Construction Management Plan Update, if necessary, the Preliminary Report Prepare and submit airspace study to FAA

EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR ARCHITECTURAL/ENGINEERING

QUALIFICATIONS

1. Recent experience of the project team with comparable airport projects within the past ten years. (25 points)

Do the qualifications indicate that the project team has recent direct experience on other general aviation airports designing similar improvements to those proposed at this location?

2. Proposed technical approach (30 points)

Does the architect/engineer provide evidence of understanding of the project; and any unique architectural/engineering aspects associated with the proposed project and how to address them?

3. Project design schedule and ability to meet schedules and deadlines (25 points)

Does the proposed design team have sufficient time to work on this project? Has the firm demonstrated an ability to meet design schedules in the past? Reasonableness of proposed schedule?

4. Construction Management Experience (20 points)

The architect/engineer will oversee the airport construction. Therefore, it is critical that the architect/engineer be involved in the day-to-day construction activities through a full-time resident project representative and periodic site visits. What evidence do the qualifications provide as to the architect/engineer’s commitment to proactive and consistent representation during construction?

Submission Procedures

The completed submission must be received in the TxDOT Aviation eGrants system no later than November 20, 2025, 2:00 PM. (CST).

Firms that wish to submit a response to this solicitation must be a user in the TxDOT Aviation eGrants system no later than one business day before the solicitation due date. To request access to eGrants, please complete the Contact Us web form located at http://txdot.gov/government/funding/egrants-2016/aviation.html

The consultant selection committee will be composed of Aviation Division staff. The final selection by the committee will generally be made following the completion of review of Responses. The committee will review all Responses and rate and rank each. The Evaluation Criteria for Engineering Qualifications can be found at http://www.txdot.gov/inside-txdot/division/aviation/projects.html under Information for Consultants. All firms will be notified, and the top-rated firm will be contacted to begin fee negotiations for the design and bidding phases. The selection committee does, however, reserve the right to conduct interviews for the top-rated firms if the committee deems it necessary. If interviews are conducted, selection will be made following interviews.

Please contact TxDOT Aviation for any technical or procedural questions at (800)68-PILOT (74568). For procedural questions, please contact Sheri Quinlan, Contract Specialist. For technical questions, please contact Mr. Steve Harp, P.E., Project Manager.

For questions regarding responding to this solicitation in eGrants, please contact the TxDOT Aviation help desk at (800)687-4568 or avn-egrantshelp@txdot.gov.

Respondents are responsible for checking the TxDOT Aviation website regularly for any changes to the RFQ documents, such as Addenda. Here is a link to the TxDOT Aviation website for your convenience. http://www.txdot.gov/inside-txdot/division/aviation/projects.html.

Historically Underutilized Business Participation

I.3.1 Introduction

The Agent is committed to promoting full and equal business opportunities for businesses in state contracting in accordance with the goals specified in the State of Texas Disparity Study. The Agent encourages the use of Historically Underutilized Businesses (HUBs) through race, ethnic and gender-neutral means.

Pursuant to Texas Government Code §2161.181 and §2161.182, and the Agent’s HUB policy and rules, the Agent is required to make a good faith effort to increase HUB participation in its contracts. The Agent may accomplish the goal of increased HUB participation by contracting directly with HUBs or indirectly through subcontracting opportunities.

I.3.2 Agent’s Administrative Rules

The Agent has adopted the CPA’s HUB rules as its own. The Agent’s HUB rules are located in Title 43, Part 1, Chapter 9, Subchapter L of the Texas Administrative Code, and the CPA rules are located in Title 34, Part 1, Chapter 20, Subchapter D, Division 1. If there are any discrepancies between the Agent’s administrative rules and this Request for Qualifications (RFQ), the rules shall take priority.

I.3.3 HUB Participation Goal

The CPA has established statewide HUB participation goals for different categories of contracts in 34 T.A.C. §20.284. In order to meet or exceed the HUB participation goals, the Agent encourages outreach to certified HUBs. Contractors shall make a good faith effort to include certified HUBs in the procurement process.

This contract is classified as a Professional Services contract under the CPA rule, and therefore has a HUB Annual Procurement Utilization Goal of 23.7% per fiscal year.

I.3.4 Required HUB Subcontracting Plan

In accordance with Government Code, Chapter 2161, Subchapter F, each state agency that considers entering into a contract with an expected value of $100,000 or more over the life of the contract (including any renewals) shall, before the agency solicits bids, proposals, offers, or other applicable expressions of interest, determine whether subcontracting opportunities are probable under the contract.

In accordance with 34 T.A.C. §20.285(a),(1),(C) of the HUB Rules. State agencies may determine that subcontracting is probable for only a subset of the work expected to be performed or the funds to be expended under the contract. If an agency determines that subcontracting is probable on only a portion of a contract, it shall document its reasons in writing for the procurement file.

The Agent has determined that subcontracting opportunities are probable for this Request for Qualifications (RFQ). As a result, the respondent must submit an HSP with its proposal.

The HSP is required whether a respondent intends to subcontract or not.

In the HSP, a respondent must indicate whether it is a Texas certified HUB. Being a certified HUB does not exempt a respondent from completing the HSP requirement.

The Agent shall review the documentation submitted by the respondent to determine if a good faith effort has been made, in accordance with solicitation and HSP requirements.

During the good faith effort evaluation, The Agent may, at its discretion, allow clarifications or enhancements to information submitted with the HSP.

If the Agent determines that the respondent’s HSP was not developed in good faith, the HSP will be considered non-responsive and will be rejected as a material failure to comply with the advertised specifications. The reasons for rejection shall be recorded in the procurement file.

I.3.5 CPA Centralized Master Bidder’s List

Respondents may search for HUB subcontractors in the CPA’s Centralized Master Bidders List (CMBL)/HUB Directory. For this procurement, the Agent has identified the following class and item codes for potential subcontracting opportunities:

NIGP Class/Item Code:

925.03 925.46 925.86

Respondents are not required to use, nor limited to using, the class and item codes identified above, and may identify other areas for subcontracting.

The Agent does not endorse, recommend nor attest to the capabilities of any company or individual listed on the CPA’s CMBL. The list of certified HUBs is subject to change, so respondents are encouraged to refer to the CMBL often to find the most current listing of HUBs.

I.3.6 HUB Subcontracting Procedures – If a Respondent Intends to Subcontract

An HSP must demonstrate that the respondent made a good faith effort to comply with the Agent’s HUB policies and procedures. The following subparts outline the items that the Agent will review in determining whether an HSP meets the good faith effort standard. A respondent that intends to subcontract must complete the HSP to document its good faith efforts.

I.3.6.1 Identify Subcontracting Areas and Divide Them into Reasonable Lots

A respondent should first identify each area of the contract work it intends to subcontract. Then, to maximize HUB participation, it should divide the contract work into reasonable lots or portions, to the extent consistent with prudent industry practices.

I.3.6.2 Notify Potential HUB Subcontractors

The HSP must demonstrate that the respondent made a good faith effort to subcontract with HUBs that have an active HUB certification. The respondent’s good faith efforts shall be shown through utilization of all methods in conformance with the development and submission of the HSP and by complying with the following steps:

I.3.6.2.1 Divide the contract work into reasonable lots or portions to the extent consistent with prudent industry practices. The respondent must determine which portions of work, including goods and services, will be subcontracted.

I.3.6.2.2 Use the appropriate method(s) to demonstrate good faith effort. The respondent can use either method(s) 1, 2, or 3:

I.3.6.3 Method 1: Respondent Intends to Subcontract with only HUBs:

The respondent must identify in the HSP the HUBs, with an active HUB certification, that will be utilized and submit written documentation that confirms 100% of all available subcontracting opportunities will be performed by one or more HUBs.

I.3.6.4 Method 2: Respondent Intends to Subcontract with HUBs and Non-HUBs (Meet or Exceed the Goal):

The respondent must identify in the HSP and submit written documentation that one or more HUBs, with an active HUB certification, will be utilized; and that the aggregate expected percentage of subcontracts with HUBs will meet or exceed the goal specified in this solicitation. Only HUB subcontractors that have an existing contract with the respondent for less than five years may be used to comply with the good faith effort requirements under this method.

When the aggregate expected percentage of subcontracts with HUBs meets or exceeds the goal specified in this solicitation, respondents may also use non-HUB subcontractors; or, I.3.6.6 Method 3: Respondent Intends to Subcontract with HUBs and Non-HUBs (Does Not Meet or Exceed the Goal):

The respondent must identify in the HSP and submit documentation regarding both of the following requirements:

Written notification to minority or women trade organizations or development centers to assist in identifying potential HUBs, with an active HUB certification, of the subcontracting opportunities the respondent intends to subcontract.

Respondents must give minority or women trade organizations or development centers at least seven (7) working days prior to submission of the respondent's response for dissemination of the subcontracting opportunities to their members. A list of minority and women trade organizations is located on the CPA’s website under the Minority and Women Organization link.

Written notification to at least three (3) HUB businesses, with an active HUB certification, of the subcontracting opportunities that the respondent intends to subcontract. The written notice must be sent to potential HUB subcontractors prior to submitting proposals and must include:

o a description of the scope of work to be subcontracted, o information regarding the location to review project plans or specifications, o information about bonding and insurance requirements, o required qualifications and other contract requirements, and o a description of how the subcontractor can contact the respondent.

Respondents must give potential HUB subcontractors a reasonable amount of time to respond to the notice, at least seven (7) working days prior to submission of the respondent's response unless circumstances require a different time period, which is determined by the agency and documented in the contract file;

Respondents must also use the CMBL, the HUB Directory, and Internet resources when searching for HUB subcontractors. Respondents may rely on the services of contractor groups; local, state and federal business assistance offices; and other organizations that provide assistance in identifying qualified applicants for the HUB program.

I.3.6.7 Written Justification of the Selection Process

The Agent will make a determination if a good faith effort was made by the respondent in the development of the required HSP. One or more of the methods identified in the previous sections may be applicable to the respondent’s good faith efforts in developing and submission of the HSP. The Agent may require the respondent to submit additional documentation explaining how the respondent made a good faith effort in accordance with the solicitation.

A respondent must provide written justification of its selection process if it chooses a non-HUB subcontractor. The justification should demonstrate that the respondent negotiated in good faith with qualified HUB bidders, and did not reject qualified HUBs, with an active HUB certification, who were the best value responsive bidders.

I.3.7 Method 4: Respondent Does Not Intend to Subcontract

When the respondent plans to complete all contract requirements with its own equipment, supplies, materials and/or employees, it is still required to complete an HSP.

The respondent must complete the “Self-Performance Justification” portion of the HSP and attest that it does not intend to subcontract for any goods or services, including the class and item codes identified in Section I.3.5. In addition, the respondent must identify the sections of the proposal that describe how it will complete the Scope of Work using its own resources or provide a statement explaining how it will complete the Scope of Work using its own resources. The respondent must agree to comply with the following if requested by the Agent:

Provide evidence of sufficient respondent staffing to meet the Request for Qualifications (RFQ) requirements, Provide monthly payroll records showing the respondent staff fully dedicated to the contract, Allow the Agent to conduct an onsite review of company headquarters or work site where services are to be performed, and, Provide documentation proving employment of qualified personnel holding the necessary licenses and certificates required to perform the Scope of Work.

I.3.8 Post-award HSP Requirements

The HUB Subcontracting Plan (HSP) shall be reviewed and evaluated prior to contract award and, if accepted, the finalized HSP will become part of the contract with the successful respondent(s).

After contract award, the Agent will coordinate a post-award meeting with the successful respondent to discuss HSP reporting requirements. The Consultant must maintain business records documenting compliance with the HSP, and must submit monthly subcontract reports by completing the HUB Monthly Progress Report within the eGrants system and submit a “HUB Subcontracting Plan (HSP) Progress Compliance Form - 2579”. This monthly report is required as a condition for payment to report to TxDOT the identity and the amount paid to all subcontractors.

As a condition of award, the Consultant is required to send notification to all selected subcontractors as identified in the accepted/approved HSP. In addition, a copy of the notification must be provided to the TxDOT Aviation Agent within 10 days of the contract award.

During the term of the contract, if the parties in the contract amend the contract to include a change to the scope of work or add additional funding, the Aviation Agent will evaluate to determine the probability of additional subcontracting opportunities. When applicable, the Consultant must submit an HSP change request for the Aviation Agent’s review. The requirements for an HSP change request will be covered in the post-award meeting.

When making a change to an HSP, the Consultant will obtain prior written approval from the Aviation Agent before making any changes to the HSP. Proposed changes must comply with the HUB Program good faith effort requirements relating to the development and submission of an HSP.

If the Consultant decides to subcontract any part of the contract after the award, it must follow the good faith effort procedures outlined in Section I.3.6 of the original RFQ (e.g., divide work into reasonable lots, notify at least three (3) vendors per subcontracted area, provide written justification of the selection process, or participate in the Mentor Protégé Program).

For this reason, TxDOT encourages respondents to identify, as part of their HSP, multiple subconsultants who are able to perform the work in each area the respondent plans to subcontract. Selecting additional subconsultants may help the selected Consultant make changes to its original HSP, when needed, and will allow the Agent to approve any necessary changes expeditiously.

Failure to meet the HSP and post-award requirements will constitute a breach of contract and will be subject to remedial actions. The Agent may also report noncompliance to the CPA in accordance with the provisions of the Vendor Performance and Debarment Program (see 34 T.A.C. §20.585 relating to Debarment) and (see 34 T.A.C. §20.586 relating to Procedures for Investigations and Debarment) eGrants Workflow:

RFQ Response eGrants Role:

Subgrantee Administrator (SA)

Subgrantee Staff (SS) eGrants link eGrants help:

https://apps2.dot.state.tx.us/apps/egrants2/logout2.aspx eGrants help desk Monday – Friday 8AM – 4PM CD/ST (excluding state/federal holidays) avn-egrantshelp@txdot.gov or 1-800-687-4568

STEP ROLE ACTIONS NOTES

01 SA

Go to View Opportunities.

a. Select Apply Now to the opportunity

b. The RFQ Response Menu is opened

Very important to click on the name of the document and not the organization name.

Make a note of the opportunity due date to ensure you respond in time.

02 SA/SS

Click on View, Edit and Complete Forms

a. Select RFQ Applicant Form

b. Confirm Project information and address

c. Upload RFQ response

PLEASE MAKE SURE YOU SELECT THE

CORRECT PDF FILE BEFORE CHANGING

STATUS.*

d. Hit Save

You should print the proposal document to a PDF so that it becomes un-editable.

03 SA

When you are ready to submit your response, click on "Save and submit to CS review". YOU ARE DONE

You will get an email saying the response was successfully submitted; the status must be changed to RFQ Response in CS Review by the due date and time posted in the solicitation.

04 SA/SS

WAIT UNTIL A SELECTION NOTIFICATION IS

SENT TO YOU

05 SS/SA

AFTER SELECTION NOTIFICATION IS RECEIVED

Log in to view status of response. Once the scores are verified, TxDOT will move the response to an interview, selected or not selected status of which you can log in to see the status of your response.

The selection notification will refer users to eGrants to view the status of their response.

User may also view the TxDOT website for selection information.

Aviation Division

*If the responder posts the incorrect file.

If status has been changed and the due date for the response has not expired, contact the help desk to ask for the status to be administratively changed back to Response in Process.

If the incorrect submission was posted, the incorrect file may be deleted, and the correct one posted as long as the status has not been changed to Response in CS Review. Respondent will need to check the “delete” box and hit save. The page refreshes. Then post the correct submission, save, and change the status.

If you are not set up in eGrants and wish to respond to a posted solicitation, you may contact the aviation help desk for assistance by using the webform available at eGrants Help Desk Form

Some organizations will have many user members. Each organization should determine which user member will submit the completed submission in eGrants. After the opportunity is selected for the organization, it will no longer appear on any other user’s home page unless the initiating user cancels the response.

Decouple Runway 06-24

Reconstruct, Extend, and

Realign Taxiway A

Demolish and Remove Taxiway C

CROSSWIND COMPONENT

RUNWAY 17-35

RUNWAY 06-24

COMBINED COVERAGE

RUNWAY

13 KNOTS

10.5 KNOTS

IFR WIND COVERAGE

PERCENT

89.17%

79.88%

97.25%

ULTIMATEEXISTING

AIRPORT DATA TABLE

2545'

NONE

94°F

B-I

STD W/ REF

NONE

33°12'11.9" N

101°20'17.6" W

MEAN MAX TEMP (Hottest Month °F)

AIRPORT REFERENCE CODE (ARC)

AIRPORT REFERENCE POINT COORDINATES

TAXIWAY LIGHTING

TAXIWAY MARKING

AIRPORT NAVIGATION AIDS

AIRPORT ELEVATION (MSL)

NOTES

ULTIMATE

RUNWAY DATA TABLE

EXISTING

17 35

4200'

4200' X 60'

MIRL

NPI

16 SW

240'

2525'*

VISUAL

NONERUNWAY VISUAL AIDS

APPROACH VISIBILITY MINIMA

TOUCHDOWN ZONE ELEVATION

PAVEMENT DESIGN STRENGTH (1000 lbs.) **

RSA - WIDTH

RSA - LENGTH BEYOND RW END

RUNWAY LENGTH & WIDTH (ft.)

RUNWAY LIGHTING

RUNWAY MARKING

RUNWAY END

TAKE-OFF RUN AVAILABLE (TORA)

TAKE-OFF DISTANCE AVAILABLE (TODA)

ACCELERATE STOP DISTANCE AVAIL. (ASDA)

LANDING DISTANCE AVAILABLE (LDA)

NPI

NONE

240'

120'

400'

200'OFZ - LENGTH BEYOND RW END

OFA WIDTH

OFA - LENGTH BEYOND RW END

400'OFZ WIDTH

RW 17-35

MAXIMUM ELEVATION ABOVE MSL

PERCENT WIND COVERAGE

ASPH

2525'*

APPROACH TYPE

FAR PART 77 APPROACH CATEGORY

RW SURFACE TYPE

FAR PART 77 APPROACH SURFACE SLOPE

0.12%PERCENT EFFECTIVE GRADIENT

20:1

VISUAL

A(V)

B-IRUNWAY ARC

DESIGN AIRCRAFT & ARC CESSNA 525 (BI)

THRESHOLD SITING SURFACE & SLOPE #2 20:1

ULTIMATEEXISTING

06 24

2200' X 60'

MIRL

BASIC

16 SW

2545'*

VISUAL

NONE NONE

ASPH

2545'*

0.83%

20:1

VISUAL

C C

A-I

CESSNA 560 (BII)

RW 06-24

300'

150'

500'

200'

400'

2525'* 2545'*

#2 20:1

VISUAL

#2 20:1

CESSNA 210 (AI)

240'

120'

250'

200'

250'

A(V) A(V) A(V)

4200'

4200' 4200'

4200'

20:1 20:1

2200'

BASIC

VISUAL

#2 20:1

90.78%

B-II

4200' X 60'

MIRL

16 SW

0.12%

ASPH

2525'*

17 35

NPI

2525'*

1 MILE

NONE

NPI

NONE

GPS

#4 20:1

2525'*

1 MILE

GPS

#4 20:1

4200'

34:1

4200'

4200' 4200'

4200'

34:1

06 24

1843' X 60'

MIRL

BASIC

16 SW

2545'*

VISUAL

NONE NONE

ASPH

2531'*

1.03%

78.51%

20:1

VISUAL

A-I

2545'*

#2 20:1

PILATUS PC-12 (AI)

240'

120'

250'

200'

250'

A(V) A(V)

20:1

BASIC

VISUAL

#2 20:1

2545'

NONE

94°F

B-II

STD W/ REF

NONE

JUNE 2025

POST, TEXAS (5F1)

POST-GARZA COUNTY AIRPORT

SHALEE DANE, E.I.T.

DATE

Aviation Division

DRAWN BY

PREPARED BY:

SHEET OF

DAN HARMON, DIRECTOR, AVIATION DIVISION SIGNATUREDATE DATE

TITLE, AIRPORT SPONSOR'S REPRESENTATIVE

CURRENT AND FUTURE DEVELOPMENT DEPICTED ON

THIS ALP IS APPROVED AND SUPPORTED BY AIRPORT

SPONSOR

SPONSOR ACKNOWLEDGES APPROVAL OF ALP BY TXDOT

DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A COMMITMENT TO FUNDING.

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

AVIATION DIVISION AIRPORT SPONSOR

JUNE 2025SHALEE DANE, E.I.T.

MARK HABERER, PE, CM

MHABERER@PARKHILL.COM

(806) 473-3600

DATEDESCRIPTION

1 07/2013 Airport Layout Drawing

2 06/2025 Airport Layout Drawing Update

AIRPORT LAYOUT DRAWING

0 300' 600'

ULTIMATE

ALD LEGEND

EXISTING

AWOS

AIRFIELD PAVEMENT TO BE REMOVED

PROPERTY LINE W/ 8' TALL GAME FENCE AIRFIELD PAVEMENT

HOLD POSITION MARKING AND SIGN

WIND CONE & SEGMENTED CIRCLE

AIRPORT REFERENCE POINT

THRESHOLD LIGHTS

BODY OF WATER

RUNWAY/TAXIWAY OUTLINE

BUILDING/FACILITIES

FEATURE ULTIMATEEXISTINGFEATURE

TERMINAL BUILDING1

DESCRIPTION

BUILDING TABLE

2 HANGAR

3 MAINTENANCE SHED

HANGAR

T-HANGAR

HANGAR

T-HANGAR

UNKNOWN

BUILDING

NUMBER

TOP

ELEVATION

UNKNOWN

T-HANGAR

HANGAR

UNKNOWNHANGAR

UNKNOWNFUELING SYSTEM

DESCRIPTIONBUILDING

NUMBER

TOP

ELEVATION

AIRFIELD MARKINGS

PROPERTY LINE

RUNWAY PROTECTION ZONE (RPZ)

PROPERTY EASEMENT

PART 77 APPROACH SURFACE

PT77

ESM

ESMT

ESM

ESMT

ESM

ESMT

PLxxPLxxPLxxPLxxPLxxPLxxPLxxPLxxPLxxPLxxPLxxPLxxPLxxPLxx

PLxx PLxx PLxx PLxx PLxx PLxx PLxx PLxx PLxx PLxx

PLxx PLxx

PLxx

P (U)L

P (U

L P (U

P (U) L

P (U

L P (U

P (U)L

P (U

P (U) L

P (U)L

P (U

P (U)L

P (U

ESMT

ESM

ESMT

RPZx

PT77x

PT77x PT77x

RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA RSA

RSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSA

TWY A

TWY C

RPZx RPZx

x R

RPZx RPZx

x R

TSS(U)

TSS

TSS(U)

TSS

XXXXXXXX

XXXXXX

PLPLPLPLPLPL

P L

PLPL

XXXXX

X X X

TLOFATLOFATLOFATLOFATLOFATLOFA

TLOFA

TLOFATLOFATLOFATLOFATLOFATLOFA

OFA

TOFA

TSATSATSATSATSATSATSATSA

TSA

TSATSATSATSATSATSATSATSA

TSA

TSATSATSATSA

TSA

TSATSATSA

TSA

TSA TSA TSA TSA

TSA

ROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFA

R O

ROFA ROFA ROFA ROFA ROFA ROFA ROFA ROFA ROFA ROFA ROFA ROFA ROFA ROFA ROFA ROFA ROFA ROFA ROFA ROFA ROFA ROFA ROFA ROFA ROFA ROFA ROFA ROFA ROFA ROFA ROFA ROFA ROFA ROFA ROFA ROFA ROFA ROFA ROFA ROFA ROFA ROFA ROFA ROFA ROFA ROFA ROFA ROFA ROFA ROFA ROFA

R O

ROFA

RVZx RVZx

RVZx

xRVZx RVZx

RVZx

RVZ

RVZRVZRVZRVZRVZRVZ

x R

RPZx

x R

RPZx

RPZ

TSS(U

TSS(U)

RSA

ROADWAY PAVEMENT

RUNWAY SAFETY AREA

RUNWAY OBJECT FREE AREA

25'

175'

240'

125'

135'

5 6

14 15

17 18

ROAD SHOULD

ULTIMATELY BE

REMOVED FROM RPZ

EX AND ULT RPZ

500 X 700 X 1000'

RELOCATED HOLD FOR B-II

200' FROM RW CENTERLINE

ROAD SHOULD ULTIMATELY

BE REMOVED FROM RPZ

EX AND ULT RPZ

250' X 450' X 1000'

EX AND ULT RPZ

500' X 700' X 1000'

ROAD SHOULD

ULTIMATELY BE

REMOVED FROM RPZ

EX AND ULT RPZ

250' X 450' X 1000'

35'

356.20'

ELECTRICAL VAULT

DATUM COORDINATE SYSTEMS - HORIZONTAL DATUM NAD 1983 State Plane Texas North 4201 Feet, VERTICAL DATUM NAVD88.

NO KNOWN OFZ OBJECT PENETRATIONS

NO SURVEY WAS COMPLETED DURING PREPARATION OF THIS DRAWING.

COORDINATES AND ELEVATIONS FROM NFDC DATA SHEET. A GIS SURVEY IS

REQUIRED FOR THE INDICATED NEW INSTRUMENT APPROACHES TO RW 17-35.

1 1

WIND DATA: LUBBOCK 2024

MAGNETIC DECLINATION 14-MAY-25

5.22°E, CHANGING 0.08°W PER YEAR

EX AND ULT 4200' X 60' TRUE AZIMUTH 180.09°

* ELEVATIONS ARE ESTIMATES, NO SURVEY DATA AVAILABLE

** PAVEMENT STRENGTH NOT VERIFIED BY PARKHILL

TAXIWAY LIGHTS

RUNWAY LIGHTS

FENCE

ROFA

RSA

TAXIWAY SAFETY AREA TSA

TAXIWAY OBJECT FREE AREA TOFA

TAXILANE OBJECT FREE AREA TLOFA

PT77

DISPLACED THRESHOLD

LAT: N033°12'05.20"

LONG: W101°20'18.56"

ELEV: 2528'

RUNWAY END COORDINATES AND ELEVATIONS

EXISTING ELEVATION

END OF RWY 17

RUNWAY END

2525'101°20'13.30" W33°12'37.26" N

END OF RWY 35 2517'101°20'13.37" W33°11'55.69" N

2545'101°20'37.86" W33°11'59.60" N

2523'101°20'13.28" W33°12'06.77" N

END OF RWY 06

END OF RWY 24

101°20'13.30" W33°12'37.26" N

101°20'13.37" W33°11'55.69" N

101°20'37.86" W33°11'59.60" N

101°20'16.99" W33°12'05.71" N

2525'

2517'

2545'

2526'

THRESHOLD SITING SURFACE

GAME FENCE

136.23'

381.54'

NO-TAXI ISLAND

GA - LOCALNPIAS SERVICE LEVEL GA - LOCAL

PAPI

ULTIMATE

TAXIWAY DATA TABLE

EXISTING

25'

89'

49'

240'

TAXIWAY & TAXILANE SAFETY AREA

TAXILANE CL TO FIXED OR MOVEABLE OBJECT

TAXIWAY & TAXILANE WIDTH

TAXIWAY OBJECT FREE AREA

TAXILANE CL TO PARALLEL TAXILANE CL

TAXIWAY CL TO PARALLEL TAXIWAY CL

39.5'

44.5'TAXIWAY CL TO FIXED OR MOVEABLE OBJECT

79'TAXILANE OBJECT FREE AREA

70'

1ATAXIWAY DESIGN GROUP

300'

101.5'

35'

124'

79''

110'

55'

62'

ELEVATIONULTIMATE

FEATURE

APPROXIMATE RUNWAY

06-24 HIGH POINT

ELEV: 2545'

APPROXIMATE RUNWAY

17-35 HIGH POINT

ELEV: 2525'

RUNWAY VISIBILITY ZONE

EX 2200' X 60'

ULT 1843' X 60'

TRUE AZIMUTH 70.86°

CROSSWIND COMPONENT

RUNWAY 17-35

RUNWAY 06-24

COMBINED COVERAGE

RUNWAY

13 KNOTS

10.5 KNOTS

ALL WEATHER WIND COVERAGE

PERCENT

90.78%

78.51%

97.72%

1683'***

1706'****

RVZ

1683'***

1843'

1843'2200'

2200'

83.86% 78.51%

33°12'12.26" N

101°20'17.63" W

*** 06 TODA AND TORA ARE BASED ON 40:1 DEPARTURE SURFACE CLEARANCE OF 17.2' TAIL HEIGHT FOR AIRCRAFT

TAXIING ON 17-35.

**** 24 LDA IS BASED ON 20:1 APPROACH SURFACE CLEARANCE ON 17.2' TAIL HEIGHT FOR AIRCRAFT TAXIING ON 17-35

SCALE 1" = 300'

AutoCAD SHX Text PT77x

AutoCAD SHX Text RPZx

AutoCAD SHX Text ROFAx

AutoCAD SHX Text RSAx

AutoCAD SHX Text TSAx

AutoCAD SHX Text TOFAx

AutoCAD SHX Text TLOFAx

AutoCAD SHX Text

RPZ

AutoCAD SHX Text

TSS

AutoCAD SHX Text

TSS(U)

AutoCAD SHX Text

NNE

AutoCAD SHX Text

ENE

AutoCAD SHX Text

AutoCAD SHX Text E

AutoCAD SHX Text

ESE

AutoCAD SHX Text

SSE

AutoCAD SHX Text

AutoCAD SHX Text S

AutoCAD SHX Text

SSW

AutoCAD SHX Text

WSW

AutoCAD SHX Text

AutoCAD SHX Text W

AutoCAD SHX Text

WNW

AutoCAD SHX Text

NNW

AutoCAD SHX Text

AutoCAD SHX Text N

AutoCAD SHX Text

KNOTS

AutoCAD SHX Text

WIND COVERAGE:

AutoCAD SHX Text 56.6

AutoCAD SHX Text .8

AutoCAD SHX Text .9

AutoCAD SHX Text .8

AutoCAD SHX Text .7

AutoCAD SHX Text .5

AutoCAD SHX Text .4

AutoCAD SHX Text .6

AutoCAD SHX Text .7

AutoCAD SHX Text 1.0

AutoCAD SHX Text 1.2

AutoCAD SHX Text 1.6

AutoCAD SHX Text 2.1

AutoCAD SHX Text 1.9

AutoCAD SHX Text 2.1

AutoCAD SHX Text 1.7

AutoCAD SHX Text 1.6

AutoCAD SHX Text 1.1

AutoCAD SHX Text .8

AutoCAD SHX Text .6

AutoCAD SHX Text .5

AutoCAD SHX Text .4

AutoCAD SHX Text .3

AutoCAD SHX Text .2

AutoCAD SHX Text .3

AutoCAD SHX Text .4

AutoCAD SHX Text .5

AutoCAD SHX Text .7

AutoCAD SHX Text .4

AutoCAD SHX Text .3

AutoCAD SHX Text .2

AutoCAD SHX Text .1

AutoCAD SHX Text .2

AutoCAD SHX Text .3

AutoCAD SHX Text .4

AutoCAD SHX Text .5

AutoCAD SHX Text .8

AutoCAD SHX Text .6

AutoCAD SHX Text .7

AutoCAD SHX Text .5

AutoCAD SHX Text .3

AutoCAD SHX Text .2

AutoCAD SHX Text .1

AutoCAD SHX Text .2

AutoCAD SHX Text .3

AutoCAD SHX Text .1

AutoCAD SHX Text

AutoCAD SHX Text .1

AutoCAD SHX Text

AutoCAD SHX Text .1

AutoCAD SHX Text

AutoCAD SHX Text .1

AutoCAD SHX Text

AutoCAD SHX Text .1

AutoCAD SHX Text

97.72 %

AutoCAD SHX Text

ALL WEATHER

AutoCAD SHX Text

NNE

AutoCAD SHX Text

ENE

AutoCAD SHX Text

AutoCAD SHX Text E

AutoCAD SHX Text

ESE

AutoCAD SHX Text

SSE

AutoCAD SHX Text

AutoCAD SHX Text S

AutoCAD SHX Text

SSW

AutoCAD SHX Text

WSW

AutoCAD SHX Text

AutoCAD SHX Text W

AutoCAD SHX Text

WNW

AutoCAD SHX Text

NNW

AutoCAD SHX Text

AutoCAD SHX Text N

AutoCAD SHX Text

KNOTS

AutoCAD SHX Text

IFR WIND COVERAGE:

AutoCAD SHX Text 54.4

AutoCAD SHX Text 1.8

AutoCAD SHX Text 1.9

AutoCAD SHX Text 2.0

AutoCAD SHX Text 2.3

AutoCAD SHX Text 2.0

AutoCAD SHX Text 1.8

AutoCAD SHX Text 1.1

AutoCAD SHX Text 1.0

AutoCAD SHX Text .8

AutoCAD SHX Text 1.4

AutoCAD SHX Text 1.5

AutoCAD SHX Text 1.6

AutoCAD SHX Text 1.4

AutoCAD SHX Text 1.2

AutoCAD SHX Text .9

AutoCAD SHX Text .7

AutoCAD SHX Text .9

AutoCAD SHX Text 1.0

AutoCAD SHX Text .9

AutoCAD SHX Text .8

AutoCAD SHX Text 1.0

AutoCAD SHX Text .5

AutoCAD SHX Text .3

AutoCAD SHX Text .2

AutoCAD SHX Text .1

AutoCAD SHX Text .2

AutoCAD SHX Text .5

AutoCAD SHX Text 1.0

AutoCAD SHX Text .9

AutoCAD SHX Text .6

AutoCAD SHX Text 1.1

AutoCAD SHX Text 1.0

AutoCAD SHX Text .7

AutoCAD SHX Text .2

AutoCAD SHX Text .1

AutoCAD SHX Text

AutoCAD SHX Text .2

AutoCAD SHX Text .1

AutoCAD SHX Text .3

AutoCAD SHX Text .2

AutoCAD SHX Text .4

AutoCAD SHX Text .1

AutoCAD SHX Text

AutoCAD SHX Text .1

AutoCAD SHX Text

AutoCAD SHX Text .1

AutoCAD SHX Text

AutoCAD SHX Text .2

AutoCAD SHX Text .5

AutoCAD SHX Text .1

AutoCAD SHX Text .2

AutoCAD SHX Text .1

AutoCAD SHX Text

AutoCAD SHX Text .1

AutoCAD SHX Text

AutoCAD SHX Text .1

AutoCAD SHX Text

AutoCAD SHX Text .1

AutoCAD SHX Text

AutoCAD SHX Text .1

AutoCAD SHX Text

AutoCAD SHX Text .1

AutoCAD SHX Text

AutoCAD SHX Text .1

AutoCAD SHX Text

AutoCAD SHX Text .1

AutoCAD SHX Text

AutoCAD SHX Text .2

AutoCAD SHX Text

AutoCAD SHX Text .1

AutoCAD SHX Text

AutoCAD SHX Text .1

AutoCAD SHX Text .2

AutoCAD SHX Text .1

AutoCAD SHX Text

AutoCAD SHX Text .1

AutoCAD SHX Text .2

AutoCAD SHX Text .1

AutoCAD SHX Text

97.25 %

AutoCAD SHX Text

AutoCAD SHX Text RVZx

841835_346754_1-ProjectExhibit-DecouplingDepicted.pdf

Slide 1

841835_346752-5F1-ALD.pdf

Sheets and Views

ANSI D PDF

2.2 Pre-Bid HUB Subcontracting Plan Overview-FEB2019_Sponsor Version for Reimbursable.pdf

ANNUAL Hub Training – Procurement phase

Slide Number 2

Subcontracting determination and solicitation review

Introduction

Purpose

Types of Solicitations Eligible for HUB Review

Subcontracting Determination & Solicitation Review

Slide Number 32

Completing the hsp

Slide Number 34

Slide Number 35

Slide Number 36

Slide Number 37

Slide Number 38

Slide Number 39

Slide Number 40

Slide Number 41

Slide Number 42

Slide Number 43

Slide Number 44

Slide Number 45

Slide Number 46

Slide Number 47

Slide Number 48

Slide Number 49

Slide Number 50

Slide Number 51

Slide Number 52

Slide Number 53

Slide Number 54

Slide Number 55

Slide Number 56

Conducting an �HSP Review

Purpose

HSP Review

Request for Clarification of HSP

Slide Number 119

ProjectExhibit-DecouplingDepicted revision 10-08-25.pdf

Slide 1

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated Oct 23, 2025.