rfq24algrahm00068.pdf

TABLE OF CONTENTS

GRAHAM MUNICIPAL AIRPORT

TXDOT SOLICITATION NO.: RFQ24ALGRAHM-00068

1. REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS ANNOUNCEMENT

2. EVALUATION CRITERIA

3. INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESPONDING TO A SOLICITATION IN EGRANTS

4. AIRPORT LAYOUT PLAN

TxDOT Solicitation No.: RFQ-24ALGRAHM-00068 TxDOT CSJ/Project No.: 24ALGRAHM

Texas Department of Transportation Aviation Division

Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for Professional Services

The City of Graham through its agent, the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT), intends to engage a qualified firm for services. This solicitation is subject to 49 U.S.C.

§47107(a)(17) and will be administered in the same manner as a solicitation conducted under Chapter 2254, Subchapter A, of the Texas Government Code. TxDOT Aviation Division will solicit and receive qualification statements for professional services as described below:

Airport Sponsor: City of Graham, Graham Municipal Airport; TxDOT CSJ/Project No.:

24ALGRAHM. The TxDOT Project Manager is Dakota Shaw.

Scope: Airport Layout Plan with Narrative Report and Drainage Study

1. Prepare an ALP with Narrative consistent with the most current FAA Advisory Circulars and Standard Operating Procedures, to include the following sheets:

a. Coversheet

b. Airport layout drawing

c. Data sheet

d. Terminal area plan

e. Airport airspace drawing

f. Inner portion of the approach surface drawing

g. On-airport land use drawing

h. Off-airport land use drawing

i. Airport property map (Exhibit A)

j. Runway departure surface drawing

k. Utility drawing

l. Airport access plans

m. Other sheets as necessary

2. Incorporate FAA AGIS requirements and data collection as needed, including an - 18B obstruction survey, and upload data to the FAA’s Airport Data and Information Portal.

3. Develop a Capital Improvement Plan, including a recommended phasing plan and financial overview that considers local, state, federal, and alternative funding sources.

4. Establish phased, attainable goals for airport improvements and development based on a forecast for aviation demand and current and future critical aircraft.

5. Consider the emergence of Unmanned Aircraft Systems and Advanced Air

Mobility and incorporate any planning in the narrative, to include vertiport siting.

6. Develop and adopt into local zoning airport height hazard protection and airport land use compatibility measures, including associated maps, to ensure the protection of the public investment in the airport.

7. Per FAA SOP 8.00, review any existing RSA determinations and update as needed or complete a determination for any runway that does not have one. If an RSA study is needed, that study will be conducted as part of this planning effort. A list of follow-on projects or studies will be a deliverable of this task.

8. Drainage Study.

The Agent, in accordance with the provisions of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (78 Stat. 252, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000d to 2000d-4) and the Regulations, hereby notifies all respondents that it will affirmatively ensure that for any contract entered into pursuant to this advertisement, disadvantaged business enterprises will be afforded full and fair opportunity to submit in response to this solicitation and will not be discriminated against on the grounds of race, color, or national origin in consideration for an award.

The proposed contract is subject to 49 CFR Part 26 concerning the participation of Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (DBE).

The DBE goal is set at 0%.

To assist in your qualification statement preparation, the criteria and most recent Airport Layout Plan are available online at http://www.dot.state.tx.us/avn/avninfo/notice/consult/index.html by selecting “Graham Municipal Airport”.

Response Procedure:

The successful firm will be selected on the basis of a Response. A prime provider may only submit one Response. If a prime provider submits more than one Response, that prime provider will be deemed non-responsive. The Response must contain the required information, and should address the recommended information, as listed below. Response submissions will be scored accordingly. If the Response is non-compliant with any of the following requirements, the Response may be deemed non-responsive.

http://www.dot.state.tx.us/avn/avninfo/notice/consult/index.htm

1. Qualifications Statement (QS) – The QS shall contain no more than nine 8.5x11-inch single-sided pages.

a. QS Format:

i. Readability – The submitter has latitude in formatting the QS for visual effectiveness. Graphics, tables, photos, and other visual aids are permitted within the nine allotted pages, except that Quick Response (QR) codes or other external link(s) are not permitted. There is no specific font, font size, color, or other formatting requirements, although a font size smaller than 10 is not recommended. Selection committee members may consider legibility and readability when scoring.

Unreadable text will not be considered and may cause the QS to be deemed non-responsive. It is the submitter’s responsibility to provide a legible, readable document.

b. QS Content - It is recommended the QS include:

i. The RFQ number, airport name, name of firm, firm address, email address, telephone number and contact information for key personnel. The response shall also identify each proposed project team member, each proposed member’s time commitment to this project as a percentage of their total work week, and whether the proposed member is an employee of the responding firm or a sub-contractor to that firm.

c. QS Content – For scoring purposes, the QS must include:

i. Information showing the firm’s project understanding and technical approach, including similar project-related experience of the project manager and each task leader responsible for a major work category. For each project referenced, identify either the project manager’s or the task leader’s specific role(s) and work contributed.

ii. In addition to individual project-related experience of the project manager and task leaders required under (ii), list no more than ten relevant projects performed by the responding firm within the last 10 years. This shall include airport name, location, phone number, and airport contact person’s name, title, and phone number. It shall also include the original project completion time estimate vs. the actual completion time for the cited project, as well as a brief narrative description of the project and whether or not your firm served as the prime or the sub on each project cited.

iii. The proposed team must demonstrate that a Licensed Professional Engineer registered in Texas will draft, sign, and seal the drainage study component.

iv. Proposed Project Schedule: Indicate the number of weeks necessary to complete the project in accordance with “Proposed Project Schedule” information below.

The Response must be submitted in eGrants following the Submission Procedures at the end of this notice.

Proposed Project Schedule

Based on the published project scope and your technical approach, indicate below the number of weeks necessary for each phase and total time to complete the project.

Some of the basic responsibilities within each planning phase are included for reference. Do not include review time. Assume, however, that your work will require some revision after review, and that the time required to address these comments should be included within your schedule. If time is required for specialized studies, indicate the additional time.

NOTE: This proposed schedule will set the basis for the contract deadlines in the professional services agreement if your firm is selected.

Kick-Off; Establish Goals and Strategic Plan o Conduct target market and SWOT analysis; establish objectives o Strategic vision – Airport vision, mission, and value statements o Create public outreach program with digital component

Phase I: Airport Role and Planning Standards o Update aviation demand forecasts – based aircraft and operations o Determine current and future critical design aircraft o Airfield design and landside hangar/business market assessment

Phase II: Airport Facility and Land Use Alternatives o Evaluate highest and best uses of airport property o Develop airside and landside facility requirements/alternatives o RSA Evaluations

Phase III: Development Plan, CIP, ALP, HHZ, Etc.

o Recommend concept plan and CIP for short- and long-term periods o Height/hazard and land use compatibility o Update Airport Layout Plan (ALP), Final Documents, and Meetings

Additional Item o Drainage Study

EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR AIRPORT PLANNING AND DRAINAGE STUDY

QUALIFICATIONS

1. Capability to perform all of the services required for this project and professional qualifications of key personnel assigned to this project relevant to the work to be performed. (25 points)

Does the consultant have the necessary resources to perform all of the services required (e.g.: planning, surveying, CAD, etc.)? Who are the professionals that will be working on this project on a daily basis and how do their qualifications and experience with general aviation airport planning and drainage study projects compare with other respondents?

2. Recent experience, within the last ten years, in the development of airport plans and drainage studies comparable to the proposed project. (25 points)

Does the consultant have direct experience developing general aviation airport plans and drainage studies similar to those proposed for this location?

3. Ability to meet the schedules and deadlines of this project and reputation for competence, timeliness, and quality of performance and work product. (25 points)

Does the proposed planning and engineering team have sufficient time to devote to this project in order to meet the schedule submitted in the qualifications? Is the proposed schedule realistic? Does the consultant consistently meet contractual timetables?

Has the work performed for other airports been satisfactory?

4. Proposed Technical Approach and Schedule to Accomplish the Project. (25 points)

Does the consultant show specific understanding and familiarity with the particular requirements of this project and how to address them? Is the consultant familiar with relevant planning and engineering? Is the schedule appropriate to accomplish the project?

Submission Procedure

The Response must be received in the TxDOT Aviation eGrants system no later than August 20, 2024 2:00 p.m. (CST).

Firms that wish to submit a response to this solicitation must be a user in the TxDOT Aviation eGrants system no later than one business day before the solicitation due date. To request access to eGrants, please complete the Contact Us web form located at http://txdot.gov/government/funding/egrants-2016/aviation.html http://txdot.gov/government/funding/egrants-2016/aviation.html

The consultant selection committee will be composed of local governmental representatives. The final selection by the committee will generally be made following the completion of review of responses. The committee will review all submissions responses and rate and rank each. The evaluation criteria for airport planning projects can be found at http://www.txdot.gov/inside-txdot/division/aviation/projects.html under Information for Consultants. All firms will be notified, and the top-rated firm will be contacted to begin fee negotiations. The selection committee does, however, reserve the right to conduct interviews for the top-rated firms if the committee deems it necessary. If interviews are conducted, selection will be made following interviews.

Please contact TxDOT Aviation for any technical or procedural questions at (800)68- PILOT (74568). For procedural questions, please contact Noemi Rios, Contract Specialist.

For technical questions please contact Dakota Shaw, Project Manager.

For questions regarding responding to this solicitation in eGrants, please contact the TxDOT Aviation help desk at 1-800-687-4568 or avn-egrantshelp@txdot.gov http://www.txdot.gov/inside-txdot/division/aviation/projects.html mailto:avn-egrantshelp@txdot.gov eGrants Workflow:

RFQ Response eGrants Role:

Subgrantee Administrator (SA)

Subgrantee Staff (SS) eGrants link eGrants help:

https://apps2.dot.state.tx.us/apps/egrants2/logout2.aspx eGrants help desk Monday – Friday 8AM – 4PM CD/ST (excluding state/federal holidays) avn-egrantshelp@txdot.gov or 1-800-687-4568

STEP ROLE ACTIONS NOTES

SA

Go to View Opportunities.

a. Select Apply Now to the opportunity

b. The RFQ Response Menu is opened

Very important to click on the name of the document and not the organization name

Make a note of the opportunity due date to ensure you respond in time

SA/SS

Click on View, Edit and Complete Forms

a. Select RFQ Applicant Form

b. Confirm Project information and address

c. Upload RFQ response

PLEASE MAKE SURE YOU SELECT THE

CORRECT PDF FILE BEFORE CHANGING

STATUS.*

d. Hit Save

You should print the proposal document to a PDF so that it becomes un-editable.

SA

When you are ready to submit your response, click on "Save and submit to CS review". YOU ARE DONE

You will get an email saying the response was successfully submitted; the status must be changed to RFQ Response in CS Review by the due date and time posted in the solicitation.

04 SA/SS WAIT UNTIL A SELECTION NOTIFICATION IS

SENT TO YOU

SS/SA

AFTER SELECTION NOTIFICATION IS RECEIVED

Log in to view status of response. Once the scores are verified, TxDOT will move the response to an interview, selected or not selected status of which you can log in to see the status of your response.

The selection notification will refer users to eGrants to view the status of their response.

User may also view the TxDOT website for selection information.

https://apps2.dot.state.tx.us/apps/egrants2/logo

*If the responder posts the incorrect file.

• If status has been changed and the due date for the response has not expired, contact the help desk to ask for the status to be administratively changed back to Response in Process.

• If the incorrect submission was posted, the incorrect file may be deleted and the correct one posted as long as the status has not been changed to Response in CS Review. Respondent will need to check the “delete” box and hit save. The page refreshes. Then post the correct submission, save, and change the status.

If you are not set up in eGrants and wish to respond to a posted solicitation, you may contact the aviation help desk for assistance by using the webform available at eGrants Help Desk Form

Some organizations will have many user members. Each organization should determine which user member will submit the completed submission in eGrants. After the opportunity is selected for the organization, it will no longer appear on any other user’s home page unless the initiating user cancels the response.

https://form.jotform.com/62164883455160

RUNWAY END COORDINATES AND ELEVATIONS

RUNWAY END LATITIJDE LONGITIJDE ELEVATION

EXISTING END OF RWY 03 33'06'20.5515" N 98'33'34.6569" w 1113.6'

EXISTING END OF RWY 21 33'06'58.6568" N 98'32'57.1732" w 1114.2'

EXISTING END OF RWY 18 33'06'53.5000" N 98'33'18.2210" w 1103.9'

DISPLACED THRESHOLD RWY 18 33'06'47.1810" N 98'33'18.5707" w 1105.7'

EXISTING END OF RWY 36 33'06'20. 7210" N 98'33'20.0280" w 1122.8'

WIND COVERAGE

RUNWAY

RUNWAY 33-21

RUNWAY 18-36

COMBINED COVERAGE

CROSSWIND COMPONENT PERCENT

13 KNOTS

10.5 KNOTS

l'.1ND DATA: l'.1CHITA FALLS 1997-2006

89.413

91.673

95. 733

EX AND ULT APPROACH RPZ

250 x 450 x 1 ooo·

AIRPORT DATA TABLE

EXISTING ULllMAlE

AIRPORT ELEVATION (MSL) 1123.0' 1123.0'

AIRPORT NAVIGATION AIDS GPS GPS

MEAN MAX TEMP (Hottest Month 'F) 97'F 97'F

AIRPORT REFERENCE CODE (ARC) 8-11 8-11

TAXIWAY MARKING STD W/ilREF STD W/ilREF

TAXIWAY LIGHTING NONE NONE

33'06'38.6" N 33'06'38.6" N

AIRPORT REFERENCE POINT COORDINATES

98'33'17.2" w 98'33'17.2" w

NOlES

DATUM COORDINATE SYSTEMS - HORIZONTAL DATUM NAO 1983 Stote Plane Texas North Central 4202 Feet, VERTICAL DA TUM NAVD88.

NO KNOWN OFZ OBJECT PENETRATIONS

CAUTION ZONE LIGHTS ARE INCLUDED IN THE RUNWAY LIGHTING.

NO SURVEY WAS COMPLETED DURING PREPARATION OF THIS DRAWING. NO INNER

PORTION OF THE APPROACH SURFACE DRAl'.1NGS ARE INCLUDED BECAUSE THERE

IS NO OBSTRUCTION DATA.

FAA STUDY NUMBER 2014-ASW- 7663-NRA

BUILDING TABLE

BUILDING DESCRIPTION TOP

NUMBER ELEVATION

1 TERMINAL 1126.3'

2 FUEL TANKS 1114.9' RUNWAY ARC

3 HANGAR 1132.2' DESIGN AIRCRAFT & ARC

4 HANGAR 1143.4' BALANCED FIELD LENGTH

5 HANGAR UNKNOWN RUNWAY LENGTH & l'.1DTH (ft.)

6 HANGAR UNKNOWN PAVEMENT DESIGN STRENGTH (1000 lbs.)

7 HANGAR UNKNOWN RUNWAY LIGHTING

8 HANGAR 1128.5' PERCENT EFFECTIVE GRADIENT

9 HANGAR UNKNOWN PERCENT WIND COVIERAGE

10 HANGAR UNKNOWN MAXIMUM ELEVATION ABOVIE MSL

11 - o· RW SURF ACE TYPE 12 - o· RSA - LENGTH BEYOND RW END

13 - o· RSA - WIDTH 14 - o' OF A - LENGTH BEYOND RW END

15 - o· OFA WIDTH 16 - o' OFZ - LENGTH BEYOND RW END 17 - o· OFZ WIDTH 18 - o'

RUNWAY END

19 - o·

APPROACH TYPE

20 - a·

APPROACH VISIBILITY MINIMA

THRESHOLD SITING SURFACE & SLOPE

RUNWAY MARKING

RUNWAY VISUAL AIDS

TOUCHDOWN ZONE ELEVATION

FAR PART 77 APPROACH CATEGORY

FAR PART 77 APPROACH SURFACE SLOPE

TAKE-OFF RUN AVAILABLE (TORA)

TAKE-OFF DISTANCE AVAILABLE (TODA)

ACCELERATE STOP DISTANCE AVAIL. (ASDA)

LANDING DISTANCE AVAILABLE (LOA)

RUNWAY DATA TABLE

RW 03-21

EXISTING ULTIMAlE

B-11 B-11

BEECH B90 (Bil) BEECH B90 (Bil)

2500' 2500'

5000' x 75' 5000' x 75'

12 SW 12 SW

MIRL MIRL

0.03 0.0%

89.413 13 kts 89.41% 13 kts

1115.7' 1115. 7'

ASPH ASPH

300' 300'

150' 150'

300' 300'

500' 500'

200' 200'

400' 400'

03 21 03 21

GPS GPS GPS. GPS

1 MILE 1 MILE 1 MILE 1 MILE

#5 20: 1 #5 20: 1 #5 20: 1 #5 20: 1

NPI NPI NPI NPI

NONE PAPI NONE PAPI

1115.7' 1114.4' 1115.7' 1114.4' c c c c 34: 1 34: 1 34:1 34:1

5000' 5000' 5000' 5000'

5000' 5000' 5000' 5000'

5000' 5000' 5000' 5000'

5000' 5000' 5000' 5000'

RW 18-36

EXISTING ULTIMAlE

A-I A-I

Socato TBM 700 (Al) Socato TBM 700 (Al)

2132' 2132'

3317' x 50' 3317' x 50'

8 SW 8 SW

NONE NONE

0.63 0.63

91.67% 91.673

1123.0' 1123.0'

ASPH ASPH

240' 240'

120' 120'

240' 240'

250' 250'

200' 200'

250' 250'

18 36 18 36

VISUAL VISUAL VISUAL VISUAL

VISUAL VISUAL VISUAL VISUAL

#2 20: 1 #2 20: 1 #2 20: 1 #2 20: 1

BASIC BASIC BASIC BASIC

NONE NONE NONE NONE

1123.8' 1122.8' 1123.8' 1122.8'

A(V) A(V) A(V) A(V)

20:1 20: 1 20: 1 20: 1

3317' 3317' 3317' 3317'

3317' 3317' 3317' 3317'

3317' 3317' 3317' 3317'

2678' 3317' 2678' 3317'

0 300 600 900

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

AVIATION DIVISION

ALP APPROVED ACCORDING TO FAA AC 150/5300-13A

PLUS THE REQUIREMENTS OF A FAVORABLE

ENVIRONMENTAL FINDING AND FAA NRA STUDY PRIOR

TO THE START OF ANY LAND ACQUISITION OR

CONSTRUCTION ON AIRPORT PROPERTY.

COPYRIGHT 2014 TXDOT AVIATION DIVISION, ALL RIGHTS

RESERVED.

C)

MAGNE nc DECLINATION 1-JAN-14:

4'42'29"E, CHANGING 7.5' W PER YEAR

TxOOT master plans and ALPs do not consider cost, feasibility. practicality, or physico! constraints and may be impossible to build.

AIRPORT SPONSOR

CURRENT AND FUTURE DEVELQPMENT DEPICTED ON

THIS ALP IS APPROVED AND SUPPORTED BY

AIRPORT SPONSOR

SPONSOR ACKNOWLEDGES APPROVAL OF ALP BY

TXDOT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A COMMITMENT TO

FUNDING.

~~0~· ~S:'....'....:::, ~:t:==_~2e...LUL£.C>«(L_!.? ~JI Ck DAVlO FULTON, DIRECTOR, AVIATION DIVISION DATE SIGNAlURE

TITLE, AIRPORT SPONSOR'S REPRESENTATIVE

PREPARED BY:

TXDOT AVIATION DIV. KS

DESIGNED SY

KS

ORA'llN BY

AIRPORT LAYOUT DRAWING

GRAHAM MUNICIPAL

GRAHAM, TEXAS

AIRPORT

(RPH)

SEP 2014

DAlf:

SEP 2014

DAlf:

SHEET 1 OF 1