rfq2407rsprg00073.pdf

PDF 4 MB Posted

Attached to
TxDOT Aviation Division- Notice to Consultants
Solicitation number
RFQ2407RSPRG00073
Issued by
Edwards County, Texas

About this file

This document is a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) issued by the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) Aviation Division on behalf of Edwards County. TxDOT is seeking to engage a qualified firm for professional engineering services to reconstruct and widen the runway, reconstruct the apron and connector taxiway, install lighting and signage, and other related improvements at the Edwards County Airport. The current project scope is detailed, and the response should address the technical approach for this work. Responses are due by July 30, 2024 at 2:00 pm CST and will be evaluated based on criteria such as the project team's experience, technical approach, design schedule, and construction management experience. TxDOT has identified potential future work items such as apron expansion and wildlife fencing that may be pursued under separate procurements over the next five years.

The RFQ includes Historically Underutilized Business (HUB) participation requirements. Respondents must submit a HUB Subcontracting Plan (HSP) demonstrating a good faith effort to utilize HUB vendors, with a statewide goal of 23.7% for professional services contracts. The selected consultant will be required to comply with post-award HSP requirements, including monthly reporting. Failure to meet HSP commitments may result in contract breach and debarment.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
rfq2407rsprg00073.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EDWARDS COUNTY AIRPORT

TXDOT SOLICITATION NO.: RFQ-2407RSPRG-00073

1. REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS SOLICITATION WITH HISTORICALLY UNDERUTILIZED

BUSINESS PARTICIPATION

2. EVALUATION CRITERIA

3. INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESPONDING TO A SOLICITATION IN EGRANTS

4. PROJECT DIAGRAM

5. AIRPORT LAYOUT PLAN

TxDOT Solicitation No.: RFQ-2407RSPRG-00073 TxDOT CSJ/Project No.: 2407RSPRG

Texas Department of Transportation Aviation Division

Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for Professional Engineering Services

Edwards County, through its agent, the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT), intends to engage a qualified firm for professional services pursuant to Chapter 2254, Subchapter A, of the Government Code. TxDOT Aviation Division will solicit and receive responses for the current aviation project as described below.

Current Project: Edwards County, TxDOT CSJ/Project No.: 2407RSPRG. The TxDOT Project Manager is Ed Mayle.

Scope: Provide engineering and design services including construction administration, to:

1. Reconstruct Runway and Apron.

2. Widen runway 10' - maintain existing center line.

3. Install asphalt overlay on Runway. (4,050' x 60')

4. Construct expanded apron; reconstruct connector taxiway.

5. Apply runway markings and taxiway striping.

6. Construct Runway 14 pavement turnaround. (Alt. 1)

7. Install medium intensity runway lighting. (MIRL)

8. Install new voltage regulator and radio controller at existing vault.

9. Install rotating beacon and tower.

10. Install precision approach path indicator. (PAPI) - 2L (Alt. 2) (Runway 14 / 34)

11. Install new hold/location signs.

In accordance with Texas Government Code §2161.252, responses that do not contain an up to date “HUB Subcontracting Plan (HSP)” are non-responsive and will be rejected without further evaluation. In addition, if TxDOT determines that the HSP was not developed in good faith, it will reject the response for failing to comply with material specifications based on the RFQ.

Utilizing multiple engineering/design and construction grants over the course of the next five years, future scope of work items at the Edwards County Airport may include the following:

Apron pavement expansion; wildlife fencing.

These potential future work items are provided for your information only. Edwards County will determine whether to proceed with any of these items, which will require separate future procurement actions.

To assist in your response preparation, the criteria, 5010 drawing, project diagram, and most recent Airport Layout Plan are available online at http://www.txdot.gov/inside-txdot/division/aviation/projects.html by selecting “Edwards County Airport.” The response should address a technical approach for the current scope only.

Response Procedure:

The successful firm will be selected on the basis of a Response. A prime provider may only submit one Response. If a prime provider submits more than one Response, that prime provider will be deemed non-responsive. The Response must contain the required information, and should address the recommended information, as listed below. Response submissions will be scored accordingly.

If the Response is non-compliant with any of the following requirements, the Response may be deemed non-responsive.

1. Qualifications Statement (QS) – The QS shall contain no more than nine 8.5x11-inch single-sided pages.

a. QS Format:

i. Readability – The submitter has latitude in formatting the QS for visual effectiveness. Graphics, tables, photos, and other visual aids are permitted within the nine allotted pages, except that Quick Response (QR) codes or other external link(s) are not permitted. There is no specific font, font size, color, or other formatting requirements, although a font size smaller than 10 is not recommended. Selection committee members may consider legibility and readability when scoring. Unreadable text will not be considered and may cause the QS to be deemed non-responsive. It is the submitter’s responsibility to provide a legible, readable document.

b. QS Content - It is recommended the QS include:

i. The RFQ number, airport name, name of firm, firm address, email address, telephone number and contact information for key personnel. The response shall also identify each proposed project team member, each proposed member’s time commitment to this project as a percentage of their total work week, and whether the proposed member is an employee of the responding firm or a sub-contractor to that firm.

c. QS Content – For scoring purposes, the QS must include:

i. Information showing the firm’s project understanding and technical approach, including similar project-related experience of the project manager and each task leader responsible for a major work category. For each project referenced, identify either the project manager’s or the task leader’s specific role(s) and work contributed. The project manager is required to be a Professional Engineer registered or licensed in Texas, by the submission deadline. If applicable to project, an Architect, is required to be registered or licensed in Texas, by the submission deadline. License number(s) must be included in the response submission.

ii. In addition to individual project-related experience of the project manager and task leaders required under (ii), list no more than ten relevant projects performed by the responding firm within the last 10 years. This shall include airport name, location, phone number, and airport contact person’s name, title, and phone number. It shall also include the original project completion time estimate vs. the actual completion time for the cited design project, as well as a brief narrative description of the project and whether or not your firm served as the prime or the sub on each project cited.

iii. Project Design Schedule: Indicate the number of weeks necessary to design the project in accordance with “Project Design Schedule Information” below.

The Response must be submitted in eGrants following the Submission Procedures at the end of this notice.

PROJECT DESIGN SCHEDULE

Based on the published project scope and your technical approach, indicate below the number of weeks necessary for each phase and total design time to design the project. Some of the basic responsibilities within each design phase are included for reference. Do not include TxDOT review time. Assume, however, that your work will require some revision after TxDOT review, and that the time required to address these comments should be included within your schedule. If time is required for specialized studies, indicate the additional time.

NOTE: This proposed schedule will set the basis for the contract deadlines in the professional services agreement if your firm is selected.

Preliminary Report Phase Attend pre-design conference.

Obtain and analyze necessary survey data.

Obtain and analyze necessary geotechnical data.

Prepare comprehensive report.

Preliminary Design Phase Attend project meeting(s) Prepare project drawings (70%) Provide all technical specifications.

Provide project cost estimate.

Final Design Phase Attend project meeting(s) Finalize drawings and contract documents (100%) Provide a revised opinion of probable total project costs.

Prepare a Construction Management Plan Update, if necessary, the Preliminary Report Prepare and submit airspace study to FAA.

EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR ARCHITECTURAL/ENGINEERING

QUALIFICATIONS

1. Recent experience of the project team with comparable airport projects within the past ten years. (25 points)

Do the qualifications indicate that the project team has recent direct experience on other general aviation airports designing similar improvements to those proposed at this location?

2. Proposed technical approach (30 points)

Does the architect/engineer provide evidence of understanding of the project; and any unique architectural/engineering aspects associated with the proposed project and how to address them?

3. Project design schedule and ability to meet schedules and deadlines (25 points)

Does the proposed design team have sufficient time to work on this project? Has the firm demonstrated an ability to meet design schedules in the past? Reasonableness of proposed schedule?

4. Construction Management Experience (20 points)

The architect/engineer will oversee the airport construction. Therefore, it is critical that the architect/engineer be involved in the day-to-day construction activities through a full-time resident project representative and periodic site visits. What evidence do the qualifications provide as to the architect/engineer’s commitment to proactive and consistent representation during construction?

Submission Procedures

The completed submission must be received in the TxDOT Aviation eGrants system no later than July 30, 2024, 2:00 p.m. (CST).

Firms that wish to submit a response to this solicitation must be a user in the TxDOT Aviation eGrants system no later than one business day before the solicitation due date. To request access to eGrants, please complete the Contact Us web form located at http://txdot.gov/government/funding/egrants-2016/aviation.html

The consultant selection committee will be composed of local government representatives. The final selection by the committee will generally be made following the completion of review of Responses. The committee will review all Responses and rate and rank each. The Evaluation Criteria for Engineering Qualifications can be found at http://www.txdot.gov/inside-txdot/division/aviation/projects.html under Information for Consultants. All firms will be notified, and the top-rated firm will be contacted to begin fee negotiations for the design and bidding phases. The selection committee does, however, reserve the right to conduct interviews for the top-rated firms if the committee deems it necessary. If interviews are conducted, selection will be made following interviews.

Please contact TxDOT Aviation for any technical or procedural questions at (800)68-PILOT (74568). For procedural questions, please contact Sheri Quinlan, Contract Specialist. For technical questions, please contact Ed Mayle, Project Manager.

For questions regarding responding to this solicitation in eGrants, please contact the TxDOT Aviation help desk at (800)687-4568 or avn-egrantshelp@txdot.gov.

Historically Underutilized Business Participation

I.3.1 Introduction

The Agent is committed to promoting full and equal business opportunities for businesses in state contracting in accordance with the goals specified in the State of Texas Disparity Study. The Agent encourages the use of Historically Underutilized Businesses (HUBs) through race, ethnic and gender-neutral means.

Pursuant to Texas Government Code §2161.181 and §2161.182, and the Agent’s HUB policy and rules, the Agent is required to make a good faith effort to increase HUB participation in its contracts. The Agent may accomplish the goal of increased HUB participation by contracting directly with HUBs or indirectly through subcontracting opportunities.

I.3.2 Agent’s Administrative Rules

The Agent has adopted the CPA’s HUB rules as its own. The Agent’s HUB rules are located in Title 43, Part 1, Chapter 9, Subchapter L of the Texas Administrative Code, and the CPA rules are located in Title 34, Part 1, Chapter 20, Subchapter D, Division 1. If there are any discrepancies between the Agent’s administrative rules and this Request for Qualifications (RFQ), the rules shall take priority.

I.3.3 HUB Participation Goal

The CPA has established statewide HUB participation goals for different categories of contracts in 34 T.A.C. §20.284. In order to meet or exceed the HUB participation goals, the Agent encourages outreach to certified HUBs. Contractors shall make a good faith effort to include certified HUBs in the procurement process.

This contract is classified as a Professional Services contract under the CPA rule, and therefore has a HUB Annual Procurement Utilization Goal of 23.7% per fiscal year.

I.3.4 Required HUB Subcontracting Plan

In accordance with Government Code, Chapter 2161, Subchapter F, each state agency that considers entering into a contract with an expected value of $100,000 or more over the life of the contract (including any renewals) shall, before the agency solicits bids, proposals, offers, or other applicable expressions of interest, determine whether subcontracting opportunities are probable under the contract.

In accordance with 34 T.A.C. §20.285(a),(1),(C) of the HUB Rules. State agencies may determine that subcontracting is probable for only a subset of the work expected to be performed or the funds to be expended under the contract. If an agency determines that subcontracting is probable on only a portion of a contract, it shall document its reasons in writing for the procurement file.

The Agent has determined that subcontracting opportunities are probable for this Request for Qualifications (RFQ). As a result, the respondent must submit an HSP with its proposal.

The HSP is required whether a respondent intends to subcontract or not.

In the HSP, a respondent must indicate whether it is a Texas certified HUB. Being a certified HUB does not exempt a respondent from completing the HSP requirement.

The Agent shall review the documentation submitted by the respondent to determine if a good faith effort has been made, in accordance with solicitation and HSP requirements.

During the good faith effort evaluation, The Agent may, at its discretion, allow clarifications or enhancements to information submitted with the HSP.

If the Agent determines that the respondent’s HSP was not developed in good faith, the HSP will be considered non-responsive and will be rejected as a material failure to comply with the advertised specifications. The reasons for rejection shall be recorded in the procurement file.

I.3.5 CPA Centralized Master Bidder’s List

Respondents may search for HUB subcontractors in the CPA’s Centralized Master Bidders List (CMBL)/HUB Directory. For this procurement, the Agent has identified the following class and item codes for potential subcontracting opportunities:

NIGP Class/Item Code:

925-86 825-46

Respondents are not required to use, nor limited to using, the class and item codes identified above, and may identify other areas for subcontracting.

The Agent does not endorse, recommend nor attest to the capabilities of any company or individual listed on the CPA’s CMBL. The list of certified HUBs is subject to change, so respondents are encouraged to refer to the CMBL often to find the most current listing of HUBs.

I.3.6 HUB Subcontracting Procedures – If a Respondent Intends to Subcontract

An HSP must demonstrate that the respondent made a good faith effort to comply with the Agent’s HUB policies and procedures. The following subparts outline the items that the Agent will review in determining whether an HSP meets the good faith effort standard. A respondent that intends to subcontract must complete the HSP to document its good faith efforts.

I.3.6.1 Identify Subcontracting Areas and Divide Them into Reasonable Lots

A respondent should first identify each area of the contract work it intends to subcontract. Then, to maximize HUB participation, it should divide the contract work into reasonable lots or portions, to the extent consistent with prudent industry practices.

I.3.6.2 Notify Potential HUB Subcontractors

The HSP must demonstrate that the respondent made a good faith effort to subcontract with HUBs that have an active HUB certification. The respondent’s good faith efforts shall be shown through utilization of all methods in conformance with the development and submission of the HSP and by complying with the following steps:

I.3.6.2.1 Divide the contract work into reasonable lots or portions to the extent consistent with prudent industry practices. The respondent must determine which portions of work, including goods and services, will be subcontracted.

I.3.6.2.2 Use the appropriate method(s) to demonstrate good faith effort. The respondent can use either method(s) 1, 2, or 3:

I.3.6.3 Method 1: Respondent Intends to Subcontract with only HUBs:

The respondent must identify in the HSP the HUBs, with an active HUB certification, that will be utilized and submit written documentation that confirms 100% of all available subcontracting opportunities will be performed by one or more HUBs;

I.3.6.4 Method 2: Respondent Intends to Subcontract with HUBs and Non-HUBs (Meet or Exceed the Goal):

The respondent must identify in the HSP and submit written documentation that one or more HUBs, with an active HUB certification, will be utilized; and that the aggregate expected percentage of subcontracts with HUBs will meet or exceed the goal specified in this solicitation. Only HUB subcontractors that have an existing contract with the respondent for less than five years may be used to comply with the good faith effort requirements under this method.

When the aggregate expected percentage of subcontracts with HUBs meets or exceeds the goal specified in this solicitation, respondents may also use non-HUB subcontractors; or, I.3.6.6 Method 3: Respondent Intends to Subcontract with HUBs and Non-HUBs (Does Not Meet or Exceed the Goal):

The respondent must identify in the HSP and submit documentation regarding both of the following requirements:

Written notification to minority or women trade organizations or development centers to assist in identifying potential HUBs, with an active HUB certification, of the subcontracting opportunities the respondent intends to subcontract.

Respondents must give minority or women trade organizations or development centers at least seven (7) working days prior to submission of the respondent's response for dissemination of the subcontracting opportunities to their members. A list of minority and women trade organizations is located on the CPA’s website under the Minority and Women Organization link.

Written notification to at least three (3) HUB businesses, with an active HUB certification, of the subcontracting opportunities that the respondent intends to subcontract. The written notice must be sent to potential HUB subcontractors prior to submitting proposals and must include:

o a description of the scope of work to be subcontracted, o information regarding the location to review project plans or specifications, o information about bonding and insurance requirements, o required qualifications and other contract requirements, and o a description of how the subcontractor can contact the respondent.

Respondents must give potential HUB subcontractors a reasonable amount of time to respond to the notice, at least seven (7) working days prior to submission of the respondent's response unless circumstances require a different time period, which is determined by the agency and documented in the contract file;

Respondents must also use the CMBL, the HUB Directory, and Internet resources when searching for HUB subcontractors. Respondents may rely on the services of contractor groups; local, state and federal business assistance offices; and other organizations that provide assistance in identifying qualified applicants for the HUB program.

I.3.6.7 Written Justification of the Selection Process

The Agent will make a determination if a good faith effort was made by the respondent in the development of the required HSP. One or more of the methods identified in the previous sections may be applicable to the respondent’s good faith efforts in developing and submission of the HSP. The Agent may require the respondent to submit additional documentation explaining how the respondent made a good faith effort in accordance with the solicitation.

A respondent must provide written justification of its selection process if it chooses a non-HUB subcontractor. The justification should demonstrate that the respondent negotiated in good faith with qualified HUB bidders, and did not reject qualified HUBs, with an active HUB certification, who were the best value responsive bidders.

I.3.7 Method 4: Respondent Does Not Intend to Subcontract

When the respondent plans to complete all contract requirements with its own equipment, supplies, materials and/or employees, it is still required to complete an HSP.

The respondent must complete the “Self-Performance Justification” portion of the HSP and attest that it does not intend to subcontract for any goods or services, including the class and item codes identified in Section I.3.5. In addition, the respondent must identify the sections of the proposal that describe how it will complete the Scope of Work using its own resources or provide a statement explaining how it will complete the Scope of Work using its own resources. The respondent must agree to comply with the following if requested by the Agent:

Provide evidence of sufficient respondent staffing to meet the Request for Qualifications (RFQ) requirements, Provide monthly payroll records showing the respondent staff fully dedicated to the contract, Allow the Agent to conduct an onsite review of company headquarters or work site where services are to be performed, and, Provide documentation proving employment of qualified personnel holding the necessary licenses and certificates required to perform the Scope of Work.

I.3.8 Post-award HSP Requirements

The HUB Subcontracting Plan (HSP) shall be reviewed and evaluated prior to contract award and, if accepted, the finalized HSP will become part of the contract with the successful respondent(s).

After contract award, the Agent will coordinate a post-award meeting with the successful respondent to discuss HSP reporting requirements. The Consultant must maintain business records documenting compliance with the HSP, and must submit monthly subcontract reports by completing the HUB Monthly Progress Report within the eGrants system and submit a “HUB Subcontracting Plan (HSP) Progress Compliance Form - 2579”. This monthly report is required as a condition for payment to report to TxDOT the identity and the amount paid to all subcontractors.

As a condition of award the Consultant is required to send notification to all selected subcontractors as identified in the accepted/approved HSP. In addition, a copy of the notification must be provided to the TxDOT Aviation Agent within 10 days of the contract award.

During the term of the contract, if the parties in the contract amend the contract to include a change to the scope of work or add additional funding, the Aviation Agent will evaluate to determine the probability of additional subcontracting opportunities. When applicable, the Consultant must submit an HSP change request for the Aviation Agent’s review. The requirements for an HSP change request will be covered in the post-award meeting.

When making a change to an HSP, the Consultant will obtain prior written approval from the Aviation Agent before making any changes to the HSP. Proposed changes must comply with the HUB Program good faith effort requirements relating to the development and submission of a HSP.

If the Consultant decides to subcontract any part of the contract after the award, it must follow the good faith effort procedures outlined in Section I.3.6 of the original RFQ (e.g., divide work into reasonable lots, notify at least three (3) vendors per subcontracted area, provide written justification of the selection process, or participate in the Mentor Protégé Program).

For this reason, TxDOT encourages respondents to identify, as part of their HSP, multiple subconsultants who are able to perform the work in each area the respondent plans to subcontract. Selecting additional subconsultants may help the selected Consultant make changes to its original HSP, when needed, and will allow the Agent to approve any necessary changes expeditiously.

Failure to meet the HSP and post-award requirements will constitute a breach of contract and will be subject to remedial actions. The Agent may also report noncompliance to the CPA in accordance with the provisions of the Vendor Performance and Debarment Program (see 34 T.A.C. §20.585 relating to Debarment) and (see 34 T.A.C. §20.586 relating to Procedures for Investigations and Debarment).

HISTORICALLY UNDERUTILIZED

BUSINESS (HUB)

SUBCONTRACTING PLAN (HSP)

COMPLETION

TxDOT HUB Program

Revised February 2019

I TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ---------------

BE SAFE .

] DRIVE SMART.

Revised February 2019

IIff alll (100%)) off yourr subcontractingg opportunitiess willl bee performedd usingg onlyy HUBB vendors,, completee thee followingg ::

Section 1 – Respondent and Requisition Information (Page 1);

Section 2a – Yes, I will be subcontracting portions of the contract (Page 2);

Section 2b – List all the portions of work you will subcontract, and indicate the percentage of the contract you expect to award to HUB vendors (Page 2 and the continuation sheet as needed);

Section 2c – Yes, I will be using oonlyy Texas certified HUBs to perform aalll of the subcontracting opportunities listed (Page 2);

Section 4 – Affirmation that all information and supporting documentation submitted is true and correct (Page 3); and

HSP GFE Method A (Attachment A) – Complete this attachment for each subcontracting opportunity listed in Section 2b (Page 1 of 1).

HSP Completion: Method A - Using only HUBs

PPagee 11

Sectionn 1:: Respondentt andd Requisitionn Informationn Complete all information requested.

HSP Completion: Method A - Using only HUBs

~ HUB Subcontracting Plan (HSP) - .. aoo>dliioe_T .... c..tCode §2'61252,banr""'9-lmo-.wd lhill~-•,.po- llldolfucxrnct - .

all •ospon- -a,ng S1ile al r .... c,n{ed ll&IOl!<,ly - e......, ... (HIJB•t nUS1 wnpie,e nj - ... s-.... "r .... If.JS Soooomaa,ng

Ptio ~SP) oMb ti..- _ ,. ... bd ,__,. {toli:ulalj.

NOTE: Responses that do not Include a comple11d HSP shall be Mjecild pursuant to Texas GOY'! Code §2161.252(b).

ThoHUBPl<ig:n-• "'l•--~lltSlor~ dll...,antqdpan<m.,......,_ .,._oflt,.. ln accc,darlcl..., Ill goo!lspeofied In !ht 2009Soaleot Texas~ S!udj. The ..-HUB goo~ -111 :14 r .... - ....... Code(TAC) !lll-28< ...

11.1 perc«ot I« l>N,y ....,sfnlcfjon OUlor lllln l>uildlng conlrltCU, 21_1 percent for •JI bulldlng cM•h'vctJon. lncludklg gen@,at coml"Kton •nd operative bullden' contracn.

U.9 -· I« all special - COIIS!nJCllon conlTKIS, 217 p,w~t tor p,ofesiltHw s«we'u contncts.

26.0 pecenr tor •1' othe ,sen'W;n contracts~ • nd

21.1 percent I« commodide1 contrffts.

• • Aneor;y 59ftGil l lostmctiooliAddilinnal Be911icemeota • • h ~ With l4 TAC f20 2'S(dHIHO,,-,., • /C'1~ I~ a.nncttr; may ditnxltuhlt pd latm .&,r m UNni r11.ru ~ HUlh lo, n .mllca'I~ ~--. m. __, ~ da. ~•• SUbCDllftlH _.,, f 1uu cerffll!d HU&s fflN'tt o, 1!:llll!!l!d.1 ~ .1ra..ma HUS ror ._ apMC)' ~ HLllfOl!I ~11.- Wt:IM atespcnc:ltn ll#S In md'odb~~goodldl tl9M, Ute~ mcnr ldiff'Ufl>e Ht.es ..

llhchtt .. ~ H1&1111Je»a:ll/:1i c»nncrs JMCn T....-..s cwllilitdHIAb D~t/11,1 ,.~ 0,-,, Ila oJWralil-~ o/W..QDrlna'.1 upamd .,be succnnnc:eda,Jff.llls,.... llftlCII --~lfflf'!!!2!!.!!!!f 11.w a cOMJIMIIOU• connd"'#lpJace lo,,_. ..,.fin/I} Wf'! __,qtalllly fnrmeet,ngllW HU99(MI. nu~isdffVtet/b~ ..endcr~-.s~e,me-2009 TexasDlspatll)'Slwy' iillilmll RnPO!<llElt AHD R£01.1S1110H INFORIIA llON

• · ~ (~ ) Name. ___________________ StattdltXH\lllt ____ _

Pllint d C<IJuc:t Ptuli I: -------- E • mai Addn! ss: Fax,:

b. tojll<lf-•Slale"Twsc:erul<atUI? □·• .. □ ·No c.~i. ---------------------- e.,ap.no.... _____ _ -

Pagee 22 Enter your Company’s name and the requisition #.

(Enter this information on each subsequent page.)

Sectionn 2:: Respondentss Subcontractingg Intentionss 2a: Yes, I will be subcontracting portions of the contract.

2b: List all the portions of work you will be subcontracting to HUBs and the % of the contract you expect to award. (Aggregate percentage should not total 100%)

2c: Yes, if you will only be using HUBs to perform ALL subcontracting opportunities in 2a.

Move on to page 3, Section 4

HSP Method IHSP Completion: Method A - Using only HUBs

ID!iil:llllRUPCHD£Hro S U8CON11UCTIIIG INRJjTIOHS

AlwdMding 111• conna"'°"' no -IOI•« pa>onlb 1llt ....,.OOOti,.,. oldl p-ud,nlnl,strypldefi.and llll"IJ """"'-'""' lhua,p• ri ""'1< bblp,otmnoClundlrh~-~llpoll~aullax-.g-h~IIIUll--""'1-al-', inctoding contnc.tad staffing, gc,octs aw:1 AMC:es wiU be sutN:onlracled. Noll: In aco:rdlnotw.lhll T,C, §n282. a~ metn ap!f!O'I ...,oonracawn 1 pme mnnctt t>.ut., kl !il,4IPly 00l'l'lfflOlitlS. « Miadl'lblle t:Mwd ~ work b a gowwnmentlll ert1-Y.

• · Choah ll!Jlll'¢,1ibat {YN cwNo) hhil1nlllN,...-aulx:on1tadlr!J ......,.._

0 · Ytt.fwll bl _,lradhg pcAOOSalb OXhd. (If Ytt ~lnbal1111&SECTIONandCCtllutb 11am calbiSEC!lON,)

0 · No. I wll net bl aubcoondng !!!! l""licn al ... ca,IJa<I. an! I .ol bl~ 111t ntt anta<i..., my_,,_ ndudn) .....,,..,, goos and IIIIM00L (IHo.-loSECTION 3M! SECTICfj'-)

I>. L.lolll llepcnonsd-(-.g """°""1.e))'OUri ..-i-.N!o. l>Nedon.,. ,.,,.,... altear11Ja<:1.lcletillyflell8-dfle""11'1d you m;,ect t> Nltf'd ID Teus C2ltm8d HOBs.andhl p@ltWllag!' (Xt.e CDTtllld )IOtl 81.ped III l'lnlld kl wendm. N ~ nm a f l!Xlscwd!d HlM:I ... ... Hon-KJB).

lllh -· ·-· SubcDtlndinfOpp:.!wnilJ O.Kifpbi

_... ... ----.ii a-.,a,m■ arurr----_ __ - - ·---- ·--IWUIIIDICll•:li1il- im■ llllilllUiAIDmi

I .,. .,.

2 ,. .,. .,.

3 .,.

s .,.

1 ,.

8 .. .. "

10 ,.

11 " " " 12 ,.

" " 13 "

" 16 ,.

i,t,le.. tr ,OU blYe mft,-Ileen ll.bcof'ltlding ~ lcodir.va6clllbeet iS Mliatftcrtnt a, _ t't'en:,,,.,..,., tfllS W,:,lltminon:rrcir:,s,rt rtr) c . 0'ltcl lllt~ bat (YHG' tlo) 11a-. a1111< )'OU .ti bo """O !!!!!lf Tnaa c«bled lUt to padonn!!f d ... -~-yoollWd"SE~ Z loolll.

0 · TH OfYH.-IDSECllONtnl-,.M"tlSPGood flltlEbl·-A-1,tor_,,Offles-.g-,ouhledJ O·No (Nllo, -.eW>IMd,dNSECTDq

d. Cl.de fie~ box{Yti« No)lhalnlku!<wllellw lllt'00"9"1 u poaodll<I'- ribanrod jOO .. - witbJcvuCJldicd Hlfll ..tlh \Illich )'CU do not l'eYe a continuous oonttac:t" n "8CI IMft br fflO(it than Bwe {SJ wan. meets « b:Cudl N I-US goal lie ccnraa,ig ageflt'1 i0eflMd Cl'I page 1111 lte "AlfflCY $pedal lmtructio,.,Addltlonal Requ~•

0 • r .. en .. , .-..1>SECTIC.Ohnd --M ffiPGood , .... e .... ....... A(,'1111d,, .... ,, .. 00 ,, ....... ._ - ""'llledl O •NOOf#o.-.. .. SECnc.<C&ndoo,q,ttltlftffiPGoodfaa,E ... •M-BC-O,,,Br lW udJ.Oflll~---... - ·, TMWPfl COOl"Kt .,.,,, em.,, - ,.,...,,.., ~ •• , ,_....., IU:r .,. ueldMtl) .,,.....,. • p.lffle ff4tr■CIICW Md • HUii Wftd'CW', .....,_ N HU9 ~pttMOt• -~ contrlCtOt.., fOOdS or SiW\l'fc• UNltt IN J;MN co•«r,o, • flJ«,l&d potfOd 01-. TM~ lltla HIM lf'Wldb,r-. lnliMNd OT p.d .... ti.Ila ... ot • awancr la ADI,.,..._. to IWNl:bllr U.. ca.net ii CGR51d■nd'RlnMINXII.. Two OT -- «mrncb ... ,_ ~ 0# onrfilp- ■IIIOfbRrlar.,.,.,.,,,.... al ... -c~.,, Gl'A. .,.,. ilndl'WfE8al eonll'KIS ,._. ~,II

IWlfW■lS ot «nttlll ..... to IN °"flMI C011he1. II ... ,. llllllailons ,,.. ptllt.- COfWJKt:l,r Md HU8 '1'Mdor ,_. HNMf . ..... ...,., #Ito .,,_

Pagee 33

Sectionn 4:: Affirmationn Read, sign and date to affirm the information you provided is true and correct.

Move on to “HSP Good Faith Effort – Method A (Attachment A)”

HSP Completion: Method A - Using only HUBs

... JI,,

I Enter rour ClOITl)a'ly's name hen,_ mliiii'JIII S n., P ERFOfUtllNG J USTIRCAfKMril ttt,-,...... "No' 11>teCTIONt. .._a,,.. m•~-- ltCno.t _. 0Mtl11• • IKTIOIN._. I )OU re,i,onded 'No" to SECTION Z - 1, lil lie- l)IOwad - .,.,,., - IOII O>fflPI~-- perform lho..,..canltl<I..., .. ..., _,..., ----l!llillilllllA FFJRMATION M-llyffl!lignlllnbll», l lllimlllMlll•an-_..,...dl11IMj)COde<ll-11SECTION1. aodlNllle-and

~ c1oo.mentaoon 9Ubnv:led WiMrie HSP11 M arw:1 CORe11 Aespondenl r.mer51itdS -~ 1W (er«rM m, ooom d me rer,1,riosr ri..._-.i1po,ldenobas10011u~toallle__,,,(Hl.18,andNon-lfJB•)olttwr..-,.,,_bb a,,ne1. Thenolb- "'8cili all """1Ulllhocmr°""'9"9f"ICY8 ..,,.and ilB-olCXXllaelforlle ,_ l!-,CXX\lad,.an!...,_, lhe ....,,,,._~a.,ett,,..-.,roJwilpenonn.lle_..,..,a;1or....,ollle•..-i--aodho,pmd-ol llet:llaio:r,nctMlle~~"P'""'"b-"-Wf1Yollle,_,.~A!dby"'°Ndm"""8"obe~tolleo:r,-9rq1 po111of uaaa:bltatamactno _,.._.1t11{10,wcdg4!r!alw hUllirac:tllawan»d.

Tu, ~ mu,o .- IIIOOlliy a,mplonce _.. (Pm,o Canracn- Plo<,J,... ,........., R,pon - PAA) to Ile """1IClrG - · ~ " ......,.,. '""' ffio HSP. lnclucq lie '"° ol rd e,p,nlOJJe m• to 11!1 __,,. (ttl& nl -•~ (The PAA a avallblo 11 http!;JJwww.<XfflJlra!er--,pftudw~~lf!!polfomu1sl.

Tu,,._... mull 90lk apptwll lrom Ile cx,nracq ._ pnor 10 mMlng q-to ls HSP, lrdidf1I 111111mg ol - <rdillnnl _,..,,....,.,...,_llcnd1..--111,_m,<ldonll<d11•HSP ttllMIHSPlsmoclllod-lll""'"""1g_-1p11orOIJII07'II, ._,..,.moybeU10C10>qnal_,...-S..-<nfoJllec:ornc,a-°"""""av-llylllw.111toninclJ<q_,,.,.lonal ..... __ The~--_...-... ~-10pe,b'm00-W-ollle_,;,~---.... ---..

... bongpwfcrmed andlMlpowltdoc:uneotml ~~and <lh,r19so.,cn_ s.,, Reminder:

► I you ~ ..,.", ID SECTION 2, I- c o, d. you"'""~• an ~p Good f•WI Ef>:r1 - - A {Alladln ... 'f for ua, d 1ho~-JOUllillldlnSEClllN2.llinlb_

► W l"JU '"'!IO'ldoil "110° SECT1ON Z. 11flM c Ind d. you - complele IA 1iSP Good f"'" Etort - - B (,t:,- 8) 0 for ~ ol h~-,oulllOdlnSEClllN2.l ... b.

HSPP Goodd Faithh Effortt –– Methodd AA (Attachmentt A)) Complete this form for each subcontracting opportunity listed in Section 2(b) of the HSP.

Sectionn A-11 List the information requested for the subcontracting opportunity.

Sectionn A-22 Provide all information requested.

HSP Completion: Method A - Using only HUBs

I

HSP Good Faith Effort - Method A (Attachment A)

I Erler your COfll>8"Y'• ""'"" hfn_

IMPORTANT: • ,.. r"!)OflOBd ·v .. · ., SECTION 2. ..... C Of . al.., mq,lo'"' HSI' .... ,au - ..... , • a,mpieood 1<51' Good fajl! E1lart - MtlllOd A (AlladlmlntAr fllf udl al Iii~_.--,au lad IO SECTlON 2, Htffl b al IN """fllatod HSPlon. Ya.. Ny~ llo pege«dYllflloed 1t.ebm • hb.:Nww c;Ql!ffllle!:.te~~~ .... dlm:t.mf f iiilltl/1·I1 SUBCONTRACTING 0PPoRTUNrTY

Enlirhllllmn....,.,alldd""""""dlli..tiar.ndw9-,."'Y,au•lallnSECl lON2, lllm,b,a/ .. ~HSPfamfllfwllldl!"" .. anploong hlllSIChmlli

---- Dt•~------------------------------

11,,1 (tlf Pi SU8COHTRACTOR SELECTION ult the llbcorhdof(t) I'>' - to po,1oml Iii 111""""8di,g ~ ,au 1oi..,-. IO SECJl()j A-1. -"'°""Y wlllllW !Illy ace al..., certAad HLB W lhlf l.,.. Vtollot I- (Vil) NUfflber ot -.i Emp~ - Nllf!IO« (Ell). 1111 - - '111A CII Iii - ti bl _ _ aodl"Aa,pl(Md ~ al-!Obi---~ j,r , .... '""4od Hlllllalld ...tyngllle,r lUl ....... an9.J19lnal,..

... Ille - al Ttdl con- Moster &dOn .... , (Q,111.)·-, IJndo<aMd - (ltJB) CirdV) - belted ..

rttlt"lr::ram1ra:n,,~~·tlJBsta11Jacode •A' ... INllMccrnpirtylllllTt:IHCMll&dHUB.

Tau■ vtD., fed•al EIN - -· .._ ... -- TellH Uftlled HUii

......... --........ C..u.-:1

N "ti .,__CLft

D v .. □ Ho 1'

□•Y .. □•HD 1'

D y., □- NCI %

O • YIIIII □•ND 1'

o .v .. □•No 1'

□•YH □•No 1'

D Yes □· No 1'

□•Yes □· No 1'

□ "l"H □ Ho %

□•Yn □-No 1'

D •• D No %

□•Yft □· No 1'

□ '" □·No %

□•Yes □• No 1'

□•Yn □·No %

□•Yff □• No 1'

0 VK □ No 1'

□•-Yft D No 1' a . v .. □-No 1'

□•Yff □• No 1'

□•Y■■ □ •• %

□ •YM □•NO 1'

□ ... □ No 1'

REMINDER: Al spld6ld III SECDON • of Ir.I ~Id HSP brn.tm, tresaxcrnnn ewneo n ncrtPnmte m 1tstmn 100 n flqlnl 1a ~ naiot M 10CRH ~dell I>!! f'le am:airactal O"tllll ad Ncn-K.181} al llllr tOClion • ■ 11.bcrtt'IID. Ttwll000t ffllll sptafyata nwimuftl Ill _ogonc:y,remenlal'O"llolcon11Cti,r-thlcontract """"'""•- - · 11e,-.cqappotllntylley\h,__.J..,pefflffll.111t -•-wluool ... ..-.•~-andlllt~poroe<fllpol ....... oonrott1Nth!__,~_,lllll'f,__A0011YCII the nolCf! ~ ~ hi !i8COOl1 fflJJ3 aho I» src,wlld ID b oolDC\lng agen:y'5 pcilJI d o:roa b -.a o:nnct oolater tao r,n (JO, WDR ®> Blti!!< !hi COMal21thW'dld.

(AtladwMnl A)

IIff youu aree subcontractingg withh HUBss andd Non-HUBs,, andd youu meett orr exceedd thee aggregatee percentagee (HUBB Goal)) off subcontractingg withh HUBss inn whichh youu doo nott havee aa continuouss contractt inn placee forr moree thann fivee (5)) years,, completee thee following::

Section 1 – Respondent and Requisition Information (Page 1);

Section 2a – Yes, I will be subcontracting portions of the contract (Page 2);

Section 2b – List all the portions of work you will subcontract, and indicate the percentage of the contract you expect to award to HUB vendors (Page 2 and the continuation sheet as needed);

Section 2c – No, I will not be using oonlyy Texas certified HUBs to perform aalll of the subcontracting opportunities listed (Page 2);

Section 2d – Yes, the aggregate expected percentage of the contract you will subcontract with Texas certified HUBs, which you have do NOT have a continuous contract in place for five (5) years or more, meets or exceeds the HUB goal in the solicitation (Page 2)

Section 4 – Affirmation that all information and supporting documentation submitted is true and correct (Page 3); and

HSP GFE Method A (Attachment A) – Complete this attachment for each subcontracting opportunity listed in 2b (Page 1 of 1).

HSP Completion: Method A – Meeting TxDOT’s HUB Goal

Pagee 11

Sectionn 1:: Respondentt andd Requisitionn Informationn Complete all information requested.

HSP Completion: Method A – Meeting TxDOT’s HUB Goal

~ HUB Subcontracting Plan (HSP) - .. aoo>dliioe_T .... c..tCode §2'61252,banr""'9-lmo-.wd lhill~-•,.po- llldolfucxrnct - .

all •ospon- -a,ng S1ile al r .... c,n{ed ll&IOl!<,ly - e......, ... (HIJB•t nUS1 wnpie,e nj - ... s-.... "r .... If.JS Soooomaa,ng

Ptio ~SP) oMb ti..- _ ,. ... bd ,__,. {toli:ulalj.

NOTE: Responses that do not Include a comple11d HSP shall be Mjecild pursuant to Texas GOY'! Code §2161.252(b).

ThoHUBPl<ig:n-• "'l•--~lltSlor~ dll...,antqdpan<m.,......,_ .,._oflt,.. ln accc,darlcl..., Ill goo!lspeofied In !ht 2009Soaleot Texas~ S!udj. The ..-HUB goo~ -111 :14 r .... - ....... Code(TAC) !lll-28< ...

11.1 perc«ot I« l>N,y ....,sfnlcfjon OUlor lllln l>uildlng conlrltCU, 21_1 percent for •JI bulldlng cM•h'vctJon. lncludklg gen@,at coml"Kton •nd operative bullden' contracn.

U.9 -· I« all special - COIIS!nJCllon conlTKIS, 217 p,w~t tor p,ofesiltHw s«we'u contncts.

26.0 pecenr tor •1' othe ,sen'W;n contracts~ • nd

21.1 percent I« commodide1 contrffts.

• • Aneor;y 59ftGil l lostmctiooliAddilinnal Be911icemeota • • h ~ With l4 TAC f20 2'S(dHIHO,,-,., • /C'1~ I~ a.nncttr; may ditnxltuhlt pd latm .&,r m UNni r11.ru ~ HUlh lo, n .mllca'I~ ~--. m. __, ~ da. ~•• SUbCDllftlH _.,, f 1uu cerffll!d HU&s fflN'tt o, 1!:llll!!l!d.1 ~ .1ra..ma HUS ror ._ apMC)' ~ HLllfOl!I ~11.- Wt:IM atespcnc:ltn ll#S In md'odb~~goodldl tl9M, Ute~ mcnr ldiff'Ufl>e Ht.es ..

llhchtt .. ~ H1&1111Je»a:ll/:1i c»nncrs JMCn T....-..s cwllilitdHIAb D~t/11,1 ,.~ 0,-,, Ila oJWralil-~ o/W..QDrlna'.1 upamd .,be succnnnc:eda,Jff.llls,.... llftlCII --~lfflf'!!!2!!.!!!!f 11.w a cOMJIMIIOU• connd"'#lpJace lo,,_. ..,.fin/I} Wf'! __,qtalllly fnrmeet,ngllW HU99(MI. nu~isdffVtet/b~ ..endcr~-.s~e,me-2009 TexasDlspatll)'Slwy' iillilmll RnPO!<llElt AHD R£01.1S1110H INFORIIA llON

• · ~ (~ ) Name. ___________________ StattdltXH\lllt ____ _

Pllint d C<IJuc:t Ptuli I: -------- E • mai Addn! ss: Fax,:

Enter your Company’s name and the requisition #.

(Enter this information on each subsequent page.)

Sectionn 2:: Respondentt Subcontractingg Intentions 2a: Yes, I will be subcontracting portions of the contract.

2b: List all the portions of work you will be subcontracting to HUBs and the Non-HUBs % of the contract you expect to award.

NOTE:: Must meet or exceed HUB goal using HUBs with which you doo nott have a ccontinuouss contractt in place for mmoree thann fivee (5)) years.

2c: No, to indicate you will NOT be only using HUBs.

2d: Yes, indicating you do NOT have a continuous contract in place for 5 or more years

HSP Completion: Method A – Meeting TxDOT’s HUB Goal

ID!iil:llllRUPCHD£Hro S U8CON11UCTIIIG INRJjTIOHS

AlwdMding 111• conna"'°"' no -IOI•« pa>onlb 1llt ....,.OOOti,.,. oldl p-ud,nlnl,strypldefi.and llll"IJ """"'-'""' lhua,p• ri ""'1< bblp,otmnoClundlrh~-~llpoll~aullax-.g-h~IIIUll--""'1-al-', inctoding contnc.tad staffing, gc,octs aw:1 AMC:es wiU be sutN:onlracled. Noll: In aco:rdlnotw.lhll T,C, §n282. a~ metn ap!f!O'I ...,oonracawn 1 pme mnnctt t>.ut., kl !il,4IPly 00l'l'lfflOlitlS. « Miadl'lblle t:Mwd ~ work b a gowwnmentlll ert1-Y.

• · Choah ll!Jlll'¢,1ibat {YN cwNo) hhil1nlllN,...-aulx:on1tadlr!J ......,.._

0 · Ytt.fwll bl _,lradhg pcAOOSalb OXhd. (If Ytt ~lnbal1111&SECTIONandCCtllutb 11am calbiSEC!lON,)

0 · No. I wll net bl aubcoondng !!!! l""licn al ... ca,IJa<I. an! I .ol bl~ 111t ntt anta<i..., my_,,_ ndudn) .....,,..,, goos and IIIIM00L (IHo.-loSECTION 3M! SECTICfj'-)

I>. L.lolll llepcnonsd-(-.g """°""1.e))'OUri ..-i-.N!o. l>Nedon.,. ,.,,.,... altear11Ja<:1.lcletillyflell8-dfle""11'1d you m;,ect t> Nltf'd ID Teus C2ltm8d HOBs.andhl p@ltWllag!' (Xt.e CDTtllld )IOtl 81.ped III l'lnlld kl wendm. N ~ nm a f l!Xlscwd!d HlM:I ... ... Hon-KJB).

lllh -· ·-· SubcDtlndinfOpp:.!wnilJ O.Kifpbi

_... .. . ----.ii a-.,a,m■ arurr----_ __ ---·---- ·--.., ,,mentn1'1 - m■ tenPe A! ?ffll .,. .,.

" 10 ,.

11 " " " 12 ,.

" " 13

" 16 ,.

i,t,le.. tr ,OU blYe mft,-Ileen ll.bcof'ltlding ~ lcodir.va6clllbeet iS Mliatftcrtnt a, _ t't'en:,,,.,..,., tfllS W,:,lltminon:rrcir:,s,rt rtr) c . 0'ltcl lllt~ bat (YHG' tlo) 11a-. a1111< )'OU .ti bo """O !!!!!lf Tnaa c«bled lUt to padonn!!f d ... -~- !ll"liWd"SE~ Z loolll.

0 · TH OfYH.-IDSECllONtnl-,.M"tlSPGoodflltlEbl·-A-1,tor_,,Offles-.g-,ouhledJ O·No (Nllo, -.eW>IMd,dNSECTDq

d. Cl.de fie~ box{Yti« No)lhalnlku!<wllellw lllt'00"9"1 u poaodll<I'- ribanrod jllO .. - witbJcvuCJldicd Hlfll ..tlh \Illich )'CU do not l'eYe a continuous oonttac:t" n "8CI IMft br fflO(it than Bwe {SJ wan. meets « b:Cudl N I-US goal lie ccnraa,ig ageflt'1 i0eflMd Cl'I page 1111 lte "AlfflCY $pedal lmtructio,.,Addltlonal Requ~•

0 • r .. en .. , .-..1>SECTIC.Ohnd --M ffiPGood , .... e .... ....... A(,'1111d,, .... ,, .. 00 ,, ....... ._ - ""'llledl O •NOOf#o.-.. .. SECnc.<C&ndoo,q,ttltlftffiPGoodfaa,E ... •M-BC-O,,,Br lW udJ.Oflll~---... - ·, TMWPfl COOl"Kt .,.,,, em.,, - ,.,...,,.., ~ •• , ,_....., IU:r .,. ueldMtl) .,,.....,. • p.lffle ff4tr■CIICW Md • HUii Wftd'CW', .....,_ N HU9 ~pttMOt• -~ contrlCtOt.., fOOdS or SiW\l'fc• UNl■t IN J;MN co•«r,o, • flJ«,l&d potfOd 01-. TM~ lltla HIM lf'Wldb,r-. lnliMNd OT p.d .... ti.Ila ... ot • awancr la ADI,.,..._. to IWNl:bllr U.. ca.net ii CGR51d■nd'RlnMINXII.. Two OT -- «mrnc b ... ,_ ~ 0# onrfilp- ■IIIOfbRrlar.,.,.,.,,,.... al ... -c~.,, Gl'A. .,.,. ilndl'WfE8al eonll'KIS ,._. ~,II

IWlfW■lS ot «nttlll ..... to IN °"flMI C011he1. II we& l lllllliletns ,,.. ptllt.- COM'Kt:l,r Md HU8 '1'Mdor ... HNMf . ..... ...,., #Ito .,,_

Sectionn 4:: Affirmationn Read, sign and date to affirm the information you provided is true and correct.

Move on to “HSP Good Faith Effort – Method A (Attachment A)”

HSP Completion: Method A – Meeting TxDOT’s HUB Goal

... JI,,

I Enter rour ClOITl)a'ly's name hen,_ mliiii'JIII S n., P ERFOfUtllNG J USTIRCAfKMril ttt,-,...... "No' 11>teCTIONt. .._a,,.. m•~-- ltCno.t _. 0Mtl11• • IKTIOIN._. I )OU re,i,onded 'No" to SECTION Z - 1, lil lie- l)IOwad - .,.,,., - IOII O>fflPI~-- perform lho..,..canltl<I..., .. ..., _,..., ----l!llillilllllA FFJRMATION M-llyffl!lignlllnbll», l lllimlllMlll•an-_..,...dl11IMj)COde<ll-11SECTION1. aodlNllle-and

~ c1oo.mentaoon 9Ubnv:led WiMrie HSP11 M arw:1 CORe11 Aespondenl r.mer51itdS -~ 1W (er«rM m, ooom d me rer,1,riosr ri..._-.i1po,ldenobas10011u~toallle__,,,(Hl.18,andNon-lfJB•)olttwr..-,.,,_bb a,,ne1. Thenolb- "'8cili all """1Ulllhocmr°""'9"9f"ICY8 ..,,.and ilB-olCXXllaelforlle ,_ l!-,CXX\lad,.an!...,_, lhe ....,,,,._~a.,ett,,..-.,roJwilpenonn.lle_..,..,a;1or....,ollle•..-i--aodho,pmd-ol llet:llaio:r,nctMlle~~"P'""'"b-"-Wf1Yollle,_,.~A!dby"'°Ndm"""8"obe~tolleo:r,-9rq1 po111of uaaa:bltatamactno _,.._.1t11{10,wcdg4!r!alw hUllirac:tllawan»d.

Tu, ~ mu,o .- IIIOOlliy a,mplonce _.. (Pm,o Canracn- Plo<,J,... ,........., R,pon - PAA) to Ile """1IClrG - · ~ " ......,.,. '""' ffio HSP. lnclucq lie '"° ol rd e,p,nlOJJe m• to 11!1 __,,. (ttl& nl -•~ (The PAA a avallblo 11 http!;JJwww.<XfflJlra!er--,pftudw~~lf!!polfomu1sl.

Tu,,._... mull 90lk apptwll lrom Ile cx,nracq ._ pnor 10 mMlng q-to ls HSP, lrdidf1I 111111mg ol - <rdillnnl _,..,,....,.,...,_llcnd1..--111,_m,<ldonll<d11•HSP ttllMIHSPlsmoclllod-lll""'"""1g_-1p11orOIJII07'II, ._,..,.moybeU10C10>qnal_,...-S..-<nfoJllec:ornc,a-°"""""av-llylllw.111toninclJ<q_,,.,.lonal ..... __ The~--_...-... ~-10pe,b'm00-W-ollle_,;,~---.... ---..

... bongpwfcrmed andlMlpowltdoc:uneotml ~~and <lh,r19so.,cn_ s.,, Reminder:

► I you ~ ..,.", ID SECTION 2, I- c o, d. you"'""~• an ~p Good f•WI Ef>:r1 - - A {Alladln ... 'f for ua, d 1ho~-JOUllillldlnSEClllN2.llinlb_

► W l"JU '"'!IO'ldoil "110° SECT1ON Z. 11flM c Ind d. you - complele IA 1iSP Good f"'" Etort - - B (,t:,- 8)

HSPP Goodd Faithh Effortt –– Methodd AA (Attachmentt A)) Complete this form for each subcontracting opportunity listed in Section 2(b) of the HSP.

Sectionn A-11 List the information requested for the subcontracting opportunity.

Sectionn A-22 Provide all information requested.

HSP Completion: Method A – Meeting TxDOT’s HUB Goal

HSP Good Faith Effort - Method A (Attachment A)

I Erler your COfll>8"Y'• ""'"" hfn_

IMPORTANT: • ,.. r"!)OflOBd ·v .. · ., SECTION 2. ..... C Of . al.., mq,lo'"' HSI' .... ,au - ..... , • a,mpieood 1<51' Good fajl! E1lart - MtlllOd A (AlladlmlntAr fllf udl al Iii~_.--,au lad IO SECTlON 2, Htffl b al IN """fllatod HSPlon. Ya.. Ny~ llo pege«dYllflloed 1t.ebm • hb.:Nww c;Ql!ffllle!:.te~~~ .... dlm:t.mf f iiilltl/1·I1 SUBCONTRACTING 0PPoRTUNrTY

Enlirhllllmn....,.,alldd""""""dlli..tiar.ndw9-,."'Y,au•lallnSECl lON2, lllm,b,a/ .. ~HSPfamfllfwllldl!"" .. anploong hlllSIChmlli

---- Dt•~------------------------------

11,,1 (tlf Pi SU8COHTRACTOR SELECTION ult the llbcorhdof(t) I'>' - to po,1oml Iii 111""""8di,g ~ ,au 1oi..,-. IO SECJl()j A-1. -"'°""Y wlllllW !Illy ace al..., certAad HLB W lhlf l.,.. Vtollot I- (Vil) NUfflber ot -.i Emp~ - Nllf!IO« (Ell). 1111 - - '111A CII Iii - ti bl _ _ aodl"Aa,pl(Md ~ al-!Obi---~ j,r , .... '""4od Hlllllalld ...tyngllle,r lUl ....... an9.J19lnal,..

... Ille - al Ttdl con- Moster &dOn .... , (Q,111.)·-, IJndo<aMd - (ltJB) CirdV) - belted ..

rttlt"lr::ram1ra:n,,~~·tlJBsta11Jacode •A' ... INllMccrnpirtylllllTt:IHCMll&dHUB.

Tau■ vtD., fed•al EIN - -· .._ ... -- Te llH Uftlled HUii

......... --........ C..u.-:1

N "ti .,__CLft

D v .. □ Ho 1'

□•Y .. □•HD 1'

D y., □- NCI %

O • YIIIII □•ND 1'

o .v .. □•No 1'

□•YH □•No 1'

D Yes □· No 1'

□•Yes □· No 1'

□ "l"H □ Ho %

□•Yn □-No 1'

D •• D No %

□•Yft □· No 1'

□ '" □·No %

□•Yes □• No 1'

□•Yn □·No %

□•Yff □• No 1'

0 VK □ No 1'

□•-Yft D No 1' a . v .. □-No 1'

□•Yff □• No 1'

□•Y■■ □ •• %

□ •YM □•NO 1'

□ ... □ No 1'

REMINDER: Al spld6ld III SECDON • of Ir.I ~Id HSP brn.tm, tresaxcrnnn ewneo n ncrtPnmte m 1tstmn 100 n flqlnl 1a ~ naiot M 10CRH ~dell I>!! f'le am:airactal O"tllll ad Ncn-K.181} al llllr tOClion • ■ 11.bcrtt'IID. Ttwll000t ffllll sptafyata nwimuftl Ill _ogonc:y,remenlal'O"llolcon11Cti,r-thlcontract """"'""•- - · 11e,-.cqappotllntylley\h,__.J..,perb,n.111t -•-wluool ... ..-.•~-andlllt~poroe<fllpollle .... oonrott1Nth!__,~_,lllll'f,__A0011YCII the nolCf! ~ ~ hi !i8COOl1 fflJJ3 aho I» src,wlld ID b oolDC\lng agen:y'5 pcilJI d o:roa b -.a o:nnct oolater tao r,n (JO, WDR ®> Blti!!< !hi COMal21thW'dld.

(AtladwMnl A)

IIff youu aree subcontractingg withh HUBss andd Non-HUBs,, andd youu doo nott meett orr exceedd thee aggregatee percentagee (HUBB Goal)) off subcontractingg withh HUBs,, completee thee followingg :

Section 1 – Respondent and Requisition Information (Page 1);

Section 2a – Yes, I will be subcontracting portions of the contract (Page 2);

Section 2b – List all the portions of work you will subcontract, and indicate the percentage of the contract you expect to award to HUB vendors (Page 2 and the continuation sheet as needed);

Section 2c – No, I will not be using only Texas certified HUBs to perform aalll of the subcontracting opportunities listed (Page 2);

Section 2d – No, the aggregate expected percentage of the contract you will subcontract with Texas certified HUBs, which you have a continuous contract in place for five (5) years or less, does not meet or exceed the HUB goal in the solicitation (Page 2)

Section 4 – Affirmation that all information and supporting documentation submitted is true and correct (Page 3); and, HSP GFE Method B (Attachment B) – Complete this attachment for each subcontracting opportunity (Page 1 of 1).

HSP Completion: Method B - by Solicitation/Notification

Sectionn 1:: Respondentt andd Requisitionn Informationn Complete all information requested.

HSP Completion: Method B - by Solicitation/Notification

~ HUB Subcontracting Plan (HSP) - .. aoo>dliioe_T .... c..tCode §2'61252,banr""'9-lmo-.wd lhill~-•,.po- llldolfucxrnct - .

all •ospon- -a,ng S1ile al r .... c,n{ed ll&IOl!<,ly - e......, ... (HIJB•t nUS1 wnpie,e nj - ... s-.... "r .... If.JS Soooomaa,ng

Ptio ~SP) oMb ti..- _ ,. ... bd ,__,. {toli:ulalj.

NOTE: Responses that do not Include a comple11d HSP shall be Mjecild pursuant to Texas GOY'! Code §2161.252(b).

ThoHUBPl<ig:n-• "'l•--~lltSlor~ dll...,antqdpan<m.,......,_ .,._oflt,.. ln accc,darlcl..., Ill goo!lspeofied In !ht 2009Soaleot Texas~ S!udj. The ..-HUB goo~ -111 :14 r .... - ....... Code(TAC) !lll-28< ...

11.1 perc«ot I« l>N,y ....,sfnlcfjon OUlor lllln l>uildlng conlrltCU, 21_1 percent for •JI bulldlng cM•h'vctJon. lncludklg gen@,at coml"Kton •nd operative bullden' contracn.

U.9 -· I« all special - COIIS!nJCllon conlTKIS, 217 p,w~t tor p,ofesiltHw s«we'u contncts.

26.0 pecenr tor •1' othe ,sen'W;n contracts~ • nd

21.1 percent I« commodide1 contrffts.

• • Aneor;y 59ftGil l lostmctiooliAddilinnal Be911icemeota • • h ~ With l4 TAC f20 2'S(dHIHO,,-,., • /C'1~ I~ a.nncttr; may ditnxltuhlt pd latm .&,r m UNni r11.ru ~ HUlh lo, n .mllca'I~ ~--. m. __, ~ da. ~•• SUbCDllftlH _.,, f 1uu cerffll!d HU&s fflN'tt o, 1!:llll!!l!d.1 ~ .1ra..ma HUS ror ._ apMC)' ~ HLllfOl!I ~11.- Wt:IM atespcnc:ltn ll#S In md'odb~~goodldl tl9M, Ute~ mcnr ldiff'Ufl>e Ht.es ..

llhchtt .. ~ H1&1111Je»a:ll/:1i c»nncrs JMCn T....-..s cwllilitdHIAb D~t/11,1 ,.~ 0,-,, Ila oJWralil-~ o/W..QDrlna'.1 upamd .,be succnnnc:eda,Jff.llls,.... llftlCII --~lfflf'!!!2!!.!!!!f 11.w a cOMJIMIIOU• connd"'#lpJace lo,,_. ..,.fin/I} Wf'! __,qtalllly fnrmeet,ngllW HU99(MI. nu~isdffVtet/b~ ..endcr~-.s~e,me-2009 TexasDlspatll)'Slwy' iillilmll RnPO!<llElt AHD R£01.1S1110H INFORIIA llON

This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .